The Eurasian Economic Union: on the «Strategy-2025» and on the transport and logistics component of the document`s issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
M. S. Komov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Commission ◽  
Regulation Of Transport ◽  
Economic Union

The article briefly describes the content of the new conceptual and programmatic perspective document of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) –«Strategic directions for the development of the Eurasian economic integration until 2025» («Strategy-2025»). The transport and logistics component of the document`s problems is commented on in more detail. In the course of these comments, proposals are substantiated to modify the legal framework of the EAEU in the aspect of strengthening the institutional regulation of transport integration of the participating countries on the basis of expanding the functional powers of regulators (subjects of the unified interstate regulatory system), including the Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC) and its departments.

The role of standardization as a key Tool of Quality Economics in the development of integration of the Eurasian Economic Union

2019 ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
V. V. Okrepilov ◽  
A. G. Gridasov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Member States ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union

The presented study examines the experience of forming a regulatory framework for the integration of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member states through the example of standardization as one of the key tools of quality economics.Aim. The study analyzes the major solutions of the EAEU authorities and member countries aimed at increasing the role of standardization in the economic integration of the Union over five years of its existence.Tasks. The authors identify efficient methods for developing standardization for the integration of the EAEU states as well as the most problematic aspects in this field that need to be taken into account in the qualitative strengthening of the Union’s economy.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition to examine the activities of the EAEU authorities and member states aimed at creating a system for the economic integration of the Union during a period of its transition from separate national markets towards a single (common) market.Results. Over five years of operation in the field of stadardization, the Eurasian Economic Union has created the necessary organizational and legal framework to ensure the successful development of integration processes. The national legislation on standardization has been modernized with allowance for the harmonization of these laws. In the next five-six years, the development of international standards for 40 technical regulations is expected to be completed, which would create a regulatory framework for unhindered interaction between all participants of the single (common) EAEU market. Conclusions. The analysis of activities in the field of standardization reveals a sufficiently thought-out and coordinated policy of the EAEU states in creating the necessary conditions for overcoming legal and administrative barriers in the movement of goods and services within the common economic space of the EAEU.

Formation Issues and Development Prospects Contractual Base of Eurasian Economic Union

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3(33)) ◽  
pp. 842
Author(s):  
Kamshat AMIRBEK ◽  
Yerkin KUBEYEV ◽  
Altai BOZHKARAULY
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Regional Integration ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Political Decisions

This article sets the task to consider the main issues of the formation and development of the legal framework of the regional integration association of states – the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The development of international economic integration is impossible without a legal framework, since it is through bilateral and multilateral treaties, as well as domestic legislation, that the states parties to international economic integration carry out political decisions and ideas into real life. Prospects for the development of the Eurasian Economic Union require an analysis of new approaches to integration interaction, as well as the solution of certain legal problems. First of all, it concerns the legal support of the functioning of both the EAEU itself and the enactment of acts of its bodies. This article focuses on solving many legal problems in the framework of the implementation of customs cooperation between the Member States of the Union, as well as the adoption of national acts, the introduction of changes and amendments to national legislation.  

scholarly journals Systematization of the EAEU legal sources in the field of regulation of the service market in science

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 83-93
Author(s):  
Lyudmila N. Berg ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Scientific Cooperation ◽  
Service Market ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Economic Union

Introduction. The law of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter – the EAEU) contains provisions aimed at organizing scientific cooperation (and cooperation in the field of innovation) of its member states. The subject of this research is the totality of sources of the Eurasian Economic Union law in the field of regulation of the services market in science. The purpose of the research is to systematize the legal sources, containing norms governing relations in the services market in the field of scientific activity. Materials and methods. The methodology of scientific research includes the dialectical method, General scientific logical operations (deductions and inductions, analysis and synthesis) and specific scientific methods (legalistic, comparative legal). Results. As a result of the research, the author presents a system of sources of the EAEU law, norms in the field of legal regulation of scientific activities and scientific cooperation within the framework of the Eurasian economic integration: the Treaty on the EAEU, international multilateral and unilateral agreements implemented in the EAEU legal framework, normative acts adopted by the Supreme Economic Council and the EAEU Economic Commission. Conclusion. The research results are applicable in further theoretical studies of the Eurasian economic integration and the EAEU law and have practical significance for the systematization of the legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union, development of legal techniques, EAEU lawmaking.

