Real-World Evidence for the Safety and Efficacy of CGRP Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Added to OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Migraine Prevention in Adult Patients With Chronic Migraine

Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) target different migraine pathways, therefore, combination treatment may provide additional effectiveness for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) than either treatment alone. The objective of this study was to collect real-world data to improve the understanding of the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of adding a CGRP mAb to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for the preventive treatment of CM.Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal study conducted using data extracted from a single clinical site's electronic medical records (EMR) of adult patients (≥18 years) with CM treated with ≥2 consecutive cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA before ≥1 month of continuous onabotulinumtoxinA and CGRP mAb (erenumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab) combination treatment. Safety was evaluated by the rate of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE). The proportion of patients who discontinued either onabotulinumtoxinA, a CGRP mAb, or combination treatment, and the reason for discontinuation, if available, was collected. The effectiveness of combination preventive treatment was assessed by the reduction in monthly headache days (MHD). Outcome data were extracted from EMR at the first CGRP mAb prescription (index) and up to four assessments at ~3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-index. The final analyses were based on measures consistently reported in the EMR.Results: EMR were collected for 192 patients, of which 148 met eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. Erenumab was prescribed to 56.7% of patients, fremanezumab to 42.6%, and galcanezumab to 0.7%. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) MHD were 20.4 (6.6) prior to onabotulinumtoxinA treatment and 14.0 (6.9) prior to the addition of a CGRP mAb (baseline). After real-world addition of a CGRP mAb, there were significant reductions in MHD at the first assessment (~3 months) (mean −2.6 days/month, 95% CI −3.7, −1.4) and at all subsequent visits. After ~12 months of continuous combination treatment, MHD were reduced by 4.6 days/month (95% CI −6.7, −2.5) and 34.9% of patients achieved ≥50% MHD reduction from index. AEs were reported by 18 patients (12.2%), with the most common being constipation (n = 8, 5.4% [onabotulinumtoxinA plus erenumab only]) and injection site reactions (n = 5, 3.4%). No SAEs were reported. Overall, 90 patients (60.8%) discontinued one or both treatments. The most common reason for discontinuing either treatment was lack of insurance coverage (40%); few (~14%) patients discontinued a CGRP mAb and none discontinued onabotulinumtoxinA due to safety/tolerability.Conclusion: In this real-world study, onabotulinumtoxinA was effective at reducing MHD and the addition of a CGRP mAb was safe, well-tolerated and associated with incremental and clinically meaningful reductions in MHD for those who stayed on the combination treatment. No new safety signals were identified. Of those who discontinued, the majority reported lack of insurance coverage as a reason. Prospective real-world and controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the safety and potential benefits of this combination treatment paradigm for people with CM.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of treatment with Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir / r + Dasabuvir over 8 versus 12 weeks in chronic HCV hepatitis genotype 1B

Romanian Journal of Infectious Diseases ◽

10.37897/rjid.2021.1.6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

pp. 44-50

Author(s):

Mircea Manuc ◽

◽

Carmen Monica Preda ◽

Laura Iliescu ◽

Doina Istratescu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Drop Out ◽

Real World Data ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Intention To Treat ◽

Genotype 1B ◽

Male Patients ◽

Severe Adverse Events ◽

Chronic Hcv

Background and aims. For the 8-week OPrD regimen, real world data are insufficient. This study aims to compare the efficacy of the two types of regimens (12-week versus 8-week) in a real world cohort of patients with genotype 1b. Material and methods. We analysed a multicentric retrospective cohort enrolling 1436 patients who started HCV therapy in 2018-2019. Liver fibrosis was staged in all subjects by Fibromax. Efficacy was assessed by the percentage of patients achieving SVR 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Results. Out of the 1436 analysed patients, 112 received 8 weeks therapy and 1324 received 12 weeks. In this cohort the proportion of male patients was 25.2%, the median age 61 years, 28.2% were interferon pre-treated, and the rate of co-morbidities was 47%. 42% of the subjects had F2 fibrosis, 29% F1 fibrosis, 16% F3 and 12% F4. The SVR rate was comparable in both groups of patients (97% in those treated with OPrD 12 weeks vs 96.4% in those that received OPrD 8 weeks) (by intention-to-treat). In the 12 weeks arm, the drop-out rate was 0.8% and the rate of severe adverse events was 1%, while in the arm of 8 weeks therapy there were no severe adverse events reported and no drop-out (p = 0.25). The only predictive factor for non-response in both treatment arms was the male sex. Conclusions. OPrD 8 weeks proved to be highly efficient in our patients with a 96.4% SVR. No serious adverse events and no drop out were reported.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes of metastatic renal carcinoma following disease progression to programmed death (PD)-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (I-O): A Meet-URO group real-world study (Meet-Uro 7).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. 691-691

