The Impact of COVID-19 on Heart Failure: What Happened to the Patients with Heart Failure Who Could Not Visit Our Clinic Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic?

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Dong-Hyuk Cho
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e044416
Author(s):  
Tan Van Nguyen ◽  
Huyen Thanh Dang ◽  
Mason Jenner Burns ◽  
Hiep HH Dao ◽  
Tu Ngoc Nguyen

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the prevalence of impairment of activities of daily living (ADLs) in older patients with heart failure (HF), and to examine the impact of ADL impairment on readmission after discharge.Design and settingsA prospective cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥65 years with HF admitted to a tertiary hospital in Vietnam from August 2016 to June 2017. Difficulties with six ADLs were assessed by a questionnaire. Participants were classified into two categories (with and without ADL impairment). The associations of ADL impairment with 3-month readmission were examined using logistic regression models.ResultsThere were 180 participants (mean age 80.6±8.2, 50% female) and 26.1% were classified as having ADL impairment. The most common impaired activity was bathing (21.1%), followed by transferring (20.0%), toileting (12.2%), dressing (8.9%), eating (3.3%), and continence (2.8%). During 3-month follow-up, 32.8% of the participants were readmitted to hospitals (55.3% in participants with ADL impairment, 24.8% in those without ADL impairment, p<0.001). ADL impairment significantly increased the risk of 3-month readmission (adjusted OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.05, p=0.01).ConclusionsIn summary, ADL impairment was common in older hospitalised patients with HF and was associated with increased readmission. These findings suggest further studies on ADL assessment and intervention during transition care for older patients with HF after discharge to prevent readmission.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
Camilla Hage ◽  
Ulf Dahlström ◽  
Pasquale Perrone-Filardi ◽  
Lars H Lund

Introduction: Changes in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been demonstrated to correlate with outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). However the prognostic value of a change in NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is unknown. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of changes in NT-proBNP on all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization and their composite in an unselected population of patients with HFPEF. Methods: 643 outpatients (age 72+12 years; 41% females) with HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥40%) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2005 and 2012 and reporting NT-proBNP levels assessment at initial registration and at follow-up were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups according the median value of NT-proBNP absolute change that was 0 pg/ml. Median follow-up from first measurement was 2.25 years (IQR: 1.43 to 3.81). Adjusted Cox’s regression models were performed using total mortality, HF hospitalization (with censoring at death) and their composite as outcomes. Results: After adjustments for 19 baseline variables including baseline NT-proBNP, as compared with an increase in NT-proBNP levels at 6 months (NT-proBNP change>0 pg/ml), a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (NT-proBNP change<0 pg/ml) was associated with a 45.2% reduction in risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.378 to 0.796; p:0.002), a 50.1% reduction in risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.362 to 0.689; p<0.001) and a 42.6% reduction in risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.574; 95% CI: 0.435 to 0.758; p<0.001)(Figure). Conclusions: Reductions in NT-proBNP levels over time are independently associated with an improved prognosis in HFPEF patients. Changes in NT-proBNP could represent a surrogate outcome in phase 2 HFPEF trials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (11) ◽  
pp. 1930-1939
Author(s):  
Sebastian Göbel ◽  
Jürgen Prochaska ◽  
Lisa Eggebrecht ◽  
Ronja Schmitz ◽  
Claus Jünger ◽  
...  

AbstractPatients with heart failure (HF) are frequently anti-coagulated with vitamin K-antagonists (VKAs). The use of long-acting VKA may be preferable for HF patients due to higher stability of plasma concentrations. However, evidence on phenprocoumon-based oral anti-coagulation (OAC) therapy in HF is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the presence of HF on quality of phenprocoumon-based OAC and the subsequent clinical outcome. Quality of OAC therapy and the incidence of adverse events were analysed in a cohort of regular care (n = 2,011) from the multi-centre thrombEVAL study program (NCT01809015) stratified by the presence of HF. To assess the modifiability of outcome, results were compared with data from individuals receiving specialized care for anti-coagulation (n = 760). Overall, the sample comprised of 813 individuals with HF and 1,160 subjects without HF in the regular care cohort. Quality of OAC assessed by time in therapeutic range (TTR) was 66.1% (47.8%/82.8%) for patients with HF and 70.6% (52.1%/85.9%) for those without HF (p = 0.0046). Stratification for New York Heart Classification (NYHA)-class demonstrated a lower TTR with higher NYHA classes: TTRNYHA-I 69.6% (49.4%/85.6%), TTRNYHA-II 66.5% (50.1%/82.9%) and TTRNYHA-≥III 61.8% (43.1%/79.9%). This translated into a worse net clinical benefit outcome for HF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [1.31/2.02]; p < 0.0001) and an increased risk of bleeding (HR 1.40 [1.04/1.89]; p = 0.028). Management in a specialized coagulation service resulted in an improvement of all, TTR (∆+12.5% points), anti-coagulation-specific and non-specific outcome of HF individuals. In conclusion, HF is an independent risk factor for low quality of OAC therapy translating into an increased risk for adverse events, which can be mitigated by specialized care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Ahmed ◽  
Ashraf Abugroun ◽  
Manar Elhassan ◽  
Berhane Seyoum

