scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemotherapies for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Jiang ◽  
Zhiming Zeng ◽  
Jie Zeng ◽  
Cuizhen Liu ◽  
Jinfeng Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Biliary Tract Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Diarrhea Incidence ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundAt present, chemotherapy is still the primary treatment for advanced biliary tract carcinoma, but it is challenging to balance the efficacy and side effects. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a better way to identify the protocol, and the advantage is that it can be combined with direct and indirect evidence to judge the best treatment regimens. Therefore, we conducted NMA on the searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsNMA was conducted regarding the searched RCTs by comparing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective remission rates (ORRs), and adverse events (AEs) of different chemotherapy protocols.ResultsWe screened 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Compared with other regimens, the best supportive care (BSC) or FUFA protocol has a worse OS. Folfox4, GEMOX+erlotinib, and C+GEMOX can improve patients’ PFS compared with BSC. Patients receiving GP+cediranib protocol have higher ORRs. There was reduced neutropenia grade ≥3 when adopting GP+cediranib, GS, C+GEMOX, RAM+GP, and MER+GP than when using FUFA protocol. The probability of vomiting of XELOX is lower than that of GEM+XELOX. There is a lower diarrhea incidence of XELOX than that of GEMOX+erlotinib. The results of cluster grade analysis illustrated that GEMOX+erlotinib owned a higher ORR and a higher surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) of neutropenia and vomiting but also had a lower SUCRA of diarrhea and fatigue. Meanwhile, both GEMOX and C+GEMOX have a better ORR and a higher AE SUCRA.ConclusionThe NMA demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy has better efficacy and lower incidence of AEs than chemotherapy alone.

A phase II study of apatinib treatment for advanced biliary tract carcinoma after failure of the standard chemotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16684-e16684
Author(s):  
Chenchen Wang ◽  
Weijian Guo ◽  
Mingzhu Huang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Biliary Tract Carcinoma ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Grade 3

e16684 Background: There is no standard second-line therapy for advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Apatinib, a VEGFR2 tyrosine kynase inhibitor, showed an inhibitary effect on tumor formation in BTC tumorgraft mouse model in previous study, with tolerable toxicity in clinical trials for other types of advanced cancer such as gastric cancer. We conducted an exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced BTC. Methods: This is a single-center, single-arm phase II study (NCT03427242). The key inclusion criteria were:(1) histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic BTC; (2) Prior lack of response or intolerance to at least one chemotherapeutic regimens; (3) At least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1; (4) No prior use of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs. Eligible patients received oral apatinib 500mg each day continuously until unacceptable toxicity or tumor progression. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and treatment safety. Results: From Dec 1, 2017 to Jan 31, 2020, a total of 18 patients (12 males and 6 females) had been recruited, and 16 patients who had received the medication of apatinib were included in this analysis. Among these patients, 10 were previously treated with only first-line chemotherapy and 6 were treated with two or more lines of therapy. The median age was 65 (range 45-76) years old. Fourteen patients had received the efficacy evaluation after treatment. Two patients achieved partial response (PR, 14.3%), 6 patients with stable disease (SD, 42.9%),and 6 patients with progressive disease(PD). The ORR and DCR were 14.3% and 57.1%, respectively. At the last follow-up date on Jan 30, 2020, 4 patients are still on apatinib medication. The median PFS was 2.70 months (95% CI, 1.94 - 3.46), and the median OS was 7.03 months (95% CI, 3.16 - 10.9). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 7 patients (43.8%). The detailed grade 3 or 4 adverse events were proteinuria in 5 patients, hand-foot syndrome in 2 patients, platelet count decrease in 1 patients, diarrhea in 1 patients and urine bilirubin in 1 patients (Table). Conclusions: For the patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma, apatinib showed an anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03427242 . [Table: see text]

