scholarly journals ANALISIS PENYELUNDUPAN HUKUM KEPEMILIKAN HAK ATAS TANAH BAGI WARGA NEGARA ASING DENGAN CARA PELANGSUNGAN PERKAWINAN DENGAN WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA

PRANATA HUKUM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
RISTI DWI RAMASARI
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Foreign Nationals ◽  
High Court ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights

Issues concerning the land can be prevented, at least to reduce the potential to avoid the cause, the problems are legal events, so the causes can be known and recognized by re-looking through existing legal ground view. From the problems in court, the process of settling the case takes a long time, sometimes for many years, it is because of the level of court that must be passed the District Court or Administrative Court, High Court, and Supreme Court.The problem in this paper is how the legal protection of land ownership rights for foreigners with the marriage with the citizens of Indonesia?egal protection of ownership of land rights for foreign nationals with marital sustainability with Indonesian citizens as a means of tenure of land ownership by foreign. By applying the nominee agreement, foreign nationals may control land as possessing land rights as Indonesian citizens. However, this agreement has not been regulated in Indonesia, especially the legal system of agreements set forth in the Civil Code (KUHPdt), so it is categorized into the category of legal smuggling of land ownership rights for foreigners. The legal effort to be taken in solving the problem of legal smuggling of land ownership rights for Foreigners with Marriage Sustainability with Indonesian Citizens is inseparable from the provisions of Article 1320 and Article 1338 of the Civil Code (KUHPdt).

scholarly journals Status Hak Atas Tanah Penduduk Desa dalam Kawasan Hutan Perum Perhutani

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Fatimiah Azzahra
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Agrarian Reform ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
Public Corporation ◽  
The Status ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights

This article aims to discuss the conflict of tenure rights between Perhutani and the community and the status of land held by the community after the entry into force of Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agraria Reform. The study uses a sociological juridical method. The location of the study is in the forest area of   Perhutani Public Corporation, Malang Regency. Data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that conflicts over ownership of land rights between Perhutani and the community have been going on for a long time. Physically the land has been controlled by the community since the Dutch colonial era and passed down from generation to generation. The granting of permission to manage the land and payment of land tax strengthened the community’s argument about land ownership. The land status which is the object of the dispute is based on Presidential Regulation No. 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform became the authority of Perhutani Public Corporation. Communities can get ownership rights or get land compensation if the Ministry of Forestry releases the land.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian atas Sertipikat Tanah Ganda Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi Putusan: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1537 K/PDT/2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1214
Author(s):  
Vanesia Hendrika Elvina ◽  
Hasni Hasni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Positive System ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
High Court ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
First Time

The purpose of implementing land registration is to provide legal certainty and legal protection. The Agrarian Law that is used in Indonesia adheres to a negative system that is tied to a positive system. The land registration activity for the first time produced proof of rights, in the form of certificates as a means of proof of land rights. Certificate as a strong proof of rights means that physical data and juridical data in a certificate have the strength of evidence and must be accepted as true information, as long as it is not proven otherwise with other evidence in the form of certificates or other certificates. In Subari’s case, there was a double land certificate in the same plot of land. Subari has the ownership of land rights that is got from his parents and from purchasing with two buffaloes. But, there are other people who dominate the land that is belong to Subari and they also have the certificate to proof their ownership of the land rights. Settlement of multiple land certificates can be done through the Court, to obtain legal certainty that the certificate of ownership of land rights which has stronger evidence is based on evidence. The district court ruled that ownership of land rights belonged to Subari, and this decision was reinforced by high court and a Supreme Court.[F1]  [F1]Paragarf single

scholarly journals Reorientasi Asas Itikad Baik/Kebenaran Sebagai Dasar Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Supriyadi Supriyadi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Basic Question ◽  
Original Owner ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
Customary Land ◽  
The Village