Abstract Introduction: Patients with underlying heart failure (HF) are at increased risk for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS). However, no studies have investigated whether the presence of existing HF would impact the outcomes of HHS. Objective: we aimed to study the impact of heart HF on outcomes of HHS among adult patients hospitalized for HHS. Methodology: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for all patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state during the years 2005-2014. The primary outcomes of the study were all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute stroke. The secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), rhabdomyolysis, acute respiratory failure (ARF), need for mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay (LOS), and total cost of stay. Results: Overall, 188,725 patients were admitted for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Mean age was 55.9 (SEM: 0.1). Females were (43.9%), Caucasians were 37.4% while African American were 35.2%. Total mortality was 1.1%, MI was 1.3% and stroke was 1.1%. Most common secondary outcome was AKI seen in 31.3% followed by ARF seen in 2.9% of total. The mean cost was 7887 $ (SEM: 84.6) and mean LOS was 4.1 days (SEM: 0.03). Patients with heart failure had higher rates for mortality 2% vs 0.9%, p&lt;0.001, MI 3.1% vs 1.1 % p&lt;0.001 and stroke 1.6% vs 1%, p&lt;0.001. In addition, they had higher rates for AKI, ARF, need for mechanical ventilation, length of stay and cost. No significant difference on risk for rhabdomyolysis. On multivariable analysis, patients with heart failure had higher odds for mortality adjusted odd’s ratio (a OR) 1.58 [95%CI: 1.15-2.17] p&lt;0.01 and higher risk for stroke a OR 1.43 [95%CI:1.04-1.95] p=0.03. In addition, presence of heart failure significantly correlated with ARF, need for mechanical ventilation, higher cost and longer LOS. No significant association was demonstrated between heart failure and risk for Rhabdomyolysis, MI and AKI. Conclusion: Diabetic patients with heart failure who develop hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state are at higher risk for stroke and mortality and respiratory failure. Particular attention on fluid balance as well as early recognition for signs of stroke is warranted.


Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (Suppl 6) ◽  
pp. A4-A5
Author(s):  
Paul Carter ◽  
Andrew Carter ◽  
Jennifer Reynolds ◽  
Hardeep Uppal ◽  
Suresh Chandran ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 452-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon L Cichosz ◽  
Flemming W Udsen ◽  
Ole Hejlesen

Aim The aim of this study was to assess the impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of a telehealth care solution compared with usual practice of patients with heart failure (HF). Methods A randomized controlled trial with a telehealth care solution (Telekit) as the intervention (with a focus on self-empowerment achieved by engaging patients in their own illness through self-monitoring) combined with usual care and usual care as the control. The primary outcome was a change in HRQoL as measured by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) score. Secondary outcomes were changes in HRQoL as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MSC) score and the HF disease-specific questionnaire Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12 (KCCQ12) score, all of which were assessed from baseline to approximately 12 months’ follow-up between the two groups. Outcomes were assessed via unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Results At baseline, 299 (145 interventions, 154 controls) patients were enrolled. In the primary analysis ( n = 299), the adjusted intervention effects were PCS –0.81 (95% CI −2.7–1.1), MCS 4.66 (95% CI 1.8–7.5) and KCCQ12 3.67 (95% CI −0.7–8.1). Only the change in MCS was statistically significant. An unadjusted analysis replicated the primary analysis. Complete case analyses ( n = 193) generally resulted in a lower intervention effect on the PCS score, but the difference remained statistically insignificant. Conclusions Only the MCS score was significantly higher in the telehealth care group compared to the control group. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02860013), July 28, 2016


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document