scholarly journals Experimental Study on Sweep Characteristics of Gas Gravity Drainage in the Interlayer Oil Reservoir

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Yu ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Daiyu Zhou ◽  
Fuyong Wang ◽  
Shi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Physical Models ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Movement Direction ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Gas Oil ◽  
Hydrocarbon Gas

Stable gas gravity drainage is considered an effective method to enhance oil recovery, especially suitable for deep buried, large dip angle, and thick oil reservoirs. The influence of reservoir heterogeneity on controlling the gas–oil interface and sweep characteristics of injected gas is particularly important to design reservoir development schemes. In this study, according to the interlayer characteristics of Donghe carboniferous oil reservoirs in the Tarim Basin, NW China, 2D visual physical models are established, in which the matrix permeability is 68.1 mD and average pore throat radius is 60 nm. Then, hydrocarbon gas gravity drainage simulation experiments are carried out systematically, and a high-speed camera is used to record the process of gas–oil flow and interface movement. In this experiment, the miscible zone of crude oil and hydrocarbon gas is observed for the first time. The interlayer has an obvious shielding influence, which can destroy the stability of the gas–oil interface and miscible zone, change the movement direction of the gas–oil interface, and reduce the final oil recovery after gravity drainage. The remaining oil mainly is distributed near the interlayers. The higher displacement pressure leads to increased stability of the gas–oil displacement front and later gas breakthrough, which leads to higher oil recovery. The lower gas injection rate contributes to a slower front velocity and wider miscible zone, which could delay gas breakthrough. For the immiscible gas gravity drainage, there is a critical gas injection rate, with which the oil recovery factor is the highest.

Unsteady-State Distributions of Fluid Compositions in Two-Phase Oil Reservoirs Undergoing Gas Injection

1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. McFarlane ◽  
T.D. Mueller ◽  
F.G. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Gas Storage ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Oil Reservoir ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Secondary Recovery ◽  
Compositional Effects ◽  
Gas Cycling

Abstract During the process of gas storage in pressure-depleted oil reservoirs, it has been observed that in some instances additional liquid oil is recovered and that the composition of the storage gas is materially altered. A mathematical study was made of the dynamic behavior of such a depleted oil reservoir undergoing gas injection. The important variable considered in this study, not included in previously published work, was that of compositional effects on the phase behavior of two-phase flow. Pressure, saturation and component composition profiles were developed for a linear, horizontal and homogeneous porous medium containing oil and gas but undergoing dry gas injection. Special new techniques were developed to overcome the problems of numerical smoothing which arise in the solution of the equations representing such systems. The method of solution includes the development of partial differential equations describing the behavior of the system, representing these equations by finite difference approximations, making certain simplifying assumptions and, finally, applying methods of numerical analysis with the aid of a high-speed digital computer. In an example calculation, results using the mathematical model are compared with field observations made on a gas storage project in Clay County, Tex. This field project involved a depleted oil reservoir used' for gas storage and gas cycling purposes. As a result of these processes, the reservoir yielded substantial amounts of secondary oil, both in the form of stock tank oil and as vaporized products in the produced gas. The methods derived in this study may be applied to a variety of oil reservoir problems which are dependent on compositional effects. INTRODUCTION In recent years the number of oil reservoirs being used for gas storage purposes has increased greatly, and there has been at least one published account of additional oil recovery resulting from gas cycling a depleted oil reservoir after repressuring with dry gas for storage purposes. Additional oil recovery from oil reservoirs resulting from gas storage operations could become an important secondary recovery process. This is especially true since the use of natural gas in large metropolitan areas continues to increase and more gas storage volume near these areas is needed. These facts provided the motivation for the work reported here. This paper reports on a study of the inter-relations of composition, saturation and pressure changes which occur when hydrocarbon gas is injected into an oil reservoir system. From an understanding of the process, prediction methods may be developed for use in forecasting the secondary recovery products from gas storage operations in oil reservoirs and, consequently, .the economics of such projects can be developed.

scholarly journals Simulation Study of Allied In-Situ Injection and Production for Enhancing Shale Oil Recovery and CO2 Emission Control