Oxaliplatin combined with leucovorin plus 5-FU (FOLFOX) in patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14093-14093
Author(s):  
J. Y. Lim ◽  
J. Y. Cho ◽  
Y. H. Paik ◽  
S. J. Lee ◽  
J. Y. Won ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Biliary Tract Carcinoma ◽  
Biliary Duct ◽  
Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

14093 Background: Biliary tract carcinoma is often diagnosed at advanced stage, with median survival rarely exceeding 6 months. There is currently no established palliative standard of care. A phase II trial was conducted to study a FOLFOX regimen as first- or second- line therapy in biliary tract carcinoma. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma were enrolled. Eligible patients were between 18 and 75 years of age and had histologically confirmed, measurable adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified according to prior chemotherapy(6) and no prior chemotherapy(15). Treatment consisted of intravenous oxaliplatin (100mg/m2) as a 2 hours infusion on day 1 followed by leucovorin 100mg/m2 on day1 and 5-FU 1000∼1200mg/m2 as a 24 hours infusion on day 1,2. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Tumor response, survival and safety were determined Results: A total of 21 patients were evaluable;12 men and 9 women with a median age of 57(range 37–71). Tumor sites were: intrahepatic (n=7) and extrahepatic biliary duct (n=9); gallbladder (n=4); and ampulla (n=1). Total 115 cycles were administered (median 5 cycles, range 2∼12). According to RECIST criteria, partial response 3(14.3%), stable disease 10(47.7%) and disease progression.8(38%). The overall response rate with and without prior chemotherapy were 0%(0/6) and 20%(3/15), respectively. In patients without prior chemotherapy (15), median progression-free-survival and overall survival were 6.6(range, 1.2∼12.8) and 8.7(range, 3.7∼19.3) months. Grade 1–2 neurotoxicity, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, nausea were common. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% and 4.7% of the patients respectively. There was no treatment related death. Conclusions: FOLFOX should be considered an active and well tolerated first-line combination chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 772-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Mohamad Hussein ◽  
James Berenson ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, toxicities from dexamethasone can be dose limiting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Patients (N = 222) received lenalidomide 30 mg/day once daily (days 1-21 every 28 days) until disease progression or intolerance. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. Overall, 67% of patients had received 3 or more prior treatment regimens. Partial response or better was reported in 26% of patients, with minimal response 18%. There was no difference between patients who had received 2 or fewer versus 3 or more prior treatment regimens (45% vs 44%, respectively). Median values for TTP, PFS, and OS were 5.2, 4.9, and 23.2 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and anemia (20%), which proved manageable with dose reduction. Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 4% of patients. Lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed and refractory MM with acceptable toxicities. These data support treatment with single-agent lenalidomide, as well as its use in steroid-sparing combination approaches. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00065351.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of combined androgen blockade with antiandrogen for advanced prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Yang ◽  
R. Chen ◽  
T. Sun ◽  
L. Zhao ◽  
F. Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Combined Androgen Blockade ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Androgen Blockade

Background Combined androgen blockade (cab) is a promising treatment modality for prostate cancer (pca). In the present meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of first-line cab using an antiandrogen (aa) with castration monotherapy in patients with advanced pca.Methods PubMed, embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) published through 12 December 2016. Hazard ratios (hrs) with 95% confidence intervals (cis) were determined for primary outcomes: overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (pfs). Subgroup analyses were performed for Western compared with Eastern patients and use of a nonsteroidal aa (nsaa) compared with a steroidal aa (saa).Results Compared with castration monotherapy, cab using an aa was associated with significantly improved os (n = 14; hr: 0.90; 95% ci: 0.84 to 0.97; p = 0.003) and pfs (n = 13; hr: 0.89; 95% ci: 0.80 to 1.00; p = 0.04). No significant difference in os (p = 0.71) and pfs (p = 0.49) was observed between the Western and Eastern patients. Compared with castration monotherapy, cab using a nsaa was associated with significantly improved os (hr: 0.88; 95% ci: 0.82 to 0.95; p = 0.0009) and pfs (hr: 0.85; 95% ci: 0.73 to 0.98; p = 0.007)—a result that was not achieved with cab using a saa. The safety profiles of cab and monotherapy were similar in terms of adverse events, including hot flushes, impotence, and grade 3 or 4 events, with the exception of risk of diarrhea and liver dysfunction or elevation in liver enzymes, which were statistically greater with cab using an aa.Conclusions Compared with castration monotherapy, first-line cab therapy with an aa, especially a nsaa, resulted in significantly improved os and pfs, and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced pca.

