scholarly journals Urgensi Penyederhanaan Agenda Sidang Pada Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Syahrul Sajidin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Business World ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Hours

Court beside as a judicial institution, have other function to give public service. One of the good and excellent services is realized by the existence of a simple service procedure. One of the most highlighted is that there are still many trial agendas that are considered unnecessary to be delivered directly in front of the panel of judges (during the hearing). Some of these stages include the agenda for reading answers, replicating and duplicating. So that from some of these backgrounds it is necessary to examine the urgency of simplifying the civil procedure law in Indonesia. From the description of the background of the research, the formulation of the problem can be arranged as follows, what is the urgency of simplifying the session agenda by submitting the answers, replicating and duplicating in writing and how is the simplifi  cation of the Civil Procedure Law in supporting the implementation of the judicial principle fast, simple and low-cost?. Simplification of civil procedural law is expected to be able to reduce the hours of the trial so that with fewer trial agendas the session becomes effective and efficient. In order for the simplification of civil procedural law to be able to bring maximum results, the Supreme Court needs to prepare several things. With the stages of building the system, managing the system, utilizing technology, increasing the role of the business world, developing HR capacity and implementing development in a systematic and measurable manner.

scholarly journals REFORM OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW AT THE APPELLATE-LEVEL COURTS IN INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amir Hamzah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court

AbstractThe frst court and the appellate-level court serve as the judex facti, but there are different regulations about procedural law in HIR, RBG, and Law No. 20 of 1947. It causes high fling of cassation appeals. As a result, the Supreme Court is impaired in fostering and developing the (civil) law due to it being hectic from examining cases. Through reform of civil procedure law of the appellate­level court (PT), the court will be placed in the appropriate position as the means of fltering proceedings, so that not all cases can be fled for a cassation appeal. It is also the time to revoke Law No. 20 of 1947.IntisariPada dasarnya Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tinggi diposisikan sebagai judex facti. Namun demikian, terdapat beberapa pengaturan mengenai hukum acara perdata mulai dari HIR, RBG hingga UU No.20 Tahun 1947 yang mengatur hal tersebut secara berbeda. Akibatnya, pengajuan kasasi meningkat sehinggamengganggu fokus Mahkamah Agung melaksanakan fungsi pembinaan hukum. Seharunya pengadilan banding diposisikan sebagai penyaring sehingga tidak semua kasus dapat diajukan ke banding dan kasasi. Selain itu, melalui pembaharuan hukum ini juga UU Nomor 20 Tahun 1947.

scholarly journals Environmental Dispute Resolution Through Class Action Lawsuit

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
K. Tjukup ◽  
P.R. A. Potra ◽  
P.A.H. Martana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The United States ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court

The procedural  law  of Class Action  is  a legal  concept  known  in  the Anglo-Saxon  legal  system  (Common  Law). Whilst  this  concept  is  not  recognised   in  the  Continental  European  legal  system  (Civil  Law),  likewise  in  Indonesian  civil procedure  that based on Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (H.I.R) and Rechtsreglement  voor de Buitengewesten  (RBg). Initially, the procedural  law of class action in Indonesian  legal  system was arranged consecutively under Law No. 23 of 1997  (Environmental Protection  Law), Law No.  8  of  1999  on Consumer Protection  and Law No. 41 of  1999  on Forestry.  The arrangement  of class action lawsuit  in the substantive  law was inspired by the recognition  of class action lawsuit  in the United  States through Article 23 of the US Federal  Rule of Civil Procedure  prescribing  that the requirements  for filing class action  lawsuit are as follows: numerosity,  commonality, typicality,  and adequacy of representation.  In Indonesia there is no procedural  law setting out the class action  lawsuit,  thus  Supreme  Court  Regulation   No.   1      of  2002  was  enacted.  The  replacement   of Law  No.  23  of  1997 (Environmental  Protection Law) by Law No. 32 of 2009 (Environmental  Protection and Management Law) allows the application of the class action with reference to this Supreme Court Regulation.  The arrangement of class action lawsuit in the Supreme Court Regulation No.  1    of 2002 still  encounters many challenges in its application.  The initial process i.e. certification  is very decisive whether the lawsuit  can be accepted  or is  qualified  as a class action lawsuit. In conjunction with this, the judges'  active role is very  important  whilst  waiting  for a specific  and adequate  legislation  to establish  the class action  procedure.  Meanwhilst,  the judges  are supposed to patch up the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1   of 2002.  Keywords:  Environmental Disputes, Procedural Law,  Class Action Lawsuit

