scholarly journals In vitro Comparison of Accuracy of Two Scanners Used in Dental Medicine

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 2344-2346
Author(s):  
Alexandru Victor Burde ◽  
Marius Manole ◽  
Radu-Septimiu Campian ◽  
Cosmin Sinescu ◽  
Sorana Baciu
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Model ◽  
Reference Model ◽  
Direct Consequence ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
Average Deviation ◽  
Virtual Reference ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Industrial Ct ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

This experimental study aims to highlight and compare the resolution and accuracy (trueness and fidelity) of an intraoral scanner and a laboratory scanner. In order to achieve the aim of this study, an experimental model consisting of a die with a standard preparation for a porcelain-fused to metal crown was manufactured from a physiognomic polymethylmethacrylate resin. The experimental model was scanned with an industrial CT to obtain the virtual reference model. Then, the die was scanned 15 times with each scanner. In order to asses trueness, comparisons were made with the virtual reference model, and for fidelity, the first scan in the series was compared with the following scans. In regards to the trueness of the scanners, the average deviation for the laboratory scanner is 4.31 and 17.34 mm for the intraoral scanner. When comparing the serial scannings� of the same die, the lowest recorded deviation is 6.4 mm for the laboratory scanner and 21.57mm for the intraoral scanner. For both fidelity and trueness, the F test demonstrates that there is a statistically significant difference between the scanners and the applied T-tests confirm the lower degree of error-rate generation by the laboratory scanner. The dimensional limitations imposed for the intraoral scanners have a direct consequence on their trueness and fidelity when compared to their laboratory counterparts.

scholarly journals In vitro Evaluation of Accuracy of Single Dies Captured by Two Intraoral Digital Scanners

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandru Victor Burde ◽  
Cristina Gasparik ◽  
Marioara Moldovan ◽  
Sorana Baciu ◽  
Cosmin Cosma
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Reference Object ◽  
Virtual Reference ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Industrial Ct ◽  
Pmma Resin ◽  
Experimental Reference

The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare the accuracy, defined as trueness and precision, of two intraoral digital scanners that use different capturing techniques. An experimental reference object consisting of a die was manufactured from a PMMA resin. The reference object was digitized with an industrial CT and was scanned 15 times with each scanner. In order to asses trueness, comparisons were made with the virtual reference model, and for fidelity, the first scan in the series was compared with the following scans. For both fidelity and trueness, the F test and T tests demonstrate that there is a statistically significant difference between the scanners.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (16) ◽  
pp. 5650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Michaelidesová ◽  
Jana Vachelová ◽  
Jana Klementová ◽  
Tomáš Urban ◽  
Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Monte Carlo Code ◽  
Proton Beams ◽  
Biologically Relevant ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Medulloblastoma Cell Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clonogenic Cell ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

Nowadays, the irradiation methodology in proton therapy is switching from the use of passively scattered beams to active pencil beams due to the possibility of more conformal dose distributions. The dose rates of active pencil beams are much higher than those of passive beams. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is any difference in the biological effectiveness of these passive and active irradiation modes. The beam qualities of double scattering and pencil beam scanning were measured dosimetrically and simulated using the Monte Carlo code. Using the medulloblastoma cell line DAOY, we performed an in vitro comparison of the two modes in two positions along the dose–deposition curve plateau and inside the Bragg peak. We followed the clonogenic cell survival, apoptosis, micronuclei, and γH2AX assays as biological endpoints. The Monte Carlo simulations did not reveal any difference between the beam qualities of the two modes. Furthermore, we did not observe any statistically significant difference between the two modes in the in vitro comparison of any of the examined biological endpoints. Our results do not show any biologically relevant differences related to the different dose rates of passive and active proton beams.

scholarly journals Effect of Different Software Programs on the Accuracy of Dental Scanner Using Three-Dimensional Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 8449
Author(s):  
Keunbada Son ◽  
Wan-Sun Lee ◽  
Kyu-Bok Lee
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Test Models ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tooth Preparation ◽  
Software Programs

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the 3D analysis for complete arch, half arch, and tooth preparation region by using four analysis software programs. The CAD reference model (CRM; N = 1 per region) and CAD test models (CTMs; N = 20 per software) of complete arch, half arch, and tooth preparation were obtained by using scanners. For both CRM and CTMs, mesh data other than the same area were deleted. For 3D analysis, four analysis software programs (Geomagic control X, GOM Inspect, Cloudcompare, and Materialise 3-matic) were used in the alignment of CRM and CTMs as well as in the 3D comparison. Root mean square (RMS) was regarded as the result of the 3D comparison. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were performed for statistical comparison of four analysis software programs (α = 0.05). In half-arch and tooth preparation region, the four analysis software programs showed a significant difference in RMS values (p < 0.001), but in complete-arch region, no significant difference was found among the four software programs (p = 0.139). As the area of the virtual cast for 3D analysis becomes smaller, variable results are obtained depending on the software program used, and the difference in results among software programs are not considered in the 3D analysis for complete-arch region.

