COMPARISON OF LEARNING MATH LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS WITH SAVI MODEL AND NHT MODEL ON STUDENT SMKN 1 KOLAKA

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
S. Supratman ◽  
Sri Wulandari Muhlis

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t <t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Yoko Masna Rivan_M ◽  
Yeffi Masnarivan

This research is based on the low level of mathematics lecture result, which is caused by the learning that is still dominated by the lecturers so that the students are less motivated and bored with the learning activities in the lectures. Lecturers have not been able to encourage students to develop the talents and skills of individual students, and still many students who have not been able to formulate their own hypothesis. learning that is not optimal yet it is necessary efforts to improve learning outcomes math lectures. This study aims to reveal the effect of ROPES learning model and initial knowledge on mathematics learning outcomes in STIKes Prima Nusantara. The research design used was Randomized Group Only Design. The population of this study is all students STIKes Prima Nusantara level I of the academic year 2017-2018. Data were collected through initial knowledge tests and and learning result tests. The results revealed that the results of lectures of students who were taught with ROPES learning model higher than the results of student learning taught by conventional learning model, student learning outcomes that have a high initial knowledge with ROPES learning model higher than the results of learning mathematics students who have a high initial knowledge with conventional learning model, student learning outcomes that have low initial knowledge with ROPES learning model higher than the results of mathematics learning students who have low initial knowledge with conventional learning model and there is no interaction between learning models and knowledge early in influencing the results of college mathematics students STIKes Prima Nusantara.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 009-020
Author(s):  
Sunartih Sunartih ◽  
Marungkil Pasaribu ◽  
Amiruddin Hatibe

This study aims to determine whether there is an influence of ASSURE learning model on student learning outcomes in temperature and heat material of class XI SMA. The method used is quasi-experimental with equivalent pretest-posttest design. The population of this study were all students of class XI SMA . Sampling was carried out by purposive sampling with the sample of the study being class XI Mipa 2 as the experimental class and class X1 Mipa 5 as the control class. The research instrument in the form of learning outcomes tests and observation sheets that have been validated by the validator and field tested. Data analysis used inferential statistics is normality, homogeneity, hypothesis testing (2-party t test). Based on the results of research and analysis of research data, obtained the value of student learning outcomes at posttest average value of the experimental class is 14.90 with a standard deviation of 3.23 and for the control class of 11.57 with a standard deviation of 2.99. The test results of the t test statistic of 2 parties from hypothesis testing obtained the price thitung(4,11)>ttabel(1,67) or thitung(-4,11)>ttabel(-1,67) so that H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. This result states that there are differences in student learning outcomes in physics subjects between classes taught with the ASSURE learning model and Direct Intruction learning models. It can be concluded that there is an influence of the ASSURE learning model on student learning outcomes in temperature and heat material in class XI of SMA. Keywords: assure learning model, learning outcomes, temperature and heat  


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


Author(s):  
Hastuti Diah Ikawati ◽  
Ilham Abdul Majid ◽  
Zul Anwar

Student activeness in class is one of the important factors that influence student learning outcomes. This activity can be influenced by several factors one of the learning models used by lecturers. The lack of variations in the learning model has an impact on the monotonous learning process so that students are easily bored and bored with the learning process. Therefore, lecturers are always required to create an interesting learning condition process, including by applying a varied learning model. There are several learning models that can be used by lecturers to improve student learning outcomes, one of which is to implement super-learning learning models. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of super-learning models on student learning outcomes in the course of the Diffusion of Educational Innovation. The population of this study is all Education Technology students who have programmed the Education Innovation Diffusion course in the even semester of the 2018/2019 academic year. Data collection techniques used tests to determine the differences in student learning outcomes before and after the super-learning learning model was used — data analysis using t-test formula. Based on the results of the study it is known that the results of the t-test show the value of t-count greater than t-table at a significance level of 5% with db = 30-1 = 29 (12,963> 2,045). Based on the results of the calculation it can be concluded that it can be concluded, there is the influence of the Superitem learning model on student learning outcomes in the educational innovation diffusion course in Education Technology Study Program Mataram IKIP academic year 2018/2019.


Author(s):  
Wijiati '

The background of this research is the lack of students mathematics learning outcomes. This is because passive students in participating in learning, and in group learning activities, group less responsible members of the group, resulting in lower student learning outcomes. This study is a class action that aims to improve learning outcomes mathematics using cooperative learning model NHT. The research was conducted in classes VI SDN 011 Kerumutan Beringin Kecamatan Makmur. Research was conducted during two cycles. The research instrument consists of a sheet of teacher activity observation and student activity and learning outcomes. Based on the results of research and discussion, that the learning outcomes of students has increased after learning activities using cooperative learning model NH. This statement is supported by the results that have been raised previously, namely: (1) the results of the initial test results of learning mathematics students get an average of 54.00 with learning completeness percentage of 48%; (2) in the first cycle of students' mathematics learning outcomes increased with an average value of 64.00 with learning completeness percentage of 84%; and (3) in the second cycle students' mathematics learning outcomes increased with an average value of 67.00 with learning completeness percentage of 92%. This shows that the classical completeness has been reached, in which the research is successful if the completeness achieved 80% of students obtaining a minimum value of 70. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that the application of cooperative learning model NHT can improve mathematics learning outcomes SDN 011 Beringin Makmur Kecamatan Kerumutan.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-228
Author(s):  
Yerizon Yerizon ◽  
Atus Amadi Putra

