scholarly journals Impact of Regional Block Failure in Ambulatory Hand Surgery on Patient Management: A Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2453
Author(s):  
Lucile Picard ◽  
Pierre Belnou ◽  
Claire Debes ◽  
Nathanael Lapidus ◽  
Eileen Sung Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Regional Block ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
The Impact

Regional anesthesia (RA) is an anesthetic technique essential for the performance of ambulatory surgery. Failure rates range from 6% to 20%, and the consequences of these failures have been poorly investigated. We determined the incidence and the impact of regional block failure on patient management in the ambulatory setting. This retrospective cohort study includes all adult patients who were admitted to a French University Hospital (Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP) between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 for unplanned ambulatory distal upper limb surgery. Univariate and stepwise multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with block failure. Among the 562 patients included, 48 (8.5%) had a block failure. RA failure was associated with a longer surgery duration (p = 0.02), more frequent intraoperative analgesics administration (p < 0.01), increased incidence of unplanned hospitalizations (p < 0.001), and a 39% prolongation of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) length of stay (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with block failure were female sex (p = 0.04), an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > 2 (p = 0.03), history of substance abuse (p = 0.01), and performance of the surgery outside of the specific ambulatory surgical unit (p = 0.01). Here, we have documented a significant incidence of block failure in ambulatory hand surgery, with impairment in the organization of care. Identifying patients at risk of failure could help improve their management, especially by focusing on providing care in a dedicated ambulatory circuit.

scholarly journals Factors Associated with Clostridioides (Clostridium) Difficile Infection and Colonization: Ongoing Prospective Cohort Study in a French University Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 7528
Author(s):  
Nagham Khanafer ◽  
Philippe Vanhems ◽  
Sabrina Bennia ◽  
Géraldine Martin-Gaujard ◽  
Laurent Juillard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Good Clinical Practice ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Virulent Strains ◽  
Scientific Meetings ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Introduction: Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile can be isolated from stool in 3% of healthy adults and in at least 10% of asymptomatic hospitalized patients. C. difficile, the most common cause of hospital-acquired infectious diarrhea in the developed world, has re-emerged in recent years with increasing incidence and severity. In an effort to reduce the spread of the pathogen, published recommendations suggest isolation and contact precautions for patients suffering from C. difficile infection (CDI). However, asymptomatic colonized patients are not targeted by infection control policies, and active surveillance for colonization is not routinely performed. Moreover, given the current changes in the epidemiology of CDI, particularly the emergence of new virulent strains either in the hospital or community settings, there is a need for identification of factors associated with colonization by C. difficile and CDI. Methods and analysis: We are carrying out a prospective, observational, cohort study in Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, a 900-bed university hospital in Lyon, France. All consecutive adult patients admitted on selected units are eligible to participate in the study. Stool samples or rectal swabs for C. difficile testing are obtained on admission, every 3–5 days during hospitalization, at the onset of diarrhea (if applicable), and at discharge. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses will be completed to mainly estimate the proportion of asymptomatic colonization at admission, and to evaluate differences between factors associated with colonization and those related to CDI. Ethics: The study is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, French law, and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The study protocol design was approved by the participating units, the ethics committee and the hospital institutional review board (Comité de protection des personnes et Comission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés; N°: 00009118). Dissemination: The results of this study will be disseminated by presenting the findings locally at each participating ward, as well as national and international scientific meetings. Findings will be shared with interested national societies crafting guidelines in CDI.

scholarly journals Can an informative video about the anesthesia technique be an effective tool to treat preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing minor, elective, outpatient hand surgery procedures?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Fusetti ◽  
Samuele Ceruti ◽  
Michele Musiari ◽  
Bruno Minotti ◽  
Stefano Cafarotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Anxiety Level ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Patient’S Satisfaction ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Anesthesia Technique ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clinical Trial Methods

Abstract Background Preoperative anxiety is a common problem with an impact on surgical outcome, anesthetic drug amount and patient’s satisfaction. An important component of preoperative anxiety is worries related to anesthesia. Suitable patients information has been shown to reduce preoperative anxiety level and this can be effectively achieved through a video. Objectives To assess the impact of an informative video about regional intra-venous anesthesia technique on patient’s preoperative anxiety levels before minor ambulatory hand surgery procedures. Study design retrospective, single-centre, case-control clinical trial. Methods To assess the impact of an educational video illustrating all the passages of intravenous regional anesthesia on preoperative anxiety level and overall patients’ satisfaction. Results Anxiety level measured after admission in the day hospital clinic did not differ between the two groups, however overall patients’ satisfaction levels were higher when patients were shown the video. Conclusions Informative videos does not seem to significantly reduce preoperative anxiety but have the potential to increase patients’ satisfaction in the ambulatory setting.