Evaluation of Accuracy of Casts of Multiple Internal Connection Implant Prosthesis Obtained From Different Impression Materials and Techniques: An In Vitro Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malesh Pujari ◽  
Pooja Garg ◽  
D. R. Prithviraj
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Internal Connection ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multiple Comparison Procedures

Movement of impression copings inside the impression material using a direct (open tray) impression technique during clinical and laboratory phases may cause inaccuracy in transferring the 3-dimensional spatial orientation of implants intraorally to the cast. Consequently, the prosthesis may require corrective procedures. This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of 3 different impression techniques using polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material to obtain a precise cast for multiple internal connection implants. A reference acrylic resin model with 4 internal connection implants was fabricated. Impressions of the reference model were made using 3 different techniques and 2 different impression materials. The study consisted of 24 specimens divided into 6 groups of 4 each. Impressions were poured with ADA type IV stone (Kalrock, Kalabhai Karson Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India). All casts were evaluated for the positional accuracy (mm) of the implant replica heads using a profile projector. These measurements were compared to the measurements calculated on the reference resin model, which served as a control. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison procedures to evaluate group means. The results revealed significant difference for anterior implant distance between the 2 impression materials (P &lt; .01) and also among the 3 different techniques (P &lt; .05). The lowest mean variation was found with the polyether impression material and the splinted technique. For posterior implants, the results suggested no significant difference between the 2 impression materials (P ≥ .05). Although results were not statistically significant, the polyether impression material showed the lowest mean variation as compared to the VPS impression material. However, there was a significant difference among the 3 different techniques (P &lt; .05). Among the 3 different techniques, the lowest mean variation between 2 posterior implants was found in the splinted technique. Casts obtained from impression techniques using square impression copings splinted together with autopolymerizing acrylic resin prior to the impression procedure were more accurate than casts obtained from impressions with nonmodified implant impression copings and with airborne particle–abraded, adhesive-coated copings. Casts obtained from polyether impression material were more accurate than casts obtained from vinyl polysiloxane impression material.

scholarly journals Effect of Tooth Types on the Accuracy of Dental 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keunbada Son ◽  
Kyu-bok Lee
Keyword(s):  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Reference Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Test Model ◽  
Intraoral Scanner ◽  
3D Scanners ◽  
Aided Design ◽  
Post Hoc

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dental three-dimensional (3D) scanners according to the types of teeth. A computer-aided design (CAD) reference model (CRM) was obtained by scanning the reference typodont model using a high-precision industrial scanner (Solutionix C500, MEDIT). In addition, a CAD test model (CTM) was obtained using seven types of dental 3D scanners (desktop scanners (E1 and DOF Freedom HD) and intraoral scanners (CS3500, CS3600, Trios2, Trios3, and i500)). The 3D inspection software (Geomagic control X, 3DSystems) was used to segment the CRM according to the types of teeth and to superimpose the CTM based on the segmented teeth. The 3D accuracy of the scanner was then analyzed according to the types of teeth. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences according to the types of teeth in statistical analysis, and the Tukey HSD test was used for post hoc testing (α = 0.05). Both desktop and intraoral scanners showed significant differences in accuracy according to the types of teeth (P < 0.001), and the accuracy of intraoral scanners tended to get worse from anterior to posterior. Therefore, when scanning a complete arch using an intraoral scanner, the clinician should consider the tendency for the accuracy to decrease from anterior to posterior.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Nocardia brasiliensis In Vitro and in an Experimental Model of Actinomycetoma in BALB/c Mice

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Edith Chacon-Moreno ◽  
Oliverio Welsh ◽  
Norma Cavazos-Rocha ◽  
Maria de la Luz Salazar-Cavazos ◽  
Hector Gerardo Garza-Lozano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Model ◽  
Nocardia Brasiliensis ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT The efficacy of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against Nocardia brasiliensis was evaluated by applying 25 mg of each drug/kg subcutaneously every 8 h in BALB/c mice infected with N. brasiliensis. A statistically significant difference was observed only with moxifloxacin. A moxifloxacin-trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination was as active as when each compound was used alone.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonam Gupta ◽  
Aparna Ichalangod Narayan ◽  
Dhanasekar Balakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
Coordinate Measuring Machine ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
The Difference