Access to the Supreme Court – Polish Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 233-244
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Zembrzuski
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
View Selection ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Special Character ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Preliminary Selection

The article presents the evolution of cassation complaint in Polish civil procedure. The author describes the nature of this appellate measure and the requirements of its admissibility. Aditionally, the text provides an insight into a preliminary procedure designed to select cassation complaints, which will be subsequently examined by the Supreme Court on the merits. The author depicts the evolution of Polish cassation into an extraordinary appellate measure and analyses how it has affected access to the Supreme Court. He argues that the preliminary acceptance procedure does not constitute a limitation of the admissibility of the cassation complaint. It is an additional, independent instrument regulating access to the Supreme Court. In his view, selection of admissible complaints with regard to preliminary acceptance is a better solution than developing limitations related to the admissibility of cassation complaints. The author concludes that requirements for cassation complaints are high and difficult to fulfil. The special character of cassation complaint, the relevance of the institution of preliminary selection, as well as other limitations, justify the thesis that Polish procedural law provides only a narrow access to the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals SMALL CLAIM COURT : PRINCIPLE CONCRETIZATION IN LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
Peni Rinda
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Simple Action ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Trial Evidence

The purpose of this research is to examine the provisions of civil procedural law in settling a lawsuit, to know the form of simple, fast, and low-cost concretization in simple lawsuit settlement. The research method uses the research object of simple, fast, and low-cost concretization in the settlement of a simple claim, normative juridical approach, the type of data used in this study is secondary data, which is sourced from the literature. Secondary data consists of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, legal material collection techniques carried out by literature and the internet, while the data analysis method is analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results show that the provisions of civil procedural law in resolving claims in court so far have been using the basis of HIR, which do not differentiate between complicated and simple case examinations so that the time for settlement is the same. The process starting from submitting/registering a lawsuit, determining the day of trial by the head of the panel of judges, the parties being summoned appropriately, the trial, evidence to the verdict took a long time, namely 6 months (SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR No. 6 of 1992), so the Supreme Court issued SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR No. 2 of 2014 which provides a time limit for completing the case of five (5) months. The simple, fast, and low-cost principles of concretizing a small claim court can be seen in the settlement stage. Settlement of a simple lawsuit is divided into 4 (four) stages, namely: 1), preliminary stage, 2) stage of case examination, 3). The objection request stage and 4), the simple action decision stage. This simple lawsuit settlement process should take a maximum of 25 (twenty-five) days. The simple principle is embodied in the shortened settlement process mechanism, the fast principle is realized within 25 days of completion, a peace that does not use the provisions of Supreme Court rules No.1 of 2016, while the principle of low cost is realized from a simple settlement mechanism, will be affected by the cost of the case.

scholarly journals Legal Domicile of the Parties in a Simple Lawsuit

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Artha Ully
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Legal Counsel ◽  
Legal Representative ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
The Right

