scholarly journals Law Enforcement on Ordinary Crimes in Minor Motive using Restorative Justice: Perspective Criminal Law Reform

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Jonlar Purba
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Spider Webs ◽  
Small Communities ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses

<p align="justify">The disparity by judges in decisions led to the inability of people facing criminal offenses. Laws are not grounded to small communities, the judicious use of a crime in Indonesia as well as the strength of spider webs in which only able to ensnare minor crimes, but are not able to touch the major crimes that occurred in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical. The results of this study found that completion ordinary crime patterned petty can be reached with a restorative justice approach, so it can focus on the direct participation of the offender, victim and community.</p>

KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MELALUI MEDIASI PENAL DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA BERMOTIF RINGAN PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT KAMPUNG KUALA GASIB DI KECAMATAN KOTO GASIB KABUPATEN SIAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
ELMA YANTI
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Direct Participation ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Differences Of Opinion ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

The settlement of criminal offenses with mild motives can be carried out by reasoning penal mediation called the restorative justice approach, which focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and the community. The research that use in this study is sociological legal research (social legal research). The concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of a mildly criminal case for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak, was carried out with the intermediary of the headman. Headman as customary village heads and as government administrators have an important role in creating peace efforts in resolving disputes that occur in the community, one of which is through the settlement of criminal cases by reasoning penal mediation with the concept of restorative justice. The constraints of the concept of restorative justice through reasoning penal mediation in the settlement of mildly criminal cases for the indigenous people of village kuala gasib in koto gasib siak are: a) The absence of a special law mediation of regulation, b) Lack of facilities and infrastructure in mediating, c) Lack of mediator skills for village head to reconcile the parties to the dispute, d) There are differences of opinion among law enforcement officials about the concept of restorative justice through penal mediation

scholarly journals Peranan Kepolisian dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak dan Orang Dewasa

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Haryanto Ginting ◽  
Muazzul Muazzul
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
School Students ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Law And Justice

<p class="1judul"><em><span>The Role of the Police in the Application of Restorative Justice to Perpetrators of Criminal Offenses Conducted by Children and Adults</span></em></p><p class="1judul"> </p><h1><span lang="EN-US">The rise of cases of brawl between high school students and even not only between high school students, but also has hit up to campuses, this often happens in big cities such as Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. This study aims to determine the role of the Police in implementing Restorative Justice against perpetrators of criminal acts of beating carried out by children and adults that occurred in the District of Namo Rambe District of Deli Serdang. The research method is done by using descriptive qualitative method that is normative. Based on the data obtained in the results of this study, the authors draw conclusions as follows: The criminal justice system must always promote the importance of law and justice. But there is a false view that the measure of the success of law enforcement is only marked by the success of bringing a suspect to court and then being sentenced. The measure of success of law enforcement by law enforcement officers should be characterized by the achievement of values of justice in the community. The police as a state tool that plays a role in enforcing the law is expected to be able to respond to this by implementing a Restorative Justice mechanism.<strong></strong></span></h1>

scholarly journals Sanksi Pidana Kerja Sosial Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ringan Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 352
Author(s):  
Teafani Kaunang Slat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Community Safety ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Criminal Offenses

This study aims to evaluate the provisions related to social service crime in the draft criminal law (R-KUHP) in the act of national criminal law reform. The study uses a normative juridical with a statue approach. The urgency of social service as the main criminal sanction against minor offenses can be justified through a combined criminal theory. Social service appropriate in the case of minor criminal offenses because this criminal has the advantage, i.e., the criminal sanction is punitive and still maintaining that the perpetrator can reintegrate into the community. The provisions of social service in the R-KUHP are quite complete and comprehensive. But several things can be noted, i.e., the need for adjustments to several clauses in the R-KUHP related to the provisions of social service and assessment to test the defendant’s readiness to work in the community needs to be more oriented towards community safety.

