scholarly journals How I treat relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (s1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C. Lee ◽  
Claudio Cerchione

The expanding therapeutic landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has contributed to significant improvements in patient outcomes. These have included combinations of proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), histone deacetylase inhibitors, and/or alkylating agents. More recently, the approval of the first-in-class nuclear export inhibitor selinexor and the first-in-class B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) belantamab mafodotin has helped address the current unmet need in patients refractory to PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 mAb directed therapy, otherwise known as triple class refractory myeloma. With the growing number of treatment options in the RRMM therapeutic landscape, the choice and sequencing of drugs and combinations has become increasingly complex. In this review we discuss our approach and considerations in the treatment of both early and late RRRM based on best available data and our clinical experience.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5210
Author(s):  
Arthur Bobin ◽  
Cécile Gruchet ◽  
Stéphanie Guidez ◽  
Hélène Gardeney ◽  
Laly Nsiala Makunza ◽  
...  

Novel treatments are needed to address the lack of options for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Even though immunotherapy-based treatments have revolutionized the field in recent years, offering new opportunities for patients, there is still no curative therapy. Thus, non-immunologic agents, which have proven effective for decades, are still central to the treatment of multiple myeloma, especially for advanced disease. Building on their efficacy in myeloma, the development of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs has been pursued, and has led to the emergence of a novel generation of agents (e.g., carfilzomib, ixazomib, pomalidomide). The use of alkylating agents is decreasing in most treatment regimens, but melflufen, a peptide-conjugated alkylator with a completely new mechanism of action, offers interesting opportunities. Moreover, with the identification of novel targets, new drug classes have entered the myeloma armamentarium, such as XPO1 inhibitors (selinexor), HDAC inhibitors (panobinostat), and anti-BCL-2 agents (venetoclax). New pathways are still being explored, especially the possibility of a mutation-driven strategy, as biomarkers and targeted treatments are increasing. Though multiple myeloma is still considered incurable, the treatment options are expanding and are progressively becoming more diverse, largely because of the continuous development of non-immunologic agents.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (11.5) ◽  
pp. 1433-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge J. Castillo

With so many recent advances in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, keeping abreast with current treatment recommendations can be challenging. Novel immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and nuclear export inhibitors have all been added to the armamentarium, and the choice of which of these drugs or drug combinations to use depends on individual disease-related and patient-related factors, previous therapies, and treatment toxicities. At the NCCN 2019 Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies, Dr. Jorge J. Castillo provided an overview of the myriad treatments available for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, as well as therapies on the horizon.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199553
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Jason Yeaw ◽  
Suneel Kudaravalli ◽  
Stojan Zavisic ◽  
...  

Introduction Real-world evidence on later line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is sparse. We evaluated clinical outcomes among RRMM patients in the 1-year following treatment with pomalidomide or daratumumab and compared economic outcomes between RRMM patients and non-MM patients. Patient and Methods Adult patients with ≥1 claim of pomalidomide or daratumumab were identified between January 2012 and February 2018 using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus US claims database. Patients were required to have a diagnosis or treatment for MM and a claim of any immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors before the index date. Mean time to new therapy, overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curve and adverse events (AEs) were reported over the 1-year post-index period. RRMM patients were also matched to a non-MM comparator cohort and economic outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results 289 RRMM patients were matched to 1,445 patients without MM. Most prevalent hematological AE was anemia (72.0%) and non-hematological AE was infections (75.4%). Mean (SD) time to a new treatment was 4.7 (5.3) months and median OS was 14.6 months. RRMM patients had significantly higher hospitalizations and physician office visits (Both P < .0001) compared to non-MM patients. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with RRMM had 4.9 times (95% CI 3.8-6.4, P < .0001) the total healthcare costs compared with patients without MM. The major driver of total costs among RRMM patients was pharmacy costs (67.3%). Conclusion RRMM patients showed a high frequency of AEs, low OS, and a substantial economic burden suggesting need for effective treatment options.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Nishida ◽  
Taketo Yamada

The treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically over the past decade with the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs); bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs); thalidomide, and lenalidomide which revealed high efficacy and improvement of overall survival (OS) in MM patients. However, despite these progresses, most patients relapse and become eventually refractory to these therapies. Thus, the development of novel, targeted immunotherapies has been pursued aggressively. Recently, next-generation PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib, IMiD; pomalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDADi); panobinostat and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); and elotuzumab and daratumumab have emerged, and especially, combination of mAbs plus novel agents has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of MM patients. The field of immune therapies has been accelerating in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has also taken center stage in MM. This review focuses on an overview of current status of novel MoAb therapy including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody (BsAb), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, in relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Lastly, investigational novel MoAb-based therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in MM is shown.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2119-2119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilly Wilson ◽  
Adam D. Cohen ◽  
Brendan M. Weiss ◽  
Dan T. Vogl ◽  
Alfred L. Garfall ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Modern therapy for multiple myeloma including generations of thalidomide analogues, proteasome inhibitors and alkylating agents has substantially improved the survival for this disease. Patients who have progressed through these agents have limited options and a very poor prognosis. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed by myeloma cells and associated cells in the microenvironment. Blockade of the PD1-PDL1 axis enhances anti-myeloma activity in pre-clinical models. Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks PD1-PD-L1 signaling, has shown clinical activity when combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in pomalidomide naïve patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (Badros et al, ASH 2015). Here we report the clinical experience of a previously pomalidomide exposed patient population receiving PEMBRO/POM/DEX. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of PEMBRO/POM/DEX in 9 heavily, pre-treated pomalidomide exposed patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma between February 2016 and July 2016. All patients had been treated with ≥ 5 prior lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and alkylating agents including high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. The PEMBRO/POM/DEX regimen included pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 2 or 3 weeks with pomalidomide 4 mg (range 2-4 mg) orally daily 21/28 days and dexamethasone 40 mg (range 4-40 mg) weekly until evidence of progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events were captured via chart review. Responses were assessed as per IMWG criteria. Results: The median age of the patients was 65 years (range 51-77) with 66% females. The patients had a median of 8 prior lines of therapy (range 5-14). The majority of subjects (78%) had cytogenetic abnormalities: 33% were gain of 1q21, 44% monosomy 17, and 11% t(11;14). Prior to therapy, 89% had significant anemia, 78% lytic bone lesions and 2 with significant renal insufficiency (creatinine 2.32 and 3.32 mg/dl respectively) though no one was on dialysis. Isotype included 5 IgA, 2 IgG, 2 lambda light chain. All patients progressed after prior lenalidomide and 8 of 9 patients progressed on previous pomalidomide the other one having stable disease. Patients received a median 3 cycles (range 2-7) of PEMBRO/POM/DEX, with modifications of pomalidomide and dexamethasone dosage dependent on toxicity. Seven patients received aspirin DVT prophylaxis. The overall response rate of PEMBRO/POM/DEX was 33%. Eighty-nine percent of patients achieved clinical benefit (3 PR, 2 MR, 3 SD). Median PFS was 57 days (0-85 days). There were no observed discontinuations of treatment or deaths attributed to drug toxicity and no pneumonitis was seen. However, adverse events consistent with previous reports from pembrolizumab as well as pomalidomide and dexamethasone were observed across all 9 patients. These AEs included: fatigue (n=9), anemia (n=9), thrombocytopenia (n=7), neutropenia (n=5), diarrhea (n=5), fevers (n= 4), shortness of breath (n=4), lower extremity edema (n=4), nausea/ vomiting (n=3), and renal insufficiency (n=3). Two patients experienced non-infectious colitis that responded to prednisone. Overall survival at 6 months for the 9 patients was 56%. 4 patients have died from progressive disease. Conclusion: PEMBRO/POM/DEX is an active regimen for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma with acceptable toxicity even in a heavily treated pomalidomide exposed patient population. Further investigation of this combination earlier in the course of the disease is warranted. Disclosures Cohen: Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weiss:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Prothena: Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Vogl:Constellation: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Calithera: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Garfall:Medimmune: Consultancy; Bioinvent: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mangan:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Stadtmauer:Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (24) ◽  
pp. 2546-2554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Heather Sutherland ◽  
Darrell White ◽  
Michael Sebag ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
...  

