scholarly journals KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS DI INDONESIA

Solusi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-282
Author(s):  
Hotman Siahaan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
History Of

In the Indonesian justice system found three (3) judicial institutions authorized to settle economic disputes, the District Court, Commercial Court and the Court of Religion. With the presence of the three courts that settle economics disputes, it can also be compared the advantages and disadvantages from each judiciary in the resolution of economic disputes.Assessment implemented through legislation approach as normative legal research which is equipped with study of the principles of law, systematic legal, comparative law, and history of law.This paper find that the settlement of economics disputes through the Commercial Court is superior compared to the other court. Unfortunately, business dispute settlemet authority for the Commercial Court is still limited to bankruptcy issues and delays payment of debt obligations as well as certain disputes in the field of intellectual property rights. Considering the excellence of the Commercial Court in the resolution of economic disputes, it is better to extend the authority of the Commercial Court, including in the areas of tort and breach of contract for other business disputes.

scholarly journals Ways to eliminate inflections in teaching disciplines of intellectual property

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurii Kuznetsov
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Polytechnic Institute ◽  
The Other ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Technical Creativity ◽  
History Of ◽  
Kyiv Polytechnic Institute

The history of introduction of disciplines devoted to the methodology of scientific and technical creativity, acquisition, protection, protection and commercialization of intellectual property rights in the Kyiv Polytechnic Institute (KPI) is presented chronologically. The positive and negative consequences of teaching disciplines in intellectual property and patent science are analyzed. Emphasis was placed on a strategic mistake when two disciplines (one legal, the other integrated engineering creative direction) merged into one and two teachers of two different departments of KPI began to teach.

Significant choice-of-law interests and its impact on the formation of choice-of-law regulation in the field of intellectual property

2021 ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Svetlana I. Krupko
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Close Connection ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Special Rules

This article analyzes the choice-of-law interests of specific and potential participants in the relations of intellectual property rights and the state in order to establish the closest connection of the above type of relation with the state, whose law should be applied. Taking into account the directionality of significant choice-of-law interests, advantages and disadvantages of territorial and universal approaches, a theoretically based solution is proposed for the formation of a general choice-of-law rule on the law to be applied to the relation of intellectual property rights. It was revealed in the study that the diversity of the relations of intellectual property rights (their obligatory and non-obligatory, property and personal non-property nature, other differences in legal features) does not automatically generate a multidirectionality of significant choice-of-law interests that should be taken into account when establishing a close connection of the above type of the relation with the state for determination of applicable law, does not prevent the formation of a general choice-of-law rule for the relations of intellectual property rights in general and does not unequivocally testify in favor of the specialization of its binding. However, the diversity of the relations of intellectual property rights should be examined and evaluated for the feasibility and limits of exceptions from the general choice-of-law rule and the development of special rules for resolving certain private of the relations of intellectual property rights.

Article 262 TFEU

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Schima
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
European Parliament ◽  
The Other ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Member States ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Legislative Procedure

Article 229a EC Without prejudice to the other provisions of the Treaties, the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament, may adopt provisions to confer jurisdiction, to the extent that it shall determine, on the Court of Justice of the European Union in disputes relating to the application of acts adopted on the basis of the Treaties which create European intellectual property rights. These provisions shall enter into force after their approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

scholarly journals HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI BENDA: PENELUSURAN DASAR PERLINDUNGAN HKI DI INDONESIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Indirani Wauran-Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Authority ◽  
Intellectual Work

<p><strong>Abstrak</strong><br />Hak Kekayaan Intelektual memberikan kewenangan hukum kepada seseorang untuk<br />mendapat keuntungan dari karya intelektual yang diciptakan. Hal ini berimplikasi pihak<br />lain, yang tanpa persetujuan, tidak diperbolehkan untuk mengambil keuntungan dari<br />sebuah karya intelektual. Pengambilan keuntungan berarti mengambil sesuatu, di mana<br />sesuatu tersebut berada dalam hukum sipil yang dikenal dengan properti. Artikel ini<br />menyelidiki kembali perlindungan dasar hak kekayaan intelektual untuk memberikan<br />justifikasi bahwa hak kekayaan intelektual adalah ‘properti’ yang memiliki sifat dasar<br />properti dan faktanya obyek properti memiliki hak milik.<br /><br /></p><p><em><strong>Abstract</strong></em><br />Intellectual Property Rights provides legal authority for a person to reap the rewards of<br />the intellectual work produced. This has a consequence that the other party without consent<br />must not take advantage of an intellectual work. Reap the rewards of means to take<br />something, which in civil law is known as the property. This article retraces the basic<br />protection of intellectual property rights to provide justification that intellectual property<br />rights are ‘a property’ that has the nature of properties and in fact, is the object of property<br />that has proprietary rights.</p>