Author(s):

Daniele Santini ◽

Marco Stellato ◽

Ugo De Giorgi ◽

Sandro Pignata ◽

Francesco Pantano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Mtor Inhibitors ◽

Outcome Data ◽

First Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

Best Response ◽

Ecog Ps ◽

Immune Oncology

691 Background: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), immune-oncology (IO), alone or in combination, (IO-IO or IO-TKI) has changed the therapeutic scenario. Few real-world data are available about safety and outcome after IO progression. Methods: Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were retrospectively collected from 162 eligible pts treated in 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group and progressing to IO. Results: 111 pts (68,5%) were treated after progression to IO. 142 (87.6%) pts received IO as second line, 5 pts as first line and 16 pts as further line. Subsequent therapy included cabozantinib (n = 79, 48.0%), everolimus (n = 11, 6.7%), sunitinib (n = 6, 3.7%) and others (n = 15, 9.25%). Median IO-PFS was 4 months (95%CI 3.1-4.8) with no difference in pts pretreated with pazopanib or sunitinib (4 months (95%CI 2.4-5.5) vs 3,9 months (95%CI 2.9-4.9) p = 0.5). PFS tends to be longer in pts reporting adverse events of any grade (5.03 (95%CI 3.8-6.1) vs 2,99 (95%CI 2.4-3.5) months p = 0.004) or without nephrectomy (4.1 vs 2.9 months p = 0.071). Median PFS, in pts treated post-IO, was 6.5 months (95%CI 5.1-7.8). In term of best response, 55 pts (49%) had stability of disease/partial response and 29 pts (26%) had progressive disease, for the other pts treatment is still ongoing. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at progression to IO, had longer PFS, 11 months (95%CI 5.7-17.5) as well as those treated with cabozantinib (7.6 months, 95%CI 5.2-10.1) compared to everolimus, (3.2 months, 95%CI 1.8-4.5) or other drugs (4.3 months, 95%CI 1.3-7.4) p = 0.001. All grade adverse events were reported in 83 pts (74%) with G3-G4 adverse events in 39 pts (35%). Median overall survival, from first line, was 41,1 months (95%CI 30.4-51.8). Conclusions: In our real world experience after progression to IO, most pts received VEGF-TKI and mTOR inhibitors that showed to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a longer mPFS.

Download Full-text

Long-term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest: Real-world results from the VIPOS study

Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders ◽

10.1177/2284026521993688 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 228402652199368

Author(s):

Sabine Moehner ◽

Kerstin Becker ◽

Jens A Lange ◽

Sophia von Stockum ◽

Marco Serrani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Health Care Professionals ◽

Study Entry ◽

Safety Signal ◽

Real World Data ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Long Term Treatment

