scholarly journals The Differences of Mathematics Learning Outcomes between Think Pair Share (TPS) and Number Heads Together (NHT)

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
andy sapta

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Elaborasi dengan hasil belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Advance Organizer pada materi fungsi di kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Buntu Pane. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah semua siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Buntu Pane. Sampel penelitian ini diambil 2 kelas dengan teknik claster random sampling. Alat pengumpul data digunakan tes hasil belajar siswa pada materi Fungsi dalam bentuk pilihan ganda yang terdiri dari 10 soal. Dari analisa data diperoleh nilai rata-rata pretes dengan model pembelajaran Elaborasi sebesar 67,61 dengan nilai rata-rata postes 80,55. Sedangkan untuk kelas dengan model pembelajaran Advance Organizer diperoleh nilai rata-rata pretes sebesar 69,05 dengan nilai rata-rata postes 74,61. Dari uji hipotesis yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji satu pihak didapat bahwa ditolak. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil belajar matematika pada materi fungsi yang menggunakan model elaborasi lebih baik daripada menggunakan model Advance Organizer pada siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Buntu Pane. Kata kunci: model Elaborasi, model Advance Organizer, FungsiAbstract. This study aims to determine the comparison of mathematics learning outcomes of students who use Elaboration learning model with learning outcomes that use Advance Organizer learning model on the material function in class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Buntu Pane. Population in this research is all student of class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Buntu Pane. The sample of this research is taken two class with cluster random sampling technique. Data collection tool used test result of student learning on material Function in the form of multiple choice consist of ten problem. From the data analysis, the average value of pretest with Elaboration learning model is 67.61 with the average value of postest 80.55. As for the class with the learning model of Advance Organizer obtained pretest average value of 69.05 with the average postest 74.61. From the hypothesis test conducted by using one party test found that rejected. Thus it can be concluded that the results of mathematics learning on the material functions that use the elaboration model is better than using the Advance Organizer model on the students of grade XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Buntu Pane.Keywords: Elaboration model, Advance Organizer model, Function


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Adiani ◽  
Maria Goreti Rini Kristiantari

This research-based on problems in students learning outcomes is still low because students are still difficult in understanding mathematics formulas and consider mathematics as difficult learning. This research aimed to know the effect of the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model assisted by domino card results on student mathematics learning outcomes grade IV Research design used a nonequivalent control group. The population was 9 groups which amounts to 338 students. Sampling used cluster random sampling technique when chosen experimental group total of 35 students and control group total of 40 students. Objective test type multiple choice used as data collection instruments. Data obtained was data on learning outcomes in mathematics in the cognitive realm and analyzed used uji-t by formula polled variance, analysis result obtained was tcount=3,818 > ttable =1,666, this showed Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model-assisted domino card give effect to student mathematics learning outcomes. So with the enactment of this model can simplify the way students learn in understanding mathematic formulas. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
S. Supratman ◽  
Sri Wulandari Muhlis

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t <t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 61-74
Author(s):  
Ayu Ramdhayani ◽  
Habib Husnial Pardi ◽  
Mauliddin Mauliddin

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in effectiveness between the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of students at SMPN 21 Mataram on the subject of circles. This research is an experimental research type with the static group pretest-posttest desaign design. The sample in this study were students of class VIII SMPN 21 Mataram. The sampling technique in this research is purposive sampling with circle material. The research data collection process used interview, observation, and test instruments. From the research results, the participatory model of learning outcomes obtained an average pretest score of 58.68 and an average posttest score of 73.32. While the discovery learning model of learning outcomes obtained an average pretest score of 58.86 and an average posttest score of 73.91. The results of the hypothesis test of learning outcomes found that the sig. (2-tailed) 0.821. Because the sig value> 0.05, meaning that H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference in effectiveness between the participatory model and the discovery learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of grade VIII students of SMPN 21 Mataram


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-129
Author(s):  
M. Fahrurrozi

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap hasil belajar Qur’an Hadits siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nurul Islam Sekarbela. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen dengan menggunakan one grup pretest dan posttest design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nurul Islam Sekarbela tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Sampel ditentukan melalui tehnik random sampling Dengan Instrumen penelitian dalam bentuk tes essay. Analisis data penelitian dengan uji-t sampel berpasangan. Analisis uji hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan signifikansi sebesar 0.003 lebih kecil daripada 0.05 artinya ada perbedaan signifikan hasil belajar antara siswa saat pretest dan posttest. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan, bahwa model pembelajaran berbasis masalah berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar siswa di Madrasah Nurul Islam Sekarbela. Kata kunci: model pembelajaran berbasis masalah, hasil belajar Title: The Effect of Use Problem Based Learning Models on Learning Results of the Qur'an Hadits Abstrak: The purpose of this study was determine the effect of problem-based learning models on the student learning outcomes in subjects of the Qur’an Hadith at the Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nurul Islam Sekarbela. This research is an experimental study using one group pretest and posttest design. The population in this study were students of class VII Madrasah Tsanawiyah Nurul Islam Sekarbela in the 2018/2019 school year. The sample is determined through random sampling techniques. The research instrument is an essay test. Analysis of research data is paired sample t-test. Hypothesis test analysis shows that the t-test 0.003 is smaller than 0.05, meaning that there are significant differences in learning outcomes between students during the pre-test and post-test. Thus it can be concluded, that the problem-based learning model influences student learning outcomes in Madrasah Nurul Islam Sekarbela.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trioki Ningsih ◽  
Puji Prastowo

