scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of HCC

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clelia Donisi ◽  
Marco Puzzoni ◽  
Pina Ziranu ◽  
Eleonora Lai ◽  
Stefano Mariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Adoptive Cell Transfer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Combination Strategy ◽  
Line Setting

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the typical inflammation-induced neoplasia. It often prospers where a chronic liver disease persists, thus leading a strong rationale for immune therapy. Several immune-based treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), cytokines, adoptive cell transfer, and vaccines, have been tested in the treatment of HCC. In this review, we summarize the role of the ICI in HCC patients in various sets of treatment. As for advanced HCC, the anti-Programmed cell Death protein 1 (PD1) antibodies and the anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies have been examined in patients with enthusiastic results in phase I-II-III studies. Overall, this led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab + ipilimumab in the second-line setting. The anti- Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL-1) antibodies have also been evaluated. Thanks to the results obtained from phase III IMbrave study, atezolizumab + bevacizumab is now the standard of care in the first-line advanced setting of HCC. As for localized HCC, the putative immunological effect of locoregional therapies led to evaluate the combination strategy with ICI. This way, chemoembolization, ablation with radiofrequency, and radioembolization combined with ICI are currently under study. Likewise, the study of adjuvant immunotherapy following surgical resection is underway. In addition, the different ICI has been studied in combination with other ICI as well as with multikinase inhibitors and anti-angiogenesis monoclonal antibody. The evidence available suggests that combining systemic therapies and locoregional treatments with ICI may represent an effective strategy in this context.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Brain Metastases: A Primer for Neurosurgeons

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. E281-E288
Author(s):  
Elisa Aquilanti ◽  
Priscilla K Brastianos
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Recognition ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Programmed Death 1

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance immune recognition of tumors by interfering with the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed death 1 (PD1) pathways. In the past decade, these agents brought significant improvements to the prognostic outlook of patients with metastatic cancers. Recent data from retrospective analyses and a few prospective studies suggest that checkpoint inhibitors have activity against brain metastases from melanoma and nonsmall cell lung cancer, as single agents or in combination with radiotherapy. Some studies reported intracranial response rates that were comparable with systemic ones. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of clinical data supporting the use of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 agents in brain metastases. We also touch upon specific considerations on the assessment of intracranial responses in patients and immunotherapy-specific toxicities. We conclude that a subset of patients with brain metastases benefit from the addition of checkpoint inhibitors to standard of care therapeutic modalities, including radiotherapy and surgery.

scholarly journals Management of pulmonary toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (154) ◽  
pp. 190012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Delaunay ◽  
Grégoire Prévot ◽  
Samia Collot ◽  
Laurent Guilleminault ◽  
Alain Didier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Pulmonary Toxicity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Life Threatening

Immunotherapy has become a standard of care in oncology, following the recent approvals of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 and programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, bladder, head and neck cancers. Besides their efficacy, these agents also generate specific immune-related adverse events. Due to the increasing prescription of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune toxicity will continue to rise. The awareness of immune-related adverse events is key to ensuring both diagnosis and management of the possible serious adverse events. Although severe immune-related adverse events remain rare, they can lead to discontinued treatment or to death if they are not forecasted and managed properly. Even if lung toxicity is not the most frequent adverse event, it remains critical as it can be life-threatening. Herein, the main aspects of pulmonary toxicity are reviewed and guidelines are also proposed in order to manage the possible side-effects.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in urothelial cancer: recent data and perspectives

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Volkova ◽  
Ya. V. Gridneva ◽  
A. S. Ol’shanskaya
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Programmed Death 1 ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors blocking the programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have shown a prominent anti-tumor activity with long-term responses and an acceptable toxicity profile  in clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and durvalumab are anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents that redefine the standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma. CTLA-4 inhibitors are also under investigation in this setting. Phase III trial KEYNOTE-045 has demonstrated significant survival benefit in patients treated with pembrolizumab comparing with the standard second-line chemotherapy. Atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and durvalumab were also recommended for platinum-pretreated urothelial carcinoma patients based on phase II data. Following investigations of biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression are needed to determine high-responders to immunotherapy. This review article describes the advances in immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals Timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic patients over 75 years of age: the earlier the better

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
Virginie Fossey-Diaz ◽  
Stéphane Culine
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The impact of ageing on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) effectiveness remains controversial. However, data from clinical studies do not show any difference between patients over 65 years and those under 65 years. We focused our study on patients over 75 and looked at the potential impact of timing in the use of ICIs. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning ICIs versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Overall Survival (OS) among the older (≥75 years) was compared with that of younger patients (< 75 years). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled. Results Fifteen phase III studies evaluating anti-PD-1(nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) were included. Patients were enrolled for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer, Renal-Cell-Carcinoma, Melanoma, Head-and-Neck-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma or Gastric Cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in first-line setting and seven in the second line. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients over 75 years of age and 5233 youngers. In first-line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) in younger. In second line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.36) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.75) in younger with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p interaction = 0.009). Conclusions ICIs appears to be effective in patients over 75 years of age. However, the survival benefit is mainly observed in first-line treatment.

