scholarly journals INA-CBGs claim versus total hospital cost: A vaginal delivery investigation at Airlangga University Academic Hospital, Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manggala Pasca Wardhana ◽  
Khanisyah Erza Gumilar ◽  
Prima Rahmadhany ◽  
Erni Rosita Dewi ◽  
Muhammad Ardian Cahya Laksana
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Level Ii

Background: Inadequate funding for vaginal delivery can be one of the barriers to reducing the maternal mortality rate. It could be therefore critical to compare the vaginal delivery cost between total hospital cost and INA-CBGs cost in national health insurance. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from October to December 2019 in Universitas Airlangga Academic Hospital. It collected data on primary diagnosis, length of stay, total hospital cost, INA-CBGs cost, and counted disparity. The data analyzed statistically using t-test independent sample (or Mann-Whitney test).Results: A total of 149 vaginal delivery claims were found, with the majority having a level II severity (79.87%) and moderate preeclampsia as a primary diagnosis (20.1%). There was a significant disparity in higher total hospital costs compared with government INA-CBGs costs (Rp. 9,238,022.09±1,265,801.88 vs 1,881,521.48±12,830.15; p<0.001). There was also an increase of LOS (p<0.001), total hospital cost (p<0.001), and cost disparity (p<0.01) in a higher severity level of vaginal delivery.Conclusion: Vaginal delivery costs in INA-CBGs scheme are underneath the actuarial value. There was also an increase in total hospital costs and a more significant disparity in the higher severity levels of vaginal delivery.

Total Hospital Costs and Readmission Rate of Patient-Specific Instrument in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Thomas ◽  
Ankur Patel ◽  
Corey Patrick ◽  
Gary Delhougne
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
P Value ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractDespite advancements in surgical technique and component design, implant loosening, stiffness, and instability remain leading causes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) aid in surgical precision and in implant positioning and ultimately reduce readmissions and revisions in TKA. The objective of the study was to evaluate total hospital cost and readmission rate at 30, 60, 90, and 365 days in PSI-guided TKA patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a primary TKA for osteoarthritis from the Premier Perspective Database between 2014 and 2017 Q2. TKA with PSI patients were identified using appropriate keywords from billing records and compared against patients without PSI. Patients were excluded if they were < 21 years of age; outpatient hospital discharges; evidence of revision TKA; bilateral TKA in same discharge or different discharges. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to control patients, hospital, and clinical characteristics. Generalized Estimating Equation model with appropriate distribution and link function were used to estimate hospital related cost while logistic regression models were used to estimate 30, 60, and 90 days and 1-year readmission rate. The study matched 3,358 TKAs with PSI with TKA without PSI patients. Mean total hospital costs were statistically significantly (p < 0.0001) lower for TKA with PSI ($14,910; 95% confidence interval [CI]: $14,735–$15,087) than TKA without PSI patients ($16,018; 95% CI: $15,826–$16,212). TKA with PSI patients were 31% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.51–0.95; p-value = 0.0218) less likely to be readmitted at 30 days; 35% (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50–0.86; p-value = 0.0022) less likely to be readmitted at 60 days; 32% (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53–0.88; p-value = 0.0031) less likely to be readmitted at 90 days; 28% (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60–0.86; p-value = 0.0004) less likely to be readmitted at 365 days than TKA without PSI patients. Hospitals and health care professionals can use retrospective real-world data to make informed decisions on using PSI to reduce hospital cost and readmission rate, and improve outcomes in TKA patients.