Introduction: The Visanne Post-approval Observational Study (VIPOS) was designed to assess the safety of dienogest 2 mg (DNG, Visanne) compared to other hormonal endometriosis treatments. Methods: Large, prospective, non-interventional, active surveillance study in six European countries (Germany, Poland, Russia, Hungary, Switzerland, and Ukraine). Women with a new hormonal therapy for endometriosis were enrolled by gynecologists and specialized centers between 2010 and 2016 and observed for up to 7 years. Self-administered questionnaires during study entry and follow-up collected information on baseline characteristics, health status and endometriosis treatment. Self-reported clinical outcomes of interest were validated by health care professionals. Results: Among the >27,000 enrolled participants, 3262 women started DNG use either at study entry or during follow-up. A total of 798 study participants used DNG during follow-up continuously for 15 months or longer (DNG long-term users). When comparing the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE) in users treated with DNG, no safety signal emerged for long-term users; the SAE incidence rate per 10,000 women-years was 367.7 (95% CI: 274.1–481.9) in DNG long-term users and 416.4 (349.1–492.5) in short-term users (treated with DNG for less than 15 months). Conclusions: Previous data on DNG long-term safety were derived from studies with relatively low numbers of patients and limited follow-up time. VIPOS provided valuable real-world data on the long-term use of DNG 2 mg in around 800 women treated in Europe and observed no safety signal regarding serious adverse events.

Download Full-text

Three-year real-world outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies in patients affected by myopic choroidal neovascularization

European Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1177/1120672120963455 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 112067212096345

Author(s):

Paolo Corazza ◽

Jamil Kabbani ◽

Taha Soomro ◽

Mostafa Mohamed Ragheb Alam ◽

Francesco Maria D’Alterio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Choroidal Neovascularization ◽

Real World ◽

Adverse Event Rate ◽

Real World Data ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization ◽

Anti Vegf ◽

Significant Difference

Purpose: To describe real world data in patients affected by myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and to compare our results with previous studies and clinical trials. Methods: This retrospective monocentric cohort study analyzed 96 eyes of 96 myopic-CNV patients treated with an anti-VEGF pro-re-nata regimen over a 3-year-long follow up period. Aflibercept and Ranibizumab were considered as first-line agents whereas Bevacizumab was reserved on a compassionate basis in patients outside the criteria for treatment. All patients underwent a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) recording at each follow up visit. Results: Our data showed that all three molecules produced significant improvements in BCVA at year 1, with no significant differences between the three drugs. Moreover, during the second year of treatment, Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab showed a significant improvement in the visual function. However, at year 3 of treatment, the data available indicated the BCVA improvement was not significant with Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab. In addition, no significant difference in the average number of injections between the three groups was detected over the follow up period. No serious adverse events were recorded, but five minor adverse events documented. Conclusion: Our study correlates with previous studies showing significant BCVA gains with the use of these molecules. Similarly, all three molecules seem to provide a similar duration of effects as previous studies have shown, with a low ocular adverse event rate.

Download Full-text

TOP-PRO study: A randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraine

Cephalalgia ◽

10.1177/03331024211047454 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 033310242110474

Author(s):

Debashish Chowdhury ◽

Luv Bansal ◽

Ashish Duggal ◽

Debabrata Datta ◽

Ankit Mundra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Chronic Migraine ◽

Virus Disease ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Preventive Treatment ◽

Point Estimate ◽

Tolerability Profile ◽

Double Blind ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Mean

Objective The aim of the TOP-PRO-study, a double-blind randomized controlled trial, was to assess the efficacy (non-inferiority) and tolerability of propranolol compared to topiramate for the prevention of chronic migraine. Background Except for topiramate, oral preventive treatment for chronic migraine lacks credible evidence. Methods Chronic migraine patients aged above 18 years and less than 65 years of age, not on any preventive treatment were randomly allocated to receive topiramate (100 mg/day) or propranolol (160 mg/day). The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change in migraine days per 28 days at the end of 24 weeks from baseline. A mean difference of 1.5 days per four weeks was chosen as the cut-off delta value. Multiple secondary efficacy outcomes and treatment emergent adverse events were also assessed. Results As against the planned sample size of 244, only 175 patients could be enrolled before the spread of the corona virus disease-2019 pandemic and enforcement of lockdown in India. Of the 175 randomized patients, 95 (topiramate 46 and propranolol 49) completed the trial. The mean change in migraine days was −5.3 ± 1.2 vs −7.3 ± 1.1 days (p = 0.226) for topiramate and propranolol groups respectively. Propranolol was found to be non-inferior and not superior to topiramate (point estimate of −1.99 with a 95% confidence interval of −5.23 to 1.25 days). Multiple secondary outcomes also did not differ between the two groups. Intention to treat analysis of 175 patients and per-protocol analysis of 95 patients yielded concordant results. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion Propranolol (160mg/day) was non-inferior, non-superior to topiramate (100mg/day) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine and had a comparable tolerability profile. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India CTRI/2019/05/018997)

