scholarly journals Features of documenting an administrative offense in the field of violation of human quarantine rules

2020 ◽  
pp. 60-74
Author(s):  
Mykola Sambor
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Evidence Collection ◽  
Theory Of Evidence ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The article examines legal, organizational aspects of documenting administrative offenses for violating the rules of quarantine of people. The decisions of the courts of Ukraine are studied, in which the evidence is examined from different angles, the question of their belonging, admissibility and sufficiency is studied. Based on the analysis of law enforcement practice of judicial bodies, the generalization of fundamental legal positions of courts aimed at observance of the principles of the rule of law and observance of human rights and freedoms has been carried out. Conclusions are made about the peculiarities of the use of sources of evidence when documenting violations of human quarantine rules. It is proposed to supplement the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses with a number of articles that would contain procedural norms aimed at regulating the procedure and rules for collecting evidence on violations of human quarantine rules. Approval of the legality of the actions of authorized officials who have been authorized by the state to draw up reports on administrative offenses and to bring persons to administrative responsibility under Art. 443 CUAO it is necessary to supplement CUAO with articles of Art. 2511 CUAO “Belonging of evidences”, Art. 2512 of the Code of Administrative Offenses “Admissibility of evidence”, Art. 2513 CUAO “Reliability of evidences”, Art. 2514 of the Code of Administrative Offenses “Sufficiency of evidence”, Art. 2515 CUAO “Obligation of evidence”. Art. 2516 CUAO “Collection of evidence”. These additions to the Code of Administrative Offenses will allow to a theory of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. Keywords: documentation, administrative offense, violation of human quarantine rules, affiliation, admissibility, sufficiency, reliability of evidence, collection of evidence.

APPLICATION OF FIREARMS AS ONE OF THE MEANS OF COORDINATION BY THE STATE WITHIN THE COMPETENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladymyrov M. ◽  
Paliukh V.
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

The article considers the main competencies of law enforcement officers who have the right to use firearms, as a force representing the state to maintain law and order, and prevent violations of human rights and security, which allows to determine the levels of possible use of firearms as a form of coercion and influence on civil society, as well as to identify its subjects and objects - to identify all participants in such a process, and the impact on large social groups in order to comply with the rule of law in society.

scholarly journals Human Rights and Law Enforcement

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Fransiska Novita Eleanora ◽  
Andang Sari
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government

Humans born into the world have declared their rights and naturalrights as gifts from the Almighty, God and every State must recognize them aslegal subjects who must always be respected and protected to realize human valueswell. Therefore; no one can or can act negatively, including the state or even theauthorities or the government. Conceptually, a country that is expected to realizeit is only a legal state that is considered legitimate and adheres to the notion ofdemocracy, namely democracy will become a rule and law. The realization of therule of law is to take action against perpetrators who are proven to have committedcrimes and human rights violations. This paper explains that there are still manycases of gross violations of human rights that have not been clearly revealed andthe perpetrators have not been given appropriate punishment, by giving sanctionsto the perpetrators, so that law enforcement is not realized. The embodiment ofthe rule of law is that it can capture cases of gross violators of human rights andconvict the perpetrators in accordance with the laws that apply in accordance withthe characteristics of the rule of law. The problem is whether law enforcement hasbeen realized especially in human rights violations and can be resolved throughnegotiation, conciliation and mediation.

APPLICATION OF THE RULE OF LAW IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyudmyla Bogachova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Political Power ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
The State ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Practice

The article defines the concept of the principle of the rule of law both in the narrow and broad sense. In the narrow sense, the principle of the rule of law is understood as the rule of law over legislation, and in the broad sense - as the rule of law over the state, state arbitrariness. Different approaches to disclosing the content of the principle of the rule of law in national and European legal doctrines are systematized. The lack of a single generally accepted concept of the principle of "rule of law" is emphasized. The decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are analyzed; attention is focused on their interpretation of the rule of law. The realization of the principle of the rule of law, primarily presupposes the domination of inalienable and inviolable human rights and freedoms over the political power of the state, and also requires quality laws and observance of the principle of legal certainty. The interpretation of the principle of the rule of law in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is considered. The CCU emphasizes that the rule of law is first and foremost the "rule of law in society"; characterizes the principle, linking it to the ideas of social justice, freedom and equality, without which it is impossible to imagine true human development and existence. The Constitutional Court calls justice as one of the basic principles of law, which is crucial in defining it as a regulator of social relations, one of the universal dimensions of law. Examples of application of the rule of law in the practice of the Supreme Court of Ukraine are given. Judges not only make a formal reference to the rule of law, but also try to analyze and disclose the content of its constituent elements (requirements) within a specific legal case. The main problems that hinder the effective implementation and realization of the rule of law in judicial practice are identified, namely - the lack of proper regulation and official interpretation; low quality of laws and legislative process; excessive number of conflicting laws; low level of legal awareness and legal culture of Ukrainian society, and early stage of civil society development in Ukraine. It is concluded that the rule of law is a principle whose main content is expressed in the following aspects: ensuring the rule of law over political power; subordination of state institutions to the needs of human rights protection and ensuring their implementation; priority of these rights over all other values of democratic, social, and legal state; preventing the manifestation of arbitrariness of state power, as well as ensuring compliance with the requirements of justice.

