scholarly journals Simplified claim proceedings: legislative regulations of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Svitlychnyy Oleksandr ◽  
◽  
Sulim V.V ◽  

In the process of building the rule of law, one of its most important criteria is the creation of a fair, transparent and efficient judiciary. The essential need for radical changes in the judiciary and the reform of its individual institutions is a matter of time. The main goal of judicial reform in Ukraine should be to create legislative and organizational conditions for the establishment of an independent, efficient and accountable judiciary in Ukraine, which will be trusted by society. Judicial and legal reform in Ukraine is comprehensive and involves amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine, legislation on the judiciary and the status of judges, reform of related institutions (prosecutor's office, bar, law enforcement agencies), as well as improving procedural legislation and legislation governing enforcement. court decisions. In particular, the article emphasizes that legislative changes have been made to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, initiated new forms of commercial litigation, one of the forms of commercial litigation is simplified litigation, which is designed to consider minor cases, cases of minor complexity and other cases for which priority is given. quick resolution of the case. Along with the simplified procedure and procedures for litigation, the introduction of this form of litigation has revealed certain shortcomings of such regulations. Keywords: commercial litigation, insignificant cases, legislation, shortcomings, procedure

Author(s):  
Sergii Melnyk ◽  
◽  
Alina Ignatievа ◽  

The article researched international experience in coordinating the action of law enforcement agencies in modern international law. It is stated that, enforcement agencies are those institutions that enforce the laws, including election-related laws. Enforcement аs an important integrity mechanism as it deters those who might be interested in subverting the system as well as identifies and punishes those who have broken the law. The responsibilities for enforcing laws and codes are usually divided among different agencies, depending on the nature and severity of the problem. Initial investigations may start with the oversight agency, but can be referred to an enforcement agency if it was determined that legal enforcement was required. For example, potential criminal cases uncovered during a routine audit can be referred to the justice system. If the prosecuting authorities decide to pursue the case, they could charge and prosecute the alleged perpetrator, with a court pronouncing sentence if the defendant were found guilty. Jurisdictionally, there can be an important difference between international law enforcement agencies and multinational law enforcement agencies, even though both are often referred to as «international», even in official documents Effective enforcement requires a functioning legal system and a respect for the rule of law. An important factor in maintaining integrity in enforcement is the independence of the judiciary, as justice is supposed to be administered fairly, equally and impartially. The prevention, investigation and cessation of international and many domestic crimes, as well as the prosecution of those responsible for their commission, are not it is always possible alone, without the help of other states and international organizations. Achieving this goal requires states not only to proclaim unilateral declarations of intent, participation in the signing international treaties and the activities of international institutions, but also the actual implementation of joint and agreed activities aimed at combating transnational and domestic organized crime.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-396
Author(s):  
Rainer Birke

In 2001, a new penal code was adopted in Ukraine after a comprehensive discussion in politics, legal science and society, replacing a codification of the Soviet era dating back to 1960, obviously unsuitable for the new realities. The new penal code of 2001 has been changed many times since then. This also applies to the criminal law provisions against corruption, evaluated and commended by GRECO. However, there is criticism of the criminal law system in Ukraine. A large number of the issues have little or nothing to do with the text of the penal code itself, but with deficits in the application of the law and the resulting loss of confidence in the activities of the law enforcement authorities. The judiciary is said to have a significant corruption problem and is significantly overloaded. The latter is to be counteracted by the introduction of the class of misdemeanor (“kryminalnyj prostupok”) in 2019 that can be investigated in a simplified procedure, which has been criticized, inter alia, because it bears the risk of the loss of quality and possibly infringes procedural rights. Also in 2019, the work on a once again completely new codification of the penal code was commenced, which is not entirely surprising in view to the existing criticism of manual errors or inadequacies of the recent code. It is to be hoped that Ukraine, with the existing will and the necessary strength, will succeed in the creation of a criminal law system that is fully in compliance with the rule of law and that a penal code will be drafted that finally finds full recognition in the society.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 4001-4010
Author(s):  
Anton Voitenko ◽  