<p class="IABSSS">The purpose of this paper is to examine the publication of Perma No. 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Settling a Simple Lawsuit. Perma can be seen as one solution to meet the needs of the community for dispute resolution procedures quickly and simply. The substance contained in Perma is to uphold the principle of justice which is simple, fast, and low cost. Therefore, the requirements in a simple lawsuit are limited in nature, where if one of the conditions is not fulfilled, the case cannot be resolved through the Simple Lawsuit Procedure in accordance with Perma No. 2 of 2015. The results of the author's research, the Perma substance is needed to be improved, because the limitation of jurisdiction is only one legal domicile and the use of legal counsel in a simple claim is something that needs to be regulated in more detail, in the future to further encourage the use of a simple claim mechanism as a instrument of applying the principle of justice that is simple, fast, and low cost in Indonesia. The Supreme Court needs to regulate in more detail the role of the attorney in simple lawsuits, such as regulating the right to speak a legal representative and the problem of the absence of the principal in the event that the party is a legal entity; Electronic calling via Sms, whasapp and email can be an alternative used in the calling process, so Perma should regulate in more detail the terms and conditions of the validity of the information technology-based calling.</p><p class="IABSSS"> </p><p class="IABSSS">Tujuan penulisan ini adalah  untuk menelaah penerbitan Perma No. 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Perma itu dapat dipandang sebagai salah satu solusi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat terhadap prosedur penyelesaian sengketa dengan cepat dan sederhana. Substansi yang terkandung di dalam Perma yaitu menjunjung asas peradilan yang sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya ringan. Oleh karena ini persyaratan dalam gugatan sederhana bersifat limitatif, di mana bila salah satu syarat tidak dipenuhi, maka perkara tersebut tidak dapat diselesaikan  melalui Prosedur Gugatan Sederhana sesuai PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015. Hasil penelitian penulis, substansi Perma diperlukan pernyempurnaan, karena pembatasan yurisdiksi hanya pada satu domisili hukum dan penggunaan kuasa hukum dalam gugatan sederhana merupakan hal yang perlu diatur secara lebih rinci, di masa yang akan datang untuk lebih mendorong penggunaan mekanisme gugatan sederhana sebagai instrumen penerapan asas peradilan yang sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya ringan di Indonesia. Mahkamah Agung perlu mengatur lebih rinci peran kuasa hukum dalam gugatan sederhana, seperti mengatur hak bicara kuasa hukum dan masalah ketidakhadiran prinsipal dalam hal pihak adalah badan hukum; Pemanggilan secara elektronik melalui SMS, WA dan email dapat menjadi alternatif yang digunakan dalam proses pemanggilan, maka PERMA sebaiknya mengatur secara lebih rinci syarat dan ketentuan keabsahan pemanggilan berbasis teknologi informasi tersebut.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Precedentes e jurisdição constitucional no novo Código de Processo Civil

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (35) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano Gonçalves Feitosa ◽  
Bernardo Silva de Seixas ◽  
Jhennifer Cristine Souza Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Federal Court ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Innovation

Precedentes e jurisdição constitucional no Novo Código de Processo CivilPrecedents and constitutional jurisdiction in the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure Adriano Gonçalves Feitosa[1]Bernardo Silva de Seixas[2]Jhennifer Cristine Souza Pinto[3] RESUMO: Este trabalho pretende demonstrar a realidade inaugurada pelo NCPC – Novo Código de Processo Civil (CPC/2015) –, apontando-lhe as inovações pertinentes ao exercício jurisdicional, à medida que o novo código, em consonância com o moderno direito processual constitucional, reforça a vinculação de certas decisões e as adequa à teoria dos precedentes judiciais. Paralelamente, é necessário comentar, em linhas gerais e numa perspectiva histórica, a respeito da interação entre os sistemas do Common Law e do Civil Law no sistema brasileiro e sua influência ao longo da trajetória de consolidação da jurisdição constitucional e processual pátria. Afinal, melhor se compreende o NCPC diante das reformas processuais promovidas ainda durante a vigência do CPC/1973. Por fim, evidencia-se o papel do Supremo Tribunal Federal como Corte Constitucional e a motivação que isso representa para a força dos precedentes no CPC/2015. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Precedentes. Novo Código de Processo Civil. Controle de Constitucionalidade. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ABSTRACT: This paper aims to show the news introduced by the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (CPC/2015), pointing out the relevant innovations in the judicial exercise, so far as the legal innovation, in line with the modern constitutional Procedural Law, reinforces the binding quality of certain judicial decisions based on a theory of legal precedents. At the same time, it had to be commented, very briefly and in a historical perspective, on the interaction between the systems of Common Law and Civil Law in the Brazilian legal system and its influence over the consolidation path of constitutional and procedural jurisdiction. After all, the NCPC can be understood through the procedural reforms promoted during the term of the old procedural law (CPC/1973). Finally, this paper highlights the role of the Supreme Court as a Constitutional Court and what this represent for the precedents in the New Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. KEYWORDS: Precedents. New Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure. Judicial Review. Brazilian Supreme Federal Court.[1] Graduando em Direito (Universidade Federal do Amazonas – UFAM).[2] Professor da Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) e do Centro Universitário de Ensino Superior do Amazonas (CIESA). Mestre em Sistema Constitucional de Garantia de Direitos (Instituição Toledo de Ensino – ITE, 2014). Especialista em Direito Processual (Centro Universitário de Ensino Superior do Amazonas – CIESA, 2013). Graduado em Direito (Centro Universitário de Ensino Superior do Amazonas – CIESA, 2011).[3] Graduanda em Direito (Universidade Federal do Amazonas – UFAM).

