Velocity-Based Resistance Training on 1-RM, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Weight resistance training (RT) has been shown to positively influence physical performance. Within the last two decades, a methodology based on monitoring RT through movement velocity (also called velocity-based resistance training, VBRT) has emerged. The aim of this PRISMA-based systematic review was to evaluate the effect of VBRT programs on variables related to muscle strength (one-repetition maximum, 1-RM), and high-speed actions (vertical jump, and sprint performance) in trained subjects. The search for published articles was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, SPORT Discus/EBSCO, OVID, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases using Boolean algorithms independently. A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review (a low-to-moderate overall risk of bias of the analyzed studies was detected). VBRT is an effective method to improve 1-RM, vertical jump and sprint. According to the results of the analyzed studies, it is not necessary to reach high muscle failure in order to achieve the best training results. These findings reinforce the fact that it is possible to optimize exercise adaptations with less fatigue. Future studies should corroborate these findings in female population.

Download Full-text

Effect of Plyometric Training on Sport Performance in Adolescent Overhead Athletes: A Systematic Review

Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach ◽

10.1177/1941738120938007 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 37-44

Author(s):

Leyla Eraslan ◽

Birgit Castelein ◽

Valentien Spanhove ◽

Ceren Orhan ◽

Irem Duzgun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Sport Performance ◽

Sprint Performance ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Training Intervention ◽

Control Group ◽

Plyometric Training ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Overhead Athletes ◽

Mesh Terms

Context: Plyometric training has been shown to be beneficial in adolescent overhead athletes. However, existing research on the effects of plyometrics on sport performance has been limited. Objective: To systematically review the current literature to investigate whether plyometric training intervention improves upper- and lower-body sport performance. Data Sources: Two electronic databases (MEDLINE and Web of Science) were searched using specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms up to February 2019, and hand-searching was performed by looking to relevant studies that were cited in other studies. Study Selection: A total of 932 items were identified and were further assessed for the eligibility in the systematic review. For a study to be eligible, each of the following inclusion criteria had to be met: (1) participants were aged 13 to 18 years and selected from a sports or athletic population and the study (2) involved the evaluation of a plyometric training intervention with an aim to improve sports performance; (3) must have included a control intervention and/or control group; (4) included a quantitative objective measure of sport performance variables concerning throwing, jumping, running, and sprinting; and (5) was published in English. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Data Extraction: A first screening was conducted based on title and abstract of the articles. In the second screening, the full text of the remaining articles was evaluated for the fulfillment of the inclusion criteria. Results: A total of 14 studies were included in this review. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from low to moderate. There is moderate evidence that plyometric training intervention improves throwing and jumping performances. There is also preliminary evidence that plyometric training intervention improves sprint performance. Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that sport performance consisting of throwing capacity, jumping ability, and sprint performance significantly improved due to plyometric training interventions in adolescent overhead athletes.

Download Full-text

Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on muscle-specific hypertrophy: A systematic review

European Journal of Sport Science ◽

10.1080/17461391.2018.1434563 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 18 (4) ◽

pp. 473-482 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Daniel A. Hackett ◽

Timothy B. Davies ◽

Rhonda Orr ◽

Kenny Kuang ◽

Mark Halaki

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Resistance Training ◽

Movement Velocity

Download Full-text

Pharmacogenomic associations of adverse drug reactions in asthma: systematic review and research prioritisation

The Pharmacogenomics Journal ◽

10.1038/s41397-019-0140-y ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (5) ◽

pp. 621-628 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Charlotte King ◽

Amanda McKenna ◽

Niloufar Farzan ◽

Susanne J. Vijverberg ◽

Marc P. van der Schee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Adverse Drug Reactions ◽

Adrenal Suppression ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Drug Reactions ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Future Studies ◽

Leukotriene Receptor ◽

Pharmacogenomic Studies

Abstract A systematic review of pharmacogenomic studies capturing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to asthma medications was undertaken, and a survey of Pharmacogenomics in Childhood Asthma (PiCA) consortia members was conducted. Studies were eligible if genetic polymorphisms were compared with suspected ADR(s) in a patient with asthma, as either a primary or secondary outcome. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. The ADRs and polymorphisms identified were change in lung function tests (rs1042713), adrenal suppression (rs591118), and decreased bone mineral density (rs6461639) and accretion (rs9896933, rs2074439). Two of these polymorphisms were replicated within the paper, but none had external replication. Priorities from PiCA consortia members (representing 15 institution in eight countries) for future studies were tachycardia (SABA/LABA), adrenal suppression/crisis and growth suppression (corticosteroids), sleep/behaviour disturbances (leukotriene receptor antagonists), and nausea and vomiting (theophylline). Future pharmacogenomic studies in asthma should collect relevant ADR data as well as markers of efficacy.

