scholarly journals Reformasi Agraria Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla dalam Konsep dan Realita Kepemimpinan yang Fasilitatif (Facilitative Leadership)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Khairul Ikhsan ◽  
Adji Suradji Muhammad
Keyword(s):  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Facilitative Leadership ◽  
Collaborative Processes ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights

The focus of the discussion in this paper will examine leadership theoretically and case studies are seen as an important element in bringing stakeholders to direct them to carry out collaborative processes or what we call Facilitative Leadership. But this concept of leadership is not a traditional leadership concept that has been known. Jokowi-Jusuf Kalla's leadership contains the agenda of the Agrarian Reform which starts from the regions and villages. In the Nine Priority Agenda, also known as Nawacita, it was stated that agrarian reform in the form of direct pledging guarantees legal certainty in land ownership rights, resolving land disputes and opposing the criminalization of the resumption of community land rights. It is interesting to study how the correlation of the National Agrarian Reform Program by the Government of President Joko Widodo is if we relate it to the concept of facilitative leadership.

scholarly journals Reformasi Agraria Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla dalam Konsep dan Realita Kepemimpinan yang Fasilitatif (Facilitative Leadership)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Khairul Ikhsan, Adji Suradji Muhammad
Keyword(s):  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Facilitative Leadership ◽  
Collaborative Processes ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights

The The focus of the discussion in this paper will examine leadership theoretically and case studies are seen as an important element in bringing stakeholders to direct them to carry out collaborative processes or what we call Facilitative Leadership. But this concept of leadership is not a traditional leadership concept that has been known. Jokowi-Jusuf Kalla's leadership contains the agenda of the Agrarian Reform which starts from the regions and villages. In the Nine Priority Agenda, also known as Nawacita, it was stated that agrarian reform in the form of direct pledging guarantees legal certainty in land ownership rights, resolving land disputes and opposing the criminalization of the resumption of community land rights. It is interesting to study how the correlation of the National Agrarian Reform Program by the Government of President Joko Widodo is if we relate it to the concept of facilitative leadership.

scholarly journals STRENGTHENING LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMAIN APPROACH IN MANIFESTING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND COMMUNITY JUSTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Nia Kurniati ◽  
Jordan Mordekhai
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
Community Justice ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Welfare Society ◽  
The Government

As an implementation of welfare society, the government issued Law Number 5 of 1960 Article 19 paragraph (2) c, which provide the legal certainty of land rights for all Indonesians carried out through land registration. The land registration system adopted by Indonesia is negative land cadastre with positive tendency. The implementation of land registration provide the basis of state duty to produce land registration evidence, namely certificate, which is valid as a strong proof of rights. This certificate guarantees the correctness of physical data besides juridical data as long as it is not proven otherwise. Method: This legal research used Normative juridical method, with qualitative juridical data analysis. Results of the study: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency adopted by Indonesia currently does not guarantee legal certainty of land ownership and the community justice itself. This is indicated by the fact that there is still a phenomenon of land disputes, among the result of the issuance of overlapping. By using a legal cadastre-based domain approach, through an approach of extracting historical values of land and integrating the process of dialogue within the issuing of certificate; obtaining legal certainty and the community justice can be achieved. Conclusion: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency is still unable to manifest legal certainty of land ownership and community justice so it is appropriate that an adage states “the highest legal certainty, is the highest injustice”. Strengthening land registration system through the domain approach is an alternative option to manifest legal certainty and community justice.

scholarly journals Problematic Issuance of Land Rights Certificate

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moh Ali Wafa
Keyword(s):  
Community Psychology ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Village

Many people who have not registered ownership rights so that they have no protection andlegal certainty due to several factors: First, factor of land ownership history. Second,community psychology. Third, weakness of land registration rules. Fourth, executorimplementation, intervention BPHTB legislation and other fees. Fifth, the mechanism ofregistration of land is too expensive for the community both procedure and registration fee.The Solution and effort to minimize the occurrence of land disputes society are: first, bypreventing the land dispute case is not repeated. Second, the government immediatelysocialize what and how the issuance of land certificates and the purpose of certificates. Third,If there is dispute in the court that the object is not certified land, the court notifies the urbanvillage and local BPN to block the transaction or the transition of the land immediately. Fourth,each transaction or transition of land with proof of ownership in the form of girik, the witness inthe transaction should be the Village Head and the BPN officer, and fifth, it is better if there island dispute in the court, at least one judge from land law expert, such as non-academicjudges (academics). DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.7089

scholarly journals Status Hak Atas Tanah Penduduk Desa dalam Kawasan Hutan Perum Perhutani