Download Full-text

Real-world data on initial treatment strategies for older adult patients with endometrial cancer in Japan

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology ◽

10.1007/s00280-019-03938-8 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 84 (5) ◽

pp. 1051-1058

Author(s):

Mayu Yunokawa ◽

Shinsuke Sasada ◽

Yae Takehara ◽

Kenta Takahashi ◽

Tatsunori Shimoi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endometrial Cancer ◽

Older Adult ◽

Real World ◽

Initial Treatment ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data

Download Full-text

Real world experience with coronary sinus reducer implantation for the treatment of refractory angina: a single-centre experience

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1203 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

J P Dias Ferreira Reis ◽

R Ramos ◽

P Rio ◽

A Fiarresga ◽

D Cacela ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Sinus ◽

Real World ◽

Therapeutic Option ◽

Objective Evaluation ◽

Short Version ◽

Refractory Angina ◽

Single Centre ◽

Real World Data ◽

Serious Adverse Events

Abstract Background Coronary sinus Reducer device (CSF) implantation is a novel therapeutic option to relieve symptoms in patients with refractory angina (RA). There is limited real-world data describing its use outside of clinical trials. Aim To assess the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a real-world setting. Methods This is a report of a single centre prospective registry of consecutive patients with RA (CCS II-IV) deemed unsuitable for revascularization. Between May 2017 and August 2019, 17 patients were referred to CSF implantation. Baseline and follow-up evaluation consisted of clinical assessment, including completion of the short version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) and CCS class evaluation and objective evaluation by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Results A total of 13 patients (70,6±6,5 years, 76,9% male) underwent CSF implantation with a procedural success of 84.6%. No cases of periprocedural serious adverse events were reported. At 12-month follow-up, any reduction in CCS Class was achieved in 72.7% of cases, with 27.2% reducing 2 CCS classes. Baseline CCS score was reduced from 2.8±0.4 to 1.7±0.8 (p=0.009). Quality of life (QoL) was significantly improved as assessed by the improvement seen in all items of SAQ-7 (p<0.017 for all). CPET duration was significantly increased (p=0.034), but no change was noted in the remainder CPET variables. During follow-up, 3 patients suffered myocardial infarction, resulting in 1 death. Conclusion CSF implantation in patients with RA was safe and led to a significant reduction of the angina burden and improvement of QoL at 12-month follow-up. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Efficacy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Who Did or Did Not Discontinue Treatment Due to Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Real-World Data Study

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13215550 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (21) ◽

pp. 5550

Author(s):

Morten Fink ◽

Anders Schwartz Vittrup ◽

Lars Bastholt ◽

Inge Marie Svane ◽

Marco Donia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Metastatic Melanoma ◽

Real World ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Induction Phase ◽

Discontinue Treatment ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data ◽

Significant Difference

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are very prevalent when treating patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination, and 30–40% of patients discontinue the treatment for this reason. It is of high clinical relevance to investigate the consequences of discontinuing the treatment early since combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab is the first line of treatment for many patients with metastatic melanoma. In this follow-up study, with real-world data from the nationwide DAMMED database, we investigated whether there was a difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who discontinued or did not discontinue treatment within the first four doses of treatment due to irAEs. In total, 448 patients were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab. Of these, 133 patients discontinued due to irAEs in the induction phase. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, there was no significant difference in PFS when comparing the group that discontinued with the group that did not discontinue. The group that discontinued had a significantly longer OS than the group that received the full length of treatment. Therefore, we conclude that there is no significant negative impact on efficacy for patients who discontinue due to irAEs in the induction phase of combination immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium for Injection in General Anesthesia Induction for Adult Patients: A Phase 3 Trial