Abstract 258: Dabigatran Etexilate is Associated with Shorter Hospital Length of Stay and Lower Hospital Costs Compared to Warfarin in Treatment-Naive, Newly-Diagnosed Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Fonseca ◽  
David R Walker ◽  
Gregory P Hess
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Dabigatran Etexilate ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Background: Warfarin and dabigatran etexilate (DE) are oral anticoagulants (OAC) used to reduce the risk of stroke among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, DE does not require titration and INR monitoring. This study examined whether hospital length of stay (LOS) and total hospital costs differed between the two therapies among treatment-naive, newly-diagnosed AF patients. Methods: LOS and total hospital costs were evaluated for hospitalizations with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) between 1/1/2011-3/31/2012, with DE or warfarin administered during hospitalization, and excluding hospitalizations of patients with valvular AF, previously diagnosed with AF, or previously treated with OAC. Hospitalizations were identified from a Charge Detail Masters database containing 397 qualified hospitals. Samples were propensity score matched using nearest neighbor within a caliper of 0.20 standard deviations of the logit, without replacement and a 2:1 match. Differences in LOS and hospital cost were then estimated using generalized linear models, fitted by generalized estimating equations (clustered by hospital) to account for possible correlation between observations. The hospitalization’s charged amount was multiplied by the hospital’s inpatient cost-to-charge ratio to estimate the total hospital cost. Covariates estimating the propensity score, LOS, and costs included patient age, payer type, CHADS 2 and HAS-BLED scores, use of bridging agents, comorbid conditions, and hospital attributes. As a sensitivity analysis, LOS and costs were estimated with the same parameters and covariates among the raw, unbalanced sample. Results: Matched samples included 1,292 warfarin and 646 DE hospitalizations of treatment-naive, newly diagnosed patients out of 4,619 and 715 hospitalizations, respectively. No covariates used in matching had standardized mean differences > 10% after matching. Two comorbidities (thromboembolism, coronary artery disease) had statistically different distributions after matching (DE: 3% vs. warfarin: 8%, p<0.001 and DE: 40% vs. warfarin: 45%, p=0.048); these were included as model covariates. Among the sample, DE had an estimated 0.7 days shorter stay compared to warfarin (DE: 4.8 days vs. warfarin: 5.5 days, p<0.01) and a $2,031 lower estimated total cost (DE: $14,794 vs warfarin: $16,826, p=0.007). Sensitivity analysis confirmed a shorter DE LOS (DE: 5.5 days vs. warfarin: 6.6 days, delta=1.1 days, p<0.01) and a lower DE hospital cost (DE: $18,362 vs. warfarin: $22,602, delta=$4,240, p<0.01). Conclusions: Among hospitalizations of treatment-naive patients newly diagnosed with nonvalvular AF, the hospitalizations during which DE was administered had a shorter LOS and at least a 12% lower total hospital cost compared to hospitalizations where warfarin was administered.

scholarly journals MON-643 Diabetes’ Cost to Us Taxpayers: Thirty-Day Readmission and Resource Utilization Among Diabetics Patients Admitted with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score Match Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabnam Nasserifar ◽  
Kam Sing Ho
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Secondary Diagnosis ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
History Of ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between diabetes and thirty-days readmission, mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization in patients who were admitted with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in the United States. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted using the AHRQ-HCUP Nationwide Readmission Database for the year 2014. Adults (≥ 18 years) with a primary diagnosis of STEMI (1), along with a secondary diagnosis of diabetes were identified using ICD-9 codes as described in the literature (2). The primary outcome was the rate of all-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were reasons for readmission, readmission mortality rate, morbidity, and resource use (length of stay and total hospitalization costs and charges). Propensity score (PS) using the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement was utilized to adjust for confounders (3). Independent risk factors for readmission were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model (4). RESULTS: In total, 116,124 hospital admissions among adults with a primary diagnosis of STEMI were identified, of which 18.05% were diabetics. 1:1 PS matching was performed based on demographic (age, gender, hospital status, etc.) and clinical characteristics (Charlson comorbidity score. The 30-day rate of readmission among diabetics and non-diabetics with STEMI were 9.31% vs. 6.18% (p &lt;0.001). The most common readmission for both groups was recurrent myocardial infarction. During the index admission for STEMI, the length of stay (LOS) among diabetics and non-diabetics patients were not statistically different (4.74 vs 4.58 days, p=0.12). However, the total hospital cost for the diabetic patients was statistically different ($27,027 vs $24,807, p &lt;0.001). Most importantly, diabetics patients’ in-hospital mortality rate during their index admission was significant higher (10.20% vs 5.92%, p &lt;0.001). Amongst those readmitted, the LOS, total hospital cost, or in-hospital mortality among diabetics were not statistically different when compared to their counterparts during their readmission. Diabetes (HR 1.60, CI 1.27-2.02, p &lt;0.001) was an independent predictor associated with higher risks of readmission. Other independent predictors associated with increased 30-day readmission include acute exacerbation of CHF, acute exacerbation of COPD, acute kidney injury, secondary diagnosis of pneumonia, history of COPD, history of ischemic stroke, history of atrial fibrillation & atrial flutter, history of chronic kidney disease, history of iron deficiency, and use of mechanical ventilator. CONCLUSION: In this study, diabetics patients admitted with STEMI have a higher 30 days of readmission rate, total hospital cost, and in-hospital mortality (p &lt;0.001) than their non-diabetic counterparts.

scholarly journals Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost after Esophagectomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue J. Fu ◽  
Vanessa P. Ho ◽  
Jennifer Ginsberg ◽  
Yaron Perry ◽  
Conor P. Delaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