<div><p>Perpindahan hak terhadap kepemilikan tanah terpancang pada aturan bahwa seseorang tak dapat mengalihkan sesuatu melebihi dari apa yang dimilikinya hal ini  berhadapan dengan asas ‘<em>bona fides’</em> (itikad baik) yang melindungi pembeli beritikad baik. Posisi hukumnya  menempatkan dua belah pihak yang pada dasarnya tidak bersalah untuk saling berhadapan di pengadilan dan meminta untuk dimenangkan, akibat ulah pihak lain yang mungkin beritikad buruk. Pertanyaan mendasarnya, dalam hal ini pihak manakah yang seharusnya mendapatkan perlindungan hukum, apakah pemegang hak atas tanah  atau  pembeli yang mengaku beritikad baik? Alasan yang paling banyak digunakan adalah telah dilakukannya jual beli melalui notaris/PPAT  Perlindungan terhadap pembeli beritikad baik adalah sebuah perkecualian, yaitu ketika pembeli tidak dapat menduga adanya suatu kekeliruan dalam peralihan hak dan kekeliruan itu terjadi akibat kesalahan pemilik sendiri (toedoenbeginsel). Jika kemudian timbul sengketa, maka harus dipertimbangkan apakah terjadinya peralihan yang tidak sah itu lebih disebabkan oleh kesalahan pembeli yang tidak mencermati asal usul tanah yang dibelinya, atau kesalahan pemilik asal yang tidak menjaga haknya dengan baik. UUPA dan PP No. 24/1997 tidak menjelaskan pengertian ‘itikad baik’. Penegasan ini disimpulkan dari ketentuan KUHPerdata, literatur, dan putusan-putusan. Dalam hal ini, standar yang seharusnya digunakan bukan hanya tahu atau tidaknya pembeli berdasarkan pengakuannya sendiri (subyektif), namun juga apakah pembeli telah melakukan upaya untuk mencari tahu (obyektif), baik secara formil (dengan melakukan transaksi di depan PPAT, atau Kepala Desa jika transaksinya adalah tanah adat), maupun secara materiil</p><p> <em>The transfer of rights to land ownership is fixed on the rule that a person cannot transfer something more than what he has. This is faced with the principle of 'bona fides' (good faith) which protects buyers with good intentions. Its legal position places two basically innocent parties to face each other in court and ask to be won, due to the actions of other parties who may have bad intentions. The basic question is, in this case which party should get legal protection, are the holders of land rights or buyers who claim good intentions? The most widely used reason is the sale and purchase through a notary / PPAT Protection of buyers with good intentions is an exception, that is when the buyer cannot predict the existence of an error in the transfer of rights and errors due to the owner's own fault (toedoenbeginsel). If a dispute arises, then it must be considered whether the illegitimate transition is caused more by the fault of the buyer who did not observe the origin of the land he bought, or the fault of the original owner who did not properly safeguard his rights. UUPA and PP No. 24/1997 does not explain the meaning of 'good faith'. This affirmation is concluded from the provisions of the Civil Code, literature, and decisions. In this case, the standard that should be used is not only whether or not the buyer is based on his own (subjective) recognition, but also whether the buyer has made an effort to find out (objectively), both formally (by conducting transactions before PPAT, or the Village Head if the transaction is customary land), and materially</em><em>.</em></p></div>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK ATAS TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DI KABUPATEN MALUKU TENGGARA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-146
Author(s):  
Cornelia Junita Welerubun
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Relationship

Unalienated land dispute resolution in a way that is custom done by indigenous chiefs to resolve the dispute relating to customs. To resolve the disputes of indigenous chiefs hold a customary or sitting often known as judicial customs. The judicial nature of the Customs mediation, there is King as a mediator in it. The important role of indigenous chiefs of in dispute resolution is needed, this is because Community law is very respectful of indigenous chiefs. Legal protection must be viewed stages namely legal protection was born from a provision of the law and the rule of law given by a society that basically is the community's agreement to regulate the relationship between the behavior members of the society and between the individuals with the Government deemed to represent the interests of the community. Legal protection is not a true picture of the work function of the law itself that its purpose is not to provide other guarantees of fairness, expediency and also legal certainty. Legal protection will be more evident in the ownership of land rights is supported by the presence of certificate of land rights, as a means of proof of land ownership rights.

scholarly journals Perjanjian Pinjam Nama sebagai Bentuk Kepemilikan Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing di Bali

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-387
Author(s):  
I Komang Gede Suwanjaya ◽  
I Nyoman Sumardika ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Specific Regulation ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Formal Requirements

A nominee agreement is an agreement that has not been specifically regulated in the Civil Code, but grows and develops in the community. The agreement is included in a special agreement or often called an innominate agreement. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing the arrangement of nominee agreements as a form of land ownership by citizens in Bali and the responsibilities of notaries in drafting agreement deeds for land tenure by foreign nationals in Bali. The research method used was normative legal research. Based on the results, it was revealed that there was no specific regulation regarding the nominee agreement which was regulated in the Civil Code. As long as the parties are able to carry out the agreement properly in accordance with the provisions of the law regarding the validity of the agreement and regarding land ownership rights that have been regulated in the Civil Code and the Basic Agrarian Law, the agreement is valid before the law. Furthermore, the responsibilities and duties of a notary have been regulated in the Law on Notary Position. the ownership of land by a foreigner based on a nominee agreement is an act that is prohibited or against the law. The violation of the articles referred to in Article 84 of the Notary Position Law is a guarantee of the formal requirements for making an authentic deed. The government must supervise this anonymous agreement because this agreement is legal smuggling. 

scholarly journals The Certificate of Building Use of Rights (Shgb) that has been out Duration of Ownership, with Execution of Sita Object Guarantee to Land

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1200-1208
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
District Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Litigation Process ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Ownership Of Land

The length of the civil litigation process regarding land from the District Court, the High Court to the final level and legal protection of the assets seized as well as proof of ownership of land or building rights are certificates. Based on these problems, it can be analyzed the validity of the execution of the object of confiscation of land against the Land Use Certificate (SHGB) that has expired and can be analyzed what steps must be taken in protecting the assets confiscated in a civil case through the Civil Procedure Code, the Agrarian Regulation Indonesia, Indonesian Auction Regulations. Based on this analysis, the Confiscation, Execution and Building Rights Auction activities that have expired are the conclusions of this study.

