scholarly journals The Intertemporal Role of Respiratory Support in Improving Neonatal Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 883
Author(s):  
Kosmas Sarafidis ◽  
William Chotas ◽  
Eleni Agakidou ◽  
Paraskevi Karagianni ◽  
Vasiliki Drossou
Keyword(s):  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Administration Methods

Defining improvements in healthcare can be challenging due to the need to assess multiple outcomes and measures. In neonates, although progress in respiratory support has been a key factor in improving survival, the same degree of improvement has not been documented in certain outcomes, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia. By exploring the evolution of neonatal respiratory care over the last 60 years, this review highlights not only the scientific advances that occurred with the application of invasive mechanical ventilation but also the weakness of the existing knowledge. The contributing role of non-invasive ventilation and less-invasive surfactant administration methods as well as of certain pharmacological therapies is also discussed. Moreover, we analyze the cost–benefit of neonatal care-respiratory support and present future challenges and perspectives.

scholarly journals Secretion management in patients with ineffective airway clearance with non-invasive mechanical ventilation use: Expert guidance for clinical practice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Hadda ◽  
Tejas Menon Suri ◽  
Sourabh Pahuja ◽  
Mohamad El-Khatib ◽  
Laura D. Ciobanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Mail ◽  
Neuromuscular Disorders ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Airway Clearance ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Airway Secretion ◽  
Secretion Clearance

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a mainstay of management of chronic respiratory failure in many disorders which are known to cause abnormal airway secretion clearance. Currently, there is no guidance regarding either the secretion handling during NIV use or the role of NIV in secretion management in these patients. The aim of this document was to provide an overview of the various techniques available in the management of respiratory secretions and their use in conjunction with NIV. Literature search was performed using the keywords, “(secretion OR secretions) AND (noninvasive ventilation OR NIV)” on PubMed and EMBASE. The search yielded 1681 and 509 titles from PubMed and EMBASE, respectively. After screening, 19 articles were included in this review. Suggestions of the expert panel were formulated by mutual consensus after reviewing the relevant literature. The draft of the expert panel’s suggestions was circulated among all authors via electronic mail for comments. Any conflicts were resolved by mutual discussion to achieve agreement. The final document was approved by all. This document by the International Network for Airway Secretions Management in NIV describes various airway secretion clearance techniques. It provides the expert panel’s suggestions for the use of these techniques in conjunction with NIV for patients with muco-obstructive and neuromuscular disorders. 

scholarly journals Protocolized Post-Extubation Respiratory Support to prevent reintubation: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a clinical trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e030476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Dale Casey ◽  
Erin R Vaughan ◽  
Bradley D Lloyd ◽  
Peter A Bilas ◽  
Eric J Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Risk Patients

IntroductionFollowing extubation from invasive mechanical ventilation, nearly one in seven critically ill adults requires reintubation. Reintubation is independently associated with increased mortality. Postextubation respiratory support (non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula applied at the time of extubation) has been reported in small-to-moderate-sized trials to reduce reintubation rates among hypercapnic patients, high-risk patients without hypercapnia and low-risk patients without hypercapnia. It is unknown whether protocolised provision of postextubation respiratory support to every patient undergoing extubation would reduce the overall reintubation rate, compared with usual care.Methods and analysisThe Protocolized Post-Extubation Respiratory Support (PROPER) trial is a pragmatic, cluster cross-over trial being conducted between 1 October 2017 and 31 March 2019 in the medical intensive care unit of Vanderbilt University Medical Center. PROPER compares usual care versus protocolized post-extubation respiratory support (a respiratory therapist-driven protocol that advises the provision of non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula based on patient characteristics). For the duration of the trial, the unit is divided into two clusters. One cluster receives protocolised support and the other receives usual care. Each cluster crosses over between treatment group assignments every 3 months. All adults undergoing extubation from invasive mechanical ventilation are enrolled except those who received less than 12 hours of mechanical ventilation, have ‘Do Not Intubate’ orders, or have been previously reintubated during the hospitalisation. The anticipated enrolment is approximately 630 patients. The primary outcome is reintubation within 96 hours of extubation.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.Trial registration numberNCT03288311.

scholarly journals Limitations of the ARDS criteria during high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation: Evidence from critically ill COVID-19 patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hultström ◽  
Ola Hellkvist ◽  
Lucian Covaciu ◽  
Filip Fredén ◽  
Robert Frithiof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
High Flow ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Steady State Condition ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
High Flow Oxygen

