EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION AND FERTILIZER N ON N ACCUMULATION AND PARTITIONING IN WHITE BEAN AND SOYBEAN

1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. SMITH ◽  
M. DIJAK ◽  
D. J. HUME
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
N Accumulation ◽  
Plant Parts ◽  
N Concentration ◽  
White Bean ◽  
Loam Soil

White bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) is generally reported to be poorly nodulated, to fix less nitrogen than soybean and to show increased yields following N fertilizer application. The work reported here attempted to determine whether white bean was N-limited under field conditions by comparing it with soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) for N accumulation in whole plants through the course of the growing season, and for N distribution among, and N concentration in, plant parts at maturity. The effects of N fertilizer and irrigation were tested in three field experiments. White bean and soybean crops were found to accumulate N at similar rates during the growing season. However, in soybean, the concentration of N in seeds was higher and the concentration in nonseed tissues lower than white bean. Differences between species for N concentrations were reflected in the allocation of N among plant parts. In both crops, fertilizer N always increased the concentration of N in seeds, and often did so in other plant tissues. Irrigation increased tissue N concentrations of plants grown on a loam soil, but decreased it on a sandy loam soil. White bean was more variable in N allocation and N concentration responses to N fertilizer and irrigation than soybean. These data indicate that, although it had much lower N2-fixation rates and comparable N demands, white bean was not more N-limited than soybean.Key words: Bean (white), soybean, irrigation, N fertilizer, N yield, N partitioning

Yield response of potatoes to variable nitrogen management by landform element and in relation to petiole nitrogen – A case study

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Moulin ◽  
Y. Cohen ◽  
V. Alchanatis ◽  
N. Tremblay ◽  
K. Volkmar
Keyword(s):  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Potato Yield ◽  
Nitrogen Management ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Fertilizer Treatment ◽  
Marketable Yield ◽  
N Concentration

Moulin, A. P., Cohen, Y., Alchanatis, V., Tremblay, N. and Volkmar, K. 2012. Yield response of potatoes to variable nitrogen management by landform element and in relation to petiole nitrogen – A case study. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 771–781. Recent increases in the cost of fertilizer N have prompted producers to assess the potential to vary inputs within fields and during the growing season to produce the highest marketable yield of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). A study was conducted from 2005 to 2007 near Brandon, Manitoba, Canada, to assess the spatial variability of potato yield in upper, middle and lower landform elements on a sandy loam soil in response to a range of N fertilizer rates applied in the spring or in combination with an application during the growing season. There was no clear trend with respect to the effect of landform on potato yield. Nitrogen fertilizer increased total and marketable yield relative to the control at rates from 75 to 225 kg ha−1in split applications or applied at seeding. No significant interaction between landform and fertilizer treatment was observed. Petiole N concentration, determined late in the growing season, was correlated with potato yield though the correlation varied considerably between years. Petiole leaflet N concentration was affected by fertilizer on most sampling dates, but decreased with time during the growing season. We conclude that although N fertilizer could be applied during the growing season based on petiole leaflet N concentration deficiencies in mid-July, there is no clear difference in potato yield due to split application relative to spring applications of N fertilizer at rates of 75 kg ha−1or greater based on landform elements for potato production, likely due to the short growing season in western Canada.

Fate of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to corn grown on different soil types

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Sen Tran ◽  
Marcel Giroux
Keyword(s):  
Sandy Soil ◽  
Soil Profile ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Organic N ◽  
N Fixation ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
Loam Soil

From an environmental standpoint, it is important to follow the fate of applied fertilizer N in soil–plant system. In this study, field experiments were conducted at two sites (Du Contour and Sainte-Rosalie series) in the Saint-Hyacinthe region in 1989 and 1990, and at four sites (Le Bras-I, -II, -III and Fourchette series) at Saint-Lambert-de-Lauzon in 1989, 1990 and 1991. The site and year combinations represented a range of different climatic conditions. The 15N-labelled fertilizer as 15NH415NO3 was spread on microplot at 180 kg N ha−1 rate, just before corn seeding. The recovery of fertilizer N (NREC) of grain and silage corn (Zea may L.) varied from 47 to 51%. At harvest, the amount of residual mineral N (soil and fertilizer) in soil profile (0–90 cm) ranged from 55 kg N ha−1 in a wet growing season to 176 kg N ha−1 in a dry growing season. The NREC in the mineral pool varied from 1.4% in wet growing season, especially on sandy soil, to 20.6% under dry conditions. The NREC recovered in the organic and fixed pools was 16.3, 24.6 and 38.9% of applied rate on the sandy soil, silt loam soil and clay loam soil, respectively. This pool was immobilized in soil profile and less subjected to significant loss overwinter than the mineral pool. The annual loss of fertilizer N varied from 13.6% on Sainte-Rosalie soil, having high N immobilization capacity, to 44.1% on Le Bras-II. These results shown that under the humid conditions found in Quebec, application of fertilizer N exceeding the optimum N rate will contribute to environmental pollution risk especially on permeable soils or soils having low N fixation and immobilization capacity. Key words: Fertilizer N loss, 15N-fertilizer, corn, mineral N, organic N