Frontiers in Pharmacology ◽

10.3389/fphar.2021.687894 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Chao-Meng Wu ◽

Wen-Sheng Zhang ◽

Jin Liu ◽

Wei-Yi Zhang ◽

Bo-Wen Ke

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

General Anesthesia ◽

Success Rate ◽

Blood Pressure Reduction ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Anesthesia Induction ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Study Drug Administration

Background: Fospropofol disodium for injection (FospropofolFD) is a prodrug that is metabolized into propofol to produce a general anesthesia effect when administered intravenously.Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FospropofolFD in comparison with propofol medium/long-chain fat emulsion injections (propofol-MCT/LCT) for general anesthesia induction in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries.Setting: Nine academic medical centers in China.Method: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-simulated, controlled, and non-inferiority trial evaluated 540 eligible adult patients randomly assigned (2:1) to the intervention (20 mg/kg FospropofolFD) or control (2 mg/kg propofol-MCT/LCT) groups.Main Outcome Measure: The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate, defined as a Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score of 1 within 5 min after study drug administration. The safety endpoints consisted of adverse events (AEs) related to consciousness, cognitive function, hemodynamic status, liver and kidney function, and blood tests.Results: A total of 347 (96.3%) and 175 (97.2%) patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, completed the study. The success rate for the primary outcome was 97.7% for both study drugs. The most frequent AEs in the intervention group were abnormal feeling (62.0%), blood pressure reduction (13.5%), and injection site pain (13.3%). No AEs related to consciousness and mental and cognitive functions or serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion: FospropofolFD (20 mg/kg) is not inferior to propofol-MCT/LCT (2 mg/kg) in general anesthesia induction for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II adult patients undergoing elective surgeries. It is safe and effective for clinical use under anesthesiologist monitoring.Impact on Practice Statement: FospropofolFD can produce a general anesthesia effect and reduce the incidence of pain at the site of injection.

Download Full-text

Achieving blood pressure control targets in hypertensive patients of rural China – A pilot randomized trial

10.21203/rs.2.12264/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Xiao Huang ◽

Lishun Liu ◽

Yun Song ◽

Lan Gao ◽

Min Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Randomized Trial ◽

Real World ◽

Large Scale ◽

Rural China ◽

Standard Group ◽

Open Label ◽

Target Groups ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Hypertensive Patients

Abstract Background This study aimed to test the feasibility and titration methods to achieve specific BP control targets in hypertensive patients of rural China. Methods A randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted in Rongcheng, China. We enrolled 105 hypertensive participants aged over 60 years, and who had no history of stroke and cardiovascular disease. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three systolic BP target groups: standard: 140 - < 150mmHg; moderately intensive: 130 - < 140mmHg; and intensive: <130mmHg. Patients were followed for 6 months. Discussion The optimal target for SBP lowering is still uncertain worldwide and such information is critically needed, especially in China. However, in China the rates of awareness, treatment and control are only 46.9%, 40.7% and 15.3%, respectively. It is challenging to achieve BP control in the real world and it is very important to develop population-specific BP control protocols that fully consider the population’s characteristics, such as age, sex, socio-economic status, compliance, education level and lifestyle. This randomized trial showed feasibility and safety of the titration protocol to achieve desirable SBP targets (<150, <140, and <130mmHg) in a sample of rural Chinese hypertensive patients. The three BP target groups had similar baseline characteristics. After 6 months of treatment, the mean SBP measured at an office visit was 137.2mmHg, 131.1mmHg, and 124.2mmHg in the three groups. Home BP and central aortic BP measurements were also obtained. At 6 months, home BP measurements (2 hours after drug administration) showed a mean SBP of 130.9 mmHg in the standard group, 124.9 mmHg in the moderately intense group, and 119.7 mmHg in the intensive group. No serious adverse events were recorded over the 6-month study period. Rates of adverse events including dry cough, palpitations, and arthralgia were low and showed no significant differences between the three groups. This trial gained real world experience and laid the foundation for a future large-scale BP target study.

Download Full-text