scholarly journals JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN RESOLUTION OF GENERAL ELECTION DISPUTES FOR REGIONAL HEAD

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Micael Josviranto
Keyword(s):  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
General Elections

purpose of this research is to find out what is the legal basis for the authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the results of the General Election of Regional Heads in Indonesia and how the effectiveness of the authority of the Constitutional Court in disputes over Regional Head General Election. The method used in this research is juridical normative, namely, the materials collected by conducting a literature study. The authority of the Constitutional Court in judging at the first and last levels whose decisions are final in deciding disputes regarding general elections, there are several paragraphs that discuss the extent to which the authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the General Election of Regional Heads has been contained in Article 157 of Law Number 10 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors which form the legal basis for the authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the results of the General Election in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Ulang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
I Kadek Andika Setiawan ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
State Revenue ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
Election Commission

A failed general election will result in a re-election and will certainly require additional budget. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the implementation of the re-election and to analyze the use of the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-election. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for implementing the re-election is a dispute over the results of the disputed General Election, by presidential candidates and members of the legislative candidates through the Constitutional Court decision. The mechanism for the provision of funds from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-General Election is the submission of additional costs by the General Election Commission to the Budget Institution and the Budget Department to revise the budget for the implementation of General Elections that are undergoing re-election.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENGADILI PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH (SUATU KAJIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 97/PUU-XI/2013 JO. PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 072-073/PUU-II/2004)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Hardy Salim ◽  
Cut Memi
Keyword(s):  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Republic

Acccording to the Arrticle 24C paragaaph (1) the Constttution of thr Republic of Indonesia of 1945, the Constitutional Court of thr Republic of Indonesia have thr power to decide upon disputes over the results of general election. The general election referred to here is elections to elect members of the legislature, regional representative councils, regional legislatures, president amd vice president. Both of thr provisions have been limitative, so there will no be any other elections that included. However, in its development, the Constittutional Court of the Republc of Indonesia is given the power to decide upon disputes ovrr the results of regional hed elections with a legal basis of the Constittutional Court Ruling Number 072-073/PUU-II/2004. However, a litle later the Constttution Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Consttttuional Court Ruling Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 which said tht the Constitusional Court of the Republic of Indonesia can’t have the power to decide upon disputes over the resuls of regional hed elections. This reaises problems regarding whether regional head elections are included in thr general election regime? And whether the Constitutional Court of the Republic Indonesia has thr authorty to decide upon disputes over the results of regional hed elections? Thr Author examined the issue by normative method. The results of thr resrarch show tht thr regional hesd elections is not a part of the general electiins regime and the Constututional Corrt of the Republic Indonesia can’t have thr power to decide upon disputes ovrr thr resulls of the regional hesd elections.

scholarly journals UPAYA PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (KDRT) MELALUI UNDANG-UNDANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Nita Yuniarti
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Data Collection Technique

The general nature of man is basically inclined towards goodness, but this tendency can change due to three factors. First, when you see an opportunity to do bad things. Second, when there is an unbearable basic need. Third, there is desire that is out of control. So controlling the three factors that cause humans to do bad things must be strived for, so that humans always tend to goodness. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, and Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2016 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002, Concerning Child Protection, is one of the state's efforts to block human opportunities to commit crimes in the form of violence in their household. This paper uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The data collection technique is observation through literature study. The problem in this research is the hope of reducing domestic violence behavior after the enactment of the PKDRT Law, but the facts show different things. The results of the study prove that the graph of domestic violence after the enactment of this law is still increasing.