Is there a benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients over 75 years of age with advanced cancer in first and second line setting: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12031-12031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Christos Chouaid ◽  
Jean F. Morere ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

12031 Background: The impact of aging on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) effectiveness is controversial. Currently, data from clinical studies do not show any difference between patients over 65 years and those under 65 years. We propose to compare the clinical benefit of ICIs in those over 75 and in those under 75. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning ICIs versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. Overall Survival (OS) among the older (≥75 years) was compared with that of younger patients ( < 75 years) in first and second line setting. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected from the studies and pooled. Results: Fifteen phase III studies evaluating anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) were included. Patients were enrolled for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer, Renal-Cell-Carcinoma, Melanoma, Head-and-Neck-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma or Gastric-Cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in first line setting and seven in second line. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients over 75 years of age and 5233 younger. In first line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) in younger. In second line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.36) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.75) in younger with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p interaction = 0.009). Conclusions: ICIs appears to be effective in patients over 75 years of age. However, the survival benefit comes mainly from the first line of treatment. This result encourages the use of ICIs early in the therapeutic management of patients over 75 years of age.

scholarly journals Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cervical Cancer: From Preclinical to Clinical Data

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2089
Author(s):  
Simona Duranti ◽  
Antonella Pietragalla ◽  
Gennaro Daniele ◽  
Camilla Nero ◽  
Francesca Ciccarone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Cervical Cancers ◽  
Relapsed Disease

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the recognized cause of almost all cervical cancers. Despite the reduction in incidence due to a wide use of screening programs and a specific vaccine, the prognosis of cervical cancer remains poor, especially for late-stage and relapsed disease. Considering the elevated rates of PD-L1 expression in up to 80% of cervical cancers, a strong rationale supports the use of immunotherapy to restore the immune response against tumor. The aim of this review is to analyze the possible role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical cancer treatment, with a particular focus on the rationale and on the results of phase I and II clinical trials. An overview of ongoing phase III studies with possible future areas of development is also provided.

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitors-related myocarditis in patients with cancer: an analysis of international spontaneous reporting systems

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rulan Ma ◽  
Quanziang Wang ◽  
Deyu Meng ◽  
Kang Li ◽  
Yong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting System ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Reporting Odds Ratio ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Safety Issues

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced myocarditis presents unique clinical challenges. Here, we assessed post-marketing safety of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors by mining the real-world data reported in two international pharmacovigilance databases. Methods We analyzed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-associated fatal adverse drug events (ADEs) reports from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) collected from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019 and data from EudraVigilance (EV) database accessed on February 29, 2020. Three different data mining approaches were used to detect the signal of fatal myocarditis caused by ICIs. Results Based on 7613 ICIs-related ADEs reported to the EV database and 5786 ICIs-associated ADEs submitted to the FAERS database, the most frequently reported ADE was ipilimumab-related colitis. For myocarditis, nivolumab-associated myocarditis was the most common. Among the five fatal toxic effects associated with ICIs, the lethality rate of myocarditis was the highest. Therefore, we further analyzed ICI-associated myocarditis and found that elderly patients and male patients were more likely to develop ICIs-related myocarditis. The results of signal detection showed that the risk signal of avelumab-related myocarditis detected by reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and proportional reporting ratios (PRR) method was the highest, whereas the signal strength of ipilimumab-related myocarditis detected by Bayesian confidence propagation neural networks (BCPNN) method was the strongest. Conclusion The findings of this study indicated the potential safety issues of developing myocarditis when using ICIs, which were consistent with the results of previous clinical trials and could provide a reference for clinical workers when using ICIs.

scholarly journals Management of Hematologic Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Barnes Rogers, CRNP, MN, AOCN, ANP-BC ◽  
Carolyn Zawislak, MPAS, PA-C ◽  
Victoria Wong, PA-C
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Activated T Cells

Immune checkpoint inhibitors target suppressor receptors, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The activated T cells are not antigen specific; therefore, the blockade of the immune checkpoint may result in the development of autoimmune adverse events. The most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are rash, colitis, and endocrinopathies. However, irAEs that affect the hematologic system are rare and can affect red blood cells (e.g., autoimmune hemolytic anemia), white blood cells, and platelets (e.g., immune thrombocytopenia). Usually one cell line is affected; however, in some cases, multiple cell lines can be affected. Other changes in the hematologic system can also be affected (e.g., cryoglobulinemia, cytokine release syndrome). Due to the rarity and lack of recognition of these AEs, the timing, spectrum of events, and clinical presentation are poorly understood. Management of hematologic irAEs usually involves the use of steroids; however, other agents (e.g., IVIG, cyclosporine, rituximab) or procedures (e.g., plasma exchange, transfusions) can also be used.

