scholarly journals IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PENGATURAN KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA FIKTIF POSITIF DAN FIKTIF NEGATIF

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
Makhtum Yandi Abrory
Keyword(s):  

 Jawaban yang diperoleh penulis dalam penelitian ini yaitu dengan adanya pengaturan di dalam UUPTUN yang berimplikasi permohonan tersebut ditolak dan di dalam UUAP permohonan tersebut diterima dianggap dikabulkan maka berimplikasi tidak adanya kepastian hukum, adanya perluasan makna KTUN, adanya dua hukum acara PTUN, kewenangan PTUN, dan berlakunya mengikatnya KTUN. harmonisasi ketentuan di dalam UUPTUN dan UUPTUN dilakukan dengan cara menggunakan teori preferensi, sehingga yang dapat diberlakukan untuk sebagai dasar pengaturan adalah ketentuan di dalam UUAP. Oleh sebab itu perlu dilakukan legislative refiew untuk merevisi UUPTUN.Kata kunci: KTUN, permohonan, sikap diam The answers obtained by the authors in this study that with the arrangement in UUPTUN implicating the application is rejected and in the UUAP the request is accepted considered granted, it implies the absence of legal certainty, the extension of the meaning of KTUN, the existence of two law of the PTUN event, the authority of PTUN, and the enactment of binding it KTUN. harmonization of provisions in UUPTUN and UUPTUN is done by using the theory of preference, so that which can be applied for the basis of arrangement is provision in UUAP. Therefore, legislative refiew needed to revise the UUPTUN.Keywords: KTUN, petition, silence

Author(s):  
Aria Dimas Harapan

ABSTRACTThe essence of this study describes the theoretical study of the phenomenon transfortation services online. Advances in technology have changed the habits of the people to use online transfortation In fact despite legal protection in the service based services transfortation technological sophistication has not been formed and it became warm conversation among jurists. This study uses normative juridical research. This study found that the first, the Government must accommodate transfotation online phenomenon in the form of rules that provide legal certainty; second, transfortation online as part of the demands of the times based on technology; third, transfortation online as part of the creative economy for economic growth . 


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizky Maulana Hakim

We realize that in the community, it is still close to the night world which can plunge the nation's next generation, through drinking, gambling, and especially Narcotics. There are many rules related to this problem, it is still possible that the minimum knowledge of the community is what causes users to become victims of the rigors of using drugs.In discussing this paper, we will take and discuss the theme of "Legal Certainty and Role of Laws on Narcotics (Narcotics and Drugs / Hazardous Materials) by Users and Distributors." The purpose of accepting this paper is, first, to be agreed by the reader which can be understood about the dangers that need to be discussed regarding the subjectivity of the drug itself; secondly, asking the reader to get a clue about actually addressing the urgency about the distribution of drugs; round, which is about knowing what the rules of the law and also the awareness in the surrounding community.Keywords: Narcotics, Role of Laws, Problem, Minimum Knowledge, awareness


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-190
Author(s):  
Siti Rohmah ◽  
Ilham Tohari ◽  
Moh. Anas Kholish

This article aims to identify and analyze the urgency and future of fiqh legislation for halal products in Indonesia. In addition, this article also aims to identify and analyze whether Law no. 33 of 2014 concerning the Guarantee of Halal Products is the result of authoritarianism in the name of Islamic law in Indonesia or is a constitutional guarantee for the majority of Muslims. The conclusion of this study shows that the effort to enact the jurisprudence of halal products through the Halal Product Guarantee Law is a constitutional necessity for Indonesian citizens who are predominantly Muslim. The regulation of halal certification in the Halal Product Guarantee Law is a form of legal certainty and constitutional protections for the majority of Muslims as consumers in Indonesia. In addition, the existence of the Halal Product Guarantee Law is also considered to provide benefits economically, socially, and healthily, which applies universally regardless of religion. Even the accusation that the Halal Product Guarantee Law is a product of authoritarianism that harms non-Muslims cannot be justified. Because the producers of food and medicine that are widely circulating in supermarkets and mini-markets in Indonesia are actually non-Muslim owners. Even with this halal certification, their products can enter the world market, especially in Muslim countries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Edi Hudiata

Since the verdict of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number 93/PUU-X/2012 pronounced on Thursday, August 29, 2013, concerning the judicial review of Law No. 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking, it is no longer dualism dispute resolution. The verdict as well as strengthen the jurisdiction of Religious Court to resolve Islamic banking disputes. In consideration of the judges, judges agreed stating that Article 55 paragraph (2) and (3) of Law No. 21 of 2008 which is an ideal norm, contains no constitutional problems. The problem is the explanation of the constitutional article 55 paragraph (2) of the Act. The emergence of the Constitutional Court verdict No. 93/PUU-X/2012 which substantially states that the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law No. 21 of 2008 does not have binding force, basically does not violate the principle of freedom of contract which is common in contract law. The parties are allowed to make a dispute resolution agreement out of religious court based on provisions as Act No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Keywords: dispute resolution, legal certainty and the principle of freedom of contract


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Ade Lisa Matasik ◽  
Theresia Woro Damayanti