scholarly journals PERAN LEMBAGA PERADILAN DALAM PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM DALAM PERKARA PERDATA

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng Ariadi ◽  
Trisadini P. Usanti ◽  
Johan Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Of Appeal

In order to application of judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost is to reduce accumulation of cases in the Supreme Court especially at the level of Cassation. Along with the increasing number of incoming cases, and was sentenced in the District Court and Court of Appeal, the amount of the proposed decision legal remedy of Cassation to the Supreme Court also increased and began to be a serious problem. For that we need to do some research on role of Judiciary in Legal action restrictions in order to reduce the accumulation of civil cases. Penerapan asas peradilan yang sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan bertujuan untuk mengurangi penumpukkan perkara di Mahkamah Agung, terutama pada tingkat Kasasi. Seiring dengan makin meningkatnya jumlah perkara yang masuk, dan diputus di PN dan PT, jumlah putusan yang diajukan upaya hukum Kasasi ke MA juga semakin meningkat dan mulai menjadi masalah serius. Untuk itu perlu dilakukan suatu penelitian tentang Peran Lembaga Peradilan dalam Pembatasan Upaya Hukum dalam rangka mengurangi penumpukkan perkara perdata.

scholarly journals Legal Domicile of the Parties in a Simple Lawsuit

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Artha Ully
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Legal Counsel ◽  
Legal Representative ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Principle Of Justice ◽  
The Right

