scholarly journals Characteristics of Warm Clouds and Precipitation in South China during the Pre-Flood Season Using Datasets from a Cloud Radar, a Ceilometer, and a Disdrometer

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 3045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiafeng Zheng ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Haonan Chen ◽  
Yabin Gou ◽  
Yuzhang Che ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South China ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Vertical Orientation ◽  
Integrated Technology ◽  
Flood Season ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Type Size ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates

The millimeter-wave cloud radar, ceilometer, and disdrometer have been widely used to observe clouds and precipitation. However, there are some drawbacks when those three instruments are solely employed due to their own limitations, such as the fact that radars usually suffer from signal attenuation and ceilometers/disdrometers cannot provide measurements of the hydrometeors of aloft clouds and precipitation. Thus, in this paper, we developed an integrated technology by combining and utilizing the advantages of three instruments together to investigate the vertical structure and diurnal variation of warm clouds and precipitation, and the raindrop size distribution. Specifically, the technology consists of appropriate data processing, quality control, and retrieval methods. It was implemented to study the warm clouds and precipitation in South China during the pre-flood season of 2016. The results showed that the hydrometeors of warm clouds and precipitation were mainly distributed below 2.5 km and most of the rainfall events were very light with a rain rate less than 1 mm h−1, however, the stronger precipitation primarily contributed the accumulated rain amount. Furthermore, a rising trend of cloud base height from 1000 to 1900 BJT was found. The cloud top height and cloud thickness gradually increased from 1200 BJT to reach a maximum at 1600 BJT (Beijing Standard Time, UTC+8), and then decreased until 2000 BJT. Also, three periods of the apparent rainfall on the ground of the day, namely, 0400–0700 BJT, 1400–1800 BJT, and 2300–2400 BJT were observed. During three periods, the raindrops had wider size spectra, higher number concentrations, larger rain rates, and higher water contents than at other times. The hydrometeor type, size, and concentration were gradually changed in the vertical orientation. The raindrop size distributions of warm precipitation in the air and on the ground were different, which can be expressed by γ distributions N(D) = 1.49 × 104D−0.9484exp(−6.79D) in the air and N(D) = 1.875 × 103D0.862exp(−2.444D) on the ground, where D and N(D) denote the diameter and number concentration of the raindrops, respectively.

scholarly journals Exploring the use of a column model for the characterization of microphysical processes in warm rain: results from a homogeneous rainshaft model

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. P. Prat ◽  
A. P. Barros
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Column Model ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
State Boundary ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Microphysical Processes ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Rain Rates

Abstract. A study of the evolution of raindrop spectra (raindrop size distribution, DSD) between cloud base and the ground surface was conducted using a column model of stochastic coalescense-breakup dynamics. Numerical results show that, under steady-state boundary conditions (i.e. constant rainfall rate and DSD at the top of the rainshaft), the equilibrium DSD is achieved only for high rain rates produced by midlevel or higher clouds and after long simulation times (~30 min or greater). Because these conditions are not typical of most rainfall, the results suggest that the theoretical equilibrium DSD might not be attainable for the duration of individual rain events, and thus DSD observations from field experiments should be analyzed conditional on the specific storm environment under which they were obtained.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Clouds and Raindrop Size Distribution in Xinjiang, Using Cloud Radar Datasets and a Disdrometer

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1382
Author(s):  
Yong Zeng ◽  
Lianmei Yang ◽  
Zuyi Zhang ◽  
Zepeng Tong ◽  
Jiangang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diurnal Variation ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Diurnal Changes ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
R Relation