Download Full-text

What defines the comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care? An integrative systematic review

Palliative Medicine ◽

10.1177/0269216321996985 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 35 (4) ◽

pp. 651-669

Author(s):

Blanca Goni-Fuste ◽

Iris Crespo ◽

Cristina Monforte-Royo ◽

Josep Porta-Sales ◽

Albert Balaguer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Comprehensive Assessment ◽

Care Provision ◽

Process Of Care ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Quality Appraisal ◽

Future Studies ◽

Appraisal Tool

Background: The comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care identifies where patients most want attention to guide clinical decisions that tailor care provision from their first encounters. Aim: To define how and what needs are identified by the comprehensive assessment of needs in the original peer-reviewed articles in the field of palliative care. Design: An integrative systematic review as outlined by Whittemore and Knafl. Quality appraisal performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science databases searched through May 2019 and updated in July 2020. Results: Forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria for original articles in English or Spanish reporting comprehensive assessment of needs of adult patients receiving palliative care. The majority (41/49) of studies were moderate to high quality. Two themes were identified: (1) How a comprehensive assessment of needs should be carried out in palliative care, which reflected a preference to develop structured tools for assessment; (2) What needs of patients should be assessed in the comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care, which conveyed a trend to assess beyond core domains – physical, psychological, social, spiritual – with information and practical most prevalent, but with substantial variation in specifying and classifying needs into domains. Conclusions: The assessment of needs in palliative care is comprehensive but lacks consensus on the needs and domains that should be assessed by the palliative care team. Future studies should better define what needs can be standardized into the assessment to improve process of care and patient satisfaction.

Download Full-text

The Power of 1: Systematic Review of N-of-1 Studies in Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.0000000000011597 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011597

Author(s):

Annelieke R Müller ◽

Marion MMG Brands ◽

Peter M van de Ven ◽

Kit CB Roes ◽

Martina C Cornel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Rare Disorders ◽

Future Studies ◽

Personalized Care ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Neuropsychiatric Manifestations ◽

Review Protocol

Objective:To improve the use of N-of-1 studies in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, we systematically reviewed the literature and formulated recommendations for future studies.Methods:The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020154720). EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for relevant studies. Information was recorded on types of interventions, outcome measures, validity, strengths and limitations using standard reporting guidelines and critical appraisal tools. Qualitative and descriptive analyses were performed.Results:Twelve studies met N-of-1 inclusion criteria, including both single trials and series. Interventions were mainly directed to neuropsychiatric manifestations. Main strengths were the use of personalized and clinically relevant outcomes in most studies. Generalizability was compromised due to limited use of validated and generalizable outcome measures.Conclusion:N-of-1 studies are sporadically reported in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Properly executed N-of-1 studies may provide a powerful alternative to larger randomized controlled trials in rare disorders and a much needed bridge between practice and science. We provide recommendations for future N-of-1 studies in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, ultimately optimizing evidence-based and personalized care.

Download Full-text

Potential treatments in the management of covid-19

Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde ◽

10.25248/reas.e3963.2020 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (9) ◽

pp. e3963

Author(s):

Luiza Miranda Marinho de Paula ◽

Jhonson Tizzo Godoy ◽

Arthur Alves Baldo ◽

Henrique Chagas Costa ◽

Isabela Soares Bôa Morte ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Health Professionals ◽

Scientific Evidence ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Low Risk ◽

Medical Clinic ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Future Studies ◽

Selection Of

Objective: To provide a tool to assist health professionals in the medical clinic regarding treatments still under study to combat COVID-19 and serve as a basis for future studies. Methods: For the development of this systematic review, research was carried out on the Embase, Pubmed databases and on the website clinicaltrials.gov, with the following inclusion criteria: selection of clinical trials carried out in adults, randomized or not, who addressed the discussion on the treatment or development of vaccines for COVID-19. Of the articles found, 22 studies were selected and those with a different methodological design were excluded. Results: The studies cover clinical trials that are divided into double or triple blind and present a low risk of bias. Among the tested interventions, Hydroxychloroquine and antivirals are the drugs that show the most promise in controlling the disease. The final results, however, are not yet available, as studies are ongoing. Final considerations: There is still no scientific evidence to recommend the use of any of the tested drugs, making it necessary to continue and maintain ongoing studies.

Download Full-text

Effect of weightlifting training on jumping ability, sprinting performance and squat strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching ◽

10.1177/17479541211061695 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 174795412110616

Author(s):

Adrián García-Valverde ◽

Agustín Manresa-Rocamora ◽

José L Hernández-Davó ◽

Rafael Sabido

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Resistance Training ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Vertical Jump ◽

Maximal Strength ◽

Countermovement Jump ◽

Jump Performance ◽

Strength Performance ◽

Positive Effects ◽

Traditional Resistance Training

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of using weightlifting movement and their derivatives in training on vertical jump, sprint times, and maximal strength performance. Thirty-four studies were used for meta-analysis with a moderate quality on the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis showed positive effects of weightlifting training, especially when combined with traditional resistance training on countermovement jump performance, sprint times, and one-repetition maximum squat (ES = 0.41, ES = −0.44, and ES = 0.81, respectively). In conclusion, results revealed the usefulness of weightlifting combined with traditional resistance training in improving sprint, countermovement jump and maximal strength performance.