scholarly journals Legal Gap: Pertentangan Hukum Masyarakat dan Hukum Negara

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-72
Author(s):  
Saeful Bahar Bahar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Logical Consequence ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Grassroots Level ◽  
The Law

This article highlights the controversy of revised act of corruption commission (UU KPK) and of the Book of Criminal Law (KUHP) which had heated up. By using legal gap theory, this writing uncovers the legal gap between the contents of revised KUHP and living laws. Consequently, people in the grassroots level seem more enthusiastic about the issue, for example, the fines because livestock entering other people yards than weakening KPK issues that drive a wave of demonstrations at the level of well-educated people. Many studies in the sphere of sociology of law that have conducted gave much attentions to the living law or norm in the mods of society. However there is not much of them which gave attention to the legal gap phenomena, it is the incompatibility between living law and formal one. Whereas, such an approach tend to be considered late if it we aim to put the sociology of law as one discipline of social science which is useful in strengthening the law enforcement. In the hilt of the matter, there is an issue of the legal gap which should have been expressed from the beginning, mainly as to the compatibility between formal and informal law when legislation was going on. By utilizing literature study, the research found that; firstly, the resistance against revised KUHP is the logical consequence of legal gap phenomena that has potential legal conflict. Secondly, there are four major manners could be done to resolve the gap; repression, counseling, reformation and restorative justice.

scholarly journals Signs of an officer holding a particularly responsible position as a special criminal subject in criminal law of Ukraine

1970 ◽  
pp. 337-341
Author(s):  
Vitalii Kabaiev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Functional Attributes ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Special Basis ◽  
Or Organization ◽  
Criminal Legislation

Effective counteraction to crime is one of the primary challenges facing Ukraine as a democratic and rule of law state. In particular, counteraction to criminal offenses committed by officials is of particular importance in this process. In order to organize a productive struggle with these negative phenomena, it is imperative that law enforcement and judicial authorities have a correct and equal understanding of such a concept as an official. The purpose of this article is to investigate the notion and characterization of an officer holding a particularly responsible position as a special crime subject. The article presents the result of the study of the notion of officers a particularly responsible position. In particular, an analysis was carried out and the characteristics of an official holding a particularly responsible position as a special subject of crime, in accordance with the criminal legislation of Ukraine, were outlined. In particular, the functional and official characteristics of such an officer are identified, which indicate that he or she is different from the general subject of the crime, and express the peculiarities of this kind of special subject of crime in comparison with others. An analysis of the current criminal law of Ukraine shows that such signs relate to the functions and duties performed by the official, as well as his relationship with the enterprises, institutions or organizations on whose behalf he is acting. Thus, to the functional attributes, the author refers to the following: the exercise of the functions of a representative of power; connection with the activity of the enterprise of the institution or organization; the place of performance of the duties of an official. Among the official features of the official, the author identifies such features as the performance of the said functions and duties on a permanent, temporary or special basis. In general, the article provides a concise list of features of officials who occupy a particularly responsible position, who are special subjects of crime, and have all the characteristics defined in Part 1 of Art. 18 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, also disclosed the content of special features that serve as an auxiliary (clarifying) source to identify a special entity.

scholarly journals PENTINGNYA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM KONSEP IUS CONSTITUENDUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Zico Junius Fernando
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Law System ◽  
Compensation Mechanisms ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Abstract: The State of Indonesia is a state of law, the affirmation of this can be seen in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The settlement of cases through the judicial system which results in a court verdict is law enforcement towards the slow path. This is because law enforcement through a long-distance, through various levels starting from the Police, Attorney General's Office, District Court, High Court and even to the Supreme Court which ultimately has an impact on the accumulation of cases which are not small in number in the Court and not to mention other effects. For this reason, it is necessary to proceed with the steps to compile invitations concerning the rights and obligations of citizens in the context of implementing the Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Renewal of the Criminal Code by its authors is positioned as the foundation for building a national criminal law system. Related to the Political Law of Criminal Law Renewal in the upcoming National Criminal Law there is a concept known as the Restorative Justice concept. Restorative Justice involves restoring relations between the victim and the perpetrator. The restoration of this relationship can be based on mutual agreement between the victim and the perpetrator. The victim can convey about the loss he suffered and the perpetrator was given the opportunity to make it up, through compensation mechanisms, peace, social work, and other agreements. Keywords: Restorative Justice; Legal Reform; RKUHP