The article presents the substantiation of theoretical provisions and the development of practical recommendations for improving the coordination of prosecuting bodies of Ukraine in the field of combating crime and corruption based on studying the features of such coordination. It is proposed to understand the coordinative activity of prosecuting bodies as the direct activities of prosecutors to the organization of interaction between public authorities and the prospect of achieving the goal based on compliance with the rule of law. It is established that coordination of law enforcement agencies, including prosecuting authorities, in the context of combating crime and corruption should be based on the principles of the rule of law, legality, independence and equality of the subjects which carry out coordination activities, the obligation to implement measures to combat crime and control the implementation, systematic and complete use of various forms of coordination activities, publicity and openness in implementation of coordination measures, independence of bodies involved in decision-making, based on the results of coordination activities, the responsibility of heads of prosecuting bodies for the results of high-quality and timely coordination of measures to combat crime and corruption. It is proved that properly organized relations between the prosecuting bodies give grounds for increasing the effectiveness of the implemented measures in combating crime and corruption. It is suggested that the prospects for further research improve the administrative legislation governing the activities of the prosecuting authorities of Ukraine in combating corruption.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 104-116
Author(s):  
Raul Narits ◽  
Silvia Kaugia ◽  
Iris Pettai

An appropriate ‘solution pattern’ for social problems in a state based on the rule of law entails the existence of corresponding legislative regulations. The solution should be approved at the level of a law as a legislative act of supreme juridical power. A solution created at that level would fully correspond to the principle of rule of law and also minimise the possibility of socalled departmental special interests prevailing, in recognition that this danger accompanies efforts toward the solution of every multifaceted problem. The authors find that, since Estonia already possesses relatively extensive experience in legislative consolidation for various aspects of the society’s reality, with most of this experience being of a positive nature, it would be a most welcome development if the issue of DV were to be included in the current process of consolidation under the auspices of the project Towards the Development of Better Legislation. Legislative drafting is stimulated by the perception of acute social problems and of a need to regulate them by legislative means. Results from 2014 and 2017 surveys show that Estonia’s legal practitioners perceive DV as a problem the causes of which demand research and whose victims require help. Most legal practitioners surveyed encountered DV in their day-to-day work, with prosecutors and police detectives bearing the heaviest burden: it consumed nearly one third of their work hours. A serious problem was identified in prejudice and stereotypes, which yield an oversimplified and distorted image of the actual causes of DV, in which the victim frequently is considered responsible. Both the general population and legal practitioners widely share the erroneous impression that the victims could avoid violence through ‘appropriate conduct’. Such stereotypic attitudes wherein victims are considered partially to blame for violence can obstruct the work of law-enforcement agencies. While the idea of a special law on DV found support and scepticism in roughly equal measure, support for it increased significantly when respondents judged the concrete opportunities and solutions offered by such a law. These legal practitioners perceived numerous bottlenecks and unsolved problems in relation to the existing legislative regulation and legal practice, which one would expect to be overcome through a special law on DV. The authors conclude from the survey-based findings that Estonia’s legal practitioners demonstrate considerable anticipation for a law on DV. The participants in the surveys also perceived an increasing need for co-operation with law-enforcement agencies in this regard – i.e., for concentrating on collaboration within this domain. However, the authors consider it undoubtedly important also to increase the involvement of specialists in the DV field: victim support services, staff of women’s shelters, and municipal social workers. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 89-101
Author(s):  
I. Haraberiush

This article examines importance of impact munition based on new conceptual ideas related to humanization of forms and methods of law enforcement. It is emphasized that in implementation of public safety and the order of law enforcement agencies should meet requirements of the rule of law whereby human, his rights and freedoms are recognized as the highest values and determine the content and direction of the state and its legal institutions. It is emphasized that use of specific means contributes to implementation of this principle by creating opportunities to avoid injuries and casualties by law enforcement officers, ordinary citizens and among offenders directly. It is noted that specific means should be considered as protection means and separated from non-lethal weapons. Definition of specific protection means is given. The system of specialized protective equipment is considered because of a conceptual position: specialized protective equipment of law enforcement agencies is a basic concept and consists of subsystems that have their own structure. Place of specialized protective equipment in the system of specialized machinery of law enforcement agencies is determined. System of specialized protective equipment of and branches of these means are structured considering purpose of special means and tactical and technical features of their application in law enforcement activity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
I. I. Baidyuk

The author has studied the essence of the principles of interaction of the State Border Service with other law enforcement agencies, which is conditioned by the importance of ensuring proper protection of the state border in the current conditions of the state development. The main method of the research was the method of critical analysis, which made it possible to analyze the provisions of the current national legislation and the approaches in the scientific doctrine to understanding the principles of interaction of the State Border Service of Ukraine with other law enforcement agencies. The content of the concept of “principles of interaction” has been clarified. The definition of the concept of “principles of interaction of the State Border Guard Service with other law enforcement agencies” has been formulated. The author has revealed the content of such principles of interaction of the Border Guard Service with other law enforcement agencies as: the rule of law, legality, respect and observance of human and citizen rights and freedoms, equality of the subjects of interaction, scientific nature, planning, personal responsibility of the management and employees of the subjects of interaction for its results, combination of open, secret and conspiratorial forms and methods of activity, promptness and professionalism of the employees of the subjects of interaction, coherence of actions of the subjects of interaction and independence of each of them within their powers. The author has offered to classify the principles of interaction of the Border Guard Service with other law enforcement agencies, by dividing them into general and special ones.


