USEFULNESS OF ADDING BIOTHESIOMETRY TO CLINICAL ASSESSMENT PROTOCOLS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY AFFECTING LOWER LIMBS
BACKGROUND Diabetes Mellitus is a major health problem of which Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) is an important complication resulting in ulceration and amputation. There are a number of bedside tests and evaluation which has been suggested for early diagnosis of DPN. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of Biothesiometry when combined along with Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom Score (DNS) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination Score (DNE) as compared against Nerve Conduction Study (NCS). NCS is considered as the gold standard in diagnosis of DPN. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study which was done in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala which is a tertiary level referral center. The study was done in a one-year period between January 2018 and January 2019 in patients with diabetes who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Patients were first evaluated with a Performa which included DNS and DNE scoring and compared with NCS parameters. Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) was assessed with a Biothesiometer and the combined results were compared with Nerve Conduction Study (NCS). The values obtained were entered in excel sheet and statistically evaluated. RESULTS 127 patients with Diabetes were recruited into the study out of which 49 were males and 78 were females with a mean age of 57.2 +/- 9.9 years. When patients who were clinically positive for DPN on evaluation with DNS and DNE were compared with NCS parameters, it was shown that there was a sensitivity of 96.2 % and specificity of 38.1% and when VPT measurement using Biothesiometer was added to the clinical evaluation the sensitivity was 100% with a negative predictive value of 100% and specificity of 23.8%. This study has shown that all of the patients who tested negative were true negatives. CONCLUSION This study concluded that addition of Biothesiometry to the combination of DNS, DNE for the evaluation of DPN is as good as NCS evaluation. Hence this combination will be useful in rural settings, where accessibility to expensive Electrodiagnostic machine is limited.