EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN PENYELESAIANNYA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Wildana Arsyad ◽  
Edi Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This study aims to provide information about procedure of dispute settlement of sharia economy in the Religious Courts. This research uses qualitative method with juridical approach. The dispute procedure of sharia economic in religious court runs in accordance with the mandate of the Law contained in article 49 to article 53 Act no. 7 years 1989, Law No. 3 year 2006, Law No. 50 of 2009 about Religious Courts. Sharia economic dispute is basically due to three things, namely because one of the parties to break the promise (wanprestasi), due to unlawful acts against the agreements agreed upon and because of coercive circumstances. Settlement of disputes is held with the aim of enforcing the law which contains the value of legal justice, the value of legal certainty, and the value of legal benefit. The settlement of the sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts is very new, so the Supreme Court up to now still conducts education and training of sharia economic certification for all Religious Court judges.Penelitian ini  bertujuan   untuk memberikan informasi mengenai prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di pengadilan agama berjalan sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang yang tertera dalam pasal 49 sampai pasal 53 Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2006 jo.Undang-Undang No.50 tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Agama.Sengketa ekonomi syariah pada dasarnya disebabkan karena tiga hal, yaitu karena salah satu pihak melakukan ingkar janji (wanprestasi), karena perbuatan melawan hukum terhadap perjanjian yang disepakati dan karena keadaan memaksa. Penyelesaian sengketa diadakan dengan tujuan untuk menegakan hukum yang di dalamnya mengandung nilai keadilan hukum, nilai kepastian hukum, dan nilai kemanfaatan hukum.Penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama merupakan hal yang sangat baru, sehingga Mahkamah Agung sampai saat ini masih melaksanakan pendidikan dan latihan sertifikasi ekonomi syariah bagi seluruh hakim Pengadilan Agama.

scholarly journals GUIDELINES FOR PRESIDENTING WOMEN FACING THE LAW IN DIVORCE WITH JUSTICE BASED IN KEBUMEN RELIGION COURT (IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMA NO. 3 YEAR 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trubus Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

An effort to improve the quality of justice with a gender perspective on July 11, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women Against the Law. In line with this study, researchers assume specifically the implementation of Perma Number 3 of 2017 is related to women dealing with law in divorce cases related to the protection of women's rights (ex-wife) along with children's rights due to divorce based on justice. the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in the field of litigation duties in the Religious Courts. In the end, judges in trying women's cases dealing with the law must reveal factors based on principles: Appreciation for human dignity, Non-discrimination, Gender Equality, Equality before the law, Justice, Utilization, for the sake of legal certainty.

ON THE CONCEPT AND CONTENT OF “ANOTHER ORDER OF PRE-TRIAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES, ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT”

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-298
Author(s):  
D.G. FILCHENKO ◽  
E.A. EVTUKHOVICH
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Critical Assessment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Dispute Settlement Procedure ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
The Impact

The article analyzes the provisions of the arbitration procedural legislation and the practice of its application on a different pre-trial dispute settlement procedure established by the contract. A different pre-trial procedure is considered as an alternative to the general claim procedure for resolving disputes. The characteristic features of a different pre-trial order have been revealed. The authors summarized the practice of arbitration courts, highlighting other demanded pre-trial dispute settlement procedures. In particular, examples of atypical other methods of dispute settlement are provided. Separately, the issue of the admissibility of the cancellation of the general claim procedure for the settlement of disputes by the agreement was considered. An independent subject of the authors’ analysis was mediation as a pre-trial dispute settlement procedure. The work also focuses on the impact of a different pre-trial dispute settlement procedure on the course of the limitation period. The article discusses the provisions of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 22 June 2021 No. 18 “On Some Issues of Pre-Trial Settlement of Disputes Considered in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings”. Some of the recommendations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation received critical assessment. The authors note the existing contradictions in the legislation and possible ways to overcome them, formulate individual conclusions as a result of studying the materials of the practice of arbitration courts.

scholarly journals MENGGALI ‘ILLAT HUKUM PERBEDAAN AGAMA SEBAGAI HALANGAN WARIS

EMPIRISMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Isna Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Religious Courts

Kompilasi Hukum Islam does not regulate interfaith inheritance distinctly. It only requires the testator and the heirs have the same religion. At court, judges of religious courts employ obligatory bequest (waṣiat wājibah) to divide inheritance to non-Muslim heirs, based on jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Number 368 K/AG/1995. As the result, different faith still become hindrance for Muslim and non-Muslim to inherit each other due to law enforcement without considering the legal reasoning (ratio legis) of the law. In this case, it is important to investigate the legal reason (ratio legis) of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance as this article tries to do. To do the investigation, the author employs Islamic legal theories (uṣūl fikih) and hermeneutics approach. As the result, the author comes to the conclusion that the ratio legis of the hadith that prohibits the interfaith inheritance is due to hostility and crime element and not due to different faith. Keywords: Interfaith Inheritance, Ratio Legis, Equality

scholarly journals ANALISIS KEABSAHAN KEPUTUSAN GUBERNUR JAWA TENGAH NOMOR 660.1/6 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG IZIN LINGKUNGAN KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN PABRIK PT SEMEN INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1288
Author(s):  
Arief Hidayat ◽  
Ahmad Redi
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Central Java ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Force