This research aimed to determine the differences between student’s learning outcomes that were taught by used discovery learning and problem based learning models on topic of environmental pollution in grade x SMA Negeri 1 Sunggal in academic year 2014/2015, The population of all of the students at grade X, that consisted of 4 classes and total of the students were 156 students. The samples were taken at random sampling of two classes, with details class X2 used discovery learning model and X1 used problem based learning model and each class numbered 39 students, so the number of samples in this study were 78 students. Type of research was experimental. The results showed that the learning outcomes of students who were taught by using discovery learning model was 82,05 ± 8,25, while the learning outcomes of students who were taught by using the problem based learning model was 76,41 ± 8,15. The result from the t-test at α = 0,05 with th 3,044; tt  1,995; and dk 76 refer that there was significant different from student’s learning outcomes who were taught using discovery learning model with problem based learning model on topic of environmental pollution in grade X SMA Negeri 1 Sunggal in academic year 2014/2015.Keywords : discovery learning, learning model, learning outcomes, problem based learning


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinta Dwi Handayani

<p>The purpose of this research is to know the effect of applying the TGT (Team Games Tournament) cooperative method through a medium of puzzle on the mathematics learning outcomes. The method used is an experimental method. The sampling is conducted using a simple random sampling technique, with samples of 40 students consisting of 20 students of an experimental class and 20 students of a control class. The analysis to test the research hypothesis is performed using the mean difference test (t-test), with the results of the hypothesis test showing that there is the effect of applying the TGT (Team Games Tournament) cooperative method through a medium of puzzle on the mathematics learning outcomes.<em></em></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Monif Maulana

The population in this study was seventh grade students consisting of 7 calsses. The sampling technique use random sampling technique that was by lottery class. From raffle earned that grade VII G class as TS-TS class and VII F Class as ekspository class. Mathematics learning outcomes data obtained using the test method in the form of objective questions. Analysis of the data used one tailed t-test and two tailed t-test. From the test results obtained by the two tailed t-test  = 1,9180 and  = 1,5409, it means  >  with a significance level of 5% and 54 degrees of freedom, which means  was rejected. This suggest that there were differences in mathematics achievement between students who use cooperative model of TS-TS and ekspository learning model. One tailed t-test result obtained that  = 1,9180 and  = 1,5409, it means  >  with a significance level of 5% and 54 degrees of freedom, which means  was rejected. This suggest that the learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative model of TS-TS was better than learning outcomes of students who use the ekspository learning model in even semester of seventh grade student in SMP Muhammadiyah 7 Yogyakarta academic year of 2016/2017


Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-71
Author(s):  
Robia Astuti ◽  
Nurmitasari Nurmitasari ◽  
Susanti Diah Lestari

The aimed of this research was: 1) to know the difference of the average of mathematics learning result of students obtained through Cooperative Script model with the average of student learning result obtained through STAD type cooperative learning model in class VII class material in SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas, and 2) to know the average of mathematics learning outcomes which is better between students whose learning is obtained through Cooperative Script model with students whose learning is obtained through STAD type cooperative learning model in class VII class material in SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas. The population in this study is all students of class VII even semester SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas academic year 2016-2017 with the number of 162 students divided into 5 (five) class. The sampling technique uses cluster random sampling. Obtained Class VII A amounted to 33 students as experimental class and class VII B which amounted to 33 students as a control class. Learning outcomes obtained through the test in the form of a description consists of 4 items. Data were analyzed using two-t test and one-party test. Data analysis using two-party t test with 5% real level obtained by result of 1,999 and 2,602, < , so reject H0 and accept H1 which indicate that there is difference of mean result of learning of mathematics between them. Analysis of data using t-test one party with 5% real level obtained ttable = 1.670 and tcount = 2.602 turns < , so H0 rejected and accepted H1 which indicates that the average mathematics learning outcomes of students applied Cooperative Script learning model more both from the STAD type cooperative learning model. The result of t test analysis concluded that there is influence of Cooperative Script model to the result of learning of class VII in SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document