The Core of Engineering Education Is to Cultivate the Students’ Engineering Practical Ability

2011 ◽  
Vol 317-319 ◽  
pp. 240-244
Author(s):  
Xian Wen Miao ◽  
Gen Fu Yuan

The higher engineering education of our country facing the challenge of Manufacturing Globalization, the urgent mission Is to cultivate the engineers who has international vision. Considering this, engineering universities reform of personnel training mode one after another, actively learn from the advanced experience of foreign countries, promoting practical teaching to the important position. Considering the objective of cultivation of our university which is to cultivate the high-quality applied talents, putting the CDIO engineering education philosophy as a guide, this article researches the problems such as practice teaching position and how to cultivate the Engineering consciousness, engineering practice and innovative ability of students in each teaching process of engineer training.

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 04-05
Author(s):  
Procopio Cocci

The objective of the ecological building instruction ought not just train understudies' natural information, the more significant thing is that it prepares understudies' natural ethics and structures the conduct which is good for the earth, and these must be shaped by training, in actuality. In the customary showing model of training, one instructor can just guide one practice simultaneously. With the improvement of organization innovation, instructor can control the distinctive practice exercises firing up in various areas or in various occasions by network. In light of the incorporation of viable need and intuitive qualities of condition instruction, the creator set forward an online domain training mode named "practice-intelligent partake in". The Core of this mode is to prepare understudies' natural ethics by training and to understand educators' guidance through organization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 599-601 ◽  
pp. 2014-2017
Author(s):  
Yan Guan ◽  
Zhe Chen

Design is a subject with strong application, but the ability of practice is also important on training mode for design talents. “Two Labs and Two Centers” is a comprehensive and systemic practice teaching mode, which build on the foundation based on labs and workrooms, the core based on Exhibition Center and Practice Center, thereby achieving the goal of effectively collaborate the talents training with social demands.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianyong Li ◽  
Jianfeng Li ◽  
Zhaoliang Jiang ◽  
Zhenjie Zhu ◽  
Wenbo Bi

Under the background of new engineering, according to the characteristics of engineering college students, we should cultivate high-level engineering talents with innovative practice ability to meet the needs of enterprises. Aiming at the problem of great investment and little effect in innovation practice teaching reform, this paper adheres to the principle of effectiveness, combines the characteristics of college students, such as precocious thinking, active thinking, independent personality, impetuous self, eager for quick success and instant benefit, blind self-confidence, strong ability to take an examination, and the status quo of serious lack of cognition and experience of engineering practice and its importance and the characteristics of intelligent manufacturing specialty It is suitable for the cultivation of innovative practice ability of college students and the ways and measures to improve its effectiveness.


Author(s):  
LARRY LEIFER ◽  
SHERI SHEPPARD

The intellectual content and social activity of engineering product development are a constant source of surprise, excitement, and challenge for engineers. When our students experience product-based-learning (PBL), they experience this excitement (Brereton et al., 1995). They also have fun and perform beyond the limits required for simple grades. We, their teachers, experience these things too. Why, then, are so few students and faculty getting the PBL message? How, then, can we put the excitement back in engineering education? In part, we think this is because of three persistent mistakes in engineering education:1. We focus on individual students.2. We focus on engineering analysis versus communication between engineers.3. We fail to integrate thinking skills in engineering science and engineering practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 107278
Author(s):  
Jhonattan Miranda ◽  
Christelle Navarrete ◽  
Julieta Noguez ◽  
José-Martin Molina-Espinosa ◽  
María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 591-593 ◽  
pp. 2302-2305
Author(s):  
Wen Hui Liu

Based on the current of higher engineering education, analyzing the barriers of the development, pointing out the deficiencies of China's higher engineering education in the training mode, afterwards, concluding the higher engineering education reform is imperative. In order to solve the existing problems and response training requirements in higher engineering education, learning from the experience of overseas development, particularly American mode and German mode as example. “a body with two wings” new training model is proposed. Moreover, it can solve the contradiction effectively. The mode can be applied to and will bring practical guiding significance for the development of higher engineering education. It can provide some reference value for higher engineering education reform meanwhile.


Author(s):  
Alice M. Agogino

How will engineering practice change in the next twenty years? What are the implications to engineering education? Will we have achieved gender equity? These questions will be discussed in the context of three recent reports of the US. National Academy of Engineering – The Engineer of 2020: Global Visions of Engineering in the New Century; Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century; and Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering.


Author(s):  
Jorge Angeles ◽  
Ron Britton ◽  
Liuchen Chang ◽  
Franҫois Charron ◽  
Peter Gregson ◽  
...  

There is increasing global competition for better product and process functionality, higher quality, lower costs, and other considerations including energy and environmental challenges. This trend requires that Canadian industry be more innovative and responsive in order to stay competitive internationally. The Canadian capability in Engineering Design is at the core of our ability to achieve this goal. At both the undergraduate and graduate levels, we must improve the capability and capacity of engineering graduates so that they are capable of leading innovation, and converting research results into value-added products and services. This paper addresses the engineering design competency, identifies needs in engineering design training, and describes directions for the design content in engineering education programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document