scholarly journals Los estilos de enseñanza y la atención a la diversidad de estilos de aprendizaje en posgrado / Teaching Styles and Attention to Diversity of Postgraduate Learning Styles

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Violeta Leonor Romero Carrion
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Master's Students ◽  
Common Features ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Attention To Diversity ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACTThe aim was to establish the relationship between teaching styles and the diversity of learning styles; The Teaching Styles questionnaires were applied to teachers and the Honey-Alonso Questionnaire of learning styles to Master's students. We found predominance of functional teaching style and theoretical learning style. There is more synchrony between teachers and students, Open - Active, the pair was formed, with common features, correlation (ρ = 0.73) but if the pair have no common traits (ρ = -0.05). It is advisable for teachers to develop different teaching styles, enabling an inclusive education.RESUMENEl objetivo fue establecer la relación entre los estilos de enseñanza y la diversidad de los estilos de aprendizaje; se aplicaron los cuestionarios de Estilos de Enseñanza a los docentes y el Cuestionario Honey-Alonso de estilos de aprendizaje a los estudiantes de Maestría. Se encontró predominancia del estilo de enseñanza funcional y del estilo de aprendizaje teórico. Existe mayor sintonía, entre los docentes y estudiantes, Abierto – Activo, el par se formó, con rasgos comunes, correlación (ρ= 0,73) pero si el par no tienen rasgos comunes (ρ= -0,05). Es recomendable que los docentes desarrollen estilos de enseñanza diversos, posibilitando una educación inclusiva.

scholarly journals Learning styles and teaching styles determine students’ academic performances

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 610
Author(s):  
Nithya Dewi Subramaniam Chetty ◽  
Lina Handayani ◽  
Noor Azida Binti Sahabudin ◽  
Zuraina Ali ◽  
Norhasyimah Hamzah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Programming Technique ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
The Relationship

<span>Individuals learn in different ways using several learning styles, but lecturers may not always share material and learning experiences that match students’ learning preferences. Mismatches between learning and teaching styles can lead to disappointment with students are taking, and lead to underperformance among them. The aim of this study is to identify the learning styles of the students enrolled in Universiti Malaysia Pahang who were registered in Programming Technique course and to investigate the relationship between students’ learning styles and teachers’ teaching styles. Five lecturers and 251 students were involved in the study as participants and. Data from students were collected using Leonard, Enid’s VAK Learning Style Survey. Meanwhile, the teaching styles of the lecturers were identified using Grasha and Reichmann’s Teaching Style Survey. The findings revealed that majority of the student’s preferred visual learning style. The result also shows that the lecturers’ teaching styles give an impact towards the <br /> students’ academic performance. From this study, we can conclude that teaching styles have significant impacts on students’ learning styles and academic performances.</span>

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Teaching Styles of English Instructors and Learning Styles of English Prep Class Students at a Turkish State University

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
ABDULKADIR DURMUS ◽  
Meral GÜVEN
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
State University ◽  
Package Program ◽  
Turkish State

It is necessary to be aware of both teaching and learning styles and employing them in teaching and learning processes and as the two important stakeholders of this process, both learners and teachers are expected to benefit from each other at maximum level especially in terms of considering the needs of learners. This study aims to find out if there is a relationship between teaching styles of instructors working at Anadolu University School of Foreign Languages (AUSFL) and learning styles of students studying at English prep class. Data of the study were collected through Grasha-Reichmann Teaching and Learning Style Scales which Sarıtaş & Süral (2010)  adapted to Turkish. SPSS package program was used in the descriptive analyses of the study and Pearson’s moment correlation coefficients in correlation calculations. Significant relationships between formal authority teaching style and avoidant learning style, and between personal model teaching style and competitive learning style were found in the study. As for the other teaching and learning styles, although there wasn’t any significant relationship among each other, considering the average values, it can be said that there was a linear relationship among them which led to consider that a partial relationship existed.  

scholarly journals Investigating the Match and Mismatch between Students’ Learning Styles and Teacher’s Teaching Styles in a Saudi School: A Case Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-20
Author(s):  
Alaa Q. Alhourani
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
English Language ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Language Teacher ◽  
Learning Style Preferences ◽  
Style Preferences

