scholarly journals PENERAPAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA (SMALL CLAIM COURT) DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA WANPRESTASI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SELONG

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-40
Author(s):  
ERNA Purnawati
Keyword(s):  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Legal Science

This study aims to determine how the application of a simpleclaim court in the settlement of default cases at Selong DistrictCourt, and to find out what aret the obstacles to a small claimcourt in settling default cases at Selong District Court. Thebenefits of this research are expected to provide input in thedevelopment of legal science,especially in the field of civil lawrelated of the settlement of simple lawsuits, especially theclassification of cases breach of contract. The method used inthis research is empirically legal research. The result showedthat the implementation of Perma Number 2 of 2015 andPerma umber 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for solvingsimple lawsuits at Selong District Court was carried outeffectively with constraints that were more due to theweakness of the Perma itself internally

scholarly journals KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS DI INDONESIA

Solusi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-282
Author(s):  
Hotman Siahaan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
History Of

In the Indonesian justice system found three (3) judicial institutions authorized to settle economic disputes, the District Court, Commercial Court and the Court of Religion. With the presence of the three courts that settle economics disputes, it can also be compared the advantages and disadvantages from each judiciary in the resolution of economic disputes.Assessment implemented through legislation approach as normative legal research which is equipped with study of the principles of law, systematic legal, comparative law, and history of law.This paper find that the settlement of economics disputes through the Commercial Court is superior compared to the other court. Unfortunately, business dispute settlemet authority for the Commercial Court is still limited to bankruptcy issues and delays payment of debt obligations as well as certain disputes in the field of intellectual property rights. Considering the excellence of the Commercial Court in the resolution of economic disputes, it is better to extend the authority of the Commercial Court, including in the areas of tort and breach of contract for other business disputes.

Review of the III International historical and legal congress “Legal traditions of the formation of Russian statehood”

2021 ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Lyudmila Yu. Grudtsyna
Keyword(s):  
Russian Empire ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Traditions ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Scientific Schools ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
Further Development

The review of the III International historical and legal congress “Legal traditions of the formation of Russian statehood", dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the proclamation of the Russian Empire, is given. One of the main tasks of the event was to bring together representatives of science from different states, different scientific schools and directions to solve topical historical and legal problems of the state and law. Following the results of the congress, a declaration was adopted, in which the importance of continuing legal research of domestic state-legal traditions was noted, the main directions for the further development of historical and legal science were outlined.

KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Yuanita Permatasari ◽  
Pranoto ,
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Legal Substances ◽  
Arbitration Award

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to find out the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration award in Indonesia, as well as the authority of the courts in annulment the international arbitration award in Indonesia. This research is a normative and prescriptive legal research. The type and source of materials used is the source of secondary legal material. The legal substances used in this study are of two kinds, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting legal materials in this study is obtained through assessment of existing libraries, books, law journals, and court awards. Based on the result of the discussion, it can be concluded: Firstly, the international arbitration award can be recognized and enforced if the award is registered and obtain an execution from the Central Jakarta District Court. International arbitration rulings can only be recognized and enforced if they full fil the conditions in Article 66 of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution law. Second, the international arbitration award is final and binding. However, in reality many international arbitration awards are requested for annulment to the Court in Indonesia.</p><p>Keywords: international arbitration award, annulment of international arbitration award, enforcement of international arbitration award</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia, serta kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, dengan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan: Pertama, agar putusan arbitrase internasional dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan, maka putusan tersebut harus terlebih dahulu didaftarkan dan memperoleh exequatur dari Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan arbitrase internasional hanya dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan apabila memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kedua, putusan arbitrase internasional bersifat final and binding. Sehingga, putusan arbitrase internasional tidak dapat diajukan upaya pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Namun, dalam realitanya banyak putusan arbitrase internasional yang dimintakan pembatalannya kepada Pengadilan di Indonesia.</p><p>Kata Kunci: putusan arbitrase internasional, pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional, pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional</p>

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP MALPRAKTEK DOKTER YANG MELAKUKAN ABORSI (STUDI PUTUSAN NO.288/PID.SUS/2018/PN. NJK)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Ricky Darmawan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Moral Ethics ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The Many

AbstractMedical actions by doctors who act not in accordance with the rules and applicable moral ethics are now beginning to emerge frequently. At this time, the problem of malpractice in health services began to be discussed by various groups in the community. This can be seen from the many indictments of malpractice cases submitted by the public about the profession of doctors who in carrying out their duties have committed wrong actions that result in losses resulting in death or disability. Medical malpractice, this is related to the task of the doctor or medical personnel under his command intentionally or negligence to do something (active or passive). The problem that the writer takes here is that the malpractice case which the writer carefully sourced from the decision of Nganjuk District Court No.288 / Pid.sus / 2018 / PN NJK, The theory used in this research is the theory of law enforcement. While the method used is empirical juridical legal research, where in analyzing the problem carried out by the method of combining legal materials (Decisions) with primary data obtained in the field. The output of this paper is that the handling of malpractice cases by doctors without the need for procedures according to medical regulations needs to be considered.Keywords: Abortion, Doctors, Law Enforcement, Malpractice.AbstrakTindakan medis oleh dokter  yang bertindak tidak sesuai dengan aturan dan etika moral yang berlaku ini kini mulai sering muncul. Pada saat ini, masalah malpraktik pelayanan kesehatan mulai dibicarakan oleh berbagai kalangan dalam masyarakat. Hal itu terlihat dari banyaknya dakwaan kasus malpraktik yang disampaikan oleh masyarakat tentang profesi dokter yang dalam melakukan tugasnya telah melakukan tindakan yang salah yang menimbulkan kerugian yang berujung pada kematian atau cacat. Malpraktik medik, hal ini berkaitan tugas dokter atau tenaga medis yang ada di bawah perintahnya dengan sengaja atau kelalaian melakukan perbuatan (aktif atau pasif). Permasalahan yang penulis ambil disini dimana Kasus malpraktek yang penulis teliti bersumber pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nganjuk No.288/Pid.sus/2018/PN NJK, Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah teori penegakan hukum. Sementara metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis empiris, dimana dalam menganalisis permasalahan dilakukan dengan metode memadukan bahan-bahan hukum (Putusan) dengan data primer yang diperoleh di lapangan. Adapun output dari tulisan ini, bahwa penanganan perkara malpraktek dokter yang diilakukan dokter tanpa danya prosedur sesuai aturan medis perlu di perhatikan.Kata kunci : Aborsi, Dokter, Malpraktek,Penegakan Hukum.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 559/PID.B/2017/PN.BYW. PENGADILAN NEGERI BANYUWANGI TENTANG PENYEBARAN AJARAN KOMUNISME/MARXISME-LENINISME SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM BERDASARKAN PASAL 107A KUHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1108
Author(s):  
Andreas Purba ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Basic Element ◽  
District Court ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Security ◽  
Individual Accountability