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3961
Author(s):  
Haiyang Yu ◽  
Songchao Qi ◽  
Zhewei Chen ◽  
Shiqing Cheng ◽  
Qichao Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Co2 Emission ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Shale Oil ◽  
Shale Oil Reservoirs

The global greenhouse effect makes carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction an important task for the world, however, CO2 can be used as injected fluid to develop shale oil reservoirs. Conventional water injection and gas injection methods cannot achieve desired development results for shale oil reservoirs. Poor injection capacity exists in water injection development, while the time of gas breakthrough is early and gas channeling is serious for gas injection development. These problems will lead to insufficient formation energy supplement, rapid energy depletion, and low ultimate recovery. Gas injection huff and puff (huff-n-puff), as another improved method, is applied to develop shale oil reservoirs. However, the shortcomings of huff-n-puff are the low sweep efficiency and poor performance for the late development of oilfields. Therefore, this paper adopts firstly the method of Allied In-Situ Injection and Production (AIIP) combined with CO2 huff-n-puff to develop shale oil reservoirs. Based on the data of Shengli Oilfield, a dual-porosity and dual-permeability model in reservoir-scale is established. Compared with traditional CO2 huff-n-puff and depletion method, the cumulative oil production of AIIP combined with CO2 huff-n-puff increases by 13,077 and 17,450 m3 respectively, indicating that this method has a good application prospect. Sensitivity analyses are further conducted, including injection volume, injection rate, soaking time, fracture half-length, and fracture spacing. The results indicate that injection volume, not injection rate, is the important factor affecting the performance. With the increment of fracture half-length and the decrement of fracture spacing, the cumulative oil production of the single well increases, but the incremental rate slows down gradually. With the increment of soaking time, cumulative oil production increases first and then decreases. These parameters have a relatively suitable value, which makes the performance better. This new method can not only enhance shale oil recovery, but also can be used for CO2 emission control.

scholarly journals Numerical Simulation of Immiscible CO2-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process to Enhance Oil Recovery

2020 ◽  
pp. 2004-2016
Author(s):  
Dahlia Abdulhadi Al-Obaidi ◽  
Mohammed Saleh Al-Jawad
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Effective Parameters ◽  
Water Contact ◽  
Enhance Oil Recovery

The Gas Assisted Gravity Drainage (GAGD) process has become one of the most important processes to enhance oil recovery in both secondary and tertiary recovery stages and through immiscible and miscible modes.  Its advantages came from the ability to provide gravity-stable oil displacement for improving oil recovery, when compared with conventional gas injection methods such as Continuous Gas Injection (CGI) and Water – Alternative Gas (WAG). Vertical injectors for CO2   gas were placed at the top of the reservoir to form a gas cap which drives the oil towards the horizontal oil producing wells which are located above the oil-water-contact. The GAGD process was developed and tested in vertical wells to increase oil recovery in reservoirs with bottom water drive and strong water coning tendencies. Many physical and simulation models of GAGD performance were studied at ambient and reservoir conditions to investigate the effects of this method to enhance the recovery of oil and to examine the most effective parameters that control the GAGD process.      A prototype 2D simulation model based on the scaled physical model was built for CO2-assisted gravity drainage in different statement scenarios. The effects of gas injection rate, gas injection pressure and oil production rate on the performance of immiscible CO2-assisted gravity drainage-enhanced oil recovery were investigated. The results revealed that the ultimate oil recovery increases considerably with increasing oil production rates. Increasing gas injection rate improves the performance of the process while high pressure gas injection leads to less effective gravity mediated recovery.

scholarly journals Hydrocarbon Gas Flooding Optimization considering Complex Fracture Networks through Numerical Simulation in the Tight Oil Reservoirs

Lithosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (Special 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Qin ◽  
Haochuan Zhang ◽  
Chang Liu ◽  
Haifeng Ding ◽  
Tianyu Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Tight Oil ◽  
Oil Reservoir ◽  
Fracture Networks ◽  
Complex Fracture ◽  
Gas Flooding ◽  
Hydrocarbon Gas ◽  
Tight Oil Reservoirs