This study examines if there is a match or mismatch between students’ learning styles and the teacher’s teaching styles in a classroom at Khalid Bin Alwlid School, Tabarjal, Saudi Arabia. The main objectives of this study are to determine dominant learning styles of the whole secondary grade students and the teacher’s teaching style. This study was carried out as a case study, and the data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Participants of this study were a class of 15 students and their English language teacher to the first secondary stage. The instruments used for collecting data were Reid’s Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (1995), Teachers Teaching Style Preferences Questionnaire (Peacock 2001), and semi-structured interview. The findings of this study indicated that the majority of the students had multiple learning styles with at least auditory and group as their major learning style preferences, followed by kinesthetic, tactile, and visual as their minor learning style preferences. They showed negative preference towards individual style. The major learning style preferences of the English language teacher were visual and individual, followed by tactile and kinesthetic as his minor style preferences, while his negligible teaching style preferences were auditory and group. There was a mismatch between the teacher’s teaching style and the students’ learning style at Khalid Bin Alwlid School, Tabarjal, Saudi Arabia

Compatibility of Students' Learning and Teaching Styles on Their Ratings of College Teaching

1985 ◽  
Vol 61 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1215-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank E. Pettigrew ◽  
Dorothy B. Zakrajsek ◽  
Mary A. Bayless ◽  
Grace Goc-Karp
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Learning Styles Inventory ◽  
Style Preferences ◽  
Instructional Styles

Student's ratings of teaching performance were compared for those whose preferences for learning style were strongly matched ( n = 77) and strongly mismatched ( n = 40) with their instructors' preference of teaching style. Canfield's Learning Styles Inventory and Canfield and Canfield's Instructional Styles Inventory measured learning and teaching style preferences. The rating scale was designed from a catalog of items. Analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in instructors' ratings between the two groups.

scholarly journals Comparative exploration of learning styles and teaching techniques between Thai and Vietnamese EFL students and instructors

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-141
Author(s):  
Nakhornsri Supalak
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
English Learning ◽  
Teaching Techniques ◽  
Arithmetic Means

AbstractLearning styles have been a particular focus of a number of researchers over the past decades. Findings from various studies researching into how students learn highlight significant relationships between learners’ styles of learning and their language learning processes and achievement. This research focuses on a comparative analysis of the preferences of English learning styles and teaching techniques perceived by students from Thailand and Vietnam, and the teaching styles and techniques practiced by their instructors. The purposes were 1) to investigate the learning styles and teaching techniques students from both countries preferred, 2) to investigate the compatibility of the teaching styles and techniques practiced by instructors and those preferred by the students, 3) to specify the learning styles and teaching techniques students with high level of English proficiency preferred, and 4) to investigate the similarities of Thai and Vietnamese students’ preferences for learning styles and teaching techniques. The sample consisted of two main groups: 1) undergraduate students from King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (KMUTNB), Thailand and Thai Nguyen University (TNU), Vietnam and 2) English instructors from both institutions. The instruments employed comprised the Students’ Preferred English Learning Style and Teaching Technique Questionnaire and the Teachers’ Practiced English Teaching Style and Technique Questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using arithmetic means and standard deviation. The findings can contribute to the curriculum development and assist teachers to teach outside their comfort level to match the students’ preferred learning styles. In addition, the findings could better promote the courses provided for students. By understanding the learning style make-up of the students enrolled in the courses, faculty can adjust their modes of content delivery to match student preferences and maximize student learning. Finally, this research could establish better understanding between language learning natures of people from Thailand and Vietnam.

scholarly journals Assessing Learning Styles of Students at Zayed University

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-35
Author(s):  
Tofi Rahal ◽  
David Palfreyman
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Study Strategies ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Educational Setting ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Learning And Study Strategies

Learning styles based education is becoming influential at higher education institutions around the world. Learning styles are characteristics of how students prefer to learn; they draw their origin from both biological and experiential conditions that make each student unique in the way he/she learns. An important first step in improving learning is to identify or assess students’ learning styles, and there are several instruments that can be used for this purpose. This is necessary for teachers and students who wish to improve learning and study strategies. Students who perform poorly in a conventional educational setting may suffer from a mismatch of learning and teaching styles; for example kinesthetic learners may not adapt to learning by listening or by reading. When we teach tactual and/or kinesthetic students by talking, they focus for only a brief amount of time and then wander off into their own thoughts and quickly forget (Burke & Dunn, 2002). We can improve students’ academic performance by providing them with alternative strategies and activities that respond to their learning style needs (Dunn & Dunn, 1993). In spring 2008, the learning styles of over 700 Zayed University students were assessed using the BE (Building Excellence) survey developed by Rundle & Dunn. The data collected is being analyzed with a view to making recommendations for teachers, students and parents to improve students’ learning. This paper represents the first in a series of publications on this subject; it reviews the survey process, and focuses on the nature and learning preferences of ZU students in perceptual elements (e.g. visual, auditory) and cognitive elements (e.g. Analytic-sequential (left-brain) vs. Global-simultaneous (right-brain) preferences).