scholarly journals Combining Correlated Outcomes and Surrogate Endpoints in a Network Meta-Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Treatments

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2663
Author(s):  
Tung Hoang ◽  
Jeongseon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Credible Intervals ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Selection Of

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies in the treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Predicted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for overall survival (OS) were calculated from the odds ratio (OR) for the overall response rate and/or HR for progression-free survival using multivariate random effects (MVRE) models. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of 49 articles to compare the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI±bevacizumab (Bmab)/cetuximab (Cmab)/panitumumab (Pmab), and FOLFOXIRI/CAPEOX±Bmab. The NMA showed significant OS improvement with FOLFOX, FOLFOX+Cmab, and FOLFIRI+Cmab compared with that of FOLFIRI (HR = 0.84, 95% CrI = 0.73–0.98; HR = 0.76, 95% CrI = 0.62–0.94; HR = 0.80, 95% CrI = 0.66–0.96, respectively), as well as with FOLFOX+Cmab and FOLFIRI+Cmab compared with that of FOLFOXIRI (HR = 0.69, 95% CrI = 0.51–0.94 and HR = 0.73, 95% CrI = 0.54–0.97, respectively). The odds of adverse events grade ≥3 were significantly higher for FOLFOX+Cmab vs. FOLFIRI+Bmab (OR = 2.34, 95% CrI = 1.01–4.66). Higher odds of events were observed for FOLFIRI+Pmab in comparison with FOLFIRI (OR = 2.16, 95% CrI = 1.09–3.84) and FOLFIRI+Bmab (OR = 3.14, 95% CrI = 1.51–5.89). FOLFOX+Cmab and FOLFIRI+Bmab showed high probabilities of being first- and second-line treatments in terms of the efficacy and safety, respectively. The findings of the efficacy and safety comparisons may support the selection of appropriate treatments in clinical practice. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020153640.

