scholarly journals Prosthetic Shoulder Joint Infection by Cutibacterium acnes: Does Rifampin Improve Prognosis? A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 475
Author(s):  
Helem Vilchez ◽  
Rosa Escudero-Sanchez ◽  
Marta Fernandez-Sampedro ◽  
Oscar Murillo ◽  
Álvaro Auñón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Nonsignificant Trend ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study ◽  
Failure Frequency ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Cutibacterium Acnes ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Prior Surgery

This retrospective, multicenter observational study aimed to describe the outcomes of surgical and medical treatment of C. acnes-related prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the potential benefit of rifampin-based therapies. Patients with C. acnes-related PJI who were diagnosed and treated between January 2003 and December 2016 were included. We analyzed 44 patients with C. acnes-related PJI (median age, 67.5 years (IQR, 57.3–75.8)); 75% were men. The majority (61.4%) had late chronic infection according to the Tsukayama classification. All patients received surgical treatment, and most antibiotic regimens (43.2%) included β-lactam. Thirty-four patients (87.17%) were cured; five showed relapse. The final outcome (cure vs. relapse) showed a nonsignificant trend toward higher failure frequency among patients with previous prosthesis (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 0.80–58.90) or prior surgery and infection (OR: 10.67; 95% IC: 1.08–105.28) in the same joint. Patients treated with clindamycin alone had a higher recurrence rate (40.0% vs. 8.8%). Rifampin treatment did not decrease recurrence in patients treated with β-lactams. Prior prosthesis, surgery, or infection in the same joint might be related to recurrence, and rifampin-based combinations do not seem to improve prognosis. Debridement and implant retention appear a safe option for surgical treatment of early PJI.

scholarly journals 390. Treatment and Outcome of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S201-S201
Author(s):  
Michael Henry ◽  
Alberto V Carli ◽  
Milan Kapadia ◽  
Yu-fen Chiu ◽  
Barry Brause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Type ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Implant Retention

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) total hip and knee prosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be highly morbid and difficult to treat. Other clinical factors notwithstanding, explantation is usually recommended, although comparative treatment data are lacking. We sought to compare the success of implant retention to two-stage exchange in MRSA-infected PJI to better understand treatment options in this difficult cohort. Methods A retrospective cohort of hip and knee PJIs from 2009 to 2016 were identified by ICD code and surgical treatment. All cases met MSIS criteria for PJI, and had culture-confirmed MRSA from synovial or intra-articular tissue culture. PJIs were either treated with exchange arthroplasty or debridement with antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR). Success was defined as no further surgical treatment for infection at two years. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to calculate the 2-year survival rate free from treatment failure. Univariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with treatment failure. Results 65 MRSA PJIs were identified with 42 undergoing explantation and 23 undergoing DAIR. Demographics, Charlson comorbidities, infection type (early post-operative, hematogenous or late chronic), and history of prior PJI were not significantly different between treatment groups. Survivorship at two years was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–88%) for exchange compared with 29% (95% CI 10–48%) for DAIR, P = 0.0002. Within the exchange group, knee PJIs were more likely to fail than hip PJI (odds ratio [OR] 7.1, CI 1.3–38, P = 0.02), and patients with diabetes were more likely to fail (OR 17, CI 1.6–178, P = 0.02). Conclusion MRSA PJIs treated with DAIR have worse outcomes than those treated with prosthesis exchange. Further investigation is needed to identify predictors of DAIR success, to optimize surgical treatment choice, and to improve outcomes of these difficult infections. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals State-of-the-art diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute peri-prosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 434-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo A. Slullitel ◽  
José I. Oñativia ◽  
Martin A. Buttaro ◽  
Marisa L. Sánchez ◽  
Fernando Comba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Highly Correlated

Acute peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a potentially devastating and undesired complication, with a prevalence of 0.3% to 2.9%. Its suspicion begins with a meticulous physical examination and anamnesis. Diagnosis should be made on the basis of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Serum and synovial biomarkers are very useful tools when major criteria are absent. Although sometimes not possible due to medical conditions, surgery is usually the first line of treatment. Although its outcome is highly correlated with the isolated microorganism, irrigation and debridement with implant retention (DAIR) is the gold standard for treatment. Ideally, the prior approach should be proximally and distally extended to augment the field of view and remove all of the prosthetic modular components, that is, femoral head and acetabular insert. Given DAIR’s unclear control of infection, with successful outcomes in the range of 30% to 95%, one- or two-stage revision protocols may play a role in certain cases of acute infections; nonetheless, further prospective, randomized studies are necessary to compare long-term outcomes between DAIR and revision surgeries. Following surgical treatment, length of antibiotherapy is in the range of six weeks to six months, without any difference in outcomes between short and long protocols. Treatment should be adjusted to the isolated bacteria and controlled further with post-operative serum biomarker levels.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:434-441. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170032

scholarly journals Long-Term Use of Tedizolid in Osteoarticular Infections: Benefits among Oxazolidinone Drugs