scholarly journals PENERAPAN HUKUM ACARA PENGADILAN NIAGA YANG BERADA DALAM LINGKUP PERADILAN UMUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladju Kusmawardi ◽  
Kholis Roisah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Area ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Court Judge

<p>The Commercial Court is a special court within the General Courts. This<br />Commercial Court has the authority to accept, examine and adjudicate the case for<br />an application for bankruptcy statements, request for a delay in the obligation to pay<br />debts (PKPU), other claims and intellectual property rights (IPR).This study aims to<br />determine the scope of duties and authority of the Commercial Court, the legal<br />standing of Creditors and Debtors after the dispute has been decided by Hakim<br />Niaga and has permanent legal force and the implementation of the execution at the<br />Commercial Court. The approach method used in this research is sociological<br />juridical with the Semarang City research area, especially the Semarang<br />Commercial Court. The research subjects included those involved in the proceedings<br />at the Semarang Commercial Court. Primary data and secondary data are obtained<br />through field surveys and literature studies.Based on the research and analysis<br />results, it is known that the scope of duties and authority of the Commercial Court is<br />to accept, examine and decide on the case for an application for bankruptcy<br />statements, postponement of the obligation to pay debts (PKPU), other claims and<br />cases included in the field of intellectual property rights (IPR).The legal standing of<br />the parties is that for the Debtor after being declared bankrupt by the Commercial<br />Court Judge, he loses the right to manage the bankrupt assets owned by him, but the<br />Debtor's civil rights as a person (personrechi) is not lost.Regarding the execution of<br />the Commercial Court that is still guided by the provisions of HI R / RBg as the<br />execution of civil cases in the District Court, this is because Law No. 4 of 1998 has<br />not been regulated separately. Especially for the execution of the forged Brand case,<br />the mark of the falsified goods / products is carried out at the Directorate General of<br />Trademark, Copy and Patent of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights in Jakarta</p>

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM TRANSAKSI KREDIT PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Lidwina Tessa Kurnia Prihantiwi ◽  
, Pujiyono
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Regulatory Constraints ◽  
Deductive Method ◽  
Banking Credit

<p>Abstract<br />This article  has the main  problem  with  the causes  of banks  not allowing  copyright  as a Fiduciary  Guarantee in Banking Credit Transactions in Indonesia. Besides, this article aims to find out the solutions that must be done so that copyright can become a Fiduciary Guarantee. This article is empirical legal research and has a descriptive nature. The types of data used are primary and secondary. Data collection techniques used were interviews  and literature studies, then the technical analysis used was the deductive method . The results showed that several things cause copyright as a fiduciary guarantee  in bank credit transactions  not yet allowed by banks. The first cause is regulatory constraints, intellectual property rights assessment constraints such as copyright, constraints according to banking, constraints according  to the OJK, constraints  on people’s  evaluation  of copyright.  From  the various causes, the authors also describe solutions to overcome these causes so that there is a bright spot on Copyright Problems as a Fiduciary Guarantee in Banking Credit Transactions.<br />Keywords: Copyright; Fiduciary Guarantee; Banking Credit</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini memiliki pokok masalah tentang penyebab perbankan belum memperbolehkan Hak Cipta   sebagai  Jaminan  Fidusia  dalam Transaksi  Kredit  Perbankan  di Indonesia.  Selain itu artikel  ini bertujuan  untuk  mengetahui  solusi  yang  harus  dilakukan  agar Hak  Cipta  dapat menjadi  Jaminan  Fidusia.  Artikel  ini adalah  penelitian  hukum  empiris  dan memiliki  sifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan  yaitu primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan  data yang digunakan  adalah wawancara  dan studi kepustakaan,  selanjutnya  teknis analisis yang digunakan  adalah metode  deduktif.  Hasil penelitian  menunjukkan  bahwa  ada beberapa  hal yang menyebabkan hak cipta sebagai jaminan fidusia dalam transaksi kredit perbankan belum diperbolehkan oleh bank. Penyebab yang pertama adalah kendala regulasi , kendala penilaian hak kekayaan intelektual seperti hak cipta, kendala menurut perbankan, kendala menurut OJK, kendala penilaian  masyarakat  terhadap hak cipta. Dari berbagai   penyebab tersebut, penulis juga memaparkan solusi-solusi mengatasi penyebab tersebut agar ada titik terang atas Problematika Hak Cipta sebagai Jaminan Fidusia dalam Transaksi Kredit Perbankan.<br />Kata Kunci: Hak Cipta; Jaminan Fidusia; Kredit Perbankan</p>

