scholarly journals The Concept of Four "Bio" in Law and Legislation

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 146-154
Author(s):  
A. A. Mokhov

Developing biotechnologies have an impact not only on technical, technological and other economic processes, but also on industries and sectors of the economy, public relations, and change the prevailing stereotypes of behavior and habits. In this regard, new sprouts of an innovative economy, and the changing social sphere, the psychology of individual groups and communities determine the need for a unified balanced biopolitics. This policy manifests itself in the provisions of the rule of law and legislation, strategic planning documents, and in law enforcement. Due to the nontriviality of technologies, their great potential opportunities, as well as challenges, risks and threats for the population, society, biopolitics is becoming an important factor in the policy pursued in general. The author proves the need for systemic and comprehensive regulation of biotechnologies allowed for use, taking into account their biological and other types of safety, contribution (positive effects) to the developing bioeconomy and development of society. In connection with the above, the concept of the four "bio" (biotechnology — biosafety — bioeconomics — biopolitics) is proposed, which requires the development of law and legislation based on modern trends in the development of technology, economy, society and the state.

Author(s):  
Kirill Lavrinovich

The relevance of the research topic are conditioned by the theoretical and practical significance of issues affecting the theoretical, methodological, sociopolitical and practical aspects of the problem of the interaction between the police and civil society institutions in the state governed by the rule of law. These questions are connected with the need to comprehend modern practice to develop new conceptual provisions and dogmatic decisions that are appropriate to the modern conditions. During historiographical analysis it was revealed that the experience of interaction between the police and civil society institutions in the modern states governed by the rule of law in the implementation of the law enforcement function of the state has not been adequately studied and evaluated. The object, subject and purpose of the study were determined in accordance with the current state of legal science. The object of the study was public relations that arise in the field of ensuring the protection of public order, freedom and security of society, state and individual. Police that carries out law enforcement activities on a professional basis and citizens who are actively involved in the implementation of the law enforcement function in the modern state are the subjects of these public relations. Ideas about the main directions and forms of cooperation between police and citizens in the implementation of the law enforcement function of modern states have formed the subject of research. The aim of the study was theoretical and legal analysis of the concept of community policing, which today is the basis for the interaction between the police and civil society institutions in the implementation of the law enforcement function in many modern states. The research methodology was a combination of general scientific (historical, systemic and functional) and special (formal-legal, historical-legal, sociological, comparative state science) methods. The result of the study was the conclusion that the concept of community policing is based on the activities of authorized police agencies to implement the law enforcement function in a modern state governed by the rule of law. These activities are aimed at implementing a model of social partnership and focused on solving specific problems that arise in society.


Author(s):  
Komang Ekayana

Corrupted state assets certainly hurt the country narrowly, but also broadly where it harms the country and its people. However, the formal approach through the current criminal procedure law has not been able to recover the losses suffered by the state. In fact, state losses resulting from corruption are state assets that must be saved. Then there needs to be a new breakthrough to recover state losses through the asset recovery model. When looking at the country from the perspective of the victims, the state must obtain protection, in this case recovery from the losses suffered due to corruption. This paper examines the model of returning assets resulting from corruption in the law enforcement process that focuses on the rule of law in the 2003 UNCAC Convention and the mechanism of returning state assets in terms of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Volodymyr USTYMENKO ◽  
◽  
Ruslan DZHABRAILOV ◽  

It is noted that an important quality of legal regulation should be the effectiveness of the method and means chosen by the state to promote the achievement of the planned socio-economic result. Despite the fact that some principles of normative project work have been covered at the legislative level (in particular, on the example of legislation in the field of regulatory policy), the practice of adopting normative legal acts the effectiveness of which remains questionable continues. One of the reasons for this state of legal regulation of social relations is the improper consideration, and sometimes conscious disregard for theoretical and applied constructions that have been substantiated within the framework of legal and economic science. As a result, this leads to the establishment of an unjust order in a certain area of public relations, which threatens the further sustainable development of the state. In view of this, attention is focused on the defects of the implementation of legal principles, especially the principle of the rule of law, in the field of legal regulation of economic relations, which leads to the imaginary effectiveness of the relevant legal acts. It is proved that the effectiveness of legal regulation of public relations will be evidenced not only by the rate of achievement of the expected result at the expense of the minimum necessary resources of economic entities, citizens and the state (i.e. the economic criterion), but also the degree of compliance with the rule of law, which will allow to talk about promoting the adoption by a legal act of the ideology of justice. Based on the analysis of some examples of legislative practice in the field of taxation, it is established that the adoption of regulations contrary to the rule of law has led to the direction of tax policy to achieve socio-economic results that contradict the principles of tax policy as a type of economic policyand principles of social policy of the state in terms of income redistribution set out in strategic documents.