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Eva Benavent ◽  
Laura Morata ◽  
Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal ◽  
Esteban Alberto Reynaga ◽  
Laura Soldevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Osteoarticular Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Lower Drug ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction ◽  
Staphylococcus Spp

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of tedizolid in osteoarticular infections. Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (January 2017–March 2019) of osteoarticular infection cases treated with tedizolid. Failure: clinical worsening despite antibiotic treatment or the need of suppressive treatment. Results: Cases (n = 51; 59% women, mean age of 65 years) included osteoarthritis (n = 27, 53%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 17, 33.3%), and diabetic foot infections (n = 9, 18%); where, 59% were orthopedic device-related. Most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus spp. (65%, n = 47; S. aureus, 48%). Reasons for choosing tedizolid were potential drug-drug interaction (63%) and cytopenia (55%); median treatment duration was 29 days (interquartile range -IQR- 15–44), 24% received rifampicin (600 mg once daily) concomitantly, and adverse events were scarce (n = 3). Hemoglobin and platelet count stayed stable throughout treatment (from 108.6 g/L to 116.3 g/L, p = 0.079; and 240 × 109/L to 239 × 109/L, p = 0.942, respectively), also in the subgroup of cases with cytopenia. Among device-related infections, 33% were managed with implant retention. Median follow-up was 630 days and overall cure rate 83%; among failures (n = 8), 63% were device-related infections. Conclusions: Long-term use of tedizolid was effective, showing a better safety profile with less myelotoxicity and lower drug-drug interaction than linezolid. Confirmation of these advantages could make tedizolid the oxazolidinone of choice for most of osteoarticular infections.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee replacement: a practical surgical guide

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akos Zahar ◽  
Martin Sarungi
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Surgical Guide ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Early Revision ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Key Steps

Abstract Purpose Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant burden in health care. Diagnosis and proper management are challenging. A standardised procedure for the diagnostic workup and surgical management provides clear benefits in outcome. Methods Several diagnostic protocols and definitions for PJI were established in recent years. Proper PJI diagnosis remains critical for success and for choosing the optimal treatment option. A distinct workup of diagnostic steps, the evaluation of the results in a multidisciplinary setup and the meticulous surgical management of the infection are the key factors of successful treatment. Results The management of PJI after TKA consists of early revision with debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in early cases or staged revision in late infections beyond 30 days postoperative or after onset of acute symptoms. The revision is performed as a two-stage procedure with the use of a fixed or mobile antibiotic spacer, or in selected cases as a single-stage operation with the use of local and systemic antibiotic treatment. Conclusions This paper reflects the opinion of two revision surgeons who follow the same protocol for diagnosis and treatment of PJI after TKA, highlighting the key steps in diagnosis and management. Level of evidence Expert’s opinion

scholarly journals Assessment of a Multiplex Serological Test for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: a Prospective Multicentre Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Bémer ◽  
Céline Bourigault ◽  
Anne Jolivet-Gougeon ◽  
Chloé Plouzeau-Jayle ◽  
Carole Lemarie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Cutibacterium Acnes

Abstract. Introduction: The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) can be difficult in the chronic stage and is based on clinical and paraclinical evidence. A minimally invasive serological test against the main pathogens encountered during PJI would distinguish PJI from mechanical loosening.Methods: We performed a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study to assess the contribution of serology in the diagnosis of PJI. Over a 2-year period, all patients undergoing prosthesis revision were included in the study. A C-reactive protein assay and a serological test specifically designed against 5 bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, S. lugdunensis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Cutibacterium acnes) were performed preoperatively. Five samples per patient were taken intraoperatively during surgery. The diagnosis of PJI was based on clinical and bacteriological criteria according to guidelines.Results: Between November 2015 and November 2017, 115 patients were included, 49 for a chronic PJI and 66 for a mechanical problem. Among patients with PJI, a sinus tract was observed in 32.6% and a C-reactive protein level ≥10 mg/L in 74.5%. The PJI was monomicrobial in 43 cases (targeted staphylococci, 24; S. agalactiae, 1; C. acnes, 2; others, 16), and polymicrobial in 6 cases (12.2%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 75.0%, 82.1%, 58.3% and 90.8%, respectively, for targeted staphylococci. Specificity/negative predictive value was 97.3%/100% for S. agalactiae and 83.8% /96.9% for C. acnes.Conclusions: The serological tests are insufficient to affirm the diagnosis of PJI for the targeted bacteria. Nevertheless, the excellent NPV may help clinicians to exclude PJI.

