scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK UMUM SYARIAH BERDASARKAN METODE RGEC RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, AND CAPITAL PADA PT. BANK MUAMALAT INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jumriaty Jusman
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Ranking Criteria ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Final Composite

Abstract: This research was conducted on the basis of observations of events that occurred at PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, where the bank is spread, issues will experience liquidity. So the purpose of this study is to determine the health level of PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia using the RGEC method (risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital) for the 2015-2017 period. This research will be conducted by collecting data in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Bank Indonesia regulations No.13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 and SE No.13 / 24 / DPNP. The research subject in this study was PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. The object of this research is the financial statements and publications of PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk 2015-2017 period. The results of the study showed that the health level of Bank Muamalat Indonesia using RGEC showed the predicate of bank health in accordance with the standards set by Bank Indonesia, with the results of financial ratios obtained from annual reports adjusted to the RGEC Component Ranking Criteria Matrix (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance , Earning and Capital) and the calculation of the final composite value on average 60%, it can be concluded that PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia in 2015-2017 ranked 4 (four) with the title "LESS HEALTH". Keywords: Bank soundness, RGEC Abstrak: Penelitian ini dilakukan atas dasar pengamatan terhadap peristiwa yang terjadi pada PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, dimana bank tersebut tersebar isu akan mengalami likuiditas.  Maka tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia dengan menggunakan metode RGEC (risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital) periode 2015-2017.  Penelitian ini akan dilakukan dengan mengumpulkan data- data sesuai dengan ketentuan yang telah diatur dalam peraturan Bank Indonesia No.13/1/PBI/2011 dan SE No.13/24/DPNP. Subjek penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah PT Bank Muamalat  Indonesia,Tbk. Objek penelitian ini adalah laporan keuangan dan tata kelolah publikasi PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia,Tbk Periode 2015-2017. Hasil penelitian bahwa tingkat Kesehatan Bank Muamalat Indonesia dengan menggunakan RGEC yang menunjukkan predikat kesehatan bank sesuai dengan standar yang telah ditetapkan oleh Bank Indonesia, dengan hasil rasio keuangan yang diperoleh dari laporan tahunan kemudian disesuaikan dengan Matriks Kriteria Peringkat Komponen RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning dan Capital) dan perhitungan nilai komposit akhir rata-rata 60% maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia pada tahun 2015 -2017 memperoleh peringkat 4 (empat) dengan predikat “KURANG SEHAT” Kata kunci : Tingkat kesehatan Bank, RGEC.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENERAPAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS DAN CAPITAL) PADA PT.BANK BENGKULU

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Ririn Marlina Sofyan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the health level of PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period if measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Based on the results of the assessment of bank soundness by applying the RGEC method at PT. Bank Bengkulu is seen from factors, namely 1. Risk Profile, the results of the 2014 NPL ratio of 0.39%, in 2015 amounted to 0.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 0.33% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the LDR ratio in 2014 amounted to 85.79%, in 2015 amounted to 91.05%, and in 2016 amounting to 93.31% this could be said to be quite healthy. 2. Good Corporate Governance in the 2014-2016 period of 89.33% can be said to be very healthy. 3. Eanings, the results of the 2014 ROA ratio amounted to 3.69%, in 2015 amounted to 3.29%, and in 2016 amounting to 3.02% this could be said to be very healthy. The results of the BOPO ratio in 2014 amounted to 74.10%, in 2015 amounted to 80.54%, and in 2016 amounting to 77.71% this could be said to be very healthy. 4. Capital, the results of the 2014 CAR ratio amounted to 16.99%, in 2015 amounted to 21.39%, and in 2016 amounting to 19.07% can be said to be very healthy. The results of the health research at PT. Bank Bengkulu in the 2014-2016 period showed that PT. The Bengkulu Bank gets PK 1, which is very healthy.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (BRI) SYARIAH BERDASARKAN METODE RGEC

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Muhamad Manarul Hidayat ◽  
Usep Deden Suherman ◽  
Hendra Syafri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Rank One ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Quantitative Approaches