Budi Pego was charged with violating Article 107a of Law Number 27 of 1999 concerning Amendment to the Criminal Law Code relating to crimes against State security, because of. Because of these accusations, Budi Pego was charged with a 10-month prison sentence in the Banyuwangi District Court. The problem faced is how criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code (case study of decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw)? The research method used is normative legal research. The results showed that criminal liability on the perpetrators of the spread of the teachings of communism in terms of Article 107A of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 559 / Pid.B / 2017 / PN.Byw. it is inappropriate if this criminal liability model is applied to criminal liability to individuals. Considering that individual accountability still requires actions and mistakes as a basic element of accountability. That is, without any deeds and mistakes, there is no criminal liability. Regarding the Budi Pego case, the policy of criminalizing the ideology of Communism/Marxism-Leninism was decriminalized. If this cannot be done, then the legislators need to revise Law No. 27 of 1999 with the concept of eliminating articles containing formal offenses and replacing them with the formulation of material offenses and in the formulation of the weight of sanctions.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

Human Rights Studies on Fulfillment of Restitution Rights for Children as Victims of Human Trafficking

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Syahfitri Nasution ◽  
Siti Nurahmi Nasution ◽  
M. Hadyan Yunhas Purba ◽  
Akmal Handi Ansari Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
Direct Observation ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Child Victim

<em>This paper aims to analyze the fulfillment the restitution rights for the children as victims after the enactment of government regulation Number 43 of 2017 in Medan based on human rights studies. This research is normative legal research with statute approach which is carried out by examining law and regulations related to the legal issue being raised that is regarding the provision of restitution for child victim of human trafficking in Medan and empirical legal research which gaining data by means direct observation in Medan District Court. Based on the studies, it can be related that restitution must be given to the victims of human trafficking because it is a part of fulfillment of human rights to compensate the victim for losses suffered as the result of a crime.</em>

scholarly journals Critisism of The Juridical Positivism Paradigm on The Meaning of Pornography In The Judge Mindset

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 07002
Author(s):  
Erni Wulandari ◽  
Rini Fidiyani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Institutional Structure ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Social Sensitivity ◽  
Social Theories ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Contextual Meaning ◽  
The Way

Pornographical in the way of lex spesialis was regulated in The Law No. 44/2008 and lex generalis loaded on The Criminal Code. The Judge interpreting pornography refer to textual definition of pornography according to the Law No. 44/2008 according the data founded that dominantly on juridical positivist paradigm. Juridical positivist paradigm is not the only one paradigm that used by the judge, moreover related about pornographical, need the change of appropriate paradigm concerning the judge mindset in interpreting pornography recorded to the judge considerations. The aim of this writing is to criticize the judge mindset and social sensitivity in interpreting and handling pornography. This study used qualitative and socio legal research to reveal the judicial considerations textual-contextually. With exposing the textual-contextual meaning of judge’s considerations, it can be traced to the legal paradigm used by judges and need to use appropriate legal paradigm related to the use of social theories that support it. The judge needs to have a non-doctrinal legal science perspective on the correct legal paradigm reform in giving judges consideration to pornographic cases. Judges are more likely shackled to the institutional structure and establishment of the juridical positivism paradigm.

scholarly journals Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.

scholarly journals Case Review of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 672/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby about Unlawful Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Building

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ramzi Maulana Arghie
Keyword(s):  
Bargaining Power ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

The research, entitled Case Study of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 672/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby about Unlawful Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Building aims to find out whether or not Dirk Tatipata is said to have defaulted on the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) of land, which he did with Ronald Sanjaya, how the legal protection for Dirk Tatipata as the party who was harmed by the decision of the Surabaya District Court, This is normative legal research, Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that legally, it is clear that Dirk Tatipata does not have high bargaining power and is a seller of land and buildings on Jl. Sleep No. 103 that has been done in front and signed by Notary Anita Lucia Kendarto, S.H., M.Kn. with several letters/deeds. Thus, legal resistance is still being carried out by carrying out a lawsuit in the land and building dispute case at the Surabaya District Court, and ending his defeat coupled with a penalty of trial fees and payment for his unlawful actions harmed Ronald Sanjaya as the legal owner of the land and buildingsKeywords: Agreement, Sale, and Purchase of Land and Buildings, Against the Law

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document