Purpose. For a precise fit of multiple implant framework, having an accurate definitive cast is imperative. The present study evaluated dimensional accuracy of master casts obtained using different impression trays and materials with open tray impression technique.Materials and Methods. A machined aluminum reference model with four parallel implant analogues was fabricated. Forty implant level impressions were made. Eight groups (n=5) were tested using impression materials (polyether and vinylsiloxanether) and four types of impression trays, two being custom (self-cure acrylic and light cure acrylic) and two being stock (plastic and metal). The interimplant distances were measured on master casts using a coordinate measuring machine. The collected data was compared with a standard reference model and was statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA.Results. Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found between the two impression materials. However, the difference seen was small (36 μm) irrespective of the tray type used. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between varied stock and custom trays.Conclusions. The polyether impression material proved to be more accurate than vinylsiloxanether impression material. The rigid nonperforated stock trays, both plastic and metal, could be an alternative for custom trays for multi-implant impressions when used with medium viscosity impression materials.

scholarly journals In Vitro Comparison of Root Surface Treatment Effect between Root Scaling with Ultrasonic Inserts and Gracey Curette and Polishing with Different Cleaning Pastes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 5967
Author(s):  
Angelica Bertacci ◽  
Daniele Moro ◽  
Gianfranco Ulian ◽  
Giovanni Valdrè
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Grain Sizes ◽  
Morphological Evaluation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Polishing Procedures ◽  
Root Surfaces ◽  
Standard Steel ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

The aim of this study was the morphological evaluation of root surfaces subjected to manual (curette) and ultrasonic (conventional and diamond tips) scaling. The surface was then polished with a rubber cup and three medium-sized pastes. Ninety teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 30 and subjected to three different root instrumentation: (1) manual instrumentation with a Gracey® curette; (2) ultrasonic instrumentation with a standard steel tip (Universal Perio S-SERIES: USU, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) at a power equal to 50%; and (3) with a diamond tip (Punta Piezo Serie E Scaling, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) at a power of 20%. Each group of the instrumented teeth was then divided in three subgroups of 10 and subjected to 30 s of rubber polishing with three different polishing pastes with medium grain sizes in single-dose cups: (1) Ultrapro Tx cool mint medium®; (2) Stomyprox media®; and (3) Nupro medium orange®. Polyether root surface replicas were then taken from all 90 samples and analyzed by SEM to evaluate surface morphology after scaling and polishing procedures. All scaling techniques caused an alteration of the root surface without statistically significant difference, whereas polishing resulted in maintenance or improvement of the surface texture.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Composite Fixation and Veterinary Acetabular Plates for Stabilization of Acetabular Osteotomies in Dogs Loaded in Three-Point-Bending Fashion

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Lewis ◽  
J. B. Madison ◽  
L. L. Blaeser ◽  
O. I. Ianz
Keyword(s):  
Yield Point ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Three Point Bending ◽  
Mixed Breed ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Biomechanical Comparison ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

SummaryAn in vitro study comparing the biomechanical performance and accuracy of reduction for two methods of acetabular osteotomy repair in the dog is presented. Pelves were harvested from five adult mixed breed dogs weighing 25-30 kg. On e hemipelvis from each dog was repaired with the composite fixation and the contralateral hemipelvis was repaired with a 2.0 mm six hole veterinary acetabular plate. Eac h hemipelvis was loaded in a threepoint- bending fashion at a rate of 5 mm/min. An extensometer was placed over the dorso-medial surface of the acetabular osteotomy during loading. Reduction was significantly better for hemipelves stabilized with the composite fixation when compared to hemipelves stabilized with the 2.0 mm six hole veterinary acetabular plate. There was not a significant difference in bending stiffness, distractional stiffness, yield point and maximum load between repair groups.An in vitro comparison was made between a composite fixation method and acetabular plates for the stabilisation of acetabular osteotomies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of High-Speed Handpiece Cutting Efficiency According to Bur Eccentricity: An In Vitro Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
pp. 3395
Author(s):  
Duk-Yeon Kim ◽  
Keunbada Son ◽  
Kyu-bok Lee
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Reference Model ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Analysis Software ◽  
Cutting Efficiency ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cutting Model

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the cutting efficiency and bur eccentricity of high-speed handpieces. The prepared lithium disilicate samples were digitized using a 3D model scanner (reference model, RM) (n = 45), and the lithium disilicate samples were cut using three high-speed handpieces. To evaluate the cutting efficiency, the cut lithium disilicate sample was digitized (cutting model, CM), and the RM and CM were superimposed using a 3D analysis software. Bur eccentricity of the high-speed handpieces was measured using dedicated equipment. Statistical analyses were performed using an analysis software. The statistical differences in pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05) were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis and post hoc tests. The S-max M600 obtained a cutting efficiency of 6.13 mm3. TG-98 and TRAUS ATN-400 showed similar efficiencies of 2.914 and 3.05 mm3, respectively. There was a significant difference in the cutting efficiency of the S-max M600 compared with TG-98 and TRAUS ATN-400 (p < 0.001). S-max M600 had an eccentricity of 3.507 µm. TG-98 and TRAUS ATN-400 had eccentricities of 5.99 and 7.767 µm, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the eccentricity among all the high-speed handpieces (p < 0.001).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document