AbstractEvery bank must have a bank soundness level from all aspects with very healthy criteria, as well as PT. BRI Syariah. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the factors that affect the health level of PT. BRI Syariah uses Bank Indonesia regulations, namely PBI No.13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 and criteria guidelines for using SE. No.13 / 24 / DPNP. In accordance with these provisions, the soundness of a bank is measured by the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). This article uses descriptive methods and quantitative approaches to determine the health level of PT. BRI Syariah is also compared to two state-owned sharia banks, namely PT. BNI Syariah and BSM. The results showed that using the RGEC method the assessment factors used were NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, and ROE. It appears that PT. The health level of BRI Syariah is still below BNI Syariah and BSM. This indicates that BRI Syariah still has to improve its financial performance to have a healthy rating at rank one, which is very healthy.   Keywords: Health Level, RGEC Method, BRI Syariah AbstrakSetiap bank harus memiliki tingkat kesehatan bank dari segala aspek dengan kriteria sangat sehat, begitupula dengan PT. BRI Syariah. Maka dari itu, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah menggunakan ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu PBI No.13/1/PBI/2011 dan pedoman kriteria menggunakan SE. No.13/24/DPNP. Sesuai ketentuan tersebut, tingkat kesehatan bank diukur dengan metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Artikel ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah yang mana juga dibandingkan dengan dua bank syariah milik BUMN yaitu PT. BNI Syariah dan BSM.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dengan menggunakan metode RGEC faktor penilaian yang digunakan adalah NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, dan ROE. Terlihat bahwa Tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah masih berada di bawah BNI Syariah dan BSM. Hal ini menandakan bahwa BRI Syariah masih harus meningkatkan kinerja keuangannya untuk memiliki peringkat yang sehat pada peringkat satu yaitu sangat sehat. Kata kunci: Tingkat Kesehatan, Metode RGEC, BRI Syariah

Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RGEC PADA BANK PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DIY

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Edy Anan ◽  
Roni Albarqis
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Profitability Assessment ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACTThis study is aimed to determine the soundness of commercial bank at PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY during the years 2011 until 2015 based on RGEC method that consisted of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings and capital. The method that used to collect data isnonparticipant observation by documenting. Descriptive analysis technique based on the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 13/24/DPNP about Assessment of Commercial Bank Soundness. The results show that the soundness level of Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 wasproved. NPL and LDR that measured Risk Profile factor prove a well executed risk management. Good Corporate Governance factor shows BPD DIY has applied corporate governance well. Earnings factor or profitability assessment consist of ROA and NIM has increased and this sign of theincreasing of total assets owned by BPD DIY that followed by increasing of profit gained by BPD DIY. Using the CAR indicator, the author proved that BPD DIY has good Capital factor, which is above Bank Indonesia provision that 8%. Conclution of the result showed that soundness level ofBank Pembangunan Daerah DIY in 2011 until 2015 overall was in the first place of composite ranked with a very healthy predicate and the total of composite score for each year is 93%, 93% , 97%, 97% and 97%.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan bank pada PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY selama tahun 2011 hingga 2015 berdasarkan metode RGEC yang terdiri dari risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings dan capital. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi nonpartisipan dengan cara dokumentasi. Teknik analisis deskriptif dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 13/24/DPNP tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesehatan BPD DIY pada tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 secara keseluruhan dapat dikatakan bank yang sehat. Faktor Risk Profile yang dinilai melalui NPL dan LDR secara keseluruhan menggambarkan pengelolaan risiko yangtelah dilaksanakan dengan baik. Faktor Good Corporate Governance, BPD DIY sudah menerapkan tata kelola perusahaan dengan baik. Faktor Earnings atau rentabilitas yang penilaiannya terdiri dari ROA dan NIM mengalami kenaikan dan hal ini menandakan bertambahnya jumlah aset yang dimiliki BPD DIY diikuti dengan bertambahnya keuntungan yang didapat oleh BPD DIY. Dengan menggunakan indikator CAR, peneliti membuktikan bahwa BPD DIY memiliki faktor Capital yang baik, yaitu diatas ketentuan Bank Indonesia sebesar 8%. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah DIY pada tahun 2011 hingga 2015 secara keseluruhan berada pada peringkat komposit satu dengan predikat sangat sehat serta masing-masing total nilai komposit sebesar 93%, 93%, 97% , 97% dan 97%

scholarly journals MENILAI TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN ANALISIS METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL PADA BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-160
Author(s):  
Hendra Galuh Febrianto ◽  
Amalia Indah Fitriana
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Optimal Level ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Risk Profiles ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Financial Research ◽  
Bank Soundness