«Soft law» in the law of the Eurasian Ec onomic Union: place and possibility of challenging

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
P.P. Myslivsky ◽  
◽  
I.N. Shchurova
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Soft Law ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Commission ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Law

In international law, there are sources that do not formally have binding force, but may indicate the emergence of the opinio juris of states, as well as emerging practice. The Eurasian Economic Union also issues acts that are not formally binding: they are adopted by the Eurasian Economic Commission in the form of recommendations. In addition, the Union takes into account the recommendatory acts of other international organizations. At present, the practice of the EAEU Court indicates that this body takes into account “soft law” in the course of argumentation, but proceeds from the impossibility of challenging acts that are recommendations of the EEC. The authors give ways to establish the possibility of challenging the EEC recommendations in the EAEU Court.

scholarly journals The Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union: Exploring the “Greater Eurasian Partnership”

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-57
Author(s):  
Gaziza Shakhanova ◽  
Jeremy Garlick
Keyword(s):  
Central Asia ◽  
Belt And Road Initiative ◽  
Local Elites ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Commission ◽  
Silk Road Economic Belt ◽  
Belt And Road ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Belt And Road ◽  
The Silk Road

The Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is a key partner in China’s Belt, and Road Initiative (BRI), since it comprises the majority of territories which the BRI’s overland route, the Silk Road Economic Belt, needs to traverse as it crosses Central Asia on the way to Europe. The goal of this article is to explore the BRI in the context of BRI–EAEU coordination. The first part of the analysis focusses on the ways the Eurasian Economic Commission delineates the “Greater Eurasian Partnership” and counterposes it against China and the BRI. Then, the article compares two sets of interpretations of the BRI and “Greater Eurasian Partnership” obtained from interviews with elites in Kazakhstan and Russia. The interviews indicate that the BRI has had a much more forceful impact on local elites than Russia’s idea of “Greater Eurasian Partnership.”

Towards an Enhanced Institutional Structure of the Eurasian Economic Union

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 102-111
Author(s):  
Igor V. Pilipenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
European Union ◽  
Institutional Structure ◽  
Governance Structures ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Integration Process ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Commission ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Eu

This article considers how to enhance the institutional structure of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in order to enable timely decision-making and implementation of governance decisions in the interests of Eurasian integration deepening. We compare the governance structures of the EAEU and the European Union (EU) using the author’s technique and through the lens of theories of neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism elaborated with respect to the EU. We propose to determine a major driver of the integration process at this stage (the College of the Eurasian Economic Commission or the EAEU member states), to reduce the number of decision-making bodies within the current institutional structure of the EAEU, and to divide clearly authority and competence of remaining bodies to exclude legal controversies in the EAEU.

scholarly journals Putin's and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons”

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno S. Sergi
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Industrial Production ◽  
Political Agenda ◽  
Regional Economic Integration ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Soviet Space ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Post Soviet Space

The Eurasian Economic Union is an institution formalized in January 2015 for the purpose of regional economic integration; it includes five countries: Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan, and may include Mongolia and Tajikistan in the future. With a GDP of $1.59 trillion in 2015, an industrial production of $1.3 trillion in 2014, and population of almost 200 million as of 2016, the EEAU could represent a geopolitical success that supports both Putin's ambitious political agenda and the Union's economic prospects. Although the efforts of this Union are ongoing and long-term success is not certain, the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union can be considered a hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons” that serves as a powerful illustration of what Putin envisions for the post-Soviet space. Despite promising steps so far, more should be done toward the achievement of economic development and balanced opportunity for all Eurasian countries. Russia's longstanding role within the Union, as well as its power and political motivations, are all considerations that must be accounted for.

INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF MECHANISMS FOR RESOLVING TRADE DISPUTES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 139-151
Author(s):  
K. I. ZHADAN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
Free Trade Agreements ◽  
Trade Agreements ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Trade Disputes ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Republic

The article examines an international legal framework of the dispute resolution under free trade agree-ments. The existing mechanisms for resolving trade disputes are analyzed and their classification is given. The article demonstrates an evolutionary change of the approach of States to the formulation of provisions on dispute settlement in international trade treaties. Special attention is paid to the systems of dispute resolution under free trade agreements to which the Eurasian Economic Union is a party. The free trade agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union and its member States with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (2015), the Islamic Republic of Iran (2018), the Republic of Singapore (2019) and the Republic of Serbia (2019) are compared with respect to the dispute resolution mechanisms. The article focuses on such institutional aspects as the method of appointing arbitrators, the scope of interstate disputes and the competition of dispute resolution platforms. The effectiveness of the dispute resolution systems of the World Trade Organization and special-ized mechanisms under the free trade agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union and its member States is evaluated. The negative and positive aspects of the existing mechanisms under the free trade agreements of the Eurasian Economic Union and its member States are highlighted, and the ways of their development are proposed.

Securitization and the Economy of Risks

2020 ◽  
pp. 1662-1675
Author(s):  
Oxana Karnaukhova
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Historical Memory ◽  
European Economic Area ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Strategic Risk ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
The Common ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
In The Beginning

In the beginning of the 21st century the society of the Second Modernity with incalculable risks marks human conditions in orientation and self-categorization on the basis of historical memory. The dichotomy “We-Other” influences strategic risk decisions. Security is becoming the umbrella topic referring to public goods, transnational markets, “the specific way of life”. In the context of different agreements and regulations co-existence (such as European Economic Area, Eurasian Economic Union, BRIC etc.) claims for personal and collective safety together with the rhetoric of memorization influences decision-making process and becomes a burden of securitization. The “Eurasian” project of integration is observed in its transformation from being based on the post-Soviet memory toward economically beneficial cooperation. Still the Eurasian Economic Union is seen as vague in its goals and instruments, relying on the approach to economic integration with the reference to the common past, memories and identity.

scholarly journals Legal Framework of Labor Migration Governance in the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Communities: Comparative Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-601
Author(s):  
A. S. Leonov ◽  
I. E. Lisinskaya
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Regional Integration ◽  
Labor Migration ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Migration Flows ◽  
Economic Union

This article provides a comparative analysis of the legal regulation of labor migration in regional integration organizations: the European Communities (ECs) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Methodologically, we argue that a synchronous comparison of the European Union (EU) in its current shape and the EAEU is rather inadequate and draw on a diachronic comparison of labor migration regulation in the EAEU and the ECs. On the one hand, we identify a number of important differences. We show, in particular, that while regulatory mechanisms in the EEC aimed at stimulating new migration flows, in the post-Soviet space mechanisms of regional migration governance provide the existing migration flows with an appropriate normative framework. We also show that in the case of the EAEU, the founding Treaty provided for a number of essential social rights for workers from EAEU Member States, whereas in the EEC these rights appeared at a much later stage. Regulation of labor migration in the EEC and the EAEU also differs in terms of distribution of competencies in this area between national and Community / Union levels. On the other hand, we also find a number of similarities, which hint at dynamics of policy learning. This is, in particular, evident in the development of mechanisms aimed at protection of migrants’ rights. This is also the case of the Agreement on pensions for workers of the EAEU member states, which seems to borrow from the EU experience opting for coordination of Member States’ retirement systems instead of their unification. Overall, some of EEC/EU ‘best practices’ have contributed to important positive developments in the regulation of intra-Union labor migration in the EAEU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document