scholarly journals RETURNS OF ASSETS IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS AS ALTERNATIVE RESTORING STATE LOSSES

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Komang Ekayana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Recovery Model ◽  
Formal Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Asset Recovery ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law

Corrupted state assets certainly hurt the country narrowly, but also broadly where it harms the country and its people. However, the formal approach through the current criminal procedure law has not been able to recover the losses suffered by the state. In fact, state losses resulting from corruption are state assets that must be saved. Then there needs to be a new breakthrough to recover state losses through the asset recovery model. When looking at the country from the perspective of the victims, the state must obtain protection, in this case recovery from the losses suffered due to corruption. This paper examines the model of returning assets resulting from corruption in the law enforcement process that focuses on the rule of law in the 2003 UNCAC Convention and the mechanism of returning state assets in terms of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. 

scholarly journals Ordre du droit et droit de l'ordre

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-729
Author(s):  
Jacques Zylberberg
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Sovereign State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Civil And Political Rights

This essay undertakes a review of national and international law to demonstrate that law is mainly an ideological and variable instrument of the State and of the United Nations, which is a by-product of the states. In this perspective, the author opposes the pragmatical ideology of resistance against the sovereign state to the juridical legitimation and the behaviour of the States who reluctantly have conceded some civil and political rights. Those rights are endangered by the growing bureaucratization of the state, the inflation of the juridical norms and rules, in addition to the permanent repressive characters of the State. The criticism of the contradiction and the variation of the rule of law when it relates to "human rights" is also extended to international law as well as to the international organizations.

scholarly journals The Concept of Four "Bio" in Law and Legislation

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 146-154
Author(s):  
A. A. Mokhov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
Innovative Economy ◽  
Law And Legislation

Developing biotechnologies have an impact not only on technical, technological and other economic processes, but also on industries and sectors of the economy, public relations, and change the prevailing stereotypes of behavior and habits. In this regard, new sprouts of an innovative economy, and the changing social sphere, the psychology of individual groups and communities determine the need for a unified balanced biopolitics. This policy manifests itself in the provisions of the rule of law and legislation, strategic planning documents, and in law enforcement. Due to the nontriviality of technologies, their great potential opportunities, as well as challenges, risks and threats for the population, society, biopolitics is becoming an important factor in the policy pursued in general. The author proves the need for systemic and comprehensive regulation of biotechnologies allowed for use, taking into account their biological and other types of safety, contribution (positive effects) to the developing bioeconomy and development of society. In connection with the above, the concept of the four "bio" (biotechnology — biosafety — bioeconomics — biopolitics) is proposed, which requires the development of law and legislation based on modern trends in the development of technology, economy, society and the state.

scholarly journals KENDALA DALAM PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI BALAI PEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA PADA SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Nuryuli Nurdin ◽  
Baso Madiong ◽  
Yulia A. Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Collection Methods

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Pelaksanaan Fungsi Balai Pemasyarakatan (BAPAS) Makassar Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Pada Sistem Pidana Anak dan Kendala Balai Pemasyarakatan dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Pada Sistem Peradilan Anak. Penelitian merupakan penelitian normatif. Metode Pengumpulan Data melalui wawancara dan dokumentasi. Teknis Analisis data ini merupakan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Balai Pemasyarakatan kelas I Makassar sebagai salah satu penegak hukum khususnya dalam pembimbingan terhadap anak nakal menjalankan perannya tersebut melalui tiga tahap, yaitu tahap Pra ajudikasi, tahap ajudikasi dan tahap Post ajudikasi. Faktor kendala yang dihadapi dalam pelaksanaan Fungsi Balai Pemasyarakatan (BAPAS) antara lain kelemahan aturan hukum yang berlaku terhadap tindak pidana anak, kurangnya koordinasi diantara sesama aparat penegak hukum, rendahnya kualitas sumber daya manusia di BAPAS, and kurang Sarana dan Prasarana yang memadai. Mengakibatkan pelaksaan Fungsi Balai Pemasyarakatan (BAPAS) kurang optimal, dan alokasi anggaran dana yang sangat minim. This study aims to determine the implementation of the function of Makassar Correctional Center (BAPAS) in the Protection of Human Rights in the Criminal Justice System of Children and the Obstacles of the Correctional Center in the Protection of Human Rights in the Justice System of Children. This research is normative research. Data collection methods were through interviews and documentation. Technical analysis of the data is a qualitative analysis. The results showed that Correctional Center Class I Makassar as one of the law enforcers, especially in guiding delinquents carried out their roles in three stages, which are the Pre-adjudication stage, the adjudication stage and the Post-adjudication stage. Obstacles faced in the implementation of the function of Correctional Center (BAPAS) are weaknesses in the rule of law that applies to the crimes of children, lack of coordination among law enforcement officials, low quality of human resources at BAPAS, and lack of adequate facilities and infrastructure. As a result, the implementation of the function of Correctional Center (BAPAS) is not optimal, and the budget allocation for funds is very minimal.