scholarly journals Law Enforcement against Children's Criminal Action Based On Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning Children Criminal Justice Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (06) ◽  
pp. 226-235
Author(s):  
Feddy Hantyo Nugroho ◽  
Rodliyah ◽  
Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Objective Interpretation ◽  
The Law

This research was conducted to analyze and find out how criminal law policy is in the effort to apply criminal sanctions against children facing the law in terms of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children and whether the concept of Diversity can be applied in the process of law enforcement against children involved in Narcotics Crimes. This research is a normative study, to analyze the legal material related to the problem under study, the author uses the Interpretation, Subjective and Objective Interpretation instruments, after that the authors process these legal materials by deductive thinking. The results obtained from the study that the drafting of Law Number 11 of 2012 is a replacement to Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning juvenile justice conducted with the aim of establishing a judiciary that truly guarantees the best protection of the interests of children facing the law as nation's next generation. The concept of Restorative Justice is one of the important things in Law Number 11 of 2012 where restoring the situation as it used to be the main goal and also no less important is the form of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on Children where criminal sanctions that are harsh and miserable are used as ultimum Remedium is not as a premium remedium especially as a maximum remedium. The concept of diversion that should be applied in Indonesia in the future, should be a combination of the concept of diversion that is applied in Australia, namely Police Diversion which is combined with the process of handling cases with the diversion prevailing in Indonesia today.

scholarly journals Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana di Tingkat Penyidikan

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 549
Author(s):  
I Made Tambir
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Systematic Method ◽  
Change Factors ◽  
Community Expectations ◽  
Research Show

As the gateway to the criminal justice system, law enforcement that carried out by polri always influenced by social change factors. In accordance with the development of law today, polri required to be able to resolve criminal acts by prioritizing restorative justice approach. However it hasn’t been regulated in statutory. The research purposes to describe and analyze the settlement of criminal acts with restorative justice approach in investigation level at the present and the future. The research used normative legal research, using a statute approach, historical approach and comparative approach, using primary and secondary legal materials that collected by a systematic method and then analyzed by descriptive and interpretation techniques. The research show that polri has carried out several policies to answer the community expectations and demands in accordance with the development of law today by issuing several letters and regulations, namely Surat Kapolri No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/Sde Ops, ST Kabareskrim No. ST/110/V/2011, STR Kabareskrim No. STR/583/VIII/2012, Perkap 15/2013, Perkap 3/2015, SE Kapolri No. SE/7/VII/2018 and SE Kapolri No. SE/8/VII/2018. In perspective of “ius constituendum,” it is needed criminal law policy to regulate the settlement of criminal acts with restorative justice approach in investigation level, by carrying out a renewal of material criminal law, including the understanding of criminal acts, objectives and guidelins for criminal actions and also renewal of formal criminal law including updating KUHAP, Perkap 14/2012 and Perkap 3/2015. Sebagai pintu gerbang sistem peradilan pidana, penegakan hukum yang dilakukan polri selalu dipengaruhi oleh faktor perubahan sosial. Dalam perkembangan hukum dewasa ini, polri dituntut mampu menyelesaikan tindak pidana dengan mengedepankan pendekatan restorative justice. Akan tetapi hal itu belum diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana di tingkat penyidikan pada saat ini dan pada masa yang akan datang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, pendekatan historis, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan konsep, dengan menggunakan bahan-bahan hukum primer dan bahan-bahan hukum sekunder yang dikumpulkan dengan metode sistematis yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa polri telah melakukan beberapa kebijakan untuk menjawab harapan dan tuntutan masyarakat sesuai dengan perkembangan hukum dewasa ini dengan menerbitkan beberapa surat dan peraturan, yaitu Surat Kapolri No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/Sde Ops, ST Kabareskrim No. ST/110/V/2011, STR Kabareskrim No. STR/583/VIII/2012, Perkap 15/2013, Perkap 3/2015, SE Kapolri No. SE/7/VII/2018 dan SE Kapolri No. SE/8/VII/2018. Dalam perspektif ius constituendum diperlukan kebijakan hukum pidana untuk mengatur penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana di tingkat penyidikan, dengan melakukan pembaharuan hukum pidana materiil, mencakup pengertian tindak pidana, tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan, serta melakukan pembaharuan hukum pidana formil, mencakup pembaharuan KUHAP, Perkap 14/2012 dan Perkap 3/2015.