<p class="IABSSS">The purpose of this paper is to examine the publication of Perma No. 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Settling a Simple Lawsuit. Perma can be seen as one solution to meet the needs of the community for dispute resolution procedures quickly and simply. The substance contained in Perma is to uphold the principle of justice which is simple, fast, and low cost. Therefore, the requirements in a simple lawsuit are limited in nature, where if one of the conditions is not fulfilled, the case cannot be resolved through the Simple Lawsuit Procedure in accordance with Perma No. 2 of 2015. The results of the author's research, the Perma substance is needed to be improved, because the limitation of jurisdiction is only one legal domicile and the use of legal counsel in a simple claim is something that needs to be regulated in more detail, in the future to further encourage the use of a simple claim mechanism as a instrument of applying the principle of justice that is simple, fast, and low cost in Indonesia. The Supreme Court needs to regulate in more detail the role of the attorney in simple lawsuits, such as regulating the right to speak a legal representative and the problem of the absence of the principal in the event that the party is a legal entity; Electronic calling via Sms, whasapp and email can be an alternative used in the calling process, so Perma should regulate in more detail the terms and conditions of the validity of the information technology-based calling.</p><p class="IABSSS"> </p><p class="IABSSS">Tujuan penulisan ini adalah  untuk menelaah penerbitan Perma No. 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Perma itu dapat dipandang sebagai salah satu solusi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat terhadap prosedur penyelesaian sengketa dengan cepat dan sederhana. Substansi yang terkandung di dalam Perma yaitu menjunjung asas peradilan yang sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya ringan. Oleh karena ini persyaratan dalam gugatan sederhana bersifat limitatif, di mana bila salah satu syarat tidak dipenuhi, maka perkara tersebut tidak dapat diselesaikan  melalui Prosedur Gugatan Sederhana sesuai PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015. Hasil penelitian penulis, substansi Perma diperlukan pernyempurnaan, karena pembatasan yurisdiksi hanya pada satu domisili hukum dan penggunaan kuasa hukum dalam gugatan sederhana merupakan hal yang perlu diatur secara lebih rinci, di masa yang akan datang untuk lebih mendorong penggunaan mekanisme gugatan sederhana sebagai instrumen penerapan asas peradilan yang sederhana, cepat, dan berbiaya ringan di Indonesia. Mahkamah Agung perlu mengatur lebih rinci peran kuasa hukum dalam gugatan sederhana, seperti mengatur hak bicara kuasa hukum dan masalah ketidakhadiran prinsipal dalam hal pihak adalah badan hukum; Pemanggilan secara elektronik melalui SMS, WA dan email dapat menjadi alternatif yang digunakan dalam proses pemanggilan, maka PERMA sebaiknya mengatur secara lebih rinci syarat dan ketentuan keabsahan pemanggilan berbasis teknologi informasi tersebut.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals MENCIPTAKAN SISTEM PERADILAN EFISIEN DENGAN SISTEM E-COURT PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SE-TANGERANG RAYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Susanto Susanto ◽  
Muhamad Iqbal ◽  
Wawan Supriyatna
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court System ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Effective Role ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Based on the Decree of the Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 305/SEK/SK/VII/2018, the Supreme Court has chosen 17 District Courts, 6 State Administrative Courts and 9 Religious Courts as the Pilot Project Court for the e-court Application. On this basis, the sample of the court taken by the author is the District Court and Religious Court which is located in Tangerang Raya. The author will focus on the effectiveness and efficiency with regard to the role of the e-court system in the administrative system of the district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya. The large amount of time and files involved are considered far from the principles of fast, simple and low cost trial. It is hoped that time and cost efficiency problems can be resolved with E-court. To prove the test of the effective role of e-court in realizing fast, simple and low cost judiciary from the segmentation of district and religious courts in Tangerang Raya, the E-court system in state and religious courts in the Greater Tangerang area in segmentation creates efficiency in the case administration service process.

scholarly journals The Application of e-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-56
Author(s):  
Sahira Jati Pratiwi ◽  
Steven Steven ◽  
Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Legal Services ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Role Of Information

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 was an era marked by the carrying out of various technology-based human activities as a result of the transformation of life. This revolution has penetrated into various sectors of life, including the rule of justice. In order to face this revolution, the court is demanded to be able to provide legal services electronically through an application called e-Court. This application is an embodiment of The Electronic Justice System which has become a commitment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the aim to synergize the role of information technology and procedural law. The presence of e-Court is expected to be able to overcome various problems in the Indonesian judicial process, such as the resolution of disputes that are running slowly, less responsive courts, and expensive judicial costs. Juridically, Law Number 48 of 2009 contains judicial principles. As stated in the law, cases submitted to the court must be resolved quickly, simply, and at a low cost. This means that the whole judicial process must be carried out with regard to effectiveness and efficiency in order to overcome obstacles in the justice administration. Thus, the presence of e-Court is expected to overcome various problems in the administration of justice with technology-based services. These services include online case registration, online case fee down payment, online party summons, and electronic trials. Therefore, this paper intends to describe the problems and challenges e-Court application in an effort to face the industrial revolution 4.0 in Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document