HISTORY AND REFORMS OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-197
Author(s):  
Adilet Merkanov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Kyrgyz Republic ◽  
The Public ◽  
Political Transformations ◽  
Democratic Rule

Nowadays in Kyrgyz Republic take a place huge reforms of prosecutors. The implementation of national projects requires a new quality of prosecutorial oversight so thatthe human rights and law enforcement potential of the prosecutor’s office really contributes to the development of a democratic rule of law. The prosecutor's office as one of the state legal institutions plays an extremely important role in the public and state life of the Kyrgyz Republic. As you know, the successful implementation of socio-economic and socio-political transformations in the state largely depends on existing laws, the observance of which the prosecutor's office is called upon to monitor.

Law at the Heart of Violence

2020 ◽  
pp. 118-157
Author(s):  
Nikita Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Development Project ◽  
The State ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Women Lawyers ◽  
State Apparatus ◽  
The Subject

This essay seeks to draw upon the updates of the Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group (JagLAG), a group of women lawyers working in the conflict-torn region of South Chhattisgarh representing adivasis of Bastar at various sites of law and documenting law in conflict. Using the JagLAG updates as archives of the life of law in Bastar, the chapter draws upon the life of law in a terrain of violence, wherein the Rule of Law collapses under the weight of the gun and the subject of law is dehumanized; reduced to a development project of the state requiring uplifting and is denied all human rights. Divided into three parts, the chapter maps out the capacity of law to fashion itself to suit the needs of the state apparatus which grows increasingly offensive and brazenly disregards human rights, silencing any form of dissent as it storms through the forests of Bastar, destroying countless lives in its stead. Notwithstanding the bourgeoisie nature of law which by design seeks to alienate and oppress, the chapter leaves behind questions worth pondering over. Are there possibilities in the law of articulating, ascertaining and asserting the voices of the marginalized, of those who are perceived as enemies of the state, mere casualties in the State’s endeavour of combating a law and order situation or is vesting any energy and hope in such a possibility of law a useless exercise?

Sociedad Civil, Estado De Derecho Y Justicia Constitucional. El Rompimiento De Paradigmas Y La Generación De Nuevos Retos

Xihmai ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (26) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Jaime Hidalgo González [1]
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Public Sphere ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
Investigación Cualitativa ◽  
Sociedad Civil

ResumenA partir de la reforma constitucional de junio de 2011, la obligación del Estado, desde su actuar integral de garantizar y tutelar los derechos humanos, generó una nueva dimensión desde la cual debemos entender y construir el Estado de Derecho. La Justicia Constitucional tiene como fines principales mantener la supremací­a constitucional, el equilibrio entre los poderes del Estado y la protección de las personas limitando el ejercicio de poder polí­tico a través de la aplicación de dos principios sustantivos y procedimentales: el principio de constitucionalidad y el principio de convencionalidad.Palabras clave: Estado, Sociedad Civil, Esfera Pública, Estado de Derecho, Justicia Constitucional, Derechos Humanos.AbstractSince the constitution reform of june 2011 the obligation of the State from his responsibility of guarantee and protect human rights generated a new dimension from which we must understand and build the Rule of Law. The Constitutional Justice has as main goals keep the constitutional supremacy, the balance between the powers of the State and the protection of the individuals by limiting the exercise of political power through the application of the principles of constitutionally and conventionality.Keywords: State, Civil Society, Public Sphere, Rule of Law, Constitutional Justice, Human Rights.    [1] Egresado de la Licenciatura en Derecho de la Universidad La Salle Pachuca. Profesor de Derecho Constitucional y Procesal Constitucional en la misma Universidad. Cuenta con estudios sobre Sociedad Civil e Instituciones Democráticas, Metodologí­as de Investigación Cualitativa y Cuantitativa, desarrollo de análisis legislativo, así­ como para la planeación, implementación y evaluación de Indicadores de Gestión y Evaluación de Polí­ticas Públicas. Ha publicado diversos artí­culos académicos sobre Ciudadaní­a, Democracia, Derechos Humanos, Análisis Constitucional y Comportamiento Electoral. Es miembro del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales y Derechos Humanos del Estado de Hidalgo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document