scholarly journals Assessing the need for a protocol in monitoring weight loss and nutritional status in orthognathic surgery based on patients experiences

2017 ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ruslin ◽  
H Dekker ◽  
DB Tuinzing ◽  
T Forouzanfar
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery

scholarly journals A study of nutritional status, development of malnutrition and food consumption in hospitalized patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
Anil Evrim Gungor ◽  
Perihan Arslan ◽  
Osman Abbasoglu
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Food Services ◽  
Hospital Malnutrition ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Mid Upper Arm Circumference ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Purpose: To investigate the nutritional status of patients on admission and during hospital stay, the factors leading to weight loss, and to evaluate patient satisfaction of hospital food. Methods: On admission, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), mid upper arm circumference (MAC) measurements were carried out; serum total protein and albumin levels were recorded. Upon discharge, measurements of weight, MAC were repeated, along with a food satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Patients with NRS-2002>3, BMI<20, were classified as nutrionally at risk which were 43.6% and 9.4% respectively. Of the patients, 77% lost weight (2.6±1.9 kg). Patients who were determined to be malnourished on admission by BMI and NRS-2002 stayed longer in hospital (p<0.0 and p<0.001, respectively). The relationships between weight loss and lenght of stay, use of medications and period of starvation were significant (p<0.0001, for each). Of the patients, 49.9% did not satisfy with the hospital food. Conclusions: Nutritional status of hospitalized patients should be screened with NRS-2002, assessed and monitored. Keywords: NRS-2002, hospital malnutrition, hospital food services

Artificial nutrition support

2010 ◽  
pp. 1535-1546
Author(s):  
Jeremy Woodward
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Nutrition Support ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Major Predictor ◽  
Current Body Mass Index

The prevalence and importance of malnutrition in affluent societies is under-recognized, and nutritional status is a major predictor of outcome for most diseases. Nutrition screening identifies patients at risk of malnutrition and should be performed in all clinical areas: this requires evaluation of events in the past (recent weight loss); present (current body mass index (BMI) and clinical signs of malnutrition); and future (current nutrient intake and foreseeable likely causes of reduced intake). A BMI of less than 18.5 kg/m...

Artificial nutrition support

2020 ◽  
pp. 1914-1926
Author(s):  
Jeremy Woodward
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Nutrition Support ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Disease States

The prevalence and relevance of undernutrition in affluent societies is often unrecognized, but nutritional status significantly impacts outcomes in all disease states. Nutrition screening identifies patients at risk of undernutrition and should be carried out in hospitals and community: its components comprise past weight loss, current body mass index, and likely foreseeable nutritional challenges. A body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m2; weight loss of more than 10% over 6 months; or BMI of less than 20 kg/m2 with weight loss of more than 5% over 6 months, are all indicative of undernutrition. Nutrition support is indicated for malnourished patients or those at risk of undernutrition in view of inadequate oral intake or malabsorption. Timing of the intervention depends on the pre-existing nutritional status and the likelihood of restoring adequate intake.

O193 ROLE OF MALNUTRITION IN 0ESOPHAGEAL SURGERY FOR CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Alfieri ◽  
M Nardi ◽  
V Moretto ◽  
E Pinto ◽  
M Briarava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Oesophagogastric Junction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim To investigate whether preoperative malnutrition is associated with long term outcome and survival in patients undergoing radical oesophagectomy for oesophageal or oesophagogastric junction cancer. Background & Methods Dysphagia, weight loss, chemo-radiationtherapy frequently lead to malnutrition in patients with oesophageal or oesophagogastric junction cancer. Severe malnutrition is associated with higher risk of postoperative complications but little is known on the correlation with long term survival. We conducted a single center retrospective study on a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing oesophagectomy from 2008 and 2012 in order to evaluate the impact of preoperative malnutrition with postoperative outcome and long term survival. Preoperative malnutrition was classified as: prealbumin level less than 220 mg/dL (PL), MUST index (Malnutrition Universal Screeening Tool) >2 and weight loss >10%. Results 177 consecutive patients were considered: due to incomplete data 60 were excluded from the analysis that was performed on 117 patients. PL was reported in 52 (44%) patients, MUST index was recorded in 62 (53%), 58 (49%) patients presented more than 10% weight loss at the preoperative evaluation. PL was associated with more postoperative Clavien-Dindo 1-2 complications (p=0.048, OR 2.35 95%IC 1.001-5.50), no differences were observed in mortality, anastomotic leak, major pulmonary complications. MUST index was not correlated with postoperative complications nor mortality but resulted worse in patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy (p=0.046, OR 1.92 95%CI 1.011-3.64). Weight loss >10% was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. Overall 7 years survival rate was 69%. and DFS was 68%. Malnourished patients did not differ from non-malnourished regarding age, sex, tumor site, tumor stage and histology. No significant difference in 7 years survival rates was observed in patients with PL <220 mg/dL ( 55 % vs 67%), neither in patients with MUST score>2 (58% vs 72%), nor in patients with weight loss >10% (53% vs 70%). Conclusions Malnutrition is more common in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy and it is associated with postoperative complications. However, both long term and disease free survival are not affected by preoperative nutritional status. Larger patient population and data on long term postoperative nutritional status will be analyzed in further studies.