Background. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) techniques offer similar oncological and surgical outcomes to open methods. The effects of MIE on hospital costs are not well documented. Methods. We reviewed the electronic records of patients who underwent esophagectomy at a single academic institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Esophagectomy techniques were grouped into open, hybrid, MIE, and transhiatal (THE) esophagectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of surgery on total hospital cost after esophagectomy. Results. 80 patients were identified: 11 THE, 11 open, 41 hybrid, and 17 MIE. Median total cost of the hospitalization was $31,375 and was similar between surgical technique groups. MIE was associated with higher intraoperative costs, but not total hospital cost. Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of a complication, increased age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (ASA4), and preoperative coronary artery disease (CAD) were associated with significantly increased cost. Conclusions. Despite the association of MIE with higher operation costs, the total hospital cost was not different between surgical technique groups. Postoperative complications and severe preoperative comorbidities are significant drivers of hospital cost associated with esophagectomy. Surgeons should choose technique based on clinical factors, rather than cost implications.

Hospital Costs Associated With Shunt Infections in Patients Receiving Antibiotic-Impregnated Shunt Catheters Versus Standard Shunt Catheters

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Attenello ◽  
Giannina L. Garces-Ambrossi ◽  
Hasan A. Zaidi ◽  
Daniel M. Sciubba ◽  
George I. Jallo
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
The United States ◽  
Shunt Infection ◽  
Csf Shunt ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Csf Shunts ◽  
Shunt Infections

Abstract BACKGROUND The average hospital cost for shunt infection treatment is $50 000, making it the most financially costly implant-related infection in the United States. We set out to determine whether introduction of antibiotic-impregnated shunts (AISs) in our practice has decreased the incidence of shunt infection or decreased infection-related hospital costs at our institution. METHODS Clinical and hospital billing records of pediatric patients undergoing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt insertion at a single institution from April 2001 to December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighteen months before October 2002, all CSF shunts included standard, non-AIS catheters. During the 4 years after October 2002, all CSF shunts included AIS catheters. Patients were followed at least 18 months after surgery. RESULTS A total of 406 pediatric patients underwent 608 shunt placement procedures (400 AISs, 208 non-AISs). Of patients with non-AIS catheters, 25 (12%) experienced shunt infection, whereas only 13 patients (3.2%) with AIS catheters experienced shunt infection during follow-up (P &lt; .001). The total hospital cost to treat 25 non-AIS shunt infections over the first 18 months was $1,234,928. The total hospital cost to treat 13 AIS shunt infections over the past 4 years was $606,328. The mean hospital cost per shunt infection was similar for infected AIS and non-AIS catheters ($46 640 vs. $49 397). However, the infection-related hospital cost per 100 patients shunted was markedly lower in the AIS cohort than in the non-AIS cohort ($151 582 vs. $593 715). DISCUSSION The introduction of AIS catheters in our institutional practice reduced the incidence of shunt infection and resulted in significant hospital cost savings. AIS systems are efficient and cost-effective instruments to prevent perioperative colonization of CSF shunt components.

scholarly journals Attributable Hospital Cost and Length of Stay Associated with Health Care-Associated Infections Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Mauldin ◽  
Cassandra D. Salgado ◽  
Ida Solhøj Hansen ◽  
Darshana T. Durup ◽  
John A. Bosso
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Health Care Associated Infections

ABSTRACT Determination of the attributable hospital cost and length of stay (LOS) are of critical importance for patients, providers, and payers who must make rational and informed decisions about patient care and the allocation of resources. The objective of the present study was to determine the additional total hospital cost and LOS attributable to health care-associated infections (HAIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant, gram-negative (GN) pathogens. A single-center, retrospective, observational comparative cohort study was performed. The study involved 662 patients admitted from 2000 to 2008 who developed HAIs caused by one of following pathogens: Acinetobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., or Pseudomonas spp. The attributable total hospital cost and LOS for HAIs caused by antibiotic-resistant GN pathogens were determined by comparison with the hospital costs and LOS for a control group with HAIs due to antibiotic-susceptible GN pathogens. Statistical analyses were conducted by using univariate and multivariate analyses. Twenty-nine percent of the HAIs were caused by resistant GN pathogens, and almost 16% involved a multidrug-resistant GN pathogen. The additional total hospital cost and LOS attributable to antibiotic-resistant HAIs caused by GN pathogens were 29.3% (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 16.23 to 42.35) and 23.8% (P = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval, 11.01 to 36.56) higher than those attributable to HAIs caused by antibiotic-susceptible GN pathogens, respectively. Significant covariates in the multivariate analysis were age ≥12 years, pneumonia, intensive care unit stay, and neutropenia. HAIs caused by antibiotic-resistant GN pathogens were associated with significantly higher total hospital costs and increased LOSs compared to those caused by their susceptible counterparts. This information should be used to assess the potential cost-efficacy of interventions aimed at the prevention of such infections.