scholarly journals Adrenal Insufficiency Masquerading as Primary Hypothyroidism Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A110-A111
Author(s):  
Michael Salim ◽  
Wafa Dawahir ◽  
Janice L Gilden ◽  
Andriy Havrylyan
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Hypothyroidism ◽  
Adrenal Crisis ◽  
Thyroid Peroxidase ◽  
Endocrine Disorders ◽  
Free T4

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel immunotherapy agents that have been used to treat multiple advanced cancer. Even though they confer potential clinical advantages by regulating immune reactions, they have been linked with serious immune-mediated adverse events. Here we present a case of a patient who was treated with ICIs, Nivolumab (programmed death-1 inhibitor) and Ipilimumab (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitor), and subsequently developed two concurrent immune-related endocrine disorders. Clinical Case: An 83-year-old man with advanced renal cell carcinoma presented with generalized weakness. He had finished four cycles of immunotherapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, and Ipilimumab was discontinued afterward. Two days after the fifth cycle of immunotherapy with Nivolumab, he developed worsening fatigue, nausea, and anorexia. He appeared mildly volume depleted with borderline hypotensive (104/63 mmHg). The rest of the physical exam was unremarkable. Initial tests showed elevated levels of TSH (13.15 uIU/mL, ref 0.45–5.33 uIU/L), reduced levels of free T4 (&lt;0.25 ng/dL, ref 0.58–1.64 ng/dL), free T3 (1.72 pg/mL, ref 2.5–3.9 pg/mL), negative thyroglobulin antibody, and elevated levels of thyroid peroxidase antibody (429 IU/mL, ref &lt;9 IU/mL), thus suggesting primary hypothyroidism. Serum levels of sodium and potassium were unremarkable (136 meQ/L, ref 136–145 mEq/L; 3.6 meQ/L, ref 3.5–5.1 meQ/L respectively). His baseline TSH was normal three months prior to arrival (1.31 uIU/mL) and suppressed one month prior to arrival (0.01 uIU/mL). Immune-related thyroiditis with immune checkpoint inhibitors was suspected. He was given levothyroxine and observed in the hospital. After two days of hospitalization, weakness had slightly improved. However, he still had persistent nausea. He also developed low blood pressure (90/47 mmHg) and mild hyponatremia (133 mEq/L) with a normal potassium level. Further investigation showed low cortisol (1.0 ug/dL, ref 5.0–21.0), low ACTH (13 pg/mL, ref 6–50 pg/mL), cortisol level at 30 and 60 minutes post-cosyntropin stimulation test of 10.8 ug/dL (ref 13.0–30.0 ug/dL) and 14.8 ug/dL (ref 14.0–36.0 ug/dL) respectively, and negative adrenal antibodies, suggesting of secondary adrenal insufficiency due to hypophysitis. The patient was started on hydrocortisone, and his symptoms improved afterward. Conclusion: This case report highlights the common pitfall of managing immune-related endocrine disorders of ICIs. Adrenal insufficiency may present with a broad range of nonspecific symptoms, which could be attributed to hypothyroidism, underlying illness, or medications. Although a rare adverse effect, it is prudent to recognize adrenal insufficiency superimposed on primary hypothyroidism. Introducing thyroxine before replacing glucocorticoids can lead to an adrenal crisis.

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitors-related myocarditis in patients with cancer: an analysis of international spontaneous reporting systems

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rulan Ma ◽  
Quanziang Wang ◽  
Deyu Meng ◽  
Kang Li ◽  
yong zhang
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting System ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Reporting Odds Ratio ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Safety Issues

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors induced myocarditis presents unique clinical challenges. Here, we assessed post-marketing safety of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors by mining the real-world data reported in two international pharmacovigilance databases. Methods: We analyzed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-associated fatal adverse drug events (ADRs) reports from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) collected from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019 and data from EudraVigilance (EV) database accessed on February 29, 2020. Three different data mining approaches were used to detect the signal of fatal myocarditis caused by ICIs. Results: Based on 7613 ICIs-related ADEs reported to the EV database and 5786 ICIs-associated ADEs submitted to the FAERS database, the most frequently reported ADE was ipilimumab-related colitis. For myocarditis, nivolumab-associated myocarditis was the most common. Among the five fatal toxic effects associated with ICIs, the lethality rate of myocarditis was the highest. Therefore, we further analyzed ICI-associated myocarditis and found that elderly patients and male patients were more likely to develop ICIs-related myocarditis. The results of signal detection showed that the risk signal of avelumab-related myocarditis detected by reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and proportional reporting ratios (PRR) method was the highest, whereas the signal strength of ipilimumab-related myocarditis detected by Bayesian confidence propagation neural networks (BCNPP) method was the strongest. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated the potential safety issues of developing myocarditis when using ICIs, which are consistent with the results of previous clinical trials and can provide a reference for clinical workers when using ICIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document