Meta Analysis of Grade 3 and/or 4 Toxicities in Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (LG-NHL) Patients Receiving Maintenance Rituximab (MR) Therapy: Impact of Schedule on Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2704-2704
Author(s):  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Dana Villines ◽  
Tina V. Valdez ◽  
Michele Ghielmini ◽  
Shu-Fang Hsu Schmitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2704 Background: MR has improved the outcome and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in front-line and relapsed settings. However, maintenance schedules have been empirically designed based on either B-cell depletion kinetics or rituximab levels, with no consensus on the optimal regimen. Overall, toxicities have been predictable and tolerable but the impact of MR schedule on toxicities has not been previously reported and could influence selection of maintenance regimens. Methods: Using PubMed, prospective clinical trials employing MR were identified. Data presented in abstract form or at meetings were deemed incomplete and thus excluded. Data were analyzed from published manuscripts as percentages of subjects experiencing an adverse event (AE). Percentages were considered as the unit of analysis as this adjusted for the uneven sample sizes. Data were collected for overall Grade 3 and/or Grade 4 toxicity (AE reported at any phase of treatment) and was further categorized as AE occurring during initial treatment or during MR. Grade 1 and 2 toxicities were excluded from meta-analysis, given lack of consistent reporting. No grade 5 toxicities were reported. The incidence, severity, and type of toxicity was analyzed by type of induction (Rituximab (R) vs. R plus chemotherapy), histology (FL vs. FL plus other LG-NHL), setting (front-line vs. relapsed), and MR schedule (one dose every 2 months vs. one dose every 3 months vs. 4 doses every 6 months). Results: Nine clinical trials involving 1,928 patients were included in this Meta analysis (4 of which were randomized controlled in the MR phase). Of those, 1,004 patients received MR. The mean percentage of Grade 3/4 toxicities during any phase of treatment was 26% (95% CI = 0.12–51.88) but when restricted to the MR phase; it was 12.88% (95% CI = 6.50–19.26). Toxicities were numerically higher in patients receiving R induction plus chemotherapy versus R induction alone and in patients receiving MR for relapsed disease versus newly diagnosed patients, but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.661 and 0.517, respectively). However, patients receiving MR every 2 months were significantly more likely to develop grade 3 and 4 toxicities compared to patients receiving MR every 6 months (P = 0.005). No statistical differences were demonstrated between the 2 vs. 3 months schedules or when comparing the 3 vs. 6 months schedules (P = 0.342 and 0.267, respectively) (Table 1). Statistically significant differences were also found in studies restricted to FL versus others allowing non-FL histologies (P = 0.025) with the FL patients experiencing more toxicity than others. The most frequently reported toxicities were neutropenia and infections. There were no treatment-related deaths in any of the arms. Conclusions: Approximately 13% of patients receiving MR experience grade 3 and/or 4 toxicities, mainly consisting of neutropenia and infections. MR given every 6 months appears to provide the least grade 3 and 4 toxicities. There is a suggestion of increased toxicity in FL histologies. It is important to note that this meta-analysis did not address efficacy and only a true comparative trial can definitively establish the relative risk/benefit ratios amongst MR schedules. Disclosures: Nabhan: Genentech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ghielmini:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Smith:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Phase II study of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab (GEMOX-B) in patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract and gallbladder cancers

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4625-4625 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Clark ◽  
J. A. Meyerhardt ◽  
D. V. Sahani ◽  
S. Namasivayam ◽  
T. A. Abrams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

4625 Background: Patients (Pts) with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) have a poor prognosis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression has been detected in BTC and GBC. Increased angiogenesis has been correlated with advanced stage of disease and poor prognosis. Given reported activity of gemcitabine (GEM) and oxaliplatin (OX) in BTC/GBC and potential benefits of targeting the VEGF pathway with bevacizumab (B), we performed a study to examine the efficacy and tolerability of GEM, OX and B (GEMOX-B) in unresectable or metastatic BTC/GBC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic measurable BTC/GBC, 0–1 prior chemotherapy regimens, performance status = 2, and adequate organ function. No clinically significant cardiovascular disease or history of active bleeding. Pts were treated with all 3 drugs intravenously on days 1 and 15 every 28 days (one cycle): B was given first at 10 mg/kg, followed by GEM at 1000 mg/m2 as dose rate infusion at 10 mg/m2/minute, and OX at 85 mg/m2. Whole body FDG-PET scan was obtained at baseline and after cycle 2. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 19 pts (10 BTC and 9 GBC) have been enrolled since May 17, 2006: median age = 69 (25–82), M/F = 13/6, ECOG 0/1/2 = 7/10/2. Treatment has been well tolerated with no grade 4–5 toxicities seen. Treatment related grade 3 toxicities included (number of pts): hypertension (2), neutropenia (1), transient SGPT elevation (1), proteinuria (1), neuropathy (1), and fatigue (1). Of 11 pts followed for at least 4 months, 3 had confirmed partial responses (PR), 5 had stable disease (SD) of at least 4 cycles, and 3 had progressive disease (PD) per RECIST criteria. Five pts had more than 50% decrease in CA19–9 levels. Of 16 PET studies analyzed, changes in SUV values from baseline to after 2 cycles of treatment were: 11 PRs, 4 SDs, 1 PD per EORTC criteria. Conclusions: GEMOX-B can be safely administered with tolerable safety profiles in patients with advanced BTC/GBC. Early evidence of antitumor activity was seen. A decreased SUV in FDG-PET following GEMOX-B treatment was observed in the majority of patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A restrospective analysis of toxicities encountered with palliative epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOX) chemotherapy for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 162-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelize Sadrudin Khakoo ◽  
Alexandros Georgiou ◽  
Justin S. Waters
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Neutropenic Sepsis ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Prophylactic Measures ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Practice Methods