Abstract Introduction The ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FIO2) during invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is used as criteria to grade the severity of respiratory failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). During the SARS-CoV2 pandemic the use of PaO2/FIO2 ratio has been increasingly used in non-invasive respiratory support such as high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). The grading of hypoxemia in non-invasively ventilated patients is uncertain. The main hypothesis, investigated in this study, was that the PaO2/FIO2 ratio does not change when switching between MV, NIV and HFNC. Methods This was a sub-study of a single-center prospective observational study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden for critical COVID-19. In a steady state condition, the PaO2/FIO2 ratio was recorded before and after any change between two of the studied respiratory support techniques (i.e., HFNC, NIV and MV). Results A total of 148 patients were included in the present analysis. We find that any change in respiratory support from or to HFNC caused a significant change in PaO2/FIO2 ratio (up to 48 mmHg, from HFNC to MV). Changes in respiratory support between NIV and MV did not show consistent change in PaO2/FIO2 ratio. In patients classified as mild to moderate ARDS during MV, the change from HFNC to MV showed a variable increase in PaO2/FIO2 ratio ranging between 52 and 140 mmHg (median of 127 mm Hg). This made prediction of ARDS severity during MV from the apparent ARDS grade during HFNC impossible. Conclusion HFNC is associated with lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio than either NIV or MV in the same patient, while NIV and MV provided similar PaO2/FIO2 and thus ARDS grade by Berlin definition. The large variation of PaO2/FIO2 ratio precludes using ARDS grade as a measure of pulmonary damage during HFNC.

Incidence, predictors and prognosis of respiratory support in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
pp. 204887262091994
Author(s):  
Thomas Metkus ◽  
P Elliott Miller ◽  
Carlos L Alviar ◽  
Jacob C Jentzer ◽  
Sean van Diepen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
St Segment Elevation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
St Segment

Background The incidences of invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive ventilation among patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and associated prognosis are not well characterized. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with admission diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction using the US National Inpatient Sample database between 2002–2014. The exposure variable was invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation within 24 h of admission, compared to no respiratory support. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We determined the association between respiratory support and mortality using Cox proportional hazard models. Results A total of 4,152,421 non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction hospitalizations were identified, among whom 1.3% required non-invasive ventilation and 1.9% required invasive mechanical ventilation. Non-invasive ventilation use increased over time (0.4% in 2002 to 2.4% in 2014, p<0.001) while there was no definite trend in invasive mechanical ventilation use. Revascularization was lower for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction hospitalizations including invasive mechanical ventilation (23.9%) and non-invasive ventilation (14.5%) compared to 36.5% of those without respiratory support ( p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was 3.1% for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction without respiratory support compared to 9.2% with non-invasive ventilation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.74–1.98) and 37.2% with invasive mechanical ventilation (adjusted hazard ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 2.88–3.19). Mortality for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-non-invasive ventilation is improving over time while mortality for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-invasive mechanical ventilation is increasing over time. Conclusion Mechanical respiratory support in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction is used in an important minority of cases, is increasing and is independently associated with mortality. Studies of the optimal management of acute coronary syndrome complicated by respiratory failure are needed to improve outcomes.

scholarly journals Non-invasive Respiratory Support in COVID-19: A Narrative Review

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manel Luján ◽  
Javier Sayas ◽  
Olga Mediano ◽  
Carlos Egea
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Questions ◽  
Continuous Positive Pressure ◽  
Nasal Flow ◽  
Improvement Procedures

Acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia may require a variety of non-pharmacological strategies in addition to oxygen therapy to avoid endotracheal intubation. The response to all these strategies, which include high nasal flow, continuous positive pressure, non-invasive ventilation, or even prone positioning in awake patients, can be highly variable depending on the predominant phenotypic involvement. Deciding when to replace conventional oxygen therapy with non-invasive respiratory support, which to choose, the role of combined methods, definitions, and attitudes toward treatment failure, and improved case improvement procedures are directly relevant clinical questions for the daily care of critically ill COVID-19 patients. The experience accumulated after more than a year of the pandemic should lead to developing recommendations that give answers to all these questions.

scholarly journals Severe COVID-19 pneumonia and barotrauma: From the frying pan into the fire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hariprasad Kalpakam ◽  
Sameer Bansal ◽  
Nithya Suresh ◽  
Samson Kade ◽  
Anmol Thorbole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
High Incidence