Yields of Sub-humid Rainfed Crops in Relation to Soil Water Retention and Cropping Sequence

1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. N. Verma ◽  
S. S. Prihar ◽  
Ranjodh Singh ◽  
Nathu Singh
Keyword(s):  
Water Retention ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Sandy Loam Soil ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
Soil Water Retention ◽  
Cropping Sequence ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Rabi Crops ◽  
Water Holding

SUMMARYField experiments were conducted for 4 years to study the yield of ‘kharif’ and ‘rabi’ crops grown in sequence on two soils differing in water-holding capacity. The results indicated that drought caused greater reduction in yield of rainy-season crops on loamy sand than on sandy loam soil. In low retentivity soil it was more profitable to raise a single crop of wheat on soil-stored water. In sandy loam soil of higher retentivity, two crops a year gave much higher yields than a single crop. Of the sequences tried, maize followed by wheat gave the highest and most stable yields. For ‘rabi’ crops, stored water showed a better yield response than an equivalent amount of rain during the growing season.

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium application on yield of potato tubers (Solatium tuberosum L.)

1987 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. C. Sharma ◽  
B. R. Arora
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Farmyard Manure ◽  
Potato Tubers ◽  
Solatium Tuberosum ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Potassium Application ◽  
Phosphorus And Potassium ◽  
Grade Increase ◽  
Nitrogen Phosphorus

SummarySix field experiments, three each during 1982–3 and 1983–4, were conducted on a sandy loam soil to study the effect of varying levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, in the absence and presence of farmyard manure (FYM) (30 t/ha), on the number of tubers and yield of potato in three grades. Increase in nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium application, in the absence or presence of FYM, did not significantly affect the total number of tubers/m2 but did affect the number of tubers in different grades. An increase in nitrogen and potassium significantly decreased the number of tubers/m2 in small (< 25 g) and increased in medium (25–75 g) and large (> 75 g) grades at 45, 60, 75 and 90 days after planting. Increase in the application of phosphorus increased the number of tubers/m2 in the small grade and decreased it in the large grade but did not affect the number in the medium grade. Increase in nitrogen and potassium application decreased the tuber yield in the small grade and increased it in the medium and large grades. Applied phosphorus increased the yield in the small and medium grades and decreased it in the large grade. The increase in the yield of tubers with increase in nitrogen and potassium application was found to be caused by an increase in the number of tubers in the medium and large grades at the expense of the small grade; however, with applied phosphorus the increase in yield was due to increase in the weight of individual tubers within the small and medium grades. FYM application decreased the number of tubers in the small grade and increased it in the medium and large grades. The response of potato to nitrogen increased and to phosphorus and potassium decreased with the application of FYM.

Predicting pasture and sheep production in the Victorian Mallee with the decision support tool, GrassGro

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Climate Variability ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Pasture Production ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Sheep Production

The GrassGro decision support tool was designed to quantify sheep and pasture production in response to management and climate variability in temperate Australia, and has been tested in temperate but not low-rainfall Australian conditions. Data from field experiments and from on-farm monitoring was used to test GrassGro predictions of annual and perennial pasture production, and sheep production at 4 locations throughout the Victorian Mallee, which is a low-rainfall area (275–375 mm annually). Predictions of long-term pasture production were then made. Predictions of the herbage biomass of annual pastures closely matched observed data for both a sandy loam (1991–2002 data) and a whole paddock (combining sandy loam and loam and sand) (2001–2002 data) soil type, at several locations across the Victorian Mallee. Linear regression between observed and simulated (April to September) data produced coefficients, significance and root mean square error of r2 = 0.81, P<0.001, 217 kg DM/ha, respectively, for sandy loam soil types and r2 = 0.94, P<0.001, 72 kg DM/ha, respectively, for whole paddock soil types. A series of simulations for individual years from 1970 to 2002 quantified the large impact of climate variability and demonstrated that seedbank and location, but not soil fertility, had a large influence on annual pasture production. However, GrassGro underestimated the production of the perennial pasture, lucerne (r2 = 0.2). GrassGro was also unable to adequately predict sheep production because it failed to take into account the sparse, clumpy structure of the low biomass pastures typical of this region. Methods to improve GrassGro were identified and included: (i) the need to adjust sheep intake from low biomass, sparse pastures, (ii) the ability to predict summer growing and autumn growing plant species, (iii) the ability to graze crop stubbles and (iv) refinements to the coefficients of equations used to model lucerne growth.