Abstract Field data indicates that oil production decline quickly and the oil recovery factor is low due to low permeability and insufficient energy in the tight oil reservoirs. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is required to improve the oil production rates of tight oil reservoirs. Gas flooding is a good means to supplement formation energy and improve oil recovery factor, especially for hydrocarbon gas flooding when CO2 is insufficient. Due to the permeability in some areas is too low, the injected gas cannot spread farther, and the EOR performance is poor. So multifractured horizontal well (MFHW) are usually used to assist gas injection in oilfields. At present, there are few studies on the optimization of hydrocarbon gas flooding parameters especially under the complex fracture network. This article uses unstructured grids to characterize the complex fracture networks, which more realistically shows the flow of formation fluids. Based on actual reservoir data, this paper establishes the numerical model of hydrocarbon gas flooding under complex fracture networks. The article conducts numerical simulation to analyze the effect of different parameters on well performance and provides the optimal injection and production parameters for hydrocarbon gas flooding in the M tight oil reservoir. The optimal injection-production well spacing of the M tight oil reservoir is about 800 to 900 m. The EOR performance is better when the total gas injection rates are about 0.45 HCPV, and gas injection rates of each well are about 3000 to 3500 m3/d (0.021 to 0.025 HCPV/a). The recommended injection-production ratio is about 1.1 to 1.2. This work can offer engineers guidance for hydrocarbon gas flooding of the MFHW with complex fracture networks. Hydrocarbon gas flooding in tight oil reservoirs can enhance oil recovery. The findings of this study can help for a better understanding of the influence of different parameters on hydrocarbon gas flooding in the M tight oil reservoir. This work can also offer engineers guidance for hydrocarbon gas flooding of the MFHW with complex fracture networks.

scholarly journals Gas-assisted gravity drainage process for improved oil recovery in Bao Den fractured basement reservoir

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-168
Author(s):  
Tuan Van Nguyen ◽  
Xuan Van Tran
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
High Water ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Gravity Drainage ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
North West ◽  
Water Cut

Gas injection has been widely used for Improved Oil Recovery (IOR)/ Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes in oil reservoirs. Unlike the conventional gas injection (CGI) modes of CGI and Water Alternating Gas (WAG), the Gas-Assisted Gravity Drainage (GAGD) process takes advantage of the natural segregation of reservoir fluids to provide gravity stable oil displacement. It has been proved that GAGD Process results in better sweep efficiency and higher microscopic displacement to recover the bypassed oil from un-swept regions in the reservoir. Therefore, dry gas has been considered for injection in fractured basement reservoir, Bao Den (BD) oil field located in Cuu Long basin through the GAGD process application. This field, with a 5-year production history, has nine production wells and is surrounded by a strong active edge aquifer from the North-West and the South East flanks. The depth of basement granite top is about 2,800 mTVDss with a vertical oil column of 1,500m. The pilot GAGD project has been designed to test an isolated domain in the BD fractured basement reservoir where there is favorable reservoir conditions to implement GAGD. Both reservoir simulation and Lab test have been run and confirmed the feasibility and the benefit of GAGD project in the selected area.The Dry gas will be periodically injected through existing wellwith high water cut production that located in the isolated area. As the injected gas rises to the top to form a gas zone pushing GOC (gas oil contact) downward, and may push WOC (water oil contact) to lower part of this producer (or even away from bottom of the well bore) could lower down water cut when switch this well back to production mode. The matched reservoir model with reservoir and fluid properties have been used to implement sensitivity analysis, the result indicated that there is significantly oil incremental and water cut reduction by GAGDapplication. Many different scenarios have run to find the optimal reservoir performance through GAGD process. Among these runs, the optimal scenario, which has distinct target, requires high levels of gas injection rate to attain the maximum cumulative oil production.

scholarly journals Modeling Near-Miscible Gas Foam Injection in Fractured Tight Rocks and Its Challenges

