scholarly journals Prawo do wizerunku w społeczeństwie informacyjnym

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-38
Author(s):  
Piotr Horosz ◽  
Agnieszka Grzesiok-Horosz
Keyword(s):  
Information Society ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Personal Nature ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The right to one’s image in an information society This article is focused on selected aspects of the right to one’s image. The authors would like to contribute to the ongoing discussion on the legal nature of the right to one’s image. In our opinion, it is not adequate to meet the requirements presented by an information society. Concepts derived from analog techniques are inadequate to meet the requirements of the digital field. The commercialisation of images also means that rights of a personal nature (moral rights) as set by the law are treated as economic ones, which is accepted partially by the legal doctrine and recognized in jurisprudence. The conducted research is supported by the critical analysis of binding legal regulations (Articles 81 and 83 of the Act on Copyright and Related Rights) and followed by de lege ferenda proposals.

Forced Termination of the Right to a Land not Used for Purpose or Used in Violation of the Law: Enforcement Issues

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 48-55
Author(s):  
G. A. Misnik ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Forced Termination ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The article provides an analysis of the legal rules governing the application of sanctions for violation of land laws. Particular attention is paid to the type of sanctions, such as the seizure of land used in violation of the law and unused in accordance with their purpose. The author examines the existing theoretical positions on the legal nature of these sanctions, examines law enforcement practice. The article provides a critical analysis of the positions of the judiciary in terms of the qualification of land offences as the basis for the application of these sanctions. As a result of the theoretical study of the issue, the author concludes that the sanctions are recognized as liability measures, the industry of which needs to be legislated.

scholarly journals THEORETIC AND LEGAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH OF THE LEGAL NATURE OF A CORPORATE CONTRACT ON THE LAW OF FRANCE AND THE USA

2017 ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
Ольга Терновая ◽  
Olga Tyernovaya ◽  
Светлана Соловьева ◽  
Svyetlana Solovyeva
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Profit Sharing ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Business Corporation ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Contractual Relations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Anglo American ◽  
The Right

This article deals with theoretical and legal approaches and peculiarities of the regulation of corporate contract under the laws of France and USA. One of the factors that promoted the promulgation of the shareholders agreement was the participation of Anglo-American investors in French societies, which were more accustomed to contractual relations then to the use of rigidly fixed forms of joint-stock companies. Despite the fact that one of the aims of such agreements was an attempt to get rid of excessive publicright control, such contracts could never contradict the mandatory requirements of the law and the provisions of the company’s charter. In the United States legislative embodiment of the right of shareholders to enter into various types of agreements is carried out by laws regulating activities, the procedure of the establishment and management of Business Corporations. The content of a shareholders agreement and the right to participate in such agreement is regulated by the legal regime of corporation. The agreement between the members of close corporation de facto may change the provisions of corporation’s charter relating to corporate governance and profit sharing. All types of shareholders agreements, which could be concluded by the members of Business Corporation, are considered in the present article. State law that regulates contractual relations does not apply to shareholders agreements despite the legal doctrine view that corporations are of a contractual nature. The comparative analysis of the jurisprudence, legal doctrine and provisions of US and French legislation allows us to conclude that in the USA, unlike France, shareholders agreements are regulated by Corporate Law, not by the provisions of the Contract Law as it takes place in France.

scholarly journals Legal status of the company's share in own authorized capital under the Law of Ukraine “On limited and additional liability companies”: problems of legal regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11/1 (-) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Volodymyr TSIUPRYK
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Company ◽  
Authorized Capital ◽  
A Share

Introduction. Nowadays, the issue of determining the legal status of the company's share in the own authorized capital of LLC and TDV has become quite acute, as evidenced by the adoption on July 28, 2021 by the Commercial Court of Cassation in Case № 904/1112/20, in which the Court established a new approach legal nature of such a phenomenon and expressed his own position on the understanding of the legislation concerning the legal status of the share of LLC and TDV in its own authorized capital. Given that a limited liability company is the most popular type of legal entity that is chosen to conduct business in Ukraine, the analysis of this issue is relevant. Some scientific value for the development of the transfer of the participant's share are the works of individual authors devoted to the study of the legal nature of the share in the authorized capital but the problems arising around the legal status of the company. in their own authorized capital in these works were only mentioned along with others, but did not receive a detailed separate study. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the normative regulation of the legal status of the company's share in the own authorized capital of LLCs and ALCs, identification of shortcomings in their legal regulation and implementation, as well as the search for ways to eliminate them. Results. One of the most relevant decisions concerning the subject of this article is the Judgment of the Commercial Court of Cassation in case № 904/1112/20 of July 28, 2021. The court in this case found that the votes attributable to the share belonging to the company itself are not taken into account when determining the results of voting at the general meeting of participants on any issues. However, Ukrainian legislation does not contain any direct norms that would prohibit the exercise of the right to manage a company in relation to itself on the basis of a share in its own authorized capital. That is why the company cannot be a participant in relation to itself, although they seem logical, but do not have sufficient regulatory support, and therefore do not allow to be firmly convinced of their compliance with the law. In view of this, it can be stated that there is a significant gap in the national legislation on this issue, which, in our opinion, the Court failed to “fill” with this decision in the case. Conclusion. In the Ukrainian legislation at the level of the Law of Ukraine “On Limited and Additional Liability Companies” Article 25 defines the possibility for a company to acquire a share in its own authorized capital. However, the regulation of the legal status of such a share cannot be called sufficient, due to which in practice there are certain problems in the implementation of the provisions of the legislation concerning the share of the company in its own authorized capital. The solution of these legal problems is necessary to ensure the highest quality and clarity of the law, as well as to form case law with common approaches to understanding a single rule.

