Fault Isolation of Large Nets Using Bridging Fault Analysis

Author(s):  
George Ontko

Abstract Bridging faults are a common failure mechanism in integrated circuits and scan-based diagnosis does a good job of isolating these defects. Diagnosis, however, can sometimes result in large search areas. Typically, these areas are caused by long repeater nets. When this happens, physical failure analysis will become difficult or impossible. This paper concerns itself with using a bridging fault analysis as a means of reducing these large search areas.

Author(s):  
Sarven Ipek ◽  
David Grosjean

Abstract The application of an individual failure analysis technique rarely provides the failure mechanism. More typically, the results of numerous techniques need to be combined and considered to locate and verify the correct failure mechanism. This paper describes a particular case in which different microscopy techniques (photon emission, laser signal injection, and current imaging) gave clues to the problem, which then needed to be combined with manual probing and a thorough understanding of the circuit to locate the defect. By combining probing of that circuit block with the mapping and emission results, the authors were able to understand the photon emission spots and the laser signal injection microscopy (LSIM) signatures to be effects of the defect. It also helped them narrow down the search for the defect so that LSIM on a small part of the circuit could lead to the actual defect.


Author(s):  
Gil Garteiz ◽  
Javeck Verdugo ◽  
David Aveline ◽  
Eric Williams ◽  
Arvid Croonquist ◽  
...  

Abstract In this paper, a failure analysis case study on a custom-built vacuum enclosure is presented. The enclosure’s unique construction and project requirement to preserve the maximum number of units for potential future use in space necessitated a fluorocarbon liquid bath for fault isolation and meticulous sample preparation to preserve the failure mechanism during failure analysis.


Author(s):  
Seth J. Prejean ◽  
Joseph Shannon

Abstract This paper describes improvements in backside deprocessing of CMOS (Complimentary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) SOI (Silicon On Insulator) integrated circuits. The deprocessing techniques described here have been adapted from a previous research publication on backside deprocessing of bulk CMOS integrated circuits [1]. The focus of these improvements was to provide a repeatable and reliable methodology of deprocessing CMOS devices from the backside. We describe a repeatable and efficient technique to deprocess flip chip packaged devices and unpackaged die from the backside. While this technique has been demonstrated on SOI and bulk devices, this paper will focus on the latest SOI technology. The technique is useful for quick and easy access to the transistor level while preserving the metal interconnects for further analysis. It is also useful for deprocessing already thinned or polished die without removing them from the package. Removing a thin die from a package is very difficult and could potentially damage the device. This is especially beneficial when performing physical failure analysis of samples that have been back thinned for the purpose of fault isolation and defect localization techniques such as: LIVA (Laser Induced Voltage Alteration), TIVA (Thermally Induce Voltage Alteration), SDL [2] (Soft Defect Localization), and TRE (Time Resolved Emission) analysis. An important fundamental advantage of deprocessing SOI devices is that the BOX (Buried Oxide) layer acts as a chemical etch stop when etching the backside or bulk silicon. This leaves the transistor active silicon intact for analysis. Further delayering allows for the inspection of the active silicon, gate oxide, silicide, spacers, and poly. After deprocessing the transistor level, the metal layers are still intact and, in most cases, still electrically connected to the outside world. This can provide additional failure analysis opportunities.


Author(s):  
Keonil Kim ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
Kunjae Lee ◽  
Kyeongju Jin ◽  
Yunwoo Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract In most of the non-destructive electrical fault isolation cases, techniques such as DLS, Photon Emission, LIT, OBIRCH indicate a fault location directly. But relying on just one of these techniques for marginal failure mechanism is not enough for better fault localization. When Failure Analysis (FA) engineers encounter high NDF (No Defect Found) rates, by using only one of the techniques, they may need to consider the relationship between the responded locations by different techniques and fail phenomenon for better defect isolation. This paper talks about how a responded DLS location does not always indicate a fault location and how LVP data collected using DLS location can pin point the real defect location.