AbstractAimCOVID-19 pneumonia with ARDS (C-ARDS) has a high mortality. Preliminary reports indicate a higher incidence of barotrauma in patients with C-ARDS[1] both on invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) This study examines the incidence and risk factors for barotrauma and change in outcomes after barotrauma in patients with severe C-ARDS on positive pressure respiratory support (PPRS).Methods and materialsThis is a retrospective study of C-ARDS associated barotrauma over 5 months in patients on PPRS in a tertiary COVID care center. The type of barotrauma, intervention, related factors, such as type of respiratory support (iMV vs NIV), airway pressure prior to the occurrence of barotrauma, and post-barotrauma outcomes were analyzed.ResultsA total of 38/410 (9.3%) C-ARDS patients on PPRS [mean age 57.82 ± 13.3 years, 32 males (84.2%)] developed barotrauma. Of these, 20 patients (52.6%) were on NIV and 18 (47.4%) patients were iMV on standard recommended settings. The median P/F ratio of patients on MV at the time of barotrauma was 116.4 (IQR 72.4, 193.25). The details of barotrauma were as follows: 24 patients had pneumothorax (PTX), 2 had pneumo-mediastinum and 12 had subcutaneous emphysema. Overall, 24/38 (63.2%) patients, including 15/18 (83.3%) on MV succumbed to their illness. The barotrauma happened a median of 6.5 days (IQR 4.75,13) after admission and 15 days (IQR 10.25,18.0) from symptom onset. The median duration from barotrauma to death was 7 days (IQR 2.25, 8.0) and barotrauma to discharge (for survivors) was 12.5 days (IQR 8.0, 21.25). All patients received steroids and 11/38 (28.9%) received additional immunosuppression with tocilizumab.ConclusionA high incidence of barotrauma was seen in this large series of severe C-ARDS patients on PPRS. Barotrauma led to further deterioration in the clinical status leading to a fatal outcome in the majority of the MV patients, despite prompt treatment.

scholarly journals “Long COVID” follow-up pathway: results of longitudinal cohort study to investigate 6- and 12-month outcomes after hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Rigoni ◽  
Emanuele Torri ◽  
Giandomenico Nollo ◽  
Livia Delle Donne ◽  
Sebastiano Rizzardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Symptomatic Infection ◽  
Telephone Consultation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

Abstract Long-term sequelae of symptomatic infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 are largely undiscovered. We performed a prospective cohort study on consecutively hospitalized Sars-CoV-2 patients (March-May 2020) for evaluating COVID-19 outcomes at 6 and 12 months. After hospital discharge, patients were addressed to two follow-up pathways based on respiratory support needed during hospitalization. Outcomes were assessed by telephone consultation or ambulatory visit. Among 471 patients, 81.6% received no respiratory support during hospitalization; 8.2% received non-invasive ventilation; 0.2% required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). 64 patients died during hospitalization, therefore 407 were enrolled for follow-up. At 6 months, among 355patients, the 27.0% had any symptoms, 19.4% dyspnea, 5.4% neurological symptoms. Fifty-two out of 104 had major damages in interstitial Computed Tomography images. IMV patients had higher probability to suffer of neurological symptoms (OR=4.12, p=0.01). At 12 months, among 344, the 24.4% suffered on any symptoms, 14.0% dyspnea, 10.0% neurological symptoms. Severe interstitial lesions were present in 37 out of 47 investigated patients. IMV patients in respect to no respiratory support, had higher probability of experiencing symptoms (OR=3.51, p<0.01), dyspnea (OR=3.08, p<0.01 ), neurological symptoms (OR= 11.50, p<0.01). COVID-19 patients showed prolonged sequelae up to 12 months, highlighting the need of follow-up pathways for post-COVID-19 syndrome.

scholarly journals Role of Non-Invasive Respiratory Supports in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Failure Patients with Do Not Intubate Orders

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2783
Author(s):  
Clément Medrinal ◽  
Alexis Gillet ◽  
Fairuz Boujibar ◽  
Jonathan Dugernier ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Confounding By Indication ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Adjusted Risk Ratio ◽  
Set Up

The current gold-standard treatment for COVID-19-related hypoxemic respiratory failure is invasive mechanical ventilation. However, do not intubate orders (DNI), prevent the use of this treatment in some cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate if non-invasive ventilatory supports can provide a good therapeutic alternative to invasive ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and a DNI. Data were collected from four centres in three European countries. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection were included. We emulated a hypothetical target trial in which outcomes were compared in patients with a DNI order treated exclusively by non-invasive respiratory support with patients who could be intubated if necessary. We set up a propensity score and an inverse probability of treatment weighting to remove confounding by indication. Four-hundred patients were included: 270 were eligible for intubation and 130 had a DNI order. The adjusted risk ratio for death among patients eligible for intubation was 0.81 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.42). The median length of stay in acute care for survivors was similar between groups (18 (10–31) vs. (19 (13–23.5); p = 0.76). The use of non-invasive respiratory support is a good compromise for patients with severe COVID-19 and a do not intubate order.

Hostile Takeovers and Anti-takeover Defenses in the Russian Corporate Market

2007 ◽  
pp. 70-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Demidova
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Hostile Takeovers ◽  
Russian Market ◽  
Takeover Defenses ◽  
The Cost ◽  
European Markets

This article analyzes definitions and the role of hostile takeovers at the Russian and European markets for corporate control. It develops the methodology of assessing the efficiency of anti-takeover defenses adapted to the conditions of the Russian market. The paper uses the cost-benefit analysis, where the costs and benefits of the pre-bid and post-bid defenses are compared.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document