Reducing the number of unnecessary laboratory tests within hospital through the use of educational interventions

2021 ◽  
pp. 000456322110406
Author(s):  
Michael Thurm ◽  
Helen Craggs ◽  
Merlin Watts ◽  
Anthony Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Blood Tests ◽  
Medical Teams ◽  
The Impact

Background The growing number of laboratory investigation requests is placing an increased burden upon NHS resources. Around a quarter of all tests are unnecessary repeats, and almost a third have no impact on patient management. Doctors recognise that tests should only be performed when clinically indicated, but a culture persists of undertaking unnecessary repeat investigations. Methods A cohort study was undertaken at a district general hospital to observe the impact of introducing educational interventions in the form of a poster and a series of educational lectures, encouraging clinicians to consider whether an investigation was clinically indicated. Data was collected from nine different sites across the hospital run by different medical teams regarding the number of tests undertaken and the impact on patient care. Results Data from over 13,000 tests and over 2000 patients was analysed from nine different sites across the hospital. There was a significant reduction (33%, p = 0.0001) in the number of blood tests performed. This reduction in testing saved £7006 over the course of 1 month, in addition to other benefits. There was a reduction in testing in eight out of the nine sites in which the study was undertaken, demonstrating good generalisability of results. There was no significant increase in length of admission or mortality. Conclusion Educational interventions to doctors have a significant and safe impact in reducing the number of unnecessary investigations, providing cost saving benefits to the NHS.

scholarly journals Advantages of a cohort study on cardiac arrest conducted by nurses

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 762-766
Author(s):  
Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo ◽  
Rodrigo Luiz Vancini ◽  
Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes ◽  
Meiry Fernanda Pinto Okuno ◽  
Ruth Ester Assayag Batista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Training Strategy ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
Telephone Calls ◽  
One Year ◽  
And Training

AbstractOBJECTIVEIdentifying factors associated to survival after cardiac arrest.METHODAn experience report of a cohort study conducted in a university hospital, with a consecutive sample comprised of 285 patients. Data were collected for a year by trained nurses. The training strategy was conducted through an expository dialogue lecture. Collection monitoring was carried out by nurses via telephone calls, visits to the emergency room and by medical record searches. The neurological status of survivors was evaluated at discharge, after six months and one year.RESULTSOf the 285 patients, 16 survived until hospital discharge, and 13 remained alive after one year, making possible to identify factors associated with survival. There were no losses in the process.CONCLUSIONCohort studies help identify risks and disease outcomes. Considering cardiac arrest, they can subsidize public policies, encourage future studies and training programs for CPR, thereby improving the prognosis of patients.

scholarly journals Impact of particulate matter on mothers and babies in Antwerp (IPANEMA): a prospective cohort study on the impact of pollutants and particulate matter in pregnancy

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e020028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Van den Eeden ◽  
Nathalie Lambrechts ◽  
Veerle Verheyen ◽  
Mario Berth ◽  
Greet Schoeters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Air Pollution ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Particulate Matter ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Hair Samples ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionAir pollution is a hot topic and is known to cause multiple health issues. Especially pregnant women seem to be vulnerable to environmental issues. There are data suggesting that exposure contributes to hypertensive disorders.This study aims to evaluate the effects of exposure to particulate matter (PM) and outdoor air pollutants on the clinical pregnancy outcome for mother and child and to determine which biochemical changes in maternal, placental and cord blood best explain this effect.Methods and analysisThis study is a prospective cohort study. We aim to recruit 200 pregnant women. The outcome measurements will include maternal parameters, labour parameters and neonatal parameters.Multiple samples will be analysed such as maternal urine samples (8-oxo-deoxyguanosine), maternal blood samples (routine blood sampling, biomarkers of pre-eclampsia and transcript markers), maternal hair samples, neonatal blood samples (transcript markers) combined with extensive questionnaires.Ethics and disseminationWe obtain informed consent from each participant prior to enrolment in the study.The study has received approval by the Ethical Committee of the Antwerp University Hospital (14/40/411).IPANEMA is the first prospective study to assess the impact of PM on mothers and babies in Antwerp, Belgium.Findings from this study will contribute to improve knowledge on the impact of exposure to air pollution on mothers and babies and will also define biomarkers as predictors for pregnant women at risk.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: 14/40/411. Registered 22-10-2015.