PERBEDAAN TAFSIR MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PEMILIHAN UMUM SERENTAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suparto Suparto
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Legislative Election

ABSTRAKSelama ini pemilu presiden dan pemilu legislatif dilakukan secara terpisah atau tidak serentak. Pemilu legislatif selalu dilakukan sebelum pemilu presiden dan wakil presiden. Pemilihan umum yang dilakukan secara terpisah dianggap lebih banyak dampak negatifnya serta tidak sesuai dengan UUD NRI 1945. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan peraturan perundangundangan. Rumusan masalahnya adalah bagaimanakah pertimbangan hakim konstitusi dalam memutus Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 sehingga terjadi perbedaan dengan putusan sebelumnya Nomor 51-52-59/PUUVI/ 2008 terkait dengan pelaksanaan pemilu serentak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertimbangan hakim konstitusi dalam memutus Putusan Nomor 14/PUUXI/ 2013 tentang pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden terjadi inkonsistensi. Putusan Nomor 14/ PUU-XI/2013 memutuskan bahwa pemilu presiden dan wakil presiden harus dilaksanakan secara bersamaan dengan pemilu anggota DPR, DPR, dan DPRD. Sedangkan dalam putusan sebelumnya yaitu Putusan Nomor 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008 pada pengujian pasal dan undang-undang yang sama (Pasal 3 ayat (5) Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008), Mahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan bahwa pemilu presiden dan wakil presiden yang dilaksanakan setelah pemilu anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD (tidak serentak) adalah tidak bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 (konstitusional). Terjadinya pertentangan putusan ini antara lain disebabkan oleh perbedaan pilihan penafsiran konstitusi.Kata kunci: inkonsistensi, mahkamah konstitusi, pemilu serentak. ABSTRACTDuring this time, the presidential and legislative elections are conducted separately or not simultaneously. The Legislative Elections are always carried out prior to the General Elections of the President and Vice President. The general election is conducted separately as considerably having more negative impacts and inconsistency with the 1945 Constitution. This analysis uses descriptive analysis method with the pertinent laws and regulations approach. The formulation of the issue is what the Constitutional Court Justices took into consideration in its Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 leading to differences to that of its previous Decision Number 51- 52-59/PUU-VI/2008 concerning the implementation of simultaneous elections. The analysis results show inconsistencies in the consideration of the Constitutional Court Justices in ruling the case through the Decision Number 14/PUU-X/2013 on the judicial review of Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning the General Elections of the President and Vice President. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-X/2013 decided that the General Election of the President and Vice President should be implemented simultaneously with the Legislative Election for the Member of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives. As for the previous decision, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008 on the judicial review of the same article and law (Article 3 (5) of Law Number 42 of 2008), the Constitutional Court decided that the elections of the President and Vice President conducted after the Legislative Election for the Member of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (not simultaneously) is not contradictory to the 1945 Constitution. The contradiction of these decisions is partly due to the variety of interpretation on the constitution.Keywords: inconsistency, the constitutional court, simultaneous elections.

scholarly journals Analysis of Reduction of Authority of The Constitutional Court Through The Law on General Election

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 01001
Author(s):  
Budiman N.P.D Sinaga ◽  
Sahat H.M.T Sinaga
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Law ◽  
Election Results ◽  
The Republic

In the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia, there is an order to further regulate in the Law such as the general election that has been enacted Law No. 7/ 2017 on General Election. In its Law, the results of the general election is merely a dispute over the result of the general election regarding the determination of the vote which may affect the election participants’ seats and the President and Vice President election results. The objective of this paper is to find out the legal consequences of the provisions of the law which reduce the authority of state institutions that have been regulated in the 1945 Constitution. The approach of this research is status approach that will be used by examining the laws and regulations relating to the problem. The provisions of the Law on General Elections can be said to have reduced the authority of the Constitutional Court granted the Constitution. There should be strong grounds for an amendment to this provision it can be done immediately by the House of Representatives and the President. Testing by the Constitutional Court may be done but it is better through changes by the House of Representatives and the President.

scholarly journals TELAAH TERHADAP PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILU SERENTAK 2019

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Lutfil Ansori
Keyword(s):  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Presidential System ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Legislative Election

This paper aims to examine the presidential threshold in relation to the simultaneous general elections 2019. After the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 14/PUU-XI/ 2013 which mandates the general election simultaneously raises the pros and cons of setting the presidential threshold. In the constitutional perspective, using or not using the presidential threshold is not contrary to the constitution, because the presidential threshold is an open legal policy of the legislator. The legislators need to rethink the provisions of the presidential threshold especially in relation to the simultaneous elections, taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of applying or abolishing the presidential threshold, in order for the purpose of strengthening the presidential system to be achieved. The existence of simultaneous general elections has substantially eliminated the provisions of the presidential threshold, so the threshold requirement to nominate the President and Vice President becomes irrelevant. However, if the legislators demand presidential threshold, the middle path that can be selected is to apply the presidential threshold by using the legislative election 2014 with a record of institutionalizing the coalition.