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Fatimiah Azzahra
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
Public Corporation ◽  
The Status ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights

This article aims to discuss the conflict of tenure rights between Perhutani and the community and the status of land held by the community after the entry into force of Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agraria Reform. The study uses a sociological juridical method. The location of the study is in the forest area of   Perhutani Public Corporation, Malang Regency. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that conflicts over ownership of land rights between Perhutani and the community have been going on for a long time. Physically the land has been controlled by the community since the Dutch colonial era and passed down from generation to generation. The granting of permission to manage the land and payment of land tax strengthened the community’s argument about land ownership. The land status which is the object of the dispute is based on Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform became the authority of Perhutani Public Corporation. Communities can get ownership rights or get land compensation if the Ministry of Forestry releases the land.

scholarly journals Implementasi PTSL Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Pertanahan Di Kecamatan Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.

scholarly journals Kendala Pelaksanaan Landreform di Indonesia: Analisa terhadap Kondisi dan Perkembangan Berbagai Faktor Prasyarat Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
NFN Syahyuti
Keyword(s):  
Land Reform ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Complete Data ◽  
New Order ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Reform Era ◽  
Reform Program ◽  
The Government

<strong>English</strong><br />Land reform program was once successful in Indonesia in 1960’s although it included only land area and limited number of receiving farmers. The New Order government never carried out land reform program explicitly, but it was substituted with programs of certification, transmigration, and Nucleus Estate Smallholders development. All of those programs aimed at enhancing people’s access to land ownership. The governments in the reform era improve some regulations related with agrarian reform but no real program of land reform. Theoretically, there are four imperative factors as prerequisites for land reform program, namely political will of the government, solid farmers’ organization, complete data, and sufficient budget. At present, all of those factors are still difficult to realize and, thus, land reform in Indonesia is hard to be implemented simultaneously. <br /><br /><br /><strong>Indonesian</strong><br />Program landreform pernah dicoba diimplementasikan di Indonesia pada era tahun 1960-an, meskipun hanya mencakup luasan tanah dan petani penerima dalam jumlah yang sangat terbatas. Kemudian, sepanjang pemerintahan Orde Baru, landreform tidak pernah lagi diprogramkan secara terbuka, namun diganti dengan program pensertifikatan, transmigrasi, dan pengembangan Perkebunan Inti Rakyat, yang pada hakekatnya bertujuan untuk memperbaiki akses masyarakat terhadap tanah. Sepanjang pemerintahan dalam era reformasi, telah dicapai beberapa perbaikan dalam hukum dan perundang-undangan keagrariaan, namun tetap belum dijumpai program nyata tentang landreform. Secara teoritis, ada empat faktor penting sebagai prasyarat pelaksanaan landreform, yaitu kesadaran dan kemauan dari elit politik, organisasi petani yang kuat, ketersediaan data yang lengkap, serta dukungan anggaran yang memadai. Saat ini, kondisi keempat faktor tersebut masih dalam kondisi lemah, sehingga dapat dikatakan implementasi landreform secara serentak dan menyeluruh di Indonesia masih sulit diwujudkan.

Analisis Penguasaan, Pemilikan, Penggunaan dan Pemanfaatan Tanah di Sempadan Pantai di Kelurahan Bintarore

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-139
Author(s):  
Irsal Marsudi Sam ◽  
Setiowati Setiowati ◽  
Rakhmat Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Land Utilization ◽  
Open Land ◽  
Housing Services ◽  
The Government ◽  
Land Utilization Type ◽  
Ownership Rights