scholarly journals 1342. Impact of HIV Infection on Treatment Outcome of New Tuberculosis Patients Attending Tuberculosis and Antiretroviral Treatment Services in the Community-Based Hospital, Thailand: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S485-S486
Author(s):  
Subencha Pinsai
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Treatment Success Rate ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV are one of the significant public health problems in Thailand, and an estimated 15,000 individuals have a dual infection. Both HIV and TB each disease speeds up the progression of each other. TB is the leading cause of death in HIV-infected individuals, and HIV coinfected TB patients have disease-specific, and treatment affected their treatment outcomes. There is insufficient evidence on issues of TB and HIV co-infection patients received treatment. This study aimed to assess the impact of HIV status on treatment outcome of TB patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study among TB patients who registered to service at Chaophraya Abhaibhubejhr Hospital, Prachin Buri, Thailand from October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018. All patients’ demographic data, diagnosis, and treatment were retrieved. Clinical characteristics, treatment outcome, and factors associated with treatment outcome were analyzed. Results There were 49 (10.65%) HIV among 460 TB patients with a median (IQR) age of 44 (32–61) years old and 65.2% were males. Disseminated TB and extrapulmonary TB were higher in HIV coinfected group (P < 0.001). All pulmonary TB patients’ lower lobe involvement was higher in HIV coinfected group (62.50 vs. 36.00, P = 0.001). In HIV coinfected group median CD4 was 134 cell/mm3 (IQR 19–294), 66.67% were diagnosed HIV infection after TB diagnosis, the median time from TB diagnosed to antiretroviral was 29 days (IQR 21–48). The overall treatment success rate was 93.04%; the treatment success rate was similar in HIV coinfected TB patients (89.80%) and non- HIV-infected patients (93.43%) (P = 0.66).Adverse drug reactions were higher in HIV coinfected group (44.89% vs 12.41%) (P < 0.001). By multiple stepwise logistic regression, factors associated with anti-TB drug adverse reactions were having HIV infection (OR 7.99; 95% CI 3.73–17.10, P < 0.001), Age >60 years (OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.43–4.87, P = 0.002) and female sex (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.11–3.52, P = 0.02). Conclusion There is a high TB treatment success rate among patients who have treated for TB, but adverse drug events in HIV co-infected TB patients is higher than that observed in non-HIV-infected patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study of the Impact of Glucocorticoid Treatment in SARS-CoV-2 Infection Mortality

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Fernández-Cruz ◽  
Belén Ruiz-Antorán ◽  
Ana Muñoz-Gómez ◽  
Aránzazu Sancho-López ◽  
Patricia Mills-Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Steroid Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Glucocorticoid Treatment ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Evidence to support the use of steroids in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is lacking. We aim to determine the impact of steroid use for COVID-19 pneumonia on hospital mortality. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study in a university hospital in Madrid, Spain, during March of 2020. To determine the role of steroids in in-hospital mortality, patients admitted with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia and treated with steroids were compared to patients not treated with steroids, and we adjusted with a propensity score for patients on steroid treatment. Survival times were compared using the log rank test. Different steroid regimens were compared and adjusted with a second propensity score. During the study period, 463 out of 848 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia fulfilled inclusion criteria. Among them, 396 (46.7%) patients were treated with steroids and 67 patients were not. Global mortality was 15.1%. The median time to steroid treatment from symptom onset was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8 to 13 days). In-hospital mortality was lower in patients treated with steroids than in controls (13.9% [55/396] versus 23.9% [16/67]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.96]; P = 0.044). Steroid treatment reduced mortality by 41.8% relative to the mortality with no steroid treatment (relative risk reduction, 0.42 [95% confidence interval, 0.048 to 0.65]). Initial treatment with 1 mg/kg of body weight/day of methylprednisolone versus steroid pulses was not associated with in-hospital mortality (13.5% [42/310] versus 15.1% [13/86]; odds ratio [OR], 0.880 [95% confidence interval, 0.449 to 1.726]; P = 0.710). Our results show that the survival of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is higher in patients treated with glucocorticoids than in those not treated. Rates of in-hospital mortality were not different between initial regimens of 1 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone and glucocorticoid pulses.

