scholarly journals Clause of Unlawful Action that May Void Arbitration Rules

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Ahmad Yani Kosali ◽  
Dimas Pratama Putra
Keyword(s):  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Illegal Acts ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Hearing ◽  
Made In ◽  
Illegal Action ◽  
Arbitration Award ◽  
Legal Force

Arbitration is a way of resolving a civil dispute outside a public court based on an arbitration agreement made in writing by the disputing parties. The problem in this research is whether the Arbitration decision can be overturned by the District Court because it contains clauses of illegal acts?, and What are the forms of illegal acts that can be overturned by the District Court? The type of research used is descriptive normative legal research. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that: An Arbitration Award can be overturned by the District Court because it contains a clause on illegal acts, is a decision that has been tested and examined through a civil court hearing that it is proven based on the evidence submitted by the disputing parties that the arbitration award contains actions against the law. And a form of illegal action that can be annulled by the District Court is a decision that has permanent legal force stating that the arbitration award is proven to have been an illegal act committed by one of the parties.

KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Yuanita Permatasari ◽  
Pranoto ,
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Legal Substances ◽  
Arbitration Award

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to find out the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration award in Indonesia, as well as the authority of the courts in annulment the international arbitration award in Indonesia. This research is a normative and prescriptive legal research. The type and source of materials used is the source of secondary legal material. The legal substances used in this study are of two kinds, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting legal materials in this study is obtained through assessment of existing libraries, books, law journals, and court awards. Based on the result of the discussion, it can be concluded: Firstly, the international arbitration award can be recognized and enforced if the award is registered and obtain an execution from the Central Jakarta District Court. International arbitration rulings can only be recognized and enforced if they full fil the conditions in Article 66 of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution law. Second, the international arbitration award is final and binding. However, in reality many international arbitration awards are requested for annulment to the Court in Indonesia.</p><p>Keywords: international arbitration award, annulment of international arbitration award, enforcement of international arbitration award</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia, serta kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, dengan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan: Pertama, agar putusan arbitrase internasional dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan, maka putusan tersebut harus terlebih dahulu didaftarkan dan memperoleh exequatur dari Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan arbitrase internasional hanya dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan apabila memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kedua, putusan arbitrase internasional bersifat final and binding. Sehingga, putusan arbitrase internasional tidak dapat diajukan upaya pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Namun, dalam realitanya banyak putusan arbitrase internasional yang dimintakan pembatalannya kepada Pengadilan di Indonesia.</p><p>Kata Kunci: putusan arbitrase internasional, pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional, pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional</p>

scholarly journals DISPUTES SETTLEMENT OF BALI TRADITIONAL INHERITANCE THROUGH PEACE AGREEMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Agung ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Peace Agreement ◽  
Peace Agreements ◽  
The Law ◽  
Made In

The inheritance and the division of inheritance that is felt to be unfair is often a source of dispute. The disputes that occur can sometimes be resolved by making a peace agreement between the disputing parties. The peace desired by the parties is, of course, expected to end disputes/conflict and to provide legal certainty among those in dispute. However, sometimes peace agreements that have been made between those in dispute are disputed again in court. This study aims to examine the settlement of Balinese traditional inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement between the parties make it. The method used in this study is a normative legal research, using a statute approach and a case approach. The result of this study showed that the settlement of Balinese indigenous inheritance disputes through a binding peace agreement of the parties that make it if the peace agreement is made based on the validity of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code, based on good faith as the principles in the law of the agreement, and must be made in the form of a notary deed is in accordance with the provisions for conciliation in book III of the Civil Code.  

scholarly journals TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP POLIS ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERJANJIAN ASURANSI

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Vianda Karina Ika Putri ◽  
Bambang Winarno ◽  
A. Rachmad Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Insurance Contract ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
The Law ◽  
Insurance Agreement ◽  
Policy Agreement ◽  
Made In ◽  
Legal Force