Dixi ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Olha Ihorivna Bezpalova ◽  
Tatiana Anatoliivna Kobzieva ◽  
Volodymyr Valeriiovych Korniienko ◽  
Ivan Vasylovych Kritsak

Issues of police control and involvement are of great essence when aspects of administrative law are revealed. The issue here is that there is no way or instances where the legitimate protection of individual rights and freedom can be guaranteed without the presence of the police in ensuring that rights are protected through the respect of the rule of law. The only way this protection can be maintained is only through the operation or application of administrative law. When dealing with the concept of police law, emphasis is laid on the responsibilities this law enforcement agencies have when dealing with matters related to state security, protection of individual living in a given society, and to a certain extent, the entire public. There is no doubt that it is the role of the police to maintain peace and security within a given society, but the question we should be posing is whether their functions performed are done within the confines of respecting fundamental human rights, following the due process of the law being the fundamental and imperative basis or essence of administrative law. One thing is to ensure security, and the other one is to ensure that when enforcing this security, fundamental freedoms and rights of individuals will be respected by the supposed called law enforcement officers. It is therefore in this light that one can say, without any questioning, that under no circumstances should police law function without the intervention of administrative law, both most compliment each other, and activities of the police must be done in strict respect and compliance with that of administrative law. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 645
Author(s):  
Dhanar Dhono Vernandhie ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah

This study describes the applicability of Qanun of Aceh No. 6 of 2014 on the Jinayat law (Qanun of Jinayat) in the order of legislation in Indonesia. Therefore this study to analyze these issues, to examine the legality principle as stated in Article 72 of the Qanun of Jinayat and the rule of law by applying the Qanun of Jinayat. This study uses normative research approach, by analyzing the legal ingredients of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. The results and discussion of the research was that Qanun of Jinayat not contrary to the order of Indonesian legislation, both formal legislative process and substantive elements of the rule of law which includes setting legal subjects, actions and sanctions of criminalization. Applicability of Qanun of Jinayat also related to three factors, namely philosophical which is a reflection of the values of the people of Aceh, sociological factors are the result of legal politics of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement and the factors juridical is the order of the constitution and legislation that higher. Qanun of Jinayat law enforcement requires the law enforcement agencies, particularly the police for continued and consistent enforcement in order to create legal certainty. Suggestions can be submitted is law enforcement-led policy-making and increased synergies between law enforcement agencies in law enforcement for action based on Qanun of Jinayat Jarimah regulated in Qanun of Jinayat.Keywords: Qanun of Jinayat in Aceh; Legality; Legislation; Law Enforcement.�


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Renée Jorgensen

Abstract Law-enforcement agencies are increasingly able to leverage crime statistics to make risk predictions for particular individuals, employing a form of inference that some condemn as violating the right to be “treated as an individual.” I suggest that the right encodes agents’ entitlement to a fair distribution of the burdens and benefits of the rule of law. Rather than precluding statistical prediction, it requires that citizens be able to anticipate which variables will be used as predictors and act intentionally to avoid them. Furthermore, it condemns reliance on various indexes of distributive injustice, or unchosen properties, as evidence of law-breaking.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bambang Ali Kusumo

<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p>            Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia may lack of the justice sense and furthermore highlight the rule of law, this is due to the influence of the philosophy of positivism developed in Europe mainland which has liberal-individualist ideology. This ideology wants everything to be rational and certainty, including legal issues must be no certainty. The purpose of this matter is to protect the rights of individuals. While the Indonesian society is a society that does not highlight the rights of individuals, but respects the balance between individual rights and collective rights. Thus, our criminal law enforcement is still sourced from Indonesian Penal Code which is a replica of the Wetboek Van Strafrech (WVS) created by the Dutch colonialists Government will not materialize justice. It is necessary to face these issues with two steps as the following i.e, <em>first one</em>: the law enforcement agencies in using the law needs a more progressive interpretation, therefore a sense of justice can be realized. Second one, it needs to be realized in accordance with the criminal law reform ideology of kinship based on the values of Pancasila as an ideology of the Indonesia. Such measures are expected to materialize justice in the criminal law enforcement of Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Criminal Law, Law Enforcement, Justice.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document