ABSTRACT In the banking world of soundness, banks are very important for the formation of trust. Trust and loyalty to banks is a very helpful factor and makes it easier for bank management to develop good business strategies. Bank Soundness Levels are results issued by banks which are carried out on bank risk and performance (Bank Indonesia Regulation Number: 13/1 / PBI / 2011). If more than conventional banking with Islamic banking, conventional banking finance is better than Islamic banking. This is blessed with poor sharia banking (corporate governance) management. In order to be able to carry out its functions properly, banks must have sufficient capital, ensure the quality of their assets properly, be well managed and managed based on the principle of prudence, generate sufficient profits to maintain an increase, and support liquidity so that it can be adjusted to their needs. Therefore banks are required to be able to achieve and maintain a good and optimal level of performance, because the level of bank performance can increase the level of trust and loyalty needed by the wider community to use the products, services and financial activities of the bank. The purpose of this study is for advanced financial research with analysis of Risk Profiles (Risk Profiles), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Profitability (Income), and Capital (Capital) which is hereinafter abbreviated as RGEC with the final aim of research for the needs of Sharia banking management in accordance with the latest Bank Indonesia and OJK regulations. This type of research uses descriptive research proposed in the RGEC analysis (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, and Capital) at Islamic Banks in Indonesia. from 2013 to 2017. Keywords: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Income, Capital, Bank Soundness   ABSTRAK Dalam dunia perbankan tingkat kesehatan bank sangat penting bagi pembentukan kepercayaan. Kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah terhadap bank merupakan faktor yang sangat membantu dan mempermudah pihak manajemen bank untuk menyusun strategi bisnis yang baik. Tingkat Kesehatan Bank adalah hasil penilaian kondisi bank yang dilakukan terhadap risiko dan kinerja bank (Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/1/PBI/2011). Jika dibanding antara perbankan konvensional dengan perbankan syariah, kinerja keuangan perbankan konvensional lebih baik daripada perbankan syariah. Hal ini dikarena tatakelola (good corporate governance) perbankan syariah yang masih buruk. Agar dapat menjalankan fungsinya dengan baik, bank harus mempunyai modal yang cukup, menjaga kualitas asetnya dengan baik, dikelola dengan baik dan dioperasikan berdasarkan prinsip kehati-hatian, menghasilkan keuntungan yang cukup untuk mempertahankan kelangsungan usahanya, serta memelihara likuiditasnya sehingga dapat memenuhi kewajibannya. Oleh karena itu bank dituntut untuk bisa mencapai dan mempertahankan tingkat kinerja yang baik dan optimal, karena tingkat kinerja bank yang baik dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah maupun masyarakat luas untuk menggunakan produk, jasa dan aktivitas keuangan dari bank tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai tingkat kesehatan keuangan dengan analisis Profil Risiko (Risk Profile), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Rentabilitas (Earnings), dan Permodalan (Capital) yang selanjutnya disingkat RGEC dengan tujuan akhir merekomendasikan kebijakan untuk memperbaiki manajemen perbankan Syariah yang sesuai peraturan Bank Indonesia dan OJK yang terbaru. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif yang berfokus pada analisis RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital) pada Bank Syariah di Indonesia. dari tahun 2013 sampai 2017. Kata kunci: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital, Tingkat Kesehatan Bank

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) (Studi Pada Bank yang Termasuk Saham LQ45 Sub Sektor Perbankan Tahun 2010–2016)

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Net Interest Margin ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