162 Background: Palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinoma improves tumour related symptoms and overall survival compared to best supportive care alone. EOX has been established as one of the most effective regimens in randomised clinical trials, but produced significant toxicity. We wished to examine the tolerability of EOX in everyday practice. Methods: A retrospective search was conducted to identify patients with advanced gastric or GEJ cancer, treated at our institution with at least one cycle of first line palliative EOX between 2009 and 2012. Patient baseline characteristics, toxicities (graded according to CTCAEv.4), dose reductions, treatment interruptions and discontinuations were analysed. Results: We identified 60 patients, 83% were male, and the median age was 64 years (age range18-82 years). 85% had a baseline performance status (PS) of 1, 10% PS of 2 and 5% PS of 0. 75% had GEJ cancer and the remainder had gastric cancer. 82% were commenced on standard EOX (1250mg/m2 capecitabine, 130mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 50mg/m2). 80% of patients experienced grade 3 or worse toxicity. 27% discontinued treatment due to excessive toxicity and 37% due to progressive disease. Significant toxicities (at least grade 3) were: 28% neutropenia, 27% diarrhoea, 23% fatigue, 10% vomiting, 10% anaemia, 8% neutropenic sepsis, 8% nausea, 5% thrombocytopenia, 5% peripheral neuropathy, 3% mucositis and 3% chest pain. 47% of patients required a dose reduction of at least 1 drug. 66% of patients completed 3 cycles, 35% completed 6 cycles and 18% completed 8 cycles. The mean progression free survival for patients completing 8 cycles was 4.6 months. Conclusions: EOX improves tumour related symptoms and overall survival but the benefits are often short-lived and in some patients it is associated with unacceptable toxicity, given their limited life expectancy. More thought needs to be given to prophylactic measures and modification of the EOX regimen to improve tolerability without compromising efficacy.

Meta-analysis of outcomes of VEGF and EGFR targeted biologic therapy in relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 534-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chan ◽  
Eva Segelov ◽  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Christos Stelios Karapetis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

534 Background: Biologic therapies used in treatment of mCRC are expensive and there is debate about their value. We examined the impact of biologic therapy on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 toxicity for patients beyond first-line treatment. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries were searched for randomized studies in relapsed mCRC comparing treatment containing targeted therapy to the same treatment without targeted therapy. Biologic agents were classed as: EGFR-inhibitors (EGFR-I), VEGF antibody/trap and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Only KRAS wild-type patients were included for EGFR-I analysis. Results were aggregated according to standard meta-analytic techniques. Results: 10 studies evaluating 5,847 patients were identified. Considering subgroups and lines, OS and PFS benefit was demonstrated in all groups across all lines except for OS in 2nd line EGFR-I use (which may be due to subsequent crossover). A benefit to ORR was seen with EGFR-I 2nd line (Pooled ORR benefit +24%, Odds Ratio (OR) 4.44, 95% CI 3.20-6.18), EGFR-I 3rd line and beyond (Pooled ORR benefit +16%), VEGF antibody/trap (Pooled ORR benefit +7.2%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.57-2.54) and VEGFR TKI (Pooled ORR benefit +1.9%, OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.27-3.30). The risk of grade 3/4 toxicity was greater with the addition of all targeted agents. Conclusions: The use of VEGF and EGFR targeted biologic agents beyond first-line setting in mCRC results in a benefit to OS, PFS and ORR for all agents except for OS benefit with second-line EGFR-I. This benefit comes at the cost of increased toxicity. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document