scholarly journals Development and validation of the OUTCoV score to predict the risk of hospitalisation among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in ambulatory settings: a prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044242
Author(s):  
Frederique Jacquerioz ◽  
Stéphanie Baggio ◽  
Angele Gayet-Ageron ◽  
François Chappuis ◽  
Laurent Getaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Rule Out

ObjectivesTo develop and validate a rule-out prediction model for the risk of hospitalisation among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the ambulatory setting to derive a simple score to determine outpatient follow-up.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingSwiss university hospital.Participants1459 individuals with a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 infection between 2 March and 23 April 2020.MethodsWe applied the rule of 10 events per variable to construct our multivariable model and included a maximum of eight covariates. We assessed the model performance in terms of discrimination and calibration and performed internal validation to estimate the statistical optimism of the final model. The final prediction model included age, fever, dyspnoea, hypertension and chronic respiratory disease. To develop the OUTCoV score, we assigned points for each predictor that were proportional to the coefficients of the regression equation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios were estimated, including positive and negative predictive values in different thresholds.Main outcome measureThe primary outcome was COVID-19-related hospitalisation.ResultsThe OUTCoV score ranged from 0 to 7.5 points. The two threshold parameters with optimal rule-out and rule-in characteristics for the risk of hospitalisation were 3 and 5.5, respectively. Outpatients with a score <3 (997/1459; 68.3%) had no follow-up as at low risk of hospitalisation (1.8%; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8). For a score ≥5.5 (20/1459; 1.4%), the hospitalisation risk was higher (30%; 95% CI 11.9 to 54.3).ConclusionsThe OUTCoV score allows to rule out two-thirds of outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection presenting a low hospitalisation risk and to identify those at high risk that require careful follow-up to assess the need for hospitalisation. The model provides a simple decision-making tool for an effective allocation of resources to maintain quality care for outpatient populations.

scholarly journals The impact of adding fetal MRI to sonographically diagnosed intrauterine ventriculomegaly: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Mahmod ◽  
Sara M Ragaee ◽  
Soha T Hamed ◽  
Ahmed Abbas ◽  
Mohamed A.F. Mourad
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Fetal Mri ◽  
Added Value ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Sonographic Examination ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
The Impact

Objective: Intrauterine fetal ventriculomegaly (IVM) is one of the most commonly detected fetal anomalies. Prenatal diagnosis in IVM is considered a challenge with a significant impact on management. The current study aims to evaluate the added value of performing fetal MRI to sonographically diagnosed IVM. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary University Hospital in the period between January 2017 and March 2019. We included pregnant women with a single fetus sonographically diagnosed IVM (symmetrical or asymmetrical). First, a basic obstetric sonographic examination was done, followed by a detailed (2D/3D) fetal CNS anomaly scan for the detection of other associated anomalies. A fetal MRI brain scan was performed for all cases. Results: Sixty women were included in the study. Of the 60 fetuses with IVM, additional findings were seen on MRI in 14 cases (23%), and most of these findings were identified in fetuses with severe IVM (about 50%). No additional abnormalities were identified in fetuses of less than 24 weeks gestation. Callosal and septum pellucidum lesions (29%), along with posterior fossa abnormalities (28%) and cortical malformations (21%) accounted for the most common additional significant fetal MRI findings. Fetal MRI sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in correlation with those of prenatal ultrasound turned out to be notably higher, approaching nearly 100 %. Conclusions: Fetal MRI for sonographically diagnosed moderate or severe IVM is recommended to guide clinical management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document