Abstract: Most of the land beach border Village Bintarore has been controlled and owned by the community. The purpose of this research are (1) to know the kind of land tenure, land ownership, land use and land utilization; (2) Land Office Policy in Bulukumba Regency granting land rights; (3) the suitability of the land use and land utilization with RTRW. The research was conducted using qualitative methods for data analysis, survey and interview methods for data collection and the use of the census method. Based on the results of the study are known: (1) land on the beach border Village Bintarore is controlled by the Government, the public and legal entities. Types of landholdings consists of State land and land ownership rights. Type of land use consists of the use of the open land for housing, services, government agencies, religious services, rental services, workshop, warehousing, graves, sports field, industry, trade and services mix. Land utilization type consists of utilization as a place of residence, mix, economic, social, agricultural and not utilized; (2) Bulukumba District Land Office do policies to keep providing land rights in the area of the border of the Bintarore Village beach, (3) there are 87,19% mismatch between the use and utilization of land at Bintarore Village beach border with RTRW.Keywords: IP4T, RTRW, beach border. Intisari: Sebagian besar tanah sempadan pantai Kelurahan Bintarore telah dikuasai dan dimiliki oleh masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui (1) Jenis penguasaan, pemilikan, penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah; (2) Kebijakan Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Bulukumba dalam pemberian hak atas tanah; (3) Kesesuaian penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah dengan RTRW. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode kualitatif, teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui survei dan wawancara serta menggunakan metode sensus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui: (1) Tanah di sempadan pantai Kelurahan Bintarore dikuasai oleh pemerintah, masyarakat dan badan hukum. Jenis pemilikan tanah terdiri dari tanah negara dan tanah hak milik. Jenis penggunaan tanah terdiri dari penggunaan untuk perumahan, tanah terbuka, jasa instansi pemerintah, jasa peribadatan, jasa sewa, perbengkelan, pergudangan, kuburan, lapangan olahraga, industri, jasa perdagangan dan kebun campuran. Jenis pemanfaatan tanah terdiri dari pemanfaatan sebagai tempat tinggal, campuran, ekonomi, sosial, pertanian dan tidak dimanfaatkan; (2) Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Bulukumba melakukan kebijakan untuk tetap memberikan hak atas tanah di kawasan sempadan pantai Kelurahan Bintarore (3) Terdapat 87,19% ketidaksesuaian antara penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah di sempadan pantai kelurahan Bintarore dengan RTRW.Kata Kunci: IP4T, RTRW, sempadan pantai. 

scholarly journals Kepastian Dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Pokok-Pokok Agraria

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-84
Author(s):  
Jawakil Butarbutar
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The People ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Definite Role

This research is related to the Basic Agrarian Law which regulates land rights including property rights by registering the rights to their land to obtain ownership rights intended for maintain legal certainty and legal protection for holders of property rights over land. For this reason, it is important to socialize the importance of registering uncertified land to become certified land for legal certainty and protection of holders of property rights on the land to avoid land problems in the community. For this reason legal certainty and protection are needed so that the status of land owned by the people is clear as well as all actions taken relating to the land such as transfer, inheritance, transfer of rights, revocation / exemption and abolition of the land rights. With the certificate, the government has a definite role to provide legal protection to the  holders of property rights because the certified land has been registered at the landoffice and it becomes an obligation for the government to protect it. Keywords: Legal Certainty and Protection, Holders of Certificates of Ownership,  Agrarian Basic Law.

scholarly journals Mechanism for collective property sharing in mixed marriage

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
Siti Alfisyahrin Lasori
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
The Status ◽  
Ownership Rights

This research discusses the mechanism of sharing joint assets for mixed marriage partners. The results of the study illustrate the applicable provisions with the facts that occur in the community regarding land ownership for Indonesian husbands or wives in mixed marriages. The research method used in this research is normative research method. The statutory approach and the conceptual approach The statutory approach is an approach using legislation and regulations. And the conceptual approach is to refer to legal principles. These principles can be found in scholarly views or legal doctrines . This study aims to analyze the mechanism for sharing joint assets in marriage, is based on the prevailing laws and regulations and provides legal certainty for the husband or wife of Indonesian citizens regarding the status of land ownership in joint assets for mixed marriages. Based on the results of the research, a conclusion is obtained that land ownership for Indonesian citizens due to mixed marriages without being equated with land rights for their foreign partners, which is only limited to use rights. Legal certainty for current Indonesian citizens to be entitled to land with ownership rights.

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document