Author(s):  
Chao-Chi Wu ◽  
Jon C. Lee ◽  
Jung-Hsiang Chuang ◽  
Tsung-Te Li

Abstract In general failure analysis cases, a less invasive fault isolation approach can be utilized to resolve a visual root cause defect. In the case of nano technology, visual defects are not readily resolved, due to an increase in non-visible defects. The nonvisible defects result in a lower success rate since conventional FA methods/tools are not efficient in identifying the failure root cause. For the advanced nanometer process, this phenomenon is becoming more common; therefore the utilization of advanced techniques are required to get more evidence to resolve the failure mechanism. The use of nanoprobe technology enables advanced device characterization h order to obtain more clues to the possible failure mechanism before utilizing the traditional physical failure analysis techniques.


Author(s):  
Paul Hubert P. Llamera ◽  
Camille Joyce G. Garcia-Awitan

Abstract Lock-in thermography (LIT), known as a powerful nondestructive fault localization technique, can also be used for microscopic failure analysis of integrated circuits (ICs). The dynamic characteristic of LIT in terms of measurement, imaging and sensitivity, is a distinct advantage compared to other thermal fault localization methods as well as other fault isolation techniques like emission microscopy. In this study, LIT is utilized for failure localization of units exhibiting functional failure. Results showed that LIT was able to point defects with emissions in the mid-wave infra-red (MWIR) range that Photo Emission Microscopy (PEM) with near infrared (NIR) to short- wave infra-red (SWIR) detection wavelength sensitivity cannot to detect.


Author(s):  
Soon Lim ◽  
Jian Hua Bi ◽  
Lian Choo Goh ◽  
Soh Ping Neo ◽  
Sudhindra Tatti

Abstract The progress of modern day integrated circuit fabrication technology and packaging has made fault isolation using conventional emission microscopy via the top of the integrated circuit more difficult, if not impossible. This is primarily due to the use of increased levels and density of metal-interconnect, and the advent of new packaging technology, e.g. flip-chip, ball-grid array and lead-on-chip, etc. Backside photon emission microscopy, i.e. performing photon emission microscopy through the bulk of the silicon via the back of the integrated circuit is a solution to this problem. This paper outlines the failure analysis of sub-micron silicon integrated circuits using backside photon emission microscopy. Sample preparation, practical difficulties encountered and case histories will be discussed.


Author(s):  
V.K. Ravikumar ◽  
R. Wampler ◽  
M.Y. Ho ◽  
J. Christensen ◽  
S.L. Phoa

Abstract Laser voltage probing is the newest generation of tools that perform timing analysis for electrical fault isolation in advanced failure analysis facilities. This paper uses failure analysis case studies on SOI to showcase the implementation of laser voltage probing in the failure analysis flow and highlight its significance in root-cause identification.


Author(s):  
Hoang-Yen To ◽  
Dat Nguyen ◽  
Clyde Dunn ◽  
Detric Davis

Abstract The flash considered for failure analysis in this paper is a non volatile memory with a NOR architecture in the array and a stacked gate for the bit cell. The flash failure was from data gain reported from various stages and at different temperatures after leaving the wafer fabrication. The failure can be single bit failure (SBF) or multiple bit failure (MBF). The FA process is comprised of two steps termed electrical failure analysis (EFA) and physical failure analysis (PFA). This paper discusses the method to differentiate failure modes and the efforts of fault isolation. Micro probing and nano probe characterization were important in the understanding of the failure mechanism. As seen in the EFA/PFA section, the reported SBF/MBF failures were actually due to a defect in the Mux and not at the bit cell.


Author(s):  
Dat Nguyen ◽  
Bob Davis ◽  
Corey Lewis

Abstract In today's electronic industry of shrinking circuit boards and shrinking semiconductor integrated circuits (IC), semiconductor companies have to be creative in providing devices with more circuitry on less silicon. Copper Bond over Active Circuit (BOAC)/Copper over Anything (COA) processes allow routing and bonding to thick top level metallization on the LinBiCMOS technology node. This paper discusses failure analysis (FA) techniques and approaches on un-passivated BOAC, and explains a generic BOAC/COA process. The approach to FA of BOAC involves package inspection-non intrusive analysis, decapsulation, die inspection, and defect identification/root cause analysis. Case studies are presented to explain the specific FA steps. Fault isolation involving BOAC requires the strategic removal of copper traces and selective analysis of the failed circuitry. Liquid crystal and micro-probing have been used effectively in failure isolation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document