THE EFFECTS OF 2-CHLORO-6 (TRICHLOROMETHYL)-PYRIDINE (’N-SERVE’) AND N FERTILIZERS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF CANADIAN OILSEED RAPE

1990 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. D. BAILEY
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Oilseed Rape ◽  
Oil Content ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
N Fertilizers ◽  
Herbage Yield ◽  
Meal Protein

’N-Serve’ has been shown to reduce losses of applied N-fertilizer and thereby increase fertilizer N-utilization by plants. This study was undertaken to test the effects of ’N-Serve’ on fertilizer N efficiency in oilseed rape production and quality. Field experiments were conducted on two chernozemic soils over 4 yr in Manitoba. The oilseed rape cultivars Tower (Brassica napus L.) and Torch (B. campestris) were used in the study. Spring and fall applied ammonium nitrate, urea and fluid-N, with and without ’N-Serve’ delayed flowering and increased the herbage yield of both oilseed rape cultivars. The number of days from full pod to maturity was increased with application of N fertilizers, but the number of days from flowering to full pod was constant. Increased herbage yield and total plant N at flowering was reflected in increased seed yield and meal protein content, but decreased oil content. ’N-Serve’ applied with and without N fertilizer reduced oil content and oil yield. However, when ’N-Serve’ was applied in the fall with urea and fluid-N it improved their efficiency, resulting in higher seed yields and meal protein content equivalent to that of spring applications. ’N-Serve’ used with fall applied ammonium nitrate or with all three sources of spring applied N had no similar effect. It is concluded that ’N-Serve’ should not be applied to oilseed rape, mainly because of its negative effect on seed oil content.Key words: Oilseed rape, ammonium nitrate, urea, fluid-N, chernozemic soil, protein, oil

Economizing the use of nitrogen fertilizer in wheat production through enriched compost

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizwan Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Naveed ◽  
Muhammad Aslam ◽  
Zahir A. Zahir ◽  
Muhammad Arshad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Chemical Fertilizer ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Yield Attributes ◽  
Wheat Production ◽  
Application Rates ◽  
Compost Application

AbstractManipulation of organic wastes and their composts as a source of organic matter (OM) and nutrients is imperative for sustainable agriculture. Further, the fortification of composts with chemical fertilizer enhances agronomic effectiveness of both by reducing the amount of fertilizer and improving the quality of compost. The present study aimed to explore the potential of organic and chemical nutrient sources with their optimal application and integration for sustainable wheat production. Accordingly, waste fruits and vegetables were collected, dried, ground and processed in a composting vessel. During the enriched composting, waste material (300 kg) was fortified with 30 kg N, i.e. 25% of the standard rate (120 kg N ha−1) of N fertilizer. Treatments for both greenhouse and field experiments using wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) included: control (without any compost or N fertilizer), compost (non-enriched), fertilizer N 120 (120 kg N ha−1), nitrogen-enriched compost (NEC), NEC+N 30 (30 kg N ha−1) and NEC+N 60 (60 kg N ha−1). Application rate of composts (non-enriched or enriched) was 300 kg ha−1in the respective treatments. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were applied at 90 kg P2O5ha−1and 60 kg K2O ha−1, respectively in all treatments. The crop was grown to maturity, and data on wheat growth and yield attributes were recorded. Application of NEC significantly improved the growth, yield and N, P and K contents of wheat compared with compost and control treatments. The performance of NEC+N 60 was statistically similar to that of fertilizer N 120. Economic analysis also revealed the superiority of NEC+N 60 over other treatments in terms of net return and relative increase in income; however, the value/cost ratio was highest with NEC alone. For effective and economical use of N fertilizer, it is suggested to integrate N fertilizer at reduced rates with NEC. Through enriched compost, application rates can be decreased from tonnes to kilograms per hectare, and dependence on chemical fertilizer can be reduced to a certain extent. So the approach is farmer friendly as it lowers compost application rates, and is economically acceptable as it saves N fertilizer. It is also environmentally sustainable due the recycling of organic waste and possible reduction of N losses to the environment. Thus, the study has wide application in the global environment and fertilizer market.