The State of Indonesia is a State of Law. But, in fact the ideals of the idea of the State of Law that was built by developing the legal tool itself as a system that is functional and just to achieve community welfare and social justice has not been optimally done. This is reflected in the new Environmental Permit issued by Central Java Governor Ganjar Pranowo (No. 660.1 / 6 of 2017 on Environmental Permit for Mining and Construction Activities of PT Semen Indonesia Plant) is considered to have injured the ideals of the law itself. The new Environmental Permit is contradictory to the content of the Review Judgment issued by the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Verdict Decision Number 99 PK / Tun 2016), because in the ruling it ordered that the Governor Replace the old Environmental Permit, which was issued in 2012 and did not issue New Environmental Permit. The verdict contains the basis of judges' consideration in deciding cases that have reflected fairness and legal certainty. The result of the research on the validity of the Environmental Permit Decree on the Review Judgment issued by the Supreme Court concluded that the decree should be invalid because it is not in line with the decision of the court which has permanent legal force.

scholarly journals MODEL PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN PARTAI POLITIK SECARA INTERNAL MAUPUN EKSTERNAL (The Model of Political Party Dispute Settlement Internally and Externally)

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Tri Cahya Indra Permana
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Other ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Undang-Undang Parpol mengatur bahwa perselisihan Parpol diselesaikan secara internal oleh Mahkamah Partai atau sebutan lain daripada itu dan secara eksternal oleh Pengadilan Negeri dan Mahkamah Agung. Substansi perselisihan yang final dan mengikat di Mahkamah Partai adalah perselisihan kepengurusan, selebihnya dapat diajukan upaya hukum ke Pengadilan Negeri dan Mahkamah Agung. Di dalam praktek, pengaturan tersebut telah menjauhkan dari rasa keadilan, kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan, oleh karenanya sebaiknya direvisi yang mana perselisihan PAW, pelanggaran terhadap hak anggota partai politik, penyalahgunaan wewenang,  pertanggungjawaban keuangan, dan atau keberatan terhadap keputusan partai politik (termasuk keputusan untuk tidak memutuskan terhadap sesuatu hal) final dan mengikat dengan Putusan MPP. Sedangkan perselisihan kepengurusan dapat diajukan upaya hukum ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Political parties act stipulates that a political party dispute resolved internally by the Mahkamah Partai or other designation of that and externally resolved by the District Court and the Supreme Court. The dispute substance in Mahkamah Partai which is final and binding is about organization dispute, the other can be settled in District Court and the Supreme Court. In practice, that arrangement makes the decision apart from the sense of justice, legal certainty and utility. Therefore, these rules should be revised so that the regulation of PAW, violations of the rights of members of political parties, abuse of authority, financial liability, or an objection to the decision of political parties (including the decision not to decide on something) is final and binding through Mahkamah Partai decision. While the organization disputes can be submitted to the Constitutional Court for legal action.

scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 501 K/ PDT.SUS-PHI/ 2016 Tentang Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-148
Author(s):  
Sonhaji Sonhaji
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Employment Agreement ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Industrial Dispute ◽  
The Law ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this study is to know that the Certain Working Agreement on Oral Time is not allowed in the legislation, the Supreme Court judges consideration in deciding the case Number 501 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2016 and the conformity of the decision with the law applicable in Indonesia. This study uses normative juridical method, which is analytical descriptive, with data collection method in the form of library study and supported by interview with judges. The results of the research show that First, the judge's decision is unfair to both parties litigation because the defendant is not punished to pay the wage of suspension (wage process) with emphasis on the consideration of unwritten PKWT so that by law become PKWTT. Second The process wage demands which are not accepted by the judge are contrary to the laws and regulations on employment and on the settlement of industrial relations disputes because the law requires that workers and employers continue to perform their obligations until the establishment of an Industrial Dispute Settlement Institution, including the obligation of employers to pay the wage of a suspension (wages process). So the Supreme Court Decision Number 501 K / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2016 is less in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. Keywords: Oral Employment Agreement, Termination Dispute, Employment