scholarly journals Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Learning Styles and Their Performance on Reading Journalistic Texts: A Gender Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-286
Author(s):  
Mehrnoush Haddad ◽  
Mohsen Shahrokhi
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Group Learning ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Gender Perspective ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Efl Teachers ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
The Relationship

This paper examined the relationship between upper intermediate female and male EFL learners’ learning styles and their performances on reading journalistic texts. Moreover, the study checked whether the gender of the participants has any impact on their performances on reading journalistic text styles. To this end, 30 female and 30 male homogeneous participants aged 22 to 45 years old, were selected based on their performance on Oxford Placement Test (OPT). To identify the participants’ learning styles, a questionnaire was distributed among the participants. The participants also sat for a test of reading journalistic texts designed by the researchers. The results indicated that learning style as a composite variable could predict the female learners’ reading of journalistic materials, and that group learning style was significantly correlated with reading journalistic texts. The data analysis, furthermore, revealed that learning style could not significantly predict male EFL learner’s performance on journalistic reading texts. Moreover, the differences between the learning styles of male and females EFL learners could not bring about significant changes in their reading journalistic texts. The results have some implications for EFL teachers and students, material developers, and curriculum designers.

scholarly journals MATCH AND MISMATCH BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES OF EFL STUDENTS AND TEACHING STYLES OF EFL TEACHERS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-58
Author(s):  
Zahratul Jannah ◽  
Veni Roza ◽  
Merry Prima Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Research ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Dependent Learning ◽  
Relationship Of

          The purposes of this research were to find out what students’ learning styles and teachers’ teaching styles at MTsN 02 Bukittinggi and to find out what are the matches or mismatches between students’ learning styles and teachers’ teaching styles at MTsN 02 Bukittinggi. The design of this research was combining both quantitative and qualitative research. The population of this research was grade VIII at MTsN 02 Bukittinggi. The sample was collected from two classes with a total number of students was 78 students and two different English teachers who taught in both classes. The instrument of this research was questionnaire and interview. The result showed that both classes had the same dominant learning style. In class VIII.6, there were dependent, participant, and collaborative learning styles. Meanwhile, in class VIII.7, the dominant learning styles was collaborative, participant and dependent learning style. While the teachers also had the same dominant teaching styles which were expert, formal authority, and personal model teaching style. Based on the theory of Grasha (2002) about the relationship of learning and teaching style, the researcher found that there was a match between learning styles and teaching styles at MTsN 02 Bukittingg and it was in cluster 2.    

scholarly journals Do Learning & Teaching Styles Affect Students Performance? An Empirical Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix U. Kamuche
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Teaching Styles ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
The Subject

The ways in which students normally obtain, retain, and get back information are defined as the students’ learning style.  Mismatches often occur between the learning styles of students in a Basic Statistics class and the teaching style of the instructor, with adverse effects on the quality of the students’ learning and on their attitudes toward the class and the subject.  The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not congruency of learning and teaching styles improve students’ performance in my Basic Statistics class.

HUBUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP ASPEK PENGETAHUAN SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN SISTEM KOMPUTER DI SMK IT RAHMATAN KARIMAH BENGKULU TENGAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Dian Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to find out the relationship between learning style and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject at SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu, the type of research is quantitative and the subject of research is grade X in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu. Data collection techniques using observation, Questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis techniques used were Descriptive Analysis, and inferential Statistical Analysis. The results of visual learning style post-test were 11 people with a mean of 76.36, an auditory learning style of 8 people at a mean of 62.14, a kinesthetic learning style of 3 people at a mean of 50.33, apart from that (r x y = 2.35) and the magnitude of r is reflected in the table (r table = 0.4132). Then rxy > r table ie = 2.35> 0.4132. In other words, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It has a significant relationship between the learning styles of students and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject of grade X TKJ in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document