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENANGGULANGAN MONEY LAUNDERING DALAM RANGKA PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Rismanto Rismanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Financial Analysis ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Enforcement Policy ◽  
The Government

Criminal law enforcement policy on prevention of money laundering in the context of criminal law reform in Indonesia can be started with the establishment of an appropriate legal products through through the government and passed by the House of Representatives, the readiness of law enforcement, protection for whistleblowers, reverse proof, constraints faced in the implementation of policies enforcement of criminal law on prevention of money laundering in the context of criminal law reform in Indonesia, the Increasing Money Laundering, human resources investigator’s ability is limited, Lack of coordination among law enforcement agencies, Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering in the form a the Reporting Center and Financial analysis hereinafter referred PPATK. This institution is an independent agency that has the authority and duty to examine the suspected actions related to money laundering.

scholarly journals PARADIGMA KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN HUKUM PIDANA

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorius Widiartana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Crime Prevention ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
The Law

ABSTRACTThe criminal law that has been used as one of the means to eridicate crime is built on a retributive paradigm, so its repressive and coercive nature dominates. Based on the retributive paradigm, crime prevention is the sole authority of the law enforcement apparatus. Crime prevention based on the retributive paradigm is also offender oriented. Unlike the retributive paradigm, the paradigm of restorative justice offers another way of dealing with crime. In the retributive paradigm of justice, the sanction imposed does not aim to take revenge on the perpetrators of crime but rather sanctions that can arouse the perpetrator's responsibility for the suffering of the victim or sanction aimed at restoring the suffering of the victim. According to the paradigm of restorative justice, the process of solving crimes is done by involving perpetrators, victims and the community. Keywords: crime prevention, criminal law, retributive, restorative justice. INTISARIHukum pidana yang selama ini dipakai sebagai salah satu sarana untuk menangulangi kejahatan dibangun atas dasar paradigma retributif, sehingga sifatnya yang represif dan koersif begitu mendominasi. Berdasar paradigma retributif, penanggulangan kejahatan merupakan kewenangan tunggal aparat penegak hukum. Penanggulangan kejahatan berdasar paradigma retributif juga bersifat offender oriented. Berbeda dengan paradigma retributif, paradigma keadilan restoratif menawarkan cara lain dalam menanggulangi kejahatan. Dalam paradigma keadilan retributif, sanksi yang dijatuhkan tidak bertujuan untuk melakukan pembalasan terhadap pelaku kejahatan melainkan sanksi yang dapat menggugah tanggung jawab pelaku terhadap penderitaan korban atau sanksi yang bertujuan untuk memulihkan penderitaan korban. Menurut paradigma keadilan restoratif, proses penyelesaian kejahatan dilakukan dengan cara melibatkan  pelaku, korban dan masyarakat. Kata kunci: Penanggulangan kejahatan, hukum pidana, retributif, keadilan restoratif.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document