The aim of this paper is to describe the research results on multiple intelligences in mathematics learning, using a descriptive approach. It also ascertains the influence of various learning models on mathematics learning outcomes based on students’ multiple intelligences. Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) and Team Games Tournament (TGT) learning models improved learning outcomes for students possessing logical-mathematical, kinesthetic, and interpersonal intelligences. Furthermore, Group Investigation (GI) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models improved student learning outcomes with logical-mathematical intelligence. Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model with peer tutors improved student learning outcomes with linguistic, logical-mathematical, and interpersonal intelligences. Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) and Jigsaw learning improved student learning outcomes with linguistic intelligence. Also, TSTS and NHT learning models improved student learning outcomes with logical-mathematical, and interpersonal intelligences. Keywords: compound intelligence, learning model, mathematics


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 647
Author(s):  
Sesweti Sesweti

This research is based on the result of learning mathematics of students of class X.TKJ1 SMK Negeri 1 Benai whichis still very low. This study aims to improve students' mathematics learning outcomes. This form of research is aclassroom action research consisting of two cycles. From the data analysis of student learning outcomes there is anincrease both from the basic score to cycle I and from cycle I to cycle II, namely the score of the basic score ofstudents who reach the minimum mastery criteria is 13 people or 32.5%. after the cycle I the number of studentswho achieve the minimum completeness criteria increased to 20 students or 50%. Furthermore, in cycle II thenumber of students who reach the minimum completeness criteria increased again to 23 students or 57.5%. Thus itcan be concluded, the application of learning models based on problems can improve student learning outcomes inthe subjects of mathematics class X.TKJ1 SMK Negeri 1 Benai.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
Sri Wahyuni

Abstract. Student activity will affect effectiveness for student learning outcomes. The effectiveness of learning consists of four indicators, namely the quality of instruction, the suitability appropriate level of instruction, incentive, and time. The purpose of this study is to: (1) Know how the effectiveness of student learning outcomes in variable calculus subjects after getting learning with discovery learning learning models. (2) Knowing whether there is an increase in student learning outcomes in many variable calculus subjects after getting learning with discovery learning learning models. The data analysis techniques are carried out from the data description test stage, then the prerequisite test is the normality and linearity test, then test the hypothesis. The steps in the study are as follows: (1) The researcher provides a stimulus for the sample class, namely the discovery learning model; (2) At the time of the learning process the partner lecturers see the activity, student learning; (3) Provide essay tests to see the level of success of students in learning; (4) Perform statistical tests to see the effectiveness of student learning outcomes using discovery learning learning models. The results of this study are that there is an effect on the effectiveness of mathematics learning using the discovery learning model of student learning outcomes in many variable calculus subjects, and there is an increase in student learning outcomes after learning with discovery learning models of many variable calculus subjects as much as 20.53.Keywords: Discovery Learning, Learning Outcomes, Calculus


Author(s):  
Muhammad Awal Nur

This research is a classroom action research that aims to know the improvement of mathematics learning outcomes through the application of Think-Pair-Share Cooperative Learning (TPS). The subjects of this study were students of Class VII B SMP Negeri 10 Ujung Loe Kab. Bulukumba in the odd semester of the academic year 2016/2017, with a total of 30 students, consisting of 15 men and 15 women. This classroom action procedure takes 2 cycles. Cycle I held 4 meetings and Cycle II held 4 meetings. Data collection is done by using learning result test and observation. The collected data were analyzed by using qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. The result of this research showed that quantitative improvement of mathematics learning outcomes after the implementation of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) cooperative learning, in cycle I showed that the average of student's learning result was 39,50 from ideal score that might be reached 100, Standard deviation of 24.58 and is in the low category. There are 7 complete students (23,33%) and 23 students (76,67%), and in cycle II shows the average of student's learning result is 69,50 from ideal score that might be reached 100, standard Deviation of 24.99 and is in the high category. There are 21 complete students (70%) and 9 (30%) unfinished students. While qualitatively during the learning process takes place changes in student attitudes. This is marked by the increased activity and activity of students during the implementation of the teaching took place viewed from the observation sheet conducted during the study. From the analysis can be concluded that with the implementation of cooperative learning type Think-Pair-Share (TPS) there is an increase in the results of learning mathematics students of class VII B SMP Negeri 10 Ujung Loe Bulukumba


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nurhusain

<p>This research is a comparative experiment. This study aims to determine the effect of the application of cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) towards mathematics learning outcomes through comparison with the results of studying mathematics taught using direct learning model. Population, namely the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Polong Bangkeng Utara Kabupaten Takalar semester of academic year 2016/2017, with a sample of students in grade VIIIA and VIIIB class. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis techniques and inferential statistics. Descriptive analysis showed that the average student learning outcomes experimental class at the high category, an average of 80.78 with a standard deviation of 11.28; and the average student learning outcomes control class in middle category with an average score of 73.82 with a standard deviation of 12.98. Inferential analysis results obtained H0 and H1 accepted. It can be concluded with 95% confidence that the results of students 'mathematics learning through cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) higher than the results of students' mathematics learning through direct learning model.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document