scholarly journals Effect of preoperative feeding with germinated brown rice supplement on clinical outcome of orthopaedic and gastrointestinal surgery patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Pooja Thacker ◽  
Subhadra Mandalika ◽  
Rahul Shah ◽  
Nilesh Doctor

Background: Malnutrition prior to surgery can lead to inflammation, increased length of hospital stay, bed sores, muscle weakness, poor quality of life and mortality post-surgery in patients. Therefore, preoperative drinks that have been enriched with vitamins, easily digestible carbohydrates and amino acids have been necessitated by ESPEN. Health benefits of brown rice, which is a good source of phytonutrients like GABA, Ferulic acid Oryzanol and B- complex, BCAA and maltodextrin, have been well researched.Methods: In the present study, a nutritious product was developed using germinated brown rice, salt and micronutrient mix (GBR Mix), analysed quantitatively (Proximate composition) and qualitatively (Phytochemicals). Major orthopaedic and gastrointestinal surgical patients in the age group of 40-65 years (n=124) were supplemented with GBR Mix in bouts of 3 meals (20gms x 3meals) namely lunch, mid-evening and bedtime time snack, 8 hrs prior to surgery unlike other patients who fasted for 12-16 hours prior to surgery. They were assessed for nutritional status, Serum Albumin, inflammatory markers (CRP and WBC), post-surgery complications and length of hospital stay.Results: Supplementation was found to improve blood sugar (p<0.05) in gastroenterology patients, reduce inflammatory markers like CRP(p=0.053) and WBC (p<0.001), reduced nausea and vomiting, improved food and fluid intake post-surgery in the patients. Additionally, length of hospital stay was also reduced (p=0.001).Conclusion: Thus, germinated brown rice could be recommended as an economical nutritious and anti-inflammatory pre surgery feed.Keywords: GBR, LOS, MUST, SGA, CRP, Micronutrient Mix 

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongyi Chen ◽  
Zhaosheng Ding ◽  
Caixia Chen ◽  
Yangfan Sun ◽  
Yuyu Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions can improve functional ability and reduce mortality in older adults, but the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, caregiver burden, and length of hospital stay remains unclear. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, length of hospital stay, and caregiver burden in older adults by conducting meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for papers published before February 29, 2020, based on inclusion criteria. Standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were also conducted. Results A total of 28 RCTs were included. Overall, the intervention components common in different CGA intervention models were interdisciplinary assessments and team meetings. Meta-analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life of older people (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.21; P = 0.009) compared to usual care, and subgroup analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life only in participants’ age > 80 years and at follow-up ≤3 months. The change value of quality of life in the CGA intervention group was better than that in the usual care group on six dimensions of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Also, compared to usual care, the CGA intervention reduced the caregiver burden (SMD = − 0.56; 95% CI = − 0.97 to − 0.15, P = 0.007), but had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Conclusions CGA intervention was effective in improving the quality of life and reducing caregiver burden, but did not affect the length of hospital stay. It is recommended that future studies apply the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of CGA interventions on the quality of life and provide supportive strategies for caregivers as an essential part of the CGA intervention, to find additional benefits of CGA interventions.


Author(s):  
Natthaporn Chatchavanthatri ◽  
Tiraporn Junyusen ◽  
Weerachai Arjharn ◽  
Tawarat Treeamnuk ◽  
Payungsak Junyusen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Carbonnel ◽  
H. Abbou ◽  
H. T. N’Guyen ◽  
S. Roy ◽  
G. Hamdi ◽  
...  

Objectives. A prospective study was carried out to compare vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and robotically assisted hysterectomy (RH) for benign gynecological disease.Materials and Methods. All patients who underwent hysterectomy from March 2010 to March 2012 for a benign disease were included. Patients’ demographics per and post surgery results were collected from medical files. A questionnaire was also conducted 2 months after surgery.Results. Sixty patients were included in the RH group and thirty four in the VH one. Operative time was significantly longer in the RH group ( versus  min; ). Blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced: versus  ml; , and versus days; , respectively. Less pain was reported at D1 and D2 by RH patients, and levels of analgesia were lower compared to those observed in the VH group. No differences were found regarding the rate of conversion to laparotomy, intra- or postoperative complications.Conclusion. Robotically assisted hysterectomy appears to reduce blood loss, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay, but it is associated with longer operative time and higher cost. Specific indications for RH remain to be defined.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5076-5076
Author(s):  
Michelle Torres ◽  
Lynn C. Hartmann ◽  
William Cliby ◽  
Kimberly Kalli ◽  
Aminah Jatoi ◽  
...  