scholarly journals Analisis Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-351
Author(s):  
Ahmad Parlindungan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
General Election ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

Regional Head Elections or abbreviated as (Pilkada), fraudulencies are often occurs as seen in one of the court verdict no. 381 /Pid.Sus/2018.PN,Psp. About money politics. Money politics is a from of giving or promising to bribe someone with the intention so thet the person does not carry out his righs in certain way during the general election. The regional head election is a main momentum of democracy in the implementation of each general election be held every pair of candidates expects no fraudulent acts carried out by the candidate pairs in order to create a conducive regional head general election. Therefor money politic perpetrators can be held accountable for their action as is have been regulated in Law No.10 of 2016 concerning the second amendement to Law No. 1 of 2015 concerning the second amendment to law number 1 of 2014 concerning the election of regional heads, while there are 25 types of criminal acts for the election of regional heads, while there are 5 articles concerning on criminal acts of general election in KUHP. Pilkada violations are divided into there, which are administrative violation, criminal violations of money politics, and disputes over the result of general elections in this case the election of regional heads. Administrative violations were reported to the electoral commission and forwarded to KPUD. Violations of general election criminal proceeds with the criminal justice system (police, public prosecutor, judiciary) in accordance with the criminal procedure code, preceded by report from thev public or candidate pairs to the election supervisory committee no later than seven days after the report is received, while disputer over the resoult of the regional head elections originally handled by the supreme court was handed over to the constitional court.

PERUBAHAN KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILIHAN UMUM TERHADAP PELANGGARAN PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-61
Author(s):  
Jumardi Harsono
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Election Administration ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Election Results ◽  
Election Commission

ABSTRAKPerubahan Kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum terhadap Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum Legislatif berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah: (1). Untuk mengetahui latar belakang terjadinya perubahan kewenangan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum terhadap pelanggaran pemilihan umum legislative berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum, (2). Untuk mengetahui mekanisme penyelesaian pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum terhadap pelanggaran pemilihan umum legislatif berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan dua pendekatan yakni pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian yang melatarbelakangi perubahan kewenangan pelanggaran Pemilu yakni adanya aspirasi Bawaslu yang kesulitan dalam praktik, dimana saat terjadi pelanggaran administrasi Pemilu yang semestinya diselesaikan dengan cepat, tidak bisa dilakukan karena proses penerusan laporan dari pengawas Pemilu ke Komisi Pemilihan Umum/Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah tidak diproses secara cepat dan tidak diberi putusan serta tindakan. Disisi lain adanya usulan agar Bawaslu dan Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi dua lembaga yang menangani perselisihan Pemilu. Mahkamah Konstitusi menangani perselisihan hasil Pemilu, sedangkan Bawaslu menangani pelanggaran ketentuan Administrasi pemilu, menjadi penyidik dan penuntut pelanggaran ketentuan pidana Pemilu, perselisihan antara Komisi Pemilihan Umum dengan peserta Pemilu, perselisihan antara peserta Pemilu. Bawaslu hendak dikembangkan menjadi penegak hukum dan menyelesaikan sebagian sengketa Pemilu. Pelanggaran Pemilu dibagi menjadi enam jenis yaitu Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu, Pelanggaran Administrasi Pemilu, Sengketa Pemilu, Perselisihan hasil Pemilu, sengketa tata usaha Negara. Keseluruhan pelanggaran Pemilu ini ditangani oleh masing-masing lembaga yang berbeda.Kata kunci: pemilu legislatif; pelanggaran pemilu; mekanisme penanganan pelanggaran pemiluABSTRACTT Changes to the Authority of the General Election Supervisory Board on Violations of Legislative General Elections based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The objectives of this study are: (1). To find out the background of the change in authority of the General Election Supervisory Agency against violations of the legislative general election based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, (2). To find out the mechanism for resolving violations of the General Election by the General Election Supervisory Board against violations of legislative elections based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This type of research is legal normative juridical research using two approaches namely the approach of legislation and a conceptual approach. The results of the research behind the change in election violation authority are the aspirations of Bawaslu which have difficulties in practice, where during the election administration violations which should be resolved quickly, cannot be done because the process of forwarding reports from Election supervisors to the Election Commission/Regional Election Commission is not processed quickly and not given decisions and actions. On the other hand there is a proposal that the Election Supervisory Body and the Constitutional Court be two institutions that handle election disputes. The Constitutional Court handles disputes over election results, while the Election Supervisory Body handles violations of electoral administration provisions, becomes investigators and prosecutors of violations of Election criminal provisions, disputes between the General Election Commission and election participants, disputes between election participants. Bawaslu wants to be developed into law enforcement and resolve some election disputes. Election Violations are divided into six types, namely Election Crimes, Election Organizers Code of Ethics, Election Administration Violations, Election Disputes, Election Results Disputes, State administrative disputes. All of these Election violations are handled by different institutions.Keywords: legislative elections; election violations; mechanism for handling election violations