Abstract Selinexor is an oral inhibitor of the nuclear export protein exportin 1. Preclinical studies demonstrated synergistic antimyeloma activity between selinexor and proteasome inhibitors (PI) through suppression of NF-κB signaling and nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins. We tested selinexor in combination with low-dose bortezomib and dexamethasone (SVd) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objectives of this study were to determine the safety profile, overall response rate (ORR), and a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of SVd. We enrolled 42 patients to receive selinexor (60, 80, or 100 mg orally) plus bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally) once or twice weekly in 21- or 35-day cycles. Patients had a median of 3 (range 1-11) prior lines of therapy, and 50% were refractory to a PI. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported in ≥10% of patients were thrombocytopenia (45%), neutropenia (24%), fatigue (14%), and anemia (12%). Incidence (4 patients, 10%) and grade (≤2) of peripheral neuropathy were low. The ORR for the entire population was 63%: 84% ORR for PI nonrefractory and 43% for PI-refractory patients. The median progression-free survival for all patients was 9.0 months; 17.8 months for PI nonrefractory, and 6.1 months for PI refractory. SVd treatment produced high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, including borezomib-refractory MM, with no unexpected side effects. The RP2D is selinexor (100 mg once weekly), bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 once weekly for 4 weeks), and dexamethasone (40 mg once weekly) per 35-day cycle. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02343042.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072097981
Author(s):  
Melody R. Becnel ◽  
Hans C. Lee

Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a first-in-class anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) that recently gained regulatory approval for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have received at least four prior therapies including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD). As the first BCMA-targeted therapy to be approved in multiple myeloma along with its “off-the-shelf” outpatient administration, belamaf addresses a significant unmet need in RRMM that is refractory to IMiD, PI, and anti-CD38 mAb therapy, otherwise known as triple-class refractory myeloma. Belamaf is also associated with frequent corneal ocular adverse events, which represents a unique toxicity in multiple myeloma therapeutics, and its administration requires a multidisciplinary approach with oncologists and eye care specialists to safely and effectively manage patients on belamaf therapy. In this review, we discuss the preclinical and clinical data leading to the regulatory approval of belamaf, the monitoring and mitigation strategies of corneal ocular adverse events, and its current and future role in the RRMM treatment landscape.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (13) ◽  
pp. 1507-1513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau

Abstract At present, multiple classes of agents with distinct mechanisms of action are available for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including alkylators, steroids, immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), histone deacetylase inhibitors (DACIs), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Over the last 5 years, several new agents, such as the third-generation IMiD pomalidomide, the second-generation PIs carfilzomib and ixazomib, the DACI panobinostat, and 2 mAbs, elotuzumab and daratumumab, have been approved, incorporated into clinical guidelines, and have transformed our approach to the treatment of patients. These agents may be part of doublet or triplet combinations, or incorporated into intensive strategies with autologous stem cell transplantation. In this review, I discuss the different treatment options available today for the treatment of MM in frontline and relapse settings.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Pinto ◽  
Rui Bergantim ◽  
Hugo R. Caires ◽  
Hugo Seca ◽  
José E. Guimarães ◽  
...  

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common blood cancer. Treatments for MM include corticosteroids, alkylating agents, anthracyclines, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, histone deacetylase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Survival outcomes have improved substantially due to the introduction of many of these drugs allied with their rational use. Nonetheless, MM patients successively relapse after one or more treatment regimens or become refractory, mostly due to drug resistance. This review focuses on the main drugs used in MM treatment and on causes of drug resistance, including cytogenetic, genetic and epigenetic alterations, abnormal drug transport and metabolism, dysregulation of apoptosis, autophagy activation and other intracellular signaling pathways, the presence of cancer stem cells, and the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, we highlight the areas that need to be further clarified in an attempt to identify novel therapeutic targets to counteract drug resistance in MM patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (34) ◽  
pp. 2783-2798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semira Sheikh ◽  
Eyal Lebel ◽  
Suzanne Trudel

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease, with a large proportion of patients in the relapsed/refractory setting often unable to achieve durable responses. Novel, well-tolerated and highly effective therapies in this patient population represent an unmet need. Preclinical studies have shown that B-cell maturation antigen is nearly exclusively expressed on normal and malignant plasma cells, thereby identifying it as a highly selective target for immunotherapeutic approaches. Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916, belamaf) is a first-in-class antibody–drug conjugate directed at B-cell maturation antigen and has shown promising activity in clinical trials. In this review, we provide an overview of belantamab mafodotin as a compound and present the available clinical efficacy and safety data in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document