<p class="JurnalASSETSABSTRAK">ABSTRAK</p><p>Pengampunan pajak telah dilakukan berulang kali di Indonesia yaitu 1964, 1989, 2008 dan 2016. Penelitian ini menguji apakah ada perbedaan kepatuhan pajak antara yang mengetahui pengampunan pajak berulang serta merasakan kepastian penegakan hukum dan yang tidak. Penelitian ini menggunakan  quasi eksperimen faktorial 2 x 2 antarsubyek dengan mahasiswa akuntansi di FEB yang sedang mengambil matakuliah manajemen pajak sebagai partisipan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat pengaruh antara pengetahuan tentang pengampunan pajak berulang maupun kepastian penegakan hukum terhadap kepatuhan pajak. Hasil dari pengujian interaksi yang diperoleh adalah ketika wajib pajak tidak mengetahui adanya pengampunan pajak yang berulang dan merasakan kepastian penegakan hukum yang tinggi akan menghasilkan kepatuhan yang paling tinggi. Sebaliknya ketika wajib pajak mengetahui adanya pengampunan pajak yang berulang dan tidak merasakan kepastian penegakan hukum yang tinggi akan menghasilkan kepatuhan yang rendah.<em></em></p><p class="JurnalASSETSABSTRAK"><em>ABSTRACT</em></p><p><em>Tax amnesty has been repeadly implemented in Indonesia namely 1964,1989, 2008 and 2016.The purpose of the study is to examine is there any tax compliance differences between those who perceive recurring tax amnesty and feel legal certainty and to those who do not. This quasi experiment design was consisted of 2x2 between subject factorial design, with Bachelor’s Degree of Accountancy at FEB UKSW who took Taxation Management as participants. The result shown that there is influence between recurring tax amnesty knowledge and legal certainty in the tax compliance. The result of the interaction testing shown that when taxpayer are not aware of any recurring tax amnesty and feel the high legal certainty will result high compliance. Conversely, when taxpayers know that there is recurring tax amnesty and do not sense a high level certainty, it would result a low tax compliance.<br /></em></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Dita Birahayu

<p>Based on Declaration of Djuanda, it declared that Indonesia maritime was defined as the entity of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), and thus, Indonesia is known as an archipelagic country with a very broad maritime territory directly adjacent to 10 neighboring countries. However, it poses a lot of potential maritime boundary conflict. Supported by this current advanced science, both artificial islands and coastal reclamation were being carried out. Singapore is one having a reclamation named Jurong Island, and it is very close to the territory of NKRI. As an independent country, Indonesia is attempting to protect its territory by having a diplomatic negotiation with Singapore in order to decide the legal certainty over their maritime borders, especially in east area. In addition, they need to define the legal status of that reclaimed island. Based on UNCLOS 1982 article 11 and 80, the legal status of the reclaimed island may not threaten the sovereignty of NKRI as its presence does not change the maritime territory of a country, and it has been agreed in the previous agreement.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Subur Purwana ◽  
Wahyu Hidayat ◽  
Mursal Maulana

Submission of Certificate of Origin (e-Form D) is conducted through a three-layer system named ASW Gateway, LNSW, and CEISA has raised issues related to the period/time of receipt of e-Form D given by customs authorities for the purposes of charging preferential tariffs in the ATIGA scheme. This article aims to analyze the legal certainty in submitting e-Form D to the customs authorities in the importing country, in this case, the Directorate General of Customs and Excise for the purpose of charging preferential tariffs, so that it can be in line with the presentation principle based on the ATIGA OCP and Indonesian domestic legal provisions. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with descriptive analysis and normative qualitative to draw conclusions. Based on the research, it was concluded that with regard to the submission of e-Form D, Customs and Excise Officials must have confidence based on factual evidence to determine whether the principle of submission of e-Form D has been accomplished or refused when an interruption in the ASW Gateway, LNSW or CEISA happened so the Customs Officer and Excise can determine tariffs based on OCP as well as domestic law in force in Indonesia.Keywords: ATIGA, Customs Authority, Directorate General of Customs and Excise, e-Form D, Tariffs Preference.ABSTRAK: Penyerahan SKA e-Form D dilakukan melalui tiga layer system yakni ASW Gateway, LNSW, dan CEISA memunculkan permasalahan terkait dengan jangka waktu/saat diterimanya e-Form D oleh otoritas kepabeanan untuk kepentingan pengenaan tarif preferensi dalam skema ATIGA. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis kepastian hukum dalam penyerahan e-Form D ke otoritas kepabeanan di negara importir, dalam hal ini Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai untuk kepentingan pengenaan tarif preferensi, sehingga dapat sejalan dengan prinsip presentasi berdasarkan OCP ATIGA dan ketentuan hukum domestik Indonesia. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif secara deskriptif analisis dan penarikan kesimpulan secara normatif kualitatif. Berdasarkan penelitian, disimpulkan bahwa berkenaan dengan penyerahan e-Form D, Pejabat Bea dan Cukai harus memiliki keyakinan berdasarkan bukti faktual untuk menentukan apakah prinsip penyerahan e-Form D sudah dipenuhi/tidak ketika terjadi gangguan pada ASW Gateway, LNSW atau CEISA sehingga Pejabat Bea dan Cukai dapat menentukan tarif berdasarkan OCP maupun hukum domestik yang berlaku di Indonesia. Kata Kunci: ATIGA, Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, e-Form D, Otoritas Kepabeanan, Tarif Preferensi. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document