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1998
Author(s):  
Haishan Luo ◽  
Kishore K. Mohanty
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Fractured Rock ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Gas Composition ◽  
Gas Oil ◽  
Rock Matrix ◽  
Reducing Gas ◽  
Tight Reservoirs ◽  
Modeling Strategy ◽  
Tight Rocks

Unlocking oil from tight reservoirs remains a challenging task, as the existence of fractures and oil-wet rock surfaces tends to make the recovery uneconomic. Injecting a gas in the form of a foam is considered a feasible technique in such reservoirs for providing conformance control and reducing gas-oil interfacial tension (IFT) that allows the injected fluids to enter the rock matrix. This paper presents a modeling strategy that aims to understand the behavior of near-miscible foam injection and to find the optimal strategy to oil recovery depending on the reservoir pressure and gas availability. Corefloods with foam injection following gas injection into a fractured rock were simulated and history matched using a compositional commercial simulator. The simulation results agreed with the experimental data with respect to both oil recovery and pressure gradient during both injection schedules. Additional simulations were carried out by increasing the foam strength and changing the injected gas composition. It was found that increasing foam strength or the proportion of ethane could boost oil production rate significantly. When injected gas gets miscible or near miscible, the foam model would face serious challenges, as gas and oil phases could not be distinguished by the simulator, while they have essentially different effects on the presence and strength of foam in terms of modeling. We provide in-depth thoughts and discussions on potential ways to improve current foam models to account for miscible and near-miscible conditions.

The Mechanism of Flue Gas Injection for Enhanced Light Oil Recovery

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. (Raj) Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Flue Gas ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Air Injection ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Flue Gases ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Light Oil ◽  
Light Oil Reservoirs

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

Risk Assessment and Enhanced Oil Recovery Effect of Gravity Assisted Oxygen-Reduced Air Flooding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Huang ◽  
Zongfa Li ◽  
Shaoran Ren ◽  
Yanming Liu
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Air Injection ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Risk Area ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
High Risk Area

Abstract The technology of air injection has been widely used in the second and tertiary recovery in oilfields. However, due to the injected air and natural gas will explode, the safety of the gas injection technology has attracted much attention. Gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air flooding is a new method that eliminates explosion risks and improves oil recovery in large-dip oil reservoirs or thick oil layers. The explosion limit data of different components of natural gas under high pressure were obtained through explosion experiments, which verified the suppression effect of oxygen-reduced air on explosions. The influence of natural gas composition and concentration on explosion limits was also investigated. In addition, a rotatable displacement device was used to study the feasibility of gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air injection for improving the heavy oil reservoirs recovery. Under pressure and temperature conditions of 20MPa and 371K, the sand-filled gravity flooding experiments with different dip angles were carried out using oxygen-reduced air with an oxygen content of 8%. The results show that with the increase of the reservoir dip, the pore volume of the injected fluid at the gas channeling point, the efficient development time of gas injection, and the final displacement efficiency of gas injection development all increase through gravity stabilization caused by gravity differentiation. In the presence of a dip angle, the cumulative oil production before the gas breakthrough point exceeded 80% of the oil production during the entire production process, indicating that gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air flooding is an effective and safe improving oil recovery method. Finally, the explosion risk of each link of the air injection process is analyzed, and the high-risk area and the low-risk area are determined.

Production Optimization Coupling Multiple Reservoirs and Facilities With Sour Gas Re-Injection for Miscible EOR in South Oman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamlesh Kumar ◽  
Varun Pathak ◽  
Pankaj Agrawal ◽  
Zaal Alias ◽  
Tushar Narwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Production System ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Production Optimization ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Fully Implicit ◽  
Gas Utilization ◽  
Sour Gas

