Inheritance of unpaid amounts provided to a citizen as a means of subsistence

Author(s):  
N. Zhilskij ◽  
N. Golovanov

According to Art. 1183 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Civil Code of the Russian Federation), the right to receive payable to the testator, but not received by him during his lifetime for any reason, the amount of wages and equivalent payments; pensions; scholarships; social security benefits; alimony; amounts of compensation for harm caused to life or health; other sums of money provided to a citizen as a means of subsistence belong to those who lived together with the deceased members of his family, as well as his disabled dependents, regardless of whether they lived with the deceased or did not live. Requests for the payment of these amounts must be presented to the obligated persons within four months from the date of opening the inheritance.

Author(s):  
Irina Damm ◽  
Aleksey Tarbagaev ◽  
Evgenii Akunchenko

A prohibition for persons holding government (municipal) positions, for government (municipal) employees, and some other employees of the public sphere who are public officials to receive remuneration (gifts) is aimed at preventing bribery (Art. 290, 291, 291.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), and could be viewed as a measure of anti-corruption criminological security. However, the existing collisions of civil, administrative and criminal law norms that regulate this prohibition lead to an ongoing discussion in research publications and complexities in practice. The goal of this research is to study the conditions and identify the problems of the legal regulation of receiving remuneration (gifts) in connection with the performance of official duties that prevent the implementation of anti-corruption criminological security. The authors use the legal theory of security measures to analyze the provisions of Clause 3, Part 1, Art. 575 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Clause 6, Part 1, Art. 17 of the Federal Law «About the Public Civil Service in the Russian Federation», examine the doctrinal approaches to defining the priority of enforcing the above-mentioned norms, study the significant features of the category «ordinary gift» and conduct its evaluation from the standpoint of differentiating between gifts and bribes, also in connection with the criteria of the insignificance of the corruption deed. The empirical basis of the study is the decisions of courts of general jurisdiction. The authors also used their experience of working in Commissions on the observance of professional behavior and the resolution of conflicts of interests at different levels. The conducted research allowed the authors to come to the following fundamental conclusions: 1) the special security rule under Clause 6, Part 1, Art. 17 of the Federal Law «About the Public Civil Service in the Russian Federation», which sets a full prohibition for government employees to receive remuneration (gifts) in connection with the performance of official duties, contradicts Clause 3, Part 1, Art. 575 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (the existing legal-linguistic vagueness of categories in Art. 575 of the CC of the RF leads to problems in law enforcement and makes a negative impact on the anti-corruption mentality of people); 2) as the concepts «gift» and «bribe» do not logically intersect, the development of additional normative legal criteria for their delineation seems to be unpromising and will lead to a new wave of scholastic and practical disagreements; 3) the introduction of a uniform and blanket ban on receiving remuneration (gifts) in the public sphere by eliminating Clause 3, Part 1, Art. 575 of the CC of the RF seems to be an effective measure of preventing bribery, and its application is justified until Russian society develops sustainable anti-corruption mentality.


Author(s):  
B.V. Ivanov ◽  
S.V. Kristalinskaya ◽  
E.A. Gladysheva ◽  
D.A. Dobrynin

The article presents the results of the analysis of the indicators of the competitions of grants of the President of the Russian Federation held in 2020 for state support of young Russian scientists and competitive selection for receiving personal scholarships named after J.I. Alferov for young scientists in the field of physics and nanotechnology: generalized data on the number of publications of winners, distribution of participants and winners by research areas, federal districts, regions, departments and organizations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Кожанчиков ◽  
Oleg Kozhanchikov ◽  
Кожанчикова ◽  
Natalya Kozhanchikova

The patent system of taxation is one of special tax regimes for individual entrepreneurs. The patent system is enforced by laws of subjects of the Russian Federation. The tax code provides certain powers of public authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation on the patent system of taxation, including the right to set the size of the potential possibility to receive annual income and its differentiation according to the established criteria in the tax code. In the Orеl region in the differentiation of the potential possible annual income to receive some criteria are not used, such as vehicle capacity and number of seats in the vehicle. We propose to use these criteria of differentiation in the regional legislation.