5076 Background: Advanced OVCA should be managed aggressively, and extensive surgery has been the most accepted initial treatment. Medically unfit patients or those with extensive disease, in which complete cytoreduction is unlikely, may not benefit from upfront radical surgery, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be an appropriate alternative. Thus, reliable preoperative indicators of surgical outcome are necessary for considering primary surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our aim is to determine if C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, albumin and Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS – score based on CRP and albumin) correlate with overall survival (OS), length of hospital stay (LOS), surgical morbidity, and suboptimal cytoreduction. Methods: We randomly selected 50 stages III/IV OVCA who underwent surgery as a primary treatment between July 2002 and June 2009 at Mayo Clinic with serum albumin levels and frozen serum available. CRP and IL-6 were measured in stored serum. Univariate and multivariate regression models were fit to evaluate associations with each of the outcomes. Results: Among the 50 patients, the mean age was 67.7 years. 34% had pretreatment albumin <3.5 g/ml, 22.4% had CRP level ≥10 mg/l, 26.5% had IL-6 ≥24 pg/ml and 45% had abnormal GPS score. At 1, 3 and 5 years following surgery, the OS was 75.6%, 49.8% and 36.9%, respectively. RD (0, <1, ≥1cm; p<0.001) was the only independent predictor of OS. Also, IL-6 (p=0.028) and stage (p=0.046) were independently associated with LOS, but no inflammatory or nutritional markers were significant associated with post surgical complications. Stage IV (p=0.019) and elevated CRP (p=0.044) were independent predictors of suboptimal surgery (RD ≥ 1cm). Conclusions: One-third of the patients in our series had low serum albumin at the time of the OVCA diagnosis, and at least one-fourth had elevated inflammatory markers. Advanced stage and elevated inflammatory markers (CRP and IL-6) were independent predictors of longer hospital stay and suboptimal debulking. These pilot data, if confirmed in a larger population, may help in the selection of candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naruebodee Srisang ◽  
Warunee Varanyanond ◽  
Somchart Soponronnarit ◽  
Somkiat Prachayawarakorn

Food Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.F. Bolarinwa ◽  
P.T. Lim ◽  
Kharidah Muhammad

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Lucha ◽  
Ralph Butler ◽  
Jessica Plichta ◽  
Michael Francis

Early postoperative oral feeding has been demonstrated to be safe and not increase postoperative morbidity. There are conflicting reports about its effect on postoperative length of stay. Some patients will fail attempts at early postoperative feeding and may be relegated to a longer postoperative course. Few studies to date have attempted to identify cost savings associated with early oral support, and those identified address nasoenteric support only. Fifty-one consecutive patients were randomized into either a traditional postoperative feeding group or an early postoperative feeding group after their gastrointestinal surgery. Length of hospital stay, hospital costs (excluding operating room costs), morbidity, and time to tolerance of a diet were compared. There was a tendency toward increased nasogastric tube use in the early feeding arm, but the morbidity rates were similar. Length of hospital stay and costs were similar in both arms. Early postoperative enteral support does not reduce hospital stay, nursing workload, or costs. It may come at a cost of higher nasogastric tube use, however, without an increase in postoperative morbidity.


Medical Care ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Louise Svendsen ◽  
Lars Holger Ehlers ◽  
Grethe Andersen ◽  
Søren Paaske Johnsen

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Sá ◽  
Gabriela Sousa ◽  
Alice Santos ◽  
Cristina Santos ◽  
Fernando José Abelha

<p><strong>Background: </strong>The “Quality of Recovery 15” questionnaire is used for the study of quality recovery after anesthesia. The aim of this study was to validate the Portuguese version of “Quality of Recovery 15” questionnaire.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> After study approval by the institutional ethics committee, an observational and cohort prospective study was conducted on patients scheduled for elective surgery from June to August 2013. The “Quality of Recovery 15” questionnaire was translated in accordance with available guidelines. The “Quality of Recovery 15” Portuguese version was used before surgery (T0) and 24h postoperatively (T1) on 170 patients. Patients who were unable to give informed consent or had cognitive impairment were excluded. Poor quality of recovery was defined for “Quality of Recovery 15” score at T1 lower than the mean “Quality of Recovery 15”<br />score minus 1 standard deviation. Reliability and observer disagreement was assessed using interclass correlation. Non-parametric tests were used for comparisons.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> There was a negative correlation between “Quality of Recovery 15” score and time spent in the postanesthesia care<br />(ρ = −0.264, p = 0.004) and length of hospital stay (ρ = −0.274, p = 0.004). Thirty-two patients (19%) had poor quality of recovery. Patients with poor quality of recovery had more frequently diabetes mellitus and hypertension and they were taking antidepressants drugs more frequently. Patients with poor quality of recovery were more frequently submitted to combined anesthesia and less frequently to general anesthesia and locoregional anesthesia (p = 0.008). The questionnaire had a good internal consistency and test–retest reliability was good.<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> The Portuguese version of the “Quality of Recovery 15” showed a good correlation with the original.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This questionnaire appears to be an accurate and reliable assessment for quality of recovery.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document