scholarly journals Timing of implant-removal in late acute periprosthetic joint infection: A multicenter observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker ◽  
Marine Sebillotte ◽  
Jose Lomas ◽  
Benjamin Kendrick ◽  
Eva Benavent Palomares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Multicenter Observational Study

scholarly journals Risk of Recurrent Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Joint Infection in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients—A Nationwide Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Namrata Singh ◽  
Rajeshwari Nair ◽  
Michihiko Goto ◽  
Martha L Carvour ◽  
Ryan Carnahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Implant Retention

AbstractBackgroundTreatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often involves immune-suppressive therapies. Concern for recurrent prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in RA patients might be high and could reduce use of joint implantation in these patients. We aimed to evaluate the risk of recurrence of PJI in RA patients compared with osteoarthritis (OA) patients by utilizing a large health care system.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted for a Staphylococcus aureus PJI who underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or 2-stage exchange (2SE) between 2003 and 2010 at 86 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Both RA patients and the comparison group of osteoarthritis (OA) patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. All index PJI and recurrent positive cultures for S. aureus during 2 years of follow-up were validated by manual chart review. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare the time to recurrent PJI for RA vs OA.ResultsIn our final cohort of 374 veterans who had either DAIR or 2SE surgery for their index S. aureus PJI, 11.2% had RA (n = 42). The majority of the cohort was male (97.3%), and 223 (59.6%) had a methicillin-susceptible S. aureus PJI. RA patients had a similar risk of failure compared with OA patients, after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.37).ConclusionsPrior diagnosis of RA does not increase the risk of recurrent S. aureus PJI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of different RA therapies on outcomes of episodes of PJI.

scholarly journals Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection with Debridement, Antibiotics and Irrigation with Implant Retention - a Narrative Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sousa ◽  
Miguel Araújo Abreu
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Implant Retention ◽  
Patient Selection Criteria

Abstract. Prosthetic joint infection usually requires combined medical and surgical therapy. While revision surgery is widely considered to be the gold standard surgical procedure, debridement, antibiotics and irrigation with implant retention is a very appealing alternative.There is however great controversy regarding its real worth with success rates ranging from 0% to over 90%. A number of different patient and host related variables as well as specific aspects of surgical and medical management have been described as relevant for the final outcome.Along this paper, the authors will provide the readers with a critical narrative review of the currently available literature while trying to provide concise and practical treatment recommendations regarding adequate patient selection criteria, proper surgical technique and optimal antibiotic therapy.

scholarly journals Timing of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for early post-surgical hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) does not affect 1-year re-revision rates: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 329-336
Author(s):  
Barry van der Ende ◽  
Jakob van Oldenrijk ◽  
Max Reijman ◽  
Peter D. Croughs ◽  
Liza N. van Steenbergen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Arthroplasty Register ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Primary Procedure ◽  
Implant Retention

Abstract. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a procedure to treat a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The timing between the primary procedure and the DAIR is likely a determinant for its successful outcome. However, the optimal timing of a DAIR and the chance of success still remain unclear. We aimed to assess the risk of re-revision within 1 year after a DAIR procedure and to evaluate the timing of the DAIR in primary THA and TKA. We used data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and selected all primary THA and TKA in the period 2007–2016 which underwent a DAIR within 12 weeks after primary procedure. A DAIR was defined as a revision for infection in which only modular parts were exchanged. A DAIR was defined as successful if not followed by a re-revision within 1 year after DAIR; 207 DAIRs were performed <4 weeks after THA, of which 16 (8 %) received a complete revision within 1 year. DAIR procedures performed between 4 and 12 weeks (n=98) had a failure rate of 9 % (n=9). After TKA 126 DAIRs were performed in less than 4 weeks, of which 11 (9 %) received a complete revision within 1 year; 83 DAIRs were performed between 4 and 12 weeks, of which 14 (17 %) were revised. There was no significant difference in 1-year re-revision rate after a DAIR procedure by timing of the DAIR procedure for total hip and knee arthroplasty based on Dutch registry data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document