Download Full-text

Effects of linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training programs on measures of muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽

10.7717/peerj.3695 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 ◽

pp. e3695 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Jozo Grgic ◽

Pavle Mikulic ◽

Hrvoje Podnar ◽

Zeljko Pedisic

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Resistance Training ◽

Muscle Hypertrophy ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Training Programs ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Future Studies ◽

The Difference ◽

Intervention Trials ◽

Theses And Dissertations

BackgroundPeriodization is an important component of resistance training programs. It is meant to improve adherence to the training regimen, allow for constant progression, help in avoiding plateaus, and reduce occurrence and severity of injuries. Previous findings regarding the effects of different periodization models on measures of muscle hypertrophy are equivocal. To provide a more in-depth look at the topic, we undertook a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of intervention trials comparing the effects of linear periodization (LP) and daily undulating periodization (DUP) resistance training programs on muscle hypertrophy.Materials and MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) and Open Access Theses and Dissertations (OATD).ResultsThe pooled standardized mean difference (Cohen’s d) from 13 eligible studies for the difference between the periodization models on muscle hypertrophy was −0.02 (95% confidence interval [−0.25, 0.21],p = 0.848).ConclusionsThe meta-analysis comparing LP and DUP indicated that the effects of the two periodization models on muscle hypertrophy are likely to be similar. However, more research is needed in this area, particularly among trained individuals and clinical populations. Future studies may benefit from using instruments that are more sensitive for detecting changes in muscle mass, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging.

Download Full-text

Antiulcer Effect of Honey in Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Induced Gastric Ulcer Model in Rats: A Systematic Review

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine ◽

10.1155/2018/7515692 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-12 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Annuar Fazalda ◽

Adam Quraisiah ◽

Mohd Fahami Nur Azlina

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Gastric Ulcer ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Future Studies ◽

Specific Term ◽

Different Types ◽

Comprehensive Search ◽

Lower Oesophagus ◽

Ulcer Model ◽

Inflammatory Drugs

Background. Peptic ulcer is a basic term for ulcers on the lower oesophagus, stomach, or jejunum. The specific term for ulcer in the stomach is gastric ulcer. The extensive use of honey around the globe helps researchers to study the usefulness of honey. Many studies had already been conducted and proved the effectiveness of honey in treating gastric ulcer.Methods. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify relevant studies on honey used as an alternative treatment of gastric ulcer cause by NSAIDs. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, SCOPUS, and Ebscohost. The main criteria used were articles published in English and using NSAIDs-induced gastric ulcer in rat’s model and those reporting the effectiveness of honey.Results. Articles published between 2001 and 2014 were identified to be relevant in studies related to the inclusion criteria. The literature search found 30 potential and closely related articles in this review, but only 5 articles were taken which meet the criteria needed to be fulfilled.Conclusions. All studies in this review reported the efficacy of honey for gastric ulcer based on its antioxidant and cytoprotective activities. Most of the studies conducted used different types of honey at various doses on rats. Future studies should be conducted to identify the appropriate dose for humans to achieve similar gastroprotective effects.

Download Full-text

The Effectiveness of Frequency-Based Resistance Training Protocols on Muscular Performance and Hypertrophy in Trained Males: A Critically Appraised Topic

Journal of Sport Rehabilitation ◽

10.1123/jsr.2019-0491 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 29 (7) ◽

pp. 1024-1031

Author(s):

Theodore Kent Kessinger ◽

Bridget Melton ◽

Theresa Miyashita ◽

Greg Ryan

Keyword(s):

Resistance Training ◽

Muscular Strength ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Clinical Question ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Bottom Line ◽

Trained Subjects ◽

Total Body ◽

Male Subjects ◽

Training Protocol

Clinical Scenario: Manipulation of exercise variables in resistance training (RT) is an important component in the development of muscular strength, power, and hypertrophy. Currently, most research centers on untrained or recreationally trained subjects. This critically appraised topic focuses on studies that center on the well-trained subject with regard to frequency of training. Clinical Question: In well-trained male subjects, is there an association between RT frequency and the development of muscular strength and hypertrophy? Summary of Key Findings: Four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. All studies showed that lower-frequency training could elicit muscular strength and hypertrophy increases. One study suggested that a higher frequency compared with a lower frequency may provide a slight benefit to hypertrophic development. One study reported a greater level of delayed onset muscle soreness with lower frequency training. The 4 studies demonstrate support for the clinical question. Clinical Bottom Line: Current evidence suggests that lower-frequency RT produces equal to greater improvements on muscular strength and hypertrophy in comparison to higher-frequency RT when volume is equated. The evidence is particularly convincing when lower-frequency RT is associated with a total-body training protocol in well-trained male subjects. Strength of Recommendation: There is moderate-to-strong evidence to suggest that lower-frequency RT, when volume is equated, will produce equal to greater improvements on muscular strength and hypertrophy in comparison to higher-frequency RT.

Download Full-text