scholarly journals PENERAPAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA (SMALL CLAIM COURT) DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA WANPRESTASI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SELONG

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-40
Author(s):  
ERNA Purnawati
Keyword(s):  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Legal Science

This study aims to determine how the application of a simpleclaim court in the settlement of default cases at Selong DistrictCourt, and to find out what aret the obstacles to a small claimcourt in settling default cases at Selong District Court. Thebenefits of this research are expected to provide input in thedevelopment of legal science,especially in the field of civil lawrelated of the settlement of simple lawsuits, especially theclassification of cases breach of contract. The method used inthis research is empirically legal research. The result showedthat the implementation of Perma Number 2 of 2015 andPerma umber 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for solvingsimple lawsuits at Selong District Court was carried outeffectively with constraints that were more due to theweakness of the Perma itself internally

scholarly journals Implikasi Konsep Utilitarianisme dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika: Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 389/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Yyk

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Shinta Rhukmi B.
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

AbstrakSistem peradilan pidana merupakan unsur yang signifikan dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana narkotika. Pengguna narkotika seyogyanya mendapatkan sanksi pidana yang berat, mengingat korban penyalahgunaan narkotika di Indonesia semakin bertambah dari tahun ke tahun. Namun, dari segi penegakan hukum Mahkamah Agung melalui Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 389/Pid.Sus/2015/PN Yyk hanya memuat formulasi yang tidak didukung dengan teori-teori keilmuan, bahkan putusan tersebut tidak mencantumkan keterangan masa penahanan atau ketentuan Pasal 197 ayat (1) huruf h Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif lebih mengutamakan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kekuatan mengikat Pasal 197 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 adalah  mandatory, imperatif dan limitatif dalam putusan hakim, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan nilai-nilai keadilan dan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak asasi manusia bagi para pihak. Adapun konsekuensi ketentuan tersebut apabila tidak dipenuhi dalam putusan hakim adalah putusan batal demi hukum.AbstractThe criminal justice system is a significant element in efforts to eradicate narcotics crime. Drug users should get severe criminal sanctions, considering that victims of narcotics abuse in Indonesia are increasing from year to year. However, in terms of law enforcement the Supreme Court through the Decision of the Yogyakarta District Court Number 389 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN Yyk only contains formulations that are not supported by scientific theories, even the decision does not include informatio on the period of detention or the provisions of Article 197 paragraph ( 1) letter h of Law Number 8 of 1981. This type of research is normative legal research. Normative legal research prioritizes literature. The results of the study indicate that the binding force of Article 197 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 is mandatory, imperative and limited in the judge's decision, which aims to provide values of justice and protection of human rights for the parties. The consequences of these  provisions if not fulfilled in the judge's decision are the verdict null and void.  

scholarly journals PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Compensation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Cost

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

Sentencing Guidelines

Criminology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Justice System ◽  
The Other ◽  
Sentencing Guidelines ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Us States ◽  
Sentencing Recommendations ◽  
History Of ◽  
Administrative Body

Sentencing guidelines are formal sentencing recommendations that provide benchmarks for appropriate punishments to judges at sentencing. They often consist of two-dimensional grids that rank the seriousness of the current offense along one axis and the prior offending history of the offender on the other. Cells within the grid provide specific ranges of punishments that are presumed to be appropriate in typical cases involving typical offenders. Many sentencing guidelines are established and monitored by a specialized administrative body known as a sentencing commission. Since the early 1980s, sentencing guidelines have been implemented in numerous US states and in the federal justice system with the express goals of reducing unwarranted disparity and increasing consistency, uniformity, and transparency in punishment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document