Observation data from March to May 2020 of the Ka-band millimeter-wave cloud radar and disdrometer, located in Xinjiang, a typical arid region of China, were used to study the diurnal variation of clouds and precipitation, raindrop size distribution (DSD), and the physical parameters of raindrops. The results showed that there are conspicuous diurnal changes in clouds and precipitation. There is a decreasing trend of the cloud base height (CBH) from 05:00 to 19:00 CST (China Standard Time, UTC +8) and a rising trend of CBHs from 20:00 to 04:00 CST. The cloud top height (CTH) and the cloud thickness show a rising trend from 03:00 to 05:00 CST, 12:00 to 14:00 CST, and 20:00 to 01:00 CST. The diurnal variation of clouds is mainly driven by wind and temperature closely related to the topography of the study area. There are three apparent precipitation periods during the day, namely, 02:00–09:00 CST, 12:00 CST, and 17:00–21:00 CST. The changes in the physical parameters of raindrops are more drastic and evident with a lower CBH, lower CTH, and higher number of cloud layers from 12:00 to 21:00 CST than other times, which are closely related to day-to-day variations of systems moving through, and incoming solar radiation and the mountain–valley wind circulation caused by the trumpet-shaped topography that opens to the west played a secondary role. The DSD is in agreement with a normalized gamma distribution, and the value of the shape factor μ is significantly different from the fixed μ value in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The rain in arid Xinjiang had a higher concentration of raindrops and a smaller average raindrop diameter than the rain in other humid regions of the Central and Southeast Asian continent. In the Z−R (radar reflectivity–rain rate) relationship, Z=249R1.20 is derived for stratiform rain, and it is significantly different from humid regions. Using Z/Dm (mass–weighted mean diameter) and R, a new empirical relationship Z/Dm=214R1.20 is established, and improvement is obtained in rain retrieval by using the Z/Dm−R relation relative to the conventional Z−R relation. Additionally, the Nt−R, Dm−R, Nw−R, and Nt−Nw relationships with larger differences from humid regions are established by fitting the power-law equations. These results are useful for improving the data parameters of microphysical processes of WRF and the accuracy of quantitative precipitation estimation in arid regions.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Vertical Air Motions and Raindrop Size Distribution Retrievals of a Squall Line Based on Cloud Radar Doppler Spectral Density Data

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Ningkun Ma ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Yichen Chen ◽  
Yang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Density ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Squall Line ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Air Velocity ◽  
Density Data ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Reflectivity Factor

A squall line is a type of strongly organized mesoscale convective system that can cause severe weather disasters. Thus, it is crucial to explore the dynamic structure and hydrometeor distributions in squall lines. This study analyzed a squall line over Guangdong Province on 6 May 2016 that was observed using a Ka-band millimeter-wave cloud radar (CR) and an S-band dual-polarization radar (PR). Doppler spectral density data obtained by the CR were used to retrieve the vertical air motions and raindrop size distribution (DSD). The results showed the following: First, the CR detected detailed vertical profiles and their evolution before and during the squall line passage. In the convection time segment (segment B), heavy rain existed with a reflectivity factor exceeding 35 dBZ and a velocity spectrum width exceeding 1.3 m s−1. In the PR detection, the differential reflectivity factor (Zdr) was 1–2 dB, and the large specific differential phase (Kdp) also represented large liquid water content. In the transition and stratiform cloud time segments (segments B and C), the rain stabilized gradually, with decreasing cloud tops, stable precipitation, and a 0 °C layer bright band. Smaller Kdp values (less than 0.9) were distributed around the 0 °C layer, which may have been caused by the melting of ice crystal particles. Second, from the CR-retrieved vertical air velocity, before squall line passage, downdrafts dominated in local convection and weak updrafts existed in higher-altitude altostratus clouds. In segment B, the updraft air velocity reached more than 8 m s−1 below the 0 °C layer. From segments C to D, the updrafts changed gradually into weak and wide-ranging downdrafts. Third, in the comparison of DSD values retrieved at 1.5 km and DSD values on the ground, the retrieved DSD line was lower than the disdrometer, the overall magnitude of the DSD retrieved was smaller, and the difference decreased from segments C to D. The standardized intercept parameter (Nw) and shape parameter (μ) of the DSD retrieved at 1.8 km showed good agreement with the disdrometer results, and the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) was smaller than that on the ground, but very close to the PR-retrieved Dm result at 2 km. Therefore, comparing with the DSD retrieved at around 2 km, the overall number concentration remained unchanged and Dm got larger on the ground, possibly reflecting the process of raindrop coalescence. Lastly, the average vertical profiles of several quantities in all segments showed that, first of all, the decrease of Nw and Dm with height in segments C and D was similar, reflecting the collision effect of falling raindrops. The trends were opposite in segment B, indicating that raindrops underwent intense mixing and rapid collision and growth in this segment. Then, PR-retrieved Dm profiles can verify the rationality of the CR-retrieved Dm. Finally, a vertical velocity profile peak generated a larger Dm especially in segments C and D.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Assumption through Comparison of Rain Rates of Measured and Radar-Equivalent Gamma DSD

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1618-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Eugenio Gorgucci ◽  
Luca Baldini ◽  
Ali Tokay
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates

AbstractTo date, one of the most widely used parametric forms for modeling raindrop size distribution (DSD) is the three-parameter gamma. The aim of this paper is to analyze the error of assuming such parametric form to model the natural DSDs. To achieve this goal, a methodology is set up to compare the rain rate obtained from a disdrometer-measured drop size distribution with the rain rate of a gamma drop size distribution that produces the same triplets of dual-polarization radar measurements, namely reflectivity factor, differential reflectivity, and specific differential phase shift. In such a way, any differences between the values of the two rain rates will provide information about how well the gamma distribution fits the measured precipitation. The difference between rain rates is analyzed in terms of normalized standard error and normalized bias using different radar frequencies, drop shape–size relations, and disdrometer integration time. The study is performed using four datasets of DSDs collected by two-dimensional video disdrometers deployed in Huntsville (Alabama) and in three different prelaunch campaigns of the NASA–Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) ground validation program including the Hydrological Cycle in Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) special observation period (SOP) 1 field campaign in Rome. The results show that differences in rain rates of the disdrometer DSD and the gamma DSD determining the same dual-polarization radar measurements exist and exceed those related to the methodology itself and to the disdrometer sampling error, supporting the finding that there is an error associated with the gamma DSD assumption.

scholarly journals A Synergy Approach to Estimate Properties of Raindrop Size Distributions Using a Doppler Lidar and Cloud Radar

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1095-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Träumner ◽  
Jan Handwerker ◽  
Andreas Wieser ◽  
Jens Grenzhäuser
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Analytical Description ◽  
Doppler Lidar ◽  
Fall Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Approximation ◽  
Size Dependent ◽  
Cloud Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Remote Sensing Systems ◽  
Raindrop Size

Abstract Remote sensing systems like radars and lidars are frequently used in atmospheric measurement campaigns. Because of their different wavelengths, they operate in different scattering regimes. Combined use may result in new measurement options. Here, an approach to estimate raindrop size distribution using vertical velocities measured by a lidar–radar combination is introduced and tested using a 2-μm Doppler lidar and a 35.5-GHz cloud radar. The lidar spectra are evaluated to deduce air motion from the aerosol peak and the fall velocity of the raindrops from the rain peak. The latter is weighted by the area (D2) of the scatters. The fall velocity derived from radar measurements is weighted by D6 (Rayleigh approximation). Assuming a size-dependent fall velocity and an analytical description of the drop size distribution, its parameters are calculated from these data. Comparison of the raindrop size distribution from the lidar–radar combination with in situ measurements on the ground yields satisfying results.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the New Version of the Laser-Optical Disdrometer, OTT Parsivel2

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1276-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tokay ◽  
David B. Wolff ◽  
Walter A. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Drop Size ◽  
Heavy Rain ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Goddard Space Flight Center ◽  
Absolute Bias ◽  
Fall Speed ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates

Abstract A comparative study of raindrop size distribution measurements has been conducted at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center where the focus was to evaluate the performance of the upgraded laser-optical OTT Particle Size Velocity (Parsivel2; P2) disdrometer. The experimental setup included a collocated pair of tipping-bucket rain gauges, OTT Parsivel (P1) and P2 disdrometers, and Joss–Waldvogel (JW) disdrometers. Excellent agreement between the two collocated rain gauges enabled their use as a relative reference for event rain totals. A comparison of event total showed that the P2 had a 6% absolute bias with respect to the reference gauges, considerably lower than the P1 and JW disdrometers. Good agreement was also evident between the JW and P2 in hourly raindrop spectra for drop diameters between 0.5 and 4 mm. The P2 drop concentrations mostly increased toward small sizes, and the peak concentrations were mostly observed in the first three measurable size bins. The P1, on the other hand, underestimated small drops and overestimated the large drops, particularly in heavy rain rates. From the analysis performed, it appears that the P2 is an improvement over the P1 model for both drop size and rainfall measurements. P2 mean fall velocities follow accepted terminal fall speed relationships at drop sizes less than 1 mm. As a caveat, the P2 had approximately 1 m s−1 slower mean fall speed with respect to the terminal fall speed near 1 mm, and the difference between the mean measured and terminal fall speeds reduced with increasing drop size. This caveat was recognized as a software bug by the manufacturer and is currently being investigated.