Author(s):  
Павел Байматов ◽  
Pavel Baymatov

The monograph is a study of theoretical and practical problems associated with the implementation of the constitutional right of citizens to social security. It adequately covers the historical and contemporary issues of the right to social security in Russia, studying international experience. The book raises the problem of implementation of the constitutional right of citizens to social security in the Russian Federation in modern conditions, if necessary, reduce the paternalistic role of the state, proposed measures aimed at increasing the role of citizens, identified theses related to the search for the most optimal and effective forms of modernization of the mechanism of realization of the right to social security. The book is addressed to state and municipal employees, deputies of representative bodies of state power and local self-government, researchers, teachers, graduate students, students of Humanities and a wide range of readers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
Anna Trutaeva

Introduction. The problem of ensuring equal scope of the right to palliative medical care of citizens living on the territory of various subjects of the Russian Federation is raised. The article describes the current legal regulation of palliative care in the Russian Federation and the existing problems of providing it. Purpose. The author aims to determine the place of legal regulation in the mechanism of ensuring the right to palliative medical care and ways to increase the degree of guarantee of this right. Methodology. Methods of analysis and synthesis, formal-logical and comparative-legal methods are used. Results. A brief overview of the current legal regulation at the Federal level and in the subjects of the Russian Federation is given, and the different scope of the right to palliative medical care of citizens living on the territory of different subjects of the Russian Federation is recorded. The article highlights the consequences of different approaches to the legal regulation of the issues under consideration, and suggests changes to them. Population by sex and age, the structure of its incidence and the degree of disability in subjects of the Russian Federation are not the same, and the bodies of state power of subjects of this level have the ability to define the needs of the population in the form of medical care that is consistent with the goal inherent in the activities of the bodies of state power of subjects of the Russian Federation in the field of social security, namely with regard to the influence of the specific features on the life of citizens and securing a reasonable differentiation of social security. Conclusion. It is concluded that it is necessary to fix the guarantee of palliative medical care in the normative legal acts of the subjects of the Russian Federation regulating the issues of public health protection, regardless of the territory of living, gender, age, diagnosis and stage of treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Oksana V. Cherkasova ◽  

The article reviews the legal status of subjects of corporate relationships, analyzes doctrinal and law enforcement aspects. The author analyzes the scientists’ standpoints, various models of interaction between the subjects of corporate relationships existing in foreign law and order, case law, arrives at conclusions about the correlation between the categories of the “right of participation”, “right of membership”, “right of management”. It is noted that the membership concept evolves out of participation by performing the function of a generic term. It is suggested to determine the “right of management” of a corporation as just one of the member’s activity areas along with other rights. The author recommends to ensure consistency of the provision of Article 2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 65.2, 65.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation where the concept of the “right of participation” would act as a basic one and the “right of management” would be its constituent part.


Author(s):  
L. V. Shchennikova ◽  
◽  
A. Yu. Migacheva ◽  

Introduction: the reform of modern civil legislation cannot be completed without the adoption of a package of amendments to the section of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation devoted to real rights. Moreover, the lack of a developed and consistent concept of real rights has a negative impact on the development of all related areas. Real rights are designed to solve strategic problems of state development, among which social issues are currently coming to the fore. In this regard, it is important to study individual real rights proposed for introduction into civil legislation in terms of their potential to promote not only the economic but also the social development of the country. This paper focuses on usufruct in the aspect of its historical identity, powerful functional message, and internationality. Purpose: the research aims to clarify the significance of real law[1] regulation in solving nationally significant problems. Based on the achievements of foreign doctrine and legislation, we attempt to show the prospects of the introduction of usufruct in the Russian system of real rights. Methods: general (philosophical), general scientific, special scientific (including special legal) methods of cognition: dialectical, logical, historical, sociological, comparative-legal and formal-legal. Results: we have studied civil legislation of thirty countries of the world. The study has shown that the introduction of usufruct can have a positive social and economic effect, but only provided that the legislator does not deviate from the historically established concept of usufruct embodied in foreign law. Conclusions:the Draft of Section II of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation ‘Real Rights’ needs revision, with the initial social function of usufruct taken into consideration. It is necessary to work out a system of grounds for the emergence and termination of usufructuary rights, to introduce a mandatory notarial form of a contract for the establishment of usufruct, to provide for the possibility of establishing usufruct by virtue of law in relation to socially significant objects and on the basis of a court decision, to enshrine non-use of the right among the grounds for termination; to allow the establishment of usufruct in relation to citizens and legal entities, and not only non-profit organizations; to allow multiple usufructuaries; to describe in detail the rights and obligations of the owner and the usufructuary, including the duties of treating the property with care, and to indicate the possible limits of the disposal of the property by the usufructuary, including via transactions; to work out the rules for the exercise of the right of usufruct in relation to certain categories of objects, for example: property of minors, inheritance, agricultural land, forests, minerals, etc.


Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 22-31
Author(s):  
S. V. Musarskiy

One of the most difficult issues of civil law is the determination of the criteria for abuse of rights prohibited by Article 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Among numerous points of view on this issue, the following has become very widespread in judicial practice: an abuse of the right can be established based on the negative consequences that have occurred for third parties as a result of the exercise of the right. Since these consequences are evident, then the exercise of the right constituted an abuse. Substantial support for this approach is provided by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation opining that the rule of Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is aimed at implementing the principle enshrined in Part 3 of Art. 17 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Having studied the origins of this point of view and its legal foundations, the author noted a number of inherent shortcomings. In particular, this point of view does not distinguish between inflicting unacceptable harm and admissible actions causing harm to another person; it does not take into account the competition of legal norms; it does not take into account that causing harm prohibited by law is an offense and, therefore, it is not an act of exercising subjective rights. These and other shortcomings of the concept of causing harm, noted by the author of the paper, lead to the conclusion that the feature of “causing harm” in itself is insufficient to qualify the act as an act of abuse of the right and the application of Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. In addition to the indicated feature, which is a prerequisite for the application of Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the court must establish another (key) factor, namely: the fact that, in its opinion, allows to distinguish between legal abuse and other lawful and unlawful phenomena.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-464
Author(s):  
A. A. Martsun

The Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation adopted a resolution of December 21, 2017 No. 54 “On some issues of application of the provisions of Chapter 24 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the change of persons in an obligation on the basis of a transaction", which sets out important clarifications regarding the application standards contained in this chapter. At the same time, not all issues related to the assignment of the claim were resolved by the above resolution. One of these issues is the definition of the term “essential value of the identity of the creditor” or approximate criteria for such a value in the context of the need to obtain the latter’s consent to the assignment of rights. The presence of this problem is rightly indicated in the scientific literature [3, p. 549–655, 688–713]. The Author examines the Model Rules of European Private Law and the UNIDROIT principles in order to find a solution to the problem. Attention is drawn to the problem of determining the essential value of the creditor for the debtor in the case of assignment of the right of claim, as well as to the consequences of making the assignment without the consent of the debtor under an obligation in which the identity of the creditor was essential.In the Author's opinion, the identity of the creditor is recognized as essential for the debtor when the connection between the debtor and the creditor arose as a result of the conclusion of a transaction that has a personallyconfidential nature, or if the connection arose during the conclusion of other transactions in the case when the connection was broken during the execution assignment of rights entails or may entail a significant deprivation for the debtor of what he had the right to count on when concluding a transaction with the creditor.In addition, situations are considered that are an exception to the presumption of the absence of a significant value of the creditor's personality for the assignment of claims for monetary obligations. The author also points out that the consequence of the transaction on the assignment of rights without the consent of the debtor in the context of paragraph 2 of Art. 388 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is the nullity of the transaction on the basis of paragraph 2 of Art. 168 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.


Author(s):  
Valentina Karginova Gubinova

Restriction of the rights of citizens is one of the tools to achieve national security of the territory. This work is aimed at analyzing the readiness of citizens to limit their rights to ensure economic security and taking into account this readiness by the authorities. As an object, the right to receive insurance old-age pension in the Russian Federation was chosen. The choice of this right is due to the demographic aging of the population in all macro-regions of the world and the almost universal increase in the retirement age. The main sources of data were statistical databases of the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation, as well as the results of sociological surveys conducted by public opinion centers and the Institute of Economics of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Data analysis was carried out using the case study method and econometric methods, in particular, panel and correlation analysis. The study showed that the willingness of a significant proportion of Russians to limit civil rights does not extend to the right to receive an old-age insurance pension. At the same time, the authorities poorly took into account the unreadiness of citizens to raise the retirement age. At the same time, the advantages and disadvantages of limiting the right to insurance old-age pensions make the formation of a “smart security” model for the territory, which involves a combination of soft and hard forces, topical.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document