This paper seeks to find out the health level of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index. It used descriptive methods with qualitative approach that is Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) model. RBBR model consists of 4 factors among others: risk profile, good corporate governance (GCG), earnings and capital factor.The analytical tool used in this study is the assessment of the level of health of banks in Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index against the risk factor using the ratio of net performing loans (NPLs) and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), a factor of corporate governance by using the self-assessment report of good corporate governance, the earnings factor using the ratio of return on assets (ROA) and net interest margin (NIM) and the factor of capital using the ratio of capital adequacy ratio (CAR). The results showed that there are several banks which have "Less Healthy", "Healthy Enough", "Pretty Good". Bank Mandiri, BRI and BNI received the predicate of "Pretty Good" in risk profile factor for liquidity risk, whereas Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough". Also, Bank BTN received the predicate of "Healthy Enough" and "Pretty Good" in earnings factor specifically ROA and GCG factor. Keywords:Indonesia Stock Exchange LQ45 Index, Health Level of Banks, Risk Based Bank Rating (RBBR) Model.

scholarly journals Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank: Pendekatan CAMEL Dan RGEC

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Amelia ◽  
Astiti Chandra Aprilianti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the risk based bank rating at PT. Bank Maybank SyariahIndonesia if measured using CAMEL (Capital, Asset, Management, Earning,Liquidity) method and RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning,Capital) in 2011-2016 and also aims to know differences in ratios used in CAMELSand RGEC methods. The research method used in this research is literature researchor study desk study. The data used in this research is secondary data using financialstatements of Bank Maybank Syariah Indonesia Period 2011-2016. The results showthat the bank can be said to be adequately sound because almost all the ratios usedmeet the specified requirements and there are still some ratios that have not met therequirements, but in both methods have different results. In the year 2011-2014 therisk based bank rating of Maybank Syariah Bank is calculated using CAMEL methodof bank is in the sound level. In 2015 -2016, the calculation of bank soundness showsthat bank condition is in an sound level. In Maybank Syariah Bank the state of thebank is in the sound level is in 2011-2013 if calculated using the RGEC method. Inthe year 2014-2016 the condition of the bank shows a adequately sound level.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, CAPITAL)? Studi pada PT BPR SINAR KUTA Periode 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Komang Gede ◽  
Tri Ratnawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Good Management ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

The results of this study indicate that based on the analysis of the BPR Sinar Kuta NPL formula in 2018 increased every year 2016 = 2.55%, 2017 = 3.12%, and 2018 =3.75%. and Liquidity risk using two ratios, namely LDR and LAR, has increased anddecreased. This shows that BPR Sinar Kuta has good profitability towards third partyrefunds. GCG Bank Sinar Kuta also has very good management as evidenced from 2016 -2018 showing a good composite predicate by determining a healthy bank valuation matrixbased on Bank Indonesia Regulation No.13 and the predicate is that all the compositevalues are still in greater or equal rules with (?) 1.5. When viewed from CAR, BankSinar Kuta is ranked 5th, it shows that Bank Sinar as a BPR Bank has a reasonable levelof health. Keywords: Factor Analysis, Bank Soundness, Bank Performance, RGEC

scholarly journals ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BANK SYARIAH NON DEVISA DAN BANK SYARIAH DEVISA DITINJAU DARI KINERJA FUNGSI BISNIS DAN FUNGSI SOSIAL DENGAN METODE RGEC DAN SHARIA CONFORMITY INDIACTOR PERIODE 2011 – 20151)

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Zain Nahdi Baldina ◽  
Achsania Hendratmi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Business Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Whitney Test ◽  
Islamic Bank ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Test Result

This study aims to compare and see the differences between foreign Islamic bank and non-foreign Islamic bank using method RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). This study examines the comparison in business and social performance of four foreign Islamic banks and six non-foreign Islamic banks. The collection of data in this study was done by collecting all the annual reports of banks that has been created as a sample over the period 2011-2015.The test result of the Independent Samples T-test and Mann Whitney Test showed there was no differences in the business performance of foreign Islamic banks exchange with Non-foreign Islamic Bank exchange as seen from the aspect of Risk profile (FDR), GCG, and Earnings (ROA). While there were differences of business and social performance as seen from Earnings (ROE), capital (CAR), and Sharia Conformity Indicator (PSR and ZR) aspects

scholarly journals Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document