scholarly journals Characteristics, Management, and Case-Fatality of Patients Hospitalized for Stroke with a Diagnosis of COVID-19 in France

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Amélie Gabet ◽  
Clémence Grave ◽  
Edouard Chatignoux ◽  
Philippe Tuppin ◽  
Yannick Béjot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Fatality ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
National Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Systèmes D’Information

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> COVID-19 was found to be associated with an increased risk of stroke. This study aimed to compare characteristics, management, and outcomes of hospitalized stroke patients with or without a hospital diagnosis of CO­VID-19 at a nationwide scale. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a cross-sectional study on all French hospitals covering the entire French population using the French national hospital discharge databases (<i>Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d’Information</i>, included in the <i>Système National des Données de Santé</i>). All patients hospitalized for stroke between 1 January and 14 June 2020 in France were selected. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was searched for during the index hospitalization for stroke or in a prior hospitalization that had occurred after 1 January 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 56,195 patients hospitalized for stroke, 800 (1.4%) had a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis. Inhospital case-fatality rates were higher in stroke patients with COVID-19, particularly for patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 (33.2%), as compared to patients hospitalized for stroke without CO­VID-19 diagnosis (14.1%). Similar findings were observed for 3-month case-fatality rates adjusted for age and sex that reached 41.7% in patients hospitalized for stroke with a concomitant primary diagnosis of COVID-19 versus 20.0% in strokes without COVID-19. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Patients hospitalized for stroke with a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis had a higher inhospital and 3 months case-fatality rates compared to patients hospitalized for stroke without a COVID-19 diagnosis. Further research is needed to better understand the excess of mortality related to these cases.

Sick on the Frontlines:A Cross Sectional Study on COVID-19 Infection, Symptom Severity Amongst Emergency Medicine Residents and Fellows in Urban Academic Hospital Settings (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey Frisch ◽  
Sarah Jones ◽  
James Willis ◽  
Richard Sinert
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Time Period ◽  
High Infection ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Specific Symptoms

BACKGROUND COVID-19, an illness caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, affected many aspects of healthcare worldwide in 2020. From March to May of 2020, New York City (NYC) experienced a large surge of cases. OBJECTIVE The authors aimed to characterize the amount of illness experienced by residents and fellows in 2 NYC hospitals during this time period. METHODS This was a cross-sectional observational study. An IRB-exempt survey was distributed to emergency medicine housestaff in May 2020 and submissions were accepted through August 2020. RESULTS 64 residents and fellows responded to our survey (a 62% response rate). 42% of responders tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Most residents experienced symptoms that could be consistent with COVID-19 however few received PCR testing. Fevers and/or chills along with loss of smell and/or taste were the most specific symptoms for COVID-19, with p-values <0.05. All 13 housestaff who reported no symptoms during the study period tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated that the rate of COVID-19 illness among emergency department housestaff is much higher than previously reported. Further studies are needed to characterize illness among medical staff in emergency departments across the nation. The high infection rate among emergency medicine trainees stresses the importance of supplying adequate PPE for healthcare professionals.

scholarly journals Perioperative Cumulative Fluid Balance and Its Association with an Increase in Costs after Major Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Tak Oh ◽  
Jung-Won Hwang ◽  
Young-Tae Jeon ◽  
Sang-Hwan Do
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Total Input ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Cumulative Fluid Balance

Positive fluid balance (FB) during the perioperative period may increase the incidence of postoperative complications, which may lead to longer hospitalization and higher hospital costs. However, a definitive association between positive FB and hospital costs has not yet been established. This retrospective observational study examined the association between perioperative FB and hospital costs of patients who underwent major surgical procedures. Medical records of patients who underwent major surgery (surgery time >2 h, estimated blood loss >500 mL) from January 2010 to December 2017 were analyzed to determine the associations between calculated FB (%, total input fluid—output fluid in liter/weight (kg) at admission) and total hospital cost ($). The analysis included medical data of 7010 patients. Multivariable linear regression analyses showed that a 1% increase in FB in postoperative day (POD) 0 (24 h), 0–1 (48 h), 0–2 (72 h), and 0–3 (96 h) significantly increased the total cost by $967.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 803.4–1132.1), $688.8 (95% CI: 566.3–811.2), $591 (95% CI: 485.7–696.4), and $434.2 (95% CI: 349.4–519.1), respectively (all p < 0.001). Perioperative cumulative FB was positively associated with hospital costs of patients who underwent major surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document