Managing inoculation failure of field pea and chickpea based on spectral responses

2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. McConnell ◽  
P. R. Miller ◽  
R. L. Lawrence ◽  
R. Engel ◽  
G. A. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Reflectance ◽  
Crop Production ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Yield Potential ◽  
Shoot Biomass ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
N Concentration

Pulse crop production is expanding in semiarid regions of the Northern Plains, and depends on successful biological N2-fixation. Inoculation failure, resulting in plant N deficiency and economic crop loss, might be alleviated by remedial N fertilizer application. The experiment was conducted using no-till management at two dryland sites in Montana in 1999 and 2000, where field pea and chickpea were grown in cereal stubble. Shoot biomass, shoot biomass N concentration, seed yield and seed N concentration were measured for uninoculated and inoculated controls and compared with remedial fertilizer N applied 0, 4, 6, and 8 wk after seeding. Spectral reflectance was compared for the inoculated and uninoculated controls. For field pea and chickpea, the critical period for fertilizer N application to prevent yield loss occurred within 6 wk of seeding (P ≤ 0.05). Logistic regression models derived from spectral reflectance had overall accuracies of 84 and 60% for detecting uninoculated control treatments in field pea and chickpea, respectively. The field pea model had a high degree of accuracy 6 wk after seeding, indicating it was capable of assisting a decision to apply remedial N fertilizer. Spectral reflectance provided a window of opportunity of 1 wk to apply remedial N fertilizer to attain full yield potential. Key words: Chickpea, field pea, inoculant failure, nitrogen, spectral reflectance

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SOIL CONCENTRATIONS OF FALL- AND SPRING-APPLIED TRIFLURALIN IN FLAX

1983 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1031-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. PCHAJEK ◽  
I. N. MORRISON ◽  
G. R. B. WEBSTER
Keyword(s):  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Soil Samples ◽  
Controlled Environment ◽  
Residual Soil ◽  
Setaria Viridis ◽  
Green Foxtail ◽  
Setaria Glauca ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
Fall Application

The efficacy of fall and spring treatments of trifluralin (α,α-trifluoro-2,6- dinitro-N, N-diproply-p-toluidine) applied to a sandy loam soil seeded to flax and the residual soil concentrations of trifluralin during the growing season were compared over 2 yr. Fall application of trifluralin at 1.12 kg/ha caused less crop injury and resulted in better green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.) control than a spring application at 0.84 kg/ha. Initial soil concentrations were higher in plots treated in the fall at 1.12 kg/ha than in plots treated in the spring at 0.84 kg/ha. Six weeks after the experiments were seeded to flax and after harvest, more trifluralin persisted in the fall-treated plots. Calculated on the basis of the amount detected at the time of seeding, an average of 31 and 30% of the trifluralin persisted until after harvest in 1978 and 1979, respectively. In controlled environment studies in which yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca L. Beauv.) was seeded into soil collected six weeks after seeding, growth of the weed was reduced more in soil that was treated in the fall compared to the spring. In soil samples taken after harvest, growth of yellow foxtail was significantly reduced only in soil that had been treated the previous fall, with about a 50% reduction resulting from the 1.12-kg/ha rate and a 90% reduction occurring from the 2.24-kg/ha rate.Key words: Setaria viridis, flax tolerance, green foxtail control, trifluralin residues

scholarly journals The Nitrogen Use Efficiency: Meaning and Sources of Variation—Case Studies on Three Vegetable Crops in Central Italy

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Benincasa ◽  
Marcello Guiducci ◽  
Francesco Tei
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Utilization Efficiency ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Application Method ◽  
N Concentration ◽  
Sources Of Variation ◽  
Use Efficiency

Nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) of crops is examined by taking into account both plant N uptake efficiency, focusing on the recovery of fertilizer-N, and the utilization efficiency of the absorbed N. The latter is further analyzed as the overall effect of the absorbed N on crop leaf area, light absorption, photosynthesis, crop growth, biomass partitioning, and yield. The main sources of variation for the NUE of crops are considered, and several of them are discussed based on results from field experiments carried out at the University of Perugia (central Italy) between 1991 and 2008 on sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), lettuce (Lactuca sativa), and processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). More specifically, the effects of species, cultivar, fertilizer-N rate, form and application method (mineral and organic fertilization, green manuring, fertigation frequency), and sink limitation are reported. Implications for residual N in the soil and leaching risks are also discussed. The fertilizer-N rate is the main factor affecting crop NUE for a given irrigation management and rainfall regime. Indeed, avoiding over fertilization is the first and primary means to match a high use efficiency and economic return of fertilizer-N with limited environmental risks from nitrate leaching. The form and application method of fertilizer-N also may affect the NUE, especially in the case of limiting or overabundant N supply. Particularly, high fertigation frequency increased the recovery of fertilizer-N by the crop. It is suggested that species-specific curves for critical N concentration (i.e., the minimum N concentration that allows the maximum growth) can be the reference to calibrate the quick tests used to guide dynamic fertilization management, which is essential to achieve both the optimal crop N nutritional status and the maximum NUE.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document