scholarly journals THE RIGHT OF AUTHORSHIP ON A WORK

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Ciprian Raul Romiţan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Natural Connection ◽  
Artistic Work ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The moral rights represent the legal expression of the relationship between the workand its creator; they precede, survive and exert a permanent influence on the economic rights.Moral rights are independent of economic rights, the author of a work preserving these rightseven after the transfer of its property rights.The right to claim recognition as the author of the work, called in the doctrine as the"right of paternity of the work" is enshrined in art. 10 lit. b) of the law and it is based on theneed to respect the natural connection between the author and his work. The right toauthorship is the most important prerogative that constitutes intellectual property rights ingeneral and consists of recognizing the true author of a scientific, literary or artistic work.

The Main Features of the Law Amending the General Administrative Procedure Act

10.4335/32 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Tjaša Ivanc
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Effective Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Electronic Service ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The Law Amending the General Administrative Procedure Act refers to a variety of provisions. New solutions should contribute to a more rapid, more efficient and more cost-effective procedure. Primarily due to elimination of the inconsistent use of individual provisions in practice, the amending law regulates more definitely the issues of authorising the persons to manage and make decisions at different decision-making levels in administrative procedures in municipalities. The law also develops electronic operations and it especially amends the electronic service provisions. There is a fairly large number of amendments in the Service Chapter. And an important novelty needs to be emphasized. This is the institute of the waiver of the right to appeal which the General Administrative Procedure Act did not know. However, it is well-known in foreign legal regulations and in the Construction Act adopted in our country. KEY WORDS: • administrative procedure • electronic operations • right to appeal

scholarly journals THE CORRESPONDENCE OF THE PERSON'S, SOCIETY'S AND THE STATE'S IMPORTANT INTERESTS THROUGH THE PRISM OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL INSURING OF CYBER SECURITY

2020 ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
M. Pleskach
Keyword(s):  
Cyber Security ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Cyber Space ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Proper Balance

The article is devoted to the issue on balancing the important interests of a person, a society and the state in cyber space by means of administrative law. The purpose of this article is to determine the legal nature and the role of the correspondence of the important interests of a person, a society and the state in cyber space in the context of administrative and legal provision of cyber security. The paper also deals with a proper balance between the law-enforcement interests of the state and the respect for fundamental human rights. The method of analysis has revealed in clarifying some features of concepts "interest", "need", "right". The method of synthesis has been used to define common concepts, for example "person's interest in cyberspace". Comparative legal method has been used in the process of comparison of the legislation of Ukraine and the international legislation that governs the issue on balancing the important interests of a person, a society and the state in cyber space. The author of this research presents the possible structure of person's cyber security through a set of important person's rights and interests in cyberspace, for example, the right to access to the Internet; the right to protect personal data in cyberspace; the right to be protected from aggressive marketing technologies in cyberspace, the prohibition of monitoring, including through cookies, HTTP, HTML5 markers or other technologies; the right to education, the right to access knowledge through the use of cyberspace etc. Conclusions and proposals of this research can be used for further research and for improving the administrative and information legislation of Ukraine, including the Law of Ukraine "On the Fundamental Principles of Cyber Security of Ukraine". Keywords: the balance of interests of the person, society and state, cyber space usage, public interest, private interest.

scholarly journals Economic Efficiency in Economic Analysis of Law

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Famulski
Keyword(s):  
Economic Efficiency ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Economic Analysis Of Law ◽  
Practical Point ◽  
A Value ◽  
The Law ◽  
Fundamental Value

The aim of the article is to identify the category of economic efficiency on the grounds of L&E. According to the primary thesis of L&E economic efficiency is a fundamental legal value. The study discusses said thesis. On one hand, the controversy surrounding the thesis stem from lack of its unequivocal understanding. On the other, law has been functioning for centuries, while the question of its economic efficiency has only been raised for a few decades. Fundamental value, which has always been associated with law, is justice. It follows that the issue of various approaches to the relation between economic efficiency and justice in L&E is considered. Critical analysis of the literature allows to formulate arguments for and against each of these values in enacting and enforcing the law. Significant differences in various approaches to this matter are identified. Simultaneously, the assumption that efficiency is a value realized in the law beside justice is considered to be correct. The issue raised is important from the practical point of view. A theoretical consensus would support formulating a model, which would allow assessment of legal regulations based on criteria of economic efficiency and justice.