2019 ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
T. O. Kolomoiets

The article substantiates the expediency of considering “anti-corruption restrictions” in relation to persons authorized to perform the functions of the state or local self-government in the aspect of compliance with the requirements of legal certainty in the use of their resource. Legal certainty (juridical security) is considered as an integral component of the rule of law, which combines the “substantive” (“quality” of the regulatory framework for using the resource of “anti-corruption” restrictions) and “procedural” (“quality” of law enforcement with respect to relevant restrictions) components that only collectively shape the phenomenon of legal certainty of “anti-corruption” restrictions. We consider appropriate to use a “broad” approach to understanding the legal certainty of “anti-corruption” restrictions, which combines the “substantive” and “procedural” legal certainty of corresponding restrictions, and enhancing the “quality” of anti-corruption legislation in terms of defining “anti-corruption” restrictions and the “quality” of its application practice makes it possible to increase the effectiveness of these restrictions as an anti-corruption “tool”. The “defects” of the “substantive” and “procedural” legal certainty of domestic “anti-corruption” restrictions are distinguished and compared with the “quality” of the corresponding components of the legal certainty of “anti-corruption” restrictions in foreign countries. Specific proposals are formulated to improve the “quality” of anti-corruption legislation in terms of fixing “anti-corruption” restrictions, the “quality” of anti-corruption enforcement practices (in terms of the terminological framework, the use of valuation concepts, techniques and technologies of anti-corruption rulemaking in the part of “anti-corruption” restrictions, law enforcement unification). The article substantiates the expediency of prudent borrowing of positive, tested by time and practice foreign experience of anti-corruption rulemaking and anti-corruption enforcement in the use of the resource of “anti-corruption” restrictions (minimization of evaluation provisions, extended conceptual series, duplication of criteria for determining limits of restrictions, minimization of blanket and referral standards, clarity and transparency of regulations, thematic generalizations of law enforcement practices) by which it is possible to ensure compliance of the “quality” of legal certainty of “anti-corruption” restrictions in Ukraine with international legal standards, consistency with foreign analogues as an effective anti-corruption “tool”.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladymyrov M. ◽  
Paliukh V.

The article considers the main competencies of law enforcement officers who have the right to use firearms, as a force representing the state to maintain law and order, and prevent violations of human rights and security, which allows to determine the levels of possible use of firearms as a form of coercion and influence on civil society, as well as to identify its subjects and objects - to identify all participants in such a process, and the impact on large social groups in order to comply with the rule of law in society.


2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
I. I. Baidyuk

The author has studied the essence of the principles of interaction of the State Border Service with other law enforcement agencies, which is conditioned by the importance of ensuring proper protection of the state border in the current conditions of the state development. The main method of the research was the method of critical analysis, which made it possible to analyze the provisions of the current national legislation and the approaches in the scientific doctrine to understanding the principles of interaction of the State Border Service of Ukraine with other law enforcement agencies. The content of the concept of “principles of interaction” has been clarified. The definition of the concept of “principles of interaction of the State Border Guard Service with other law enforcement agencies” has been formulated. The author has revealed the content of such principles of interaction of the Border Guard Service with other law enforcement agencies as: the rule of law, legality, respect and observance of human and citizen rights and freedoms, equality of the subjects of interaction, scientific nature, planning, personal responsibility of the management and employees of the subjects of interaction for its results, combination of open, secret and conspiratorial forms and methods of activity, promptness and professionalism of the employees of the subjects of interaction, coherence of actions of the subjects of interaction and independence of each of them within their powers. The author has offered to classify the principles of interaction of the Border Guard Service with other law enforcement agencies, by dividing them into general and special ones.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Fransiska Novita Eleanora ◽  
Andang Sari

Humans born into the world have declared their rights and naturalrights as gifts from the Almighty, God and every State must recognize them aslegal subjects who must always be respected and protected to realize human valueswell. Therefore; no one can or can act negatively, including the state or even theauthorities or the government. Conceptually, a country that is expected to realizeit is only a legal state that is considered legitimate and adheres to the notion ofdemocracy, namely democracy will become a rule and law. The realization of therule of law is to take action against perpetrators who are proven to have committedcrimes and human rights violations. This paper explains that there are still manycases of gross violations of human rights that have not been clearly revealed andthe perpetrators have not been given appropriate punishment, by giving sanctionsto the perpetrators, so that law enforcement is not realized. The embodiment ofthe rule of law is that it can capture cases of gross violators of human rights andconvict the perpetrators in accordance with the laws that apply in accordance withthe characteristics of the rule of law. The problem is whether law enforcement hasbeen realized especially in human rights violations and can be resolved throughnegotiation, conciliation and mediation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Levani Ivardava

The article is devoted to the analysis of sources of regulatory regulation of digitalization of public relations in the Russian Federation, foreign countries, at the international level (including draft legal acts, strategic planning documents). With this analysis, it is possible to identify prospects for the dynamics of the national rule of law, since these normative and programmatic acts reflect the State's policy in this area, indicating the level of understanding of the State of the problems that are present in this area.


2021 ◽  
pp. 215-220
Author(s):  
M. V. Osiadla

The article examines the problem of interpretive activity in the law enforcement process, which is due to the need to clarify the content of the legal norm. The issue of interpretation in the process of application of legal norms is considered, as the modern Ukrainian legislation is not regulated and contains internal conflicts. The article describes the types of official normative interpretation, in particular, as authentic, legal, departmental. The use of interpretation in the law enforcement process as an opportunity to understand the essence of legislative terms,ensuring equal application by all subjects of public relations, which involves compliance with the principle of legitimate expectations and the rule of law. Keywords: interpretation, application, authentic interpretation, casual interpretation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Irina A. Aleshkova ◽  
◽  
Anastasia S. Stalnova ◽  

The article is devoted to the comprehension, disclosure and description of the principle of prohibition of retroactivity of the law “Lex ad praeteriam non valet” in a systemic relationship with a number of principles of the rule of law. The authors note the relationship between the principle of prohibition of retroactive force of law and the principles of the rule of law and maintaining citizens’ confidence in the law and actions of the state, as well as such trends in its development as substantive stability and liberalization in law enforcement based on the sphere of legal regulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document