The Library of Congress Remote Online Library User Pilot Project: The California State Library Experience

2019 ◽  
pp. 125-141
Author(s):  
Kathleen Low
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Smirnov ◽  
Yu. V. Sokolova

The chat communication is a new type of user distance service. The authors examine the technology applications in different organizations and libraries, in particular. Intelligent information systems are used for designing virtual assistants and chatbots. The authors emphasize that, as for today, the scientific classification for chatbots is lacking. They attempt to categorize virtual talkbots. They discuss iPavlov artificial intellect library. The most interesting Russian developments are Telegram chatbots of Russian State Library for Young Adults, Directorate of Cultural Centers of Moscow, and that of St. Petersburg State Library for the Blind and Visually Impaired. RNPLS&T has implemented jivo system of chat communication. The reasons for choosing this system and operation results are discussed. The authors conclude that chat communication meets the principles and improves efficiency of user services.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Dwi Titaningsih ◽  
Suharno Suharno

<p>The online journal is one of the sources of information from various sources of information availability, available good from the hearts and abroad to get literature review. It is influenced by the development of technology and information wichis increasingly advanced so that information can be obtained easily.Along with advances in information technology (ICT), efforts in obtaining and providing information is not limited to the distance, space, and time. The use of the online journal by researchers and extension workers are rarely used. The use of the online journal by researchersand extension workers are rarely used. Effort to examine the use of online journals was conducted to determine show far the use of the online journal by researchers, extension workers, and other library user in IAIT Yogyakarta. The studies was conducted in September 2015 and arranged in randomized design with 30 respondents. The result of this studies showed that (1) frequency of using journal online are more dominant in one to two times a week wich is done by 22 library user (73,34%), (2) the length of time utilization for accessing online journals most are one to two hours wich is done by 13 library user (43,34%), (3) the level of ability of library user wich using Boolean operator AND, OR, NOT evidently 11 library user does not understand (36,67%), (4) the action to download from the search result conducted by is library user (50%), (5) The access point information in the most preferred search by keyword is done by 21 library user (70%), (6) the purpose of utilizing the online journal access research were 12 library user (40%), (7) completeness of information required by library user perceived by 23 library user (76,66%), (8) accesing online journal wich are mostly done at the work space is as much as 20 library user (66,67%), (9) the domestic online journals are more affractive was choosen by 17 library user (56,66%).</p><p>Keywords: benefit of journal, journal online, library user</p>


1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Henriette D. Avram ◽  
Lenore S. Maruyama

<p class="p1">Synopsis of three progress reports on the <span class="s1">RECON </span>Pilot Project submitted by the Library of Congress to the Council on Library <span class="s1">Resourc</span><span class="s2">es </span>covering the period October 1970-May 1971. Progress is<span class="s3"> </span>r<span class="s4">e</span>ported in the following areas: RECON production, foreign languag<span class="s4">e </span><span class="s2">editing </span>test, format recognition, microfilming, input d<span class="s4">ev</span>ic<span class="s4">e</span>s, and tasks assigned to the RECON Working Task Force.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
John W. Thompson

This essay points out that inconsistencies in the assignment of subject headings and call number can lead to failure to retrieve relevant materials from our libraries. Today it is frequently asserted that bibliographic records cataloged by the Library of Congress or other approved libraries will not require review or editing in our local libraries. This paper provides clear, but by no means unique examples of “cataloging failure” and explains the implications of a policy to add unedited bibliographic records (from vendors such as OCLC) to our library catalogs. The result is the omission of otherwise relevant titles from fairly routine searches.


1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Henriette D. Avram ◽  
Lenore S. Maruyama

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="section"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>A synopsis of the third progress report on the RECON Pilot Project submitted by the Library of Congress to the Council on Library Resources. An overview is given of the progress </span><span>made </span><span>from April through September 1970 in the following areas: RECON production, format recognition, research titles, microfilming, and investigation of </span><span>input </span><span>devices. In addition, the status of the tasks assigned to the RECON Working Task Force are briefly described.</span></p></div></div></div></div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document