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN PENJAMINAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG DIDASARKAN PADA AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 53/PDT.G/2017/PN.SGN)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Akbar Rahadianto ◽  
Endang Pandamdari
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Made In

Land rights guarantee is a guarantee made by the debtor to the creditor which generally aims to obtain a loan in the form of money for the debtor and repayment of debt to the creditor. In the case of guaranteeing land rights, the procedure has been regulated in the Underwriting Rights on land along with land-related objects act. In this act, it is explained that in the case of guaranteeing land rights, it must be made in an authentic deed named deed of mortgage. But in this case the debtor guarantees ownership rights of the land to the creditor with only deed under hand, not with the deed of mortgage. Is the guarantee still valid? and how about the executorial power? In this study the author uses a case approach and legislative approach. It can be concluded that the guarantee of ownership rights on land based on the deed under the hand is valid because it has fulfilled the elements of Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the legal requirements of the agreement. Then for the execution strength, it can be done, but it will be very difficult because it requires a court order to execute the collateral object. The suggestion from the author is that in guaranteeing the rights to the land, it must be charged the Deed of mortgage, so that if there is a default, the execution of the guarantee object is easy and does not take a long time.

scholarly journals Permanent Grant of Land Certificate for Adat People, is it Possible?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1245-1255
Author(s):  
Yusuf Zamil ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Positive System ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Legal Entities

Adat peoples mean the original inhabitants or the first inhabitants of a country or the earliest population's descendants lived in the area. All this time, adat people in Indonesia have always been marginalized and banished from their homeland. Companies that acquired investment permits from the government often dismiss the adat peoples for their interests. This dismissal occurs due to the absence of proof for the collective land ownership (ulayat land), which is used and utilized collectively and communally. This article discusses the possibility of permanently grant the land certificates to provide legal protection for the adat peoples. Granting a certificate of land rights is possible if the government changes the land registration system from the negative to the positive system (torrens system). Adat peoples may acquire land certificates if they are considered as a legal entity. According to Indonesian law, only individuals or legal entities can register ownership of land. To make adat people a legal entity is by making regulations by the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning which states that adat people in certain areas who have met the requirements are declared as legal entities.

scholarly journals Diskriminasi Terhadap WNI Keturunan Tionghoa Terkait Kepemilikan Tanah di Yogyakarta

ijd-demos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brilian Satrio Pamungkas ◽  
Febrio Elfianta ◽  
Kintan Anindita Zulfana ◽  
Tanti Sabila
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Land Policy ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Citizenship Status ◽  
Chinese Descent ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Special Region

AbstractThis scientific journal writing aims to analyze the land policy established by the Yogyakarta Special Region government regarding land rights ownership for Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent. The enactment of the UUAP in Jogja resulted in that individuals with Indonesian citizenship status were allowed to pocket or hold ownership rights to land. However, this is very inversely proportional to reality, first implementing the Deputy Governor's Instructions which made it impossible for Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent to own land rights in Jogja. The local government only allows Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent to only be allowed as use rights, building use rights, and business use. The Yogyakarta Regional Government seems to discriminate against its citizens, especially those of Chinese descent. This situation has made many Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent cast strong protests over the ownership of land rights for their groups to the local governmentKeywords: citizenship, restriction on the acquisition of rights, land ownership in Yogyakarta AbstrakPenulisan jurnal ilmiah ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan pertanahan yang ditetapkan oleh Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta mengenai kepemilikan hak atas tanah bagi warga negara Indonesia keturunan Tionghoa. Dengan berlakunya UUAP di Jogja, warga negara Indonesia diperbolehkan mengantongi atau memiliki hak kepemilikan atas tanah. Namun hal ini sangat berbanding terbalik dengan kenyataan, pertama melaksanakan Instruksi Wakil Gubernur yang tidak memungkinkan warga negara Indonesia keturunan Tionghoa memiliki hak atas tanah di Jogja. Pemerintah daerah hanya mengizinkan warga negara Indonesia keturunan Tionghoa untuk hanya diperbolehkan sebagai hak pakai, hak guna bangunan, dan guna usaha. Pemerintah Daerah Yogyakarta terlihat melakukan diskriminasi terhadap warganya, terutama yang keturunan Tionghoa. Situasi ini membuat banyak warga Indonesia keturunan Tionghoa melayangkan protes keras atas kepemilikan hak atas tanah bagi kelompoknya kepada pemerintah daerah.Kata kunci: kewarganegaraan, pembatasan perolehan hak, kepemilikan tanah di Yogyakarta

KONSEP HAK KEPEMILIKAN BERDASARKAN HUKUM ADAT DAN HUKUM ISLAM

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Yanto Sufriadi
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Social Function ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
Individual Ownership

This study focuses on the concept of land ownership rights based on Indonesian customary law and Islamic law. This study is a normative legal research with the approach of statutory law, customary law and Islamic law. Data obtained through library research. Based on this study, it is concluded that both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law recognize individual ownership of land, but that ownership has a social function, namely that land rights must provide benefits for welfare, both the welfare of the owner and the welfare of the community. Both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law prohibit land ownership that is detrimental to the welfare of others. This concept is expected to become a reference in formulating the ownership of material rights in Indonesian National Law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document