Abstract Effective gas utilization is critical to any gas injection development project to maximize recoveries for a given purchase of make-up gas, whilst reducing the Green Gas House (GHG) emissions. This paper describes the use of a fully implicit Integrated Production System Model (IPSM) for two inter-connected production system networks, coupling multiple, critically sour oil reservoirs undergoing Miscible Gas Injection (MGI) for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) using produced sour gas from oil and condensate fields in South Oman. The IPSM model links sixteen reservoir models with varying levels of complexities to the facilities network. Complexities in the facilities include multiple nodal constraints that necessitate the use of an Equation of State model (EOS). The IPSM model honors the gas balance implicitly. Gas flood optimization includes prioritizing low GOR production wells (at reservoir and well level) whilst maintaining reservoir pressure above Minimum Miscibility Pressures (MMP). Development schedule optimization also helps in optimizing the compressor size, the key Capex component. Compositional modeling allows continuous tracking of souring levels at different nodes, providing integrity status of overall production system network. The current IPSM model helps in optimization of schedule for the phased development of the oil reservoirs and eventually the most efficient gas utilization. This has enabled low pressure operation in some reservoirs providing oil at very low unit technical cost while waiting for gas availability. Compositional tracking for H2S helps in operating the facilities within design limits whilst planning future developments to cater to this design. Some key parameters can be parameterized for quick sensitivity analysis for an informed decision making for business opportunities. The production potential of the system is also tracked to ensure there is a cushion in the system to deal with any unexpected changes. This feature helps in planning and optimizing the scheduled turn-around activities for these two inter-connected production system networks. The novelty of this work is collaboration across multiple disciplines, especially the surface and subsurface because of complex interactions between facilities constraints and reservoir performance (associated with produced gas reinjection). Compositional tracking and injection gas apportionment across multiple reservoirs is key to the overall value maximization in this complex development.

scholarly journals An evaluation on mechanisms of miscibility development in acid gas injection for volatile oil reservoirs

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erhui Luo ◽  
Zifei Fan ◽  
Yongle Hu ◽  
Lun Zhao ◽  
Jianjun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Gas Injection ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Gas Oil ◽  
Oil Composition ◽  
Acid Gas ◽  
Compositional Model ◽  
Injection Process ◽  
Acid Gas Injection

Produced gas containing the acid gas reinjection is one of the effective enhanced oil recovery methods, not only saving costs of disposing acid gases and zero discharge of greenhouse gases but also supporting reservoir pressure. The subsurface fluid from the Carboniferous carbonate reservoir in the southern margin of the Pre-Caspian basin in Central Asia has low density, low viscosity, high concentrations of H2S (15%) and CO2 (4%), high solution gas/oil ratio. The reservoir is lack of fresh water because of being far away onshore. Pilot test has already been implemented for the acid gas reinjection. Firstly, in our work a scheme of crude oil composition grouping with 15 compositions was presented on the basis of bottomhole sampling from DSTs of four wells. After matching PVT physical experiments including viscosity, density and gas/oil ratio and pressure–temperature (P–T) phase diagram by tuning critical properties of highly uncertain heavy components, the compositional model with phase behavior was built under meeting accuracy of phase fitting, which was used to evaluate mechanism of miscibility development in the acid gas injection process. Then using a cell-to-cell simulation method, vaporizing and/or condensing gas drive mechanisms were investigated for mixtures consisting of various proportions of CH4, CO2 and H2S in the gas injection process. Moreover, effects of gas compositions on miscible mechanisms have also been determined. With the aid of pressure-composition diagrams and pseudoternary diagrams generated from the Equation of State (EoS), pressures of First Contact Miscibility (FCM) and Multiple Contact Miscibility (MCM) for various gases mixing with the reservoir oil sample under reservoir temperature were calculated. Simulation results show that pressures of FCM are higher than those of MCM, and CO2 and H2S are able to reduce the miscible pressure. At the same time, H2S is stronger. As the CH4 content increases, both pressures of FCM and MCM are higher. But incremental values of MCM decrease. In addition, calculated envelopes of pseudoternary diagrams for mixtures of CH4, CO2 and H2S gases of varying composition with acid gas injection have features of bell shape, hourglass shape and triangle shape, which can be used to identify vaporizing and/or condensing gas drives. Finally, comparison of the real produced gas and the one deprived of its C3+ was performed to determine types of miscibility and calculate pressures of FCM and MCM. This study provides a theoretical guideline for selection of injection gas to improve miscibility and oil recovery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document