scholarly journals Election Design Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajar Laksono ◽  
Oly Viana Agustine
Keyword(s):  
Presidential Elections ◽  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Original Intent ◽  
Major Implication ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Will ◽  
Legal Condition

The major implication from Constitutional Court Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013 is that the Constitution promotes fundamental changes to the design of the general election regarding both process and substance. Therefore, in order to uphold the Constitution, efforts are required to reconstruct the design of the general election, particularly so that elections are conducted in accordance with Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013 as a representation of the spirit and the will of the 1945 Constitution. Essentially, the current norm regarding the implementation of general elections following the election of members of the representative institution is not consistent with the stipulations in Article 22E Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) and Article 1 Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Constitutional Court Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013 aims to realign the implementation of the elections with the intentions of the 1945 Constitution. Through implementation of the original intent method and systematic interpretation, the Constitutional Court offered its interpretation that the framers of the amended Constitution intended that general elections have five ballot boxes, with the first for the People’s Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, DPR), the second for the Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, DPD), the third for the president and vice president, the fourth for the Regional People’s Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah, DPRD) at the provincial level and the fifth for the DPRD at the regency level. Thus, it can be concluded that the presidential elections should be conducted simultaneously with elections of members of the representative bodies. Through this decision, the Constitutional Court revoked the prevailing norm, such that Presidential Elections and Elections of members of representative bodies were no longer valid because they violated the 1945 Constitution. The Constitutional Court introduced a new legal condition that obligated General Elections to be held simultaneously.

scholarly journals The Impact of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 30 / PUU-XVI / 2018 on the Institution of the Regional Representative Council

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Al-Fatih ◽  
Mujar Ibnu Syarif ◽  
Abdul Qodir
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Case ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Regulatory Approach ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Impact

This study aims to determine the background of the filing of the Constitutional Court case lawsuit Number 30 / PUU-XVI / 2018 and understand the influence of the Constitutional Court decision Number 30 / PUU-XVI / 2018 on the Institutional Council of Regional Representatives. The research method used in this research is juridical normative with a statutory approach, a historical approach, and a conceptual approach obtained from data collection techniques through literature study through the statutory regulatory approach that refers to the 1945 Constitution, the Law, and the Constitutional Court Decisions. related to the theme of the discussion. The results of the study show that the background for filing a lawsuit against the Constitutional Court Decision Number 30 / PUU-XVI / 2018 is that there is no clear meaning to the phrase “other work” in Article 182 letter I of the Election Law that has provided space for political party functionaries as candidate members DPD. In addition to the impact of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 30 / PUU-XVI / 2018 is the issuance of the Final List of Candidates (DCT) for DPD candidates issued by the General Elections Commission (KPU) as a follow-up to implementing the Constitutional Court Decision in which the KPU has crossed out the candidates. DPD members who still serve as functionaries of political parties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document