Uncertainties of GPM DPR Rain Estimates Caused by DSD Parameterizations

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 2524-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Liao ◽  
Robert Meneghini ◽  
Ali Tokay
Keyword(s):  
Dual Wavelength ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Comparison Of The Results ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
The Impact

AbstractA framework based on measured raindrop size distribution (DSD) data has been developed to assess uncertainties in DSD models employed in Ku- and Ka-band dual-wavelength radar retrievals. In this study, the rain rates and attenuation coefficients from DSD parameters derived by dual-wavelength algorithms are compared with those directly obtained from measured DSD spectra. The impact of the DSD gamma parameterizations on rain estimation from the Global Precipitation Measurement mission (GPM) Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) is examined for the cases of a fixed shape factor μ as well as for a constrained μ—that is, a μ–Λ relation (a relationship between the shape parameter and slope parameter Λ of the gamma DSD)—by using 11 Particle Size and Velocity (Parsivel) disdrometer measurements with a total number of about 50 000 one-minute spectra that were collected during the Iowa Flood Studies (IFloodS) experiment. It is found that the DPR-like dual-wavelength techniques provide fairly accurate estimates of rain rate and attenuation if a fixed-μ gamma DSD model is used, with the value of μ ranging from 3 to 6. Comparison of the results reveals that the retrieval errors from the μ–Λ relations are generally small, with biases of less than ±10%, and are comparable to the results from a fixed-μ gamma model with μ equal to 3 and 6. The DSD evaluation procedure is also applied to retrievals in which a lognormal DSD model is used.

scholarly journals Correction of raindrop size distributions measured by Parsivel disdrometers, using a two-dimensional-video-disdrometer as a reference

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 8521-8579 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. Raupach ◽  
A. Berne
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Correction Method ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Field Campaigns ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
First And Second Generation ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
Mediterranean France

Abstract. The raindrop size distribution (DSD) quantifies the micro-structure of rainfall and is critical to studying precipitation processes. We present a method to improve the accuracy of DSD measurements from Parsivel disdrometers, using a two-dimensional-video-disdrometer (2DVD) as a reference instrument. Parsivel disdrometers bin recorded raindrops into velocity and equivolume diameter classes, but may mis-estimate the number of drops per class. We define a filter for raw disdrometer measurements to remove particles that are unlikely to be plausible raindrops. In our correction method, drop velocities are corrected with reference to theoretical models of terminal drop velocity. Non-plausible measurements are removed. Lastly, drop concentrations are corrected such that on average the Parsivel concentrations match those recorded by a 2DVD. The correction can be trained on and applied to data from both generations of Parsivel disdrometers. The method was applied to data collected during field campaigns in Mediterranean France, for a network of first and second generation Parsivel disdrometers. We compared the moments of the resulting DSDs to those of a collocated 2DVD, and the resulting DSD-derived rain rates to collocated rain gauges. The correction vastly improved the accuracy of the moments of the Parsivel DSDs, and in the majority of cases the rain rate match with collocated rain gauges was improved.

Clarifying remotely-retrieved precipitation of shallow marine clouds from the NSF/NCAR Gulfstream V

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mampi Sarkar ◽  
Paquita Zuidema ◽  
Virendra Ghate
Keyword(s):  
Doppler Radar ◽  
Rain Attenuation ◽  
Doppler Velocity ◽  
Distribution Width ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Remote Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Rain Rates ◽  
The Impact

AbstractPrecipitation is a key process within the shallow cloud lifecycle. The Cloud System Evolution in the Trades (CSET) campaign included the first deployment of a 94 GHz Doppler radar and 532 nm lidar. Despite a larger sampling volume, initial mean radar/lidar retrieved rain rates (Schwartz et al. 2019) based on the upward-pointing remote sensor datasets are systematically less than those measured by in-situ precipitation probes in the cumulus regime. Subsequent retrieval improvements produce rainrates that compare better to in-situ values, but still underestimate. Retrieved shallow cumulus drop sizes can remain too small and too few, with an overestimated shape parameter narrowing the raindrop size distribution too much. Three potential causes for the discrepancy are explored: the gamma functional fit to the dropsize distribution, attenuation by rain and cloud water, and an underaccounting of Mie dampening of the reflectivity. A truncated exponential fit may represent the dropsizes below a showering cumulus cloud more realistically, although further work would be needed to fully evaluate the impact of a different dropsize representation upon the retrieval. The rain attenuation is within the measurement uncertainty of the radar. Mie dampening of the reflectivity is shown to be significant, in contrast to previous stratocumulus campaigns with lighter rain rates, and may be difficult to constrain well with the remote measurements. An alternative approach combines an a priori determination of the dropsize distribution width based on the in-situ data with the mean radar Doppler velocity and reflectivity. This can produce realistic retrievals, although a more comprehensive assessment is needed to better characterize the retrieval errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document