WAIVER OF SUBJECTIVE RIGHT INSTITUTE: LEGAL NATURE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

2020 ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
I. N. Chebotareva ◽  
◽  
O. S. Pashutina ◽  
I. V. Revina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Scientific Interest ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Look ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The nature of a subjective right causes the possibility of a criminal proceedings participant willingly, based on own interests and wishes, both to exercise the right exactly and waive it and not to use the provided procedural possibilities. Within the criminal proceedings, the waiver of the right institute is new, underdeveloped. There is practically no understanding of its subject matter and the extent of its exercise at the level of doctrine and jurisprudence as opposed to the foreign experience and civil legal regulation, which causes definite scientific interest in this topic. The paper carries out the look-back analysis of the definition of the nature of the waiver of the subjective right in Russian legal doctrine. This institute is relatively new and little researched in the Russian doctrine, which determines a particular scientific interest in the study of this issue. The paper provides the authors’ description of the waiver of the subjective right. In respect to the Russian criminal procedural legislation, the authors highlight the necessity to distinguish between the refusal of a right and the refusal to exercise a right by the participants in the criminal procedural activity; analyze the differentiated approach of the legislator on this issue. Based on the theoretical and legal analysis, the authors define that the waiver of the subjective right has definite essential features, forms, and ways of implementation, as well as specify the criteria for its admissibility. The paper proves the conclusion that the waiver of the right within the criminal process is possible under such conditions, as the direct willingness of a subject of criminal law relations to waive a right; the awareness of the existence of a particular procedural right and the consequences of such refusal; the form of a waiver showing its voluntary nature by implementing the intended freedom of choice. The authors expressed the proposals aimed at the improvement of norms of current criminal procedural legislation.

ASSIGNMENT OF THE RIGHT TO DEMAND DIVIDENDS IN JOINT STOCK COMPANIES

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiia Diadiuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Contractual Relationship ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
State Regulator ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
A Company

An article explores theoretical and practical problems of the assignment of the claim dividends to joint-stock companies. The author pointed to the legal nature of the transfer of the right of claim. Were studied the peculiarities and procedure of transferring the shareholder's right to receive dividends due to him to third parties. The right to receive dividends by a shareholder gives rise to a monetary obligation, the parties to which are a company (the debtor) and a shareholder (the creditor). We can see the possibility of assignment of the right to claim payment of dividends as a legal basis for replacing the creditor (shareholder) in the obligation because of the absence of a direct legal prohibition, as well as the personal nature of the legal relationship between the company and the shareholder. The practical implementation of this possibility is complicated by several factors, including the lack of a clear legal position on the nature of dividends, as well as the right to receive dividends; legislative non-regulation of the procedure for assignment of the right to demand payment of dividends. The analyzed decisions of the state regulator indicate the impossibility of replacing the creditor in the obligation to pay dividends if the shareholder transfers his rights to another person under the transaction (agreement) in the manner prescribed by regulations. The legal doctrine shows, the essence of the shareholder's right to dividends allows distinguishing the corporate right to dividends, and the right to claim payment of dividends (obligatory). Accordingly, the right to claim payment of dividends has the characteristics of an independent property object (asset), which may be the object of a contractual relationship. The obligatory right to demand payment of dividends will be the subject of a contract of assignment of the right to claim dividends to be paid (cession), as a kind of agreement of assignment of the right to demand a monetary obligation. The conclusion of an agreement on the assignment of the right to claim dividends is possible only after the acquisition by the shareholder (original creditor) of the right to claim the company.

What's it Got to Do with Morality? Moral Rights: An Historic and Contemporary Perspective

2005 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Maree Sainsbury
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Media ◽  
Contemporary Perspective ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Contemporary Context

Australia introduced moral rights legislation in December 2000, giving effect to a doctrine that originated in civil law jurisdictions in the eighteenth century. The rights given effect to in Australia are the right of integrity, which allows the author to prevent derogatory treatment of their work, and the right of attribution, which mandates attribution of the author when the work is reproduced, published or otherwise communicated to the public. There is also the right to prevent false attribution of authorship. This article looks at the historical development of moral rights and examines why such an amendment to the law in Australia was necessary in a contemporary context. It discusses the implications of this amendment for the media and other industries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document