NATIONAL INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM: KEY ACTORS AND LINKAGES

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 58-65
Author(s):  
M. A. RYBACHUK ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Innovation Ecosystem ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Government Education ◽  
Different Levels

The article analyzes the possibilities for the development and transformation of the NIS of Russia into an ecosystem. A review of the features of innovation ecosystems has been carried out. Based on the quadruple helix that is the variant of adaptation of the triple helix model to Russian conditions and system economic theory, a structural model of an integrated national innovation system has been developed. The model is based on a quadrangular pyramid, the faces of which reflect the NIS macro-subsystems: science, government, education, and business. The pyramid is divided into three levels of the hierarchy (micro-, meso-, and macro), including the corresponding economic agents. The analysis of links uniting agents belonging to different levels and macro-subsystems of the NIS is carried out. It has been established that interaction between all agents should be based on ecosystem principles, such as mutual responsibility, information openness, equal access to public infrastructure, and others.

A System Approach to Harmonization of the Country Model of Innovative Development

2020 ◽  
pp. 68-83
Author(s):  
Maxim A. Rybachuk
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Innovation Systems ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
National Innovation Systems ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Global Innovation ◽  
Government Education ◽  
The Government ◽  
Two Parameters

One of the most common models of national innovation systems as of today is the triple helix model. Four- and five-tier constructions also exist and present an option for adapting the triple helix model to the economic conditions of different countries. In this paper, we are based on the system economic theory and propose to consider the national innovation system (NIS) of Russia as a complex of four socio-economic macro-subsystems: science, government, education, and business. In this case, science acts as a system of the object type: the government – as the environment type, education – as the process type, and business – as the project type. The interaction order and role functions of these subsystems are determined. A quantitative evaluation of the quadruple helix subsystem parity was carried out; namely, the system balance indices of the NIS of Russia for 2015–2019 were calculated. The world countries’ data used to calculate the global innovation index according to the methodology of the WIPO constitute the statistical basis for the calculation. The place of the NIS of Russia among the national innovation systems of other countries for 2019, according to two parameters: the NIS subsystems balance and the effectiveness of NIS activities, was determined. For comparison, 16 countries, divided into four groups, were selected: innovative leaders, catching-up countries, lagging countries, and outsiders. It is established that Russia belongs to the countries of the second group. It is shown that to harmonize the NIS of Russia, to increase its efficiency and move Russia to the group of leaders, it is necessary to revise the economic policy and add to it, along with increasing the efficiency of innovative activity, another goal such as improving the balance of the quadruple helix subsystems.

Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?

2012 ◽  
pp. 535-565
Author(s):  
Elias Carayannis ◽  
David F.J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Knowledge Innovation ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Helix Structure

This article develops an inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary framework of analysis that relates knowledge, innovation and the environment (natural environments) to each other. For that purpose the five-helix structure model of the Quintuple Helix is being introduced. The Triple Helix model, designed by Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000), focuses on the relations of universities, industry and governments. The Quadruple Helix (Carayannis & Campbell, 2009) blends in the perspective of a media-based and culture-based public. The Quintuple Helix finally frames knowledge and innovation in the context of the environment (natural environments). Therefore, the Quintuple Helix can be interpreted as an approach in line with sustainable development and social ecology. “Eco-innovation” and “eco-entrepreneurship” should be processed in such a broader understanding of knowledge and innovation.

An Innovation Ecosystem beyond the Triple Helix Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 631-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Ferraris ◽  
Stefano Leucci ◽  
Stefano Bresciani ◽  
Fausto Giunchiglia
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Innovation ◽  
Local Area ◽  
Innovation Ecosystem ◽  
Close Link ◽  
North East ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
The Social

In the current global scenario, the relevance and the importance of social innovation becomes critical in order to face this situation of crisis. For its close link with the local area in which it takes place, social innovation is deeply rooted in the overall system, and thus involves the action of many different actors. The aim of this chapter is to highlight the presence of a new managerial model that is more suitable to promote social innovation within an ecosystem. This analysis has been developed focusing on a new and innovative framework, the Social Innovation Pyramid, and on the Trentino's ecosystem based in North-East of Italy.

scholarly journals Logistical approach to universities integration in the Russian innovation economy

2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 01020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei Barykin ◽  
Aleksandra Kobicheva
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
National Innovation System ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
The Government ◽  
Innovation Economy

New stage of economy development requires from universities implementation of new function, providing acceleration of interaction among main actors in national innovation system. The main factors of activity and efficiency of higher schools are sufficient funding and stimulating policies of the government. We have reviewed last world indicators of R&D financing and the structure of such financing. Also we have examined the existing approach to interpreting the new integration function of universities, offered our vision and showed the location of such function in a triple-helix model. In the end we have described the practical example of carrying out integration function by high school. It could be proved that the universities should be considered as the logistics integral providers acting as coordinating of both the government and the business agents in economic relations.