scholarly journals RESTRICTIONS ON THE RELIGIOUS JUDICIARYS’ AUTHORITY AS A RESULT OF JUDICIAL POWER CONFLICT RULES

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts

The new authorities of religious courts, particularly in Economics Sharia field still collide with other rules. This writing intends to identify the rules conflict  that exist. Based on the analysis, can be identified the rule conflict  relating to the authority of the judge occurs on the peace effort. Rules of conflict regarding peace with instrument PerMA No.1 year 2008 can be accessed by using the principle of lex superior derogat legi law priori, whereas with regard to the authority prosecuting Sharia Board of arbitration verdict temporarily can use the verdict of the Supreme Court of Cassation Number 56/PK/AG/2011, however this is still not final because we are not wedded to the binding force principle of precedent. The next rule of conflict is related with judgement authority to the bankruptcy matter. On this occasion, the author gives suggestions to immediately syncronize authorities prosecutes’ rules, so it can give birth to legal certainty. Keyword: authority to prosecute, peace, The National Syariah Board Of Arbitration, bankruptcy

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI ISLAM BERBASISKAN NILAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Misbahul Huda
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Economic Instruments ◽  
Business Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

<p align="center"><strong>PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI ISLAM BERBASISKAN NILAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Misbahul Huda</span></p><p align="center">Dosen Institute of Business Law and Legal Management</p><p align="center">ABSRAK</p><p>Ekonomi islam sebagai salah satu instrumen ekonomi indonesia telah menwarkan sebuah sistem yang tepat bagi keberlangsungan ekonomi nasional. Namun dalam praktiknya, sistem ekonomi islam mestinya masih perlu dilakukan perbaikan yang salah satunya dalam sistem penyelesaian sengket. Selama ini dalam praktinya sesuai dengan perundang-undangan penyelesaian sengketa dilakukan oleh pengadilan agama, akan tetap masih terbukanya peluang dalam penyelesaian segketa melalui pengadilan negeri telah membuka peluang besar bagi terciptanya ketidakpastian hukum. Disinilah perlunya mahkamah agung memberikan penegasan yang berkaitan hal-hal masalah sengketa ekonomi islam diselesaikan melalui pengadilan agam dan secara khusus kewenangan tersebut bersifat mutlak sehingga nilai penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi islam nantinya dapat berbasiskan nilai kepastian hukum.</p><p> </p><p align="left">Keyword : <em>sengketa, ekonomi islam dan kepastian hukum.</em></p><p align="left"><em> </em></p><p align="center"><strong>ISLAMIC ECONOMIC DISPUTE SETTLEMENT </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>BASED ON THE VALUE OF LEGAL DEFINITION</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Misbahul Huda</span></p><p align="center">Lecture Institute of Business Law and Legal Management</p><p align="center">Abstract</p><p>Islamic economics as one of the economic instruments in Indonesia has offered a system that is right for the sustainability of national economy. But in practice, the Islamic economic system should still need to be repaired, one of them is in the system of settlement of clutch. So far, in practice in accordance with the dispute resolution legislation carried out by religious courts, there is open opportunities in the dispute settlement through the district court. It has opened up great opportunities for the creation of legal uncertainty. This is where the necessity of the Supreme Court to provide affirmations related to issues of economic disputes of Islam. It is resolved through religious courts and specifically the authority is absolute, so that the value of Islamic economic dispute resolution will be based on the value of legal certainty.</p><p>Keyword: dispute, Islamic economy and legal certainty.</p>

scholarly journals Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1399
Author(s):  
Guntur Aris Prabowo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law

AbstractThe title of this research is “Elektonic State Administration Dispute Settlement Arrangements” provides an explanation of the legal issues discussed by the author about 1) Comparison of procedural law ini State Administrative Courts which is carried out coventionally and electronically; and 2) Constraints to the application of Electronic Court in the State Administrative Court. Rapid technological advances make it easy for humans in all area, one of which is in the law. Legal breakthroughs carried out by the Supreme Court can be seen in the existence of Electronic Court. The State Administrative Court, which is an institution under the Supreme Court, implements electronic court. The State Administrative Court has a function to protect the public against government actions and policies.Keywords: The State Administrative Court; Electronic Court; Conventional Court.AbstrakPenelitian ini yang berjudul “Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik” memberikan penjelasan pada rumusan masalah yang dibahas oleh penulis tentang 1) Perbandingan hukum acara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang dilakukan secara konvensional dengan elektronik; dan 2) Kendala penerapan Peradilan Elektronik di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kemajuan teknologi yang sangat pesat memberikan kemudahan bagi manusia di segala bidang, salah satunya adalah di bidang hukum. Terobosan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dapat dilihat dengan adanya Peradilan Elektronik. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang merupakan lembaga yang berada di bawah Mahkamah Agung menerapkan peradilan elektronik. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara memiliki fungsi untuk melindungi masyarakat terhadap tindakan dan kebijakan pemerintah.Kata Kunci: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara; Peradilan Elektronik; Peradilan Konvensional.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document