Decline of nutritional status in the first week of hospitalisation predicts longer length of stay and hospital readmission during 6-month follow-up

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Júlia Lima ◽  
Paula Portal Teixeira ◽  
Igor da Conceição Eckert ◽  
Camila Ferri Burgel ◽  
Flávia Moraes Silva
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Severe Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Monitoring ◽  
Nutrition Care Process

Abstract Nutritional status (NS) monitoring is an essential step of the nutrition care process. To assess changes in NS throughout hospitalisation and its ability to predict clinical outcomes, a prospective cohort study with patients over 18 years of age was conducted. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) was performed within 48 h of admission and 7 d later. For each patient, decline in NS was assessed by two different methods: changes in SGA category and severe weight loss alone (≥2 % during the first week of hospitalisation). Patients were followed up until discharge to assess length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality and contacted 6 months post-discharge to assess hospital readmission and death. Out of the 601 patients assessed at admission, 299 remained hospitalised for at least 7 d; of those, 16·1 % had a decline in SGA category and 22·8 % had severe weight loss alone. In multivariable analysis, decline in SGA category was associated with 2-fold (95 % CI 1·06, 4·21) increased odds of prolonged LOS and 3·6 (95 % CI 1·05, 12·26) increased odds of hospital readmission at 6 months. Severe weight loss alone was associated with 2·5-increased odds (95 % CI 1·40, 4·64) of prolonged LOS. In conclusion, deterioration of NS was more often identified by severe weight loss than by decline in SGA category. While both methods were associated with prolonged LOS, only changes in the SGA predicted hospital readmission. These findings reinforce the importance of nutritional monitoring and provide guidance for further research to prevent short-term NS deterioration from being left undetected.

Changes in Body Composition, Comorbidities, and Nutritional Status Associated with Lower Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery in Older Subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3589-3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Faucher ◽  
Judith Aron-Wisnewsky ◽  
Cécile Ciangura ◽  
Laurent Genser ◽  
Adriana Torcivia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Lower Weight ◽  
Older Subjects

scholarly journals Altered Preoperative Nutritional Status in Colorectal Cancer: A Not So Infrequent Issue

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Javier Páramo-Zunzunegui ◽  
Araceli Ramos-Carrasco ◽  
Marcos Alonso-García ◽  
Rosa Cuberes-Montserrat ◽  
Gil Rodríguez-Caravaca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
A Value ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

Introduction. Malnutrition and weight loss in cancer patients is a common problem that affects the prognosis of the disease. In the case of CRC, malnutrition rates range between 30 and 60%. Objectives. Description of the preoperative nutritional status of patients diagnosed with colorectal neoplasia who will undergo surgery. Materials and Methods. A prospective observational study is performed. Results. Of 234 patients studied, we observed that 139 (59%) had some degree of nutritional risk. Of all of them, 44.9% (N = 47) had 1-2 points according to MUST and 25% (N = 27) had more than 2 points. No differences were found when studying nutritional risk according to the location of the neoplasm. It was observed that 2.15% of the patients were underweight, 51% overweight, and 23% obese. 19.4% of patients lost less than 5 kg in the 3–6 months prior to diagnosis, 20.7% lost between 5 and 10 kg, and 2.1% lost more than 10 kg. In asymptomatic patients, the weight loss was lower than in symptomatic patients, loss <5 kg, 8.2% vs. 22.8%, and loss 5–10 kg, 16.2% vs. 29.3%, with a value of p = 0.016 . 5% (N = 7) of the patients had hypoalbuminemia record. 16.5% (N = 23) had some degree of prealbumin deficiency and 20.9% (N = 29) of hypoproteinemia. Symptomatic patients had more frequent analytical alterations, 1-2 altered parameters in 48.8% (N = 20) of asymptomatic vs. 61.2% (N = 22) in the symptomatic, p = 0.049 .

scholarly journals Needle Catheter Jejunostomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreato-Biliary Cancer–Impact on Nutritional and Clinical Outcome in the Early and Late Postoperative Period

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Wobith ◽  
Lena Wehle ◽  
Delia Haberzettl ◽  
Ali Acikgöz ◽  
Arved Weimann
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Biliary Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Course ◽  
Catheter Jejunostomy ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal ◽  
Late Postoperative Period

The metabolic risk for patients undergoing abdominal cancer resection increases in the perioperative period and malnutrition may be observed. In order to prevent further weight loss, the guidelines recommend for high-risk patients the placement of a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) for supplementing enteral feeding in the early and late postoperative period. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of NCJ placement and its potential benefits regarding the nutritional status in the postoperative course. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer, such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreato-biliary cancer, and NCJ placement during the operation. The nutritional parameters body mass index (BMI), perioperative weight loss, phase angle measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the clinical outcome were assessed perioperatively and during follow-up visits 1 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months after surgery. In 102 patients a NCJ was placed between January 2006 and December 2016. Follow-up visits 1 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months after surgery were performed in 90 patients and 88 patients, respectively. No severe complications were seen after the NCJ placement. The supplementing enteral nutrition via NCJ did not improve the nutritional status of the patients postoperatively. There was a significant postoperative decline of weight and phase angle, especially in the first to third month after surgery, which could be stabilized until 4–6 months after surgery. Placement of NCJ is safe. In patients with upper gastrointestinal and pancreato-biliary cancer, supplementing enteral nutrition during the postoperative course and continued after discharge may attenuate unavoidable weight loss and a reduction of body cell mass within the first six months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document