Models of Innovation Development: Measurement Indicators and their Interaction (a Case Study of Kazakhstan)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2361
Author(s):  
Saule Kozykeyevna BISHIMBAYEVA ◽  
Kulyanda Kulbosynovna NURASHEVA ◽  
Aigul Adilzhanovna NURMUKHANBETOVA
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Emerging Economies ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Innovation Ecosystem ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
The People ◽  
The Social

The goal of the study is to demonstrate that the Triple Helix model neither sufficiently reflects the process of innovation development nor justifies the fourth helix, the indicators of which describe the real situation in the social and economic area of the country and are an important element of the innovation ecosystem. The study uses empirical methods: observation, measurement, description of facts; logical inferences; sampling of the required information, its grouping; system and statistical analysis; and comparison of the indicators under study. The analysis of the existing models of innovation development and their applicability in Kazakhstan practice has been carried out. Considering the Triple Helix concept of innovation development, a proposal is made to introduce a fourth player – the civil society, which ensures the influence and voice of the people and serves as a channel of communication with the authorities. The solution of the innovation problem presented in the article is of interest to the post-Soviet countries and emerging economies, where social issues and the welfare of citizens have not received sufficient attention, but the components of the Triple Helix (government, universities and business) do not work without their solution. The distinction of the study lies in the development of a model of the fourth helix of innovation development, which reflects the state of the civil society and socioeconomic processes in the country.

scholarly journals Quadruple Helix Collaboration in Efforts to Fulfill Human Security in Kemijen Village, Semarang City

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-238
Author(s):  
Satwika Paramasatya ◽  
Yemima Galih Pradipta ◽  
Kevin Rendra Pratama ◽  
Desy Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Human Security ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
The People ◽  
The One ◽  
Quadruple Helix Model

Human security is very vital for humans. Initially, security was defined as freedom from war. However, over time it began to shift into a broad and collective concept of security. The United Nations established three important pillars of Human Security, namely: freedom from want, freedom from fear, and freedom to live in dignity. The implementation of compliance with Human Security is complex and not simple. This paper argues that the Triple Helix model, the position of society is neglected because they are only positioned as an object where they should also be the one who play an active role as actors. Therefore, a new breakthrough is needed in the effort to fulfill Human Security in Kemijen Village, Semarang City through the Quadruple Helix concept that involves government, business, academics and the community. This study uses a descriptive-qualitative approach by combining literature studies and interviews. The Quadruple Helix is basically a collaboration between top-down and bottom-up approaches, and this study proves that the Quadruple Helix model is utmost important, because the solutions are more  well-targeted and meet the needs of the community. The Quadruple Helix model also allowed the people of Kemijen Village to be involved to become subjects through Focus Group Discussion.

Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate to Each Other?

2012 ◽  
pp. 29-59
Author(s):  
Elias Carayannis ◽  
David F.J. Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Social Ecology ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Knowledge Innovation ◽  
Quintuple Helix ◽  
Helix Structure

This article develops an inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary framework of analysis that relates knowledge, innovation and the environment (natural environments) to each other. For that purpose the five-helix structure model of the Quintuple Helix is being introduced. The Triple Helix model, designed by Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000), focuses on the relations of universities, industry and governments. The Quadruple Helix (Carayannis & Campbell, 2009) blends in the perspective of a media-based and culture-based public. The Quintuple Helix finally frames knowledge and innovation in the context of the environment (natural environments). Therefore, the Quintuple Helix can be interpreted as an approach in line with sustainable development and social ecology. “Eco-innovation” and “eco-entrepreneurship” should be processed in such a broader understanding of knowledge and innovation.

scholarly journals Inovasi dan Daya Saing UMKM di Era New Normal: dari Triple Helix Model ke Quadruple Helix Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-162
Author(s):  
Umu Khouroh ◽  
Christina Sri Ratnaningsih ◽  
Bayu Rahayudi
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Quadruple Helix ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
The Government ◽  
Role Of The Government ◽  
Quadruple Helix Model

The role of MSMEs in the economic development of a country has important implications for increasing income, reducing unemployment, alleviating poverty and economic growth. The Covid-19 pandemic has had a negative impact and threatened the survival of MSMEs. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the triple helix model by examining the role of each helix: universities, companies, and governments to help MSMEs rise from adversity. This study identifies behavioral profiles in terms of the performance of the triple helix model from the perspective of MSMEs and recognizes key factors for innovation success and competitiveness. The survey involved 134 MSMEs. The analysis method uses SEM-PLS with WarpPLS07. The results of the study indicate that there is a positive influence between the synergy of the government and academia in increasing the innovation and competitiveness of MSMEs. Innovation is able to become a mediator for the synergy of the government and academia in increasing the competitiveness of MSMEs. MSMEs need to be more active and proactive, the role of the government and academics still needs to be improved and coupled with the optimal role of other helixes, especially the community as a strategy to survive and thrive in the Covid-19 pandemic situation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document