Abstract: Electronic policy or e-policy is an insurance contract that happends due to an electronic commercial transactions. But e-policy has been in Indonesia although there is no clear legal framework related to the existence of these e-policy. The purpose of this study are 1) Determine and analyze how the legality of e-policy according to the law in Indonesia. 2) Determine and analyze how the strength of e-policies evidence in the event of a dispute between the parties. Judicial review of electronic policy in the insurance agreement, namely: 1) E-polis as a form of agreement which could be interpreted is not qualify as legitimate e-policy agreement contrary to KUHDagang to be equivalent for sub law. So, insurance agreement can be interpreted is not meet objective conditions of an agreement that could result in the agreement is null and void (Article 1320 of KUHPerdata). 2) The strength of evidence on e-policy will have a strong legal force if the e-policy is made in the form of a deed in writing and acknowledged by both parties entered into an agreement, but if e-policy just softfile that send by email then e-policy does not have the strength of evidence because it was not in accordance with the provisions of Indonesian laws. Keywords: Agreement, E-policy, The Insurance Agreement Abstrak: Polis elektronik atau e-polis merupakan kontrak asuransi yang terjadi akibat suatu transaksi komersial elektronik. Namun e-polis telah berada di Indonesia meski belum ada payung hukum yang jelas terkait adanya e-polis ini. Tujuan Penelitian ini ialah 1) Mengetahui dan menganalisis keabsahan e-polis menurut hukum di Indonesia, 2) Mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana kekuatan pembuktian e-polis dalam hal terjadi sengketa antara para pihak. Tinjauan yuridis terhadap polis elektronik dalam perjanjian asuransi, yakni : 1) E-polis sebagai suatu bentuk perjanjian yang dapat diartikan tidak memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian karena e-polis bertentangan dengan KUHDagang yang setara dengan Undang-Undang. Sehingga perjanjian asuransi tersebut dapat diartikan tidak memenuhi syarat objektif suatu perjanjian yang dapat mengakibatkan perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum (Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata). 2) Kekuatan pembuktian pada e-polis akan memiliki kekuatan hukum yang kuat apabila e-polis dibuat dalam bentuk akta yang tertulis dan diakui oleh kedua belah pihak yang mengadakan perjanjian, namun apabila e-polis tersebut hanya berbentuk softfile yang dikirim melalui email maka e-polis tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan pembuktian karena tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan-ketentuan hukum positif Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Perjanjian, E-polis, perjanjian asuransi

scholarly journals SANKSI YANG DITERIMA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTE TANAH DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA AUTENTIK YANG CACAT HUKUM (STUDI PUTUSAN: PN JAKSEL NO. 124/PDT.G/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andi Pratono ◽  
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community People ◽  
Is Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Made In

Indonesia is the law of state or law state, as a law state country, Indonesia must have 3(three) important element such as legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Those main elements represent all the law state. In community, people everyday acts always relate to legal act, such as contract, buying or selling object that promised. To ensure those legal act have the ability perfect proof power, those legal act poured in the form of deed. In buying and selling land, a deed of sale and purchase must be made in front authorized official like land deed officer. However land deed officer as public official do make mistake on duty, with the result that party at a disadvantage. Party that loss because of mistake land deed officer, do ask for responsibility by suing the land deed officer to compensate the losses. Land deed officer in carrying out their duties must apply the precautionary principle so as to minimize any mistakes in making the deed. Author is using normative legal research methods, supported by a data which is theory and interviews some expert in land deed officer and Code of Ethics. The legal consequences to the land deed officer due the legal acts are against the law, which is a sanction will be given. The sanction will divided in three types such as sanction according to the Civil Law, Criminal Law and Code of Ethics or Government Regulation about land deed officer.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

scholarly journals Case Review of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 672/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby about Unlawful Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Building

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ramzi Maulana Arghie
Keyword(s):  
Bargaining Power ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

The research, entitled Case Study of Surabaya District Court Decision No. 672/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby about Unlawful Sale and Purchase Agreement of Land and Building aims to find out whether or not Dirk Tatipata is said to have defaulted on the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) of land, which he did with Ronald Sanjaya, how the legal protection for Dirk Tatipata as the party who was harmed by the decision of the Surabaya District Court, This is normative legal research, Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that legally, it is clear that Dirk Tatipata does not have high bargaining power and is a seller of land and buildings on Jl. Sleep No. 103 that has been done in front and signed by Notary Anita Lucia Kendarto, S.H., M.Kn. with several letters/deeds. Thus, legal resistance is still being carried out by carrying out a lawsuit in the land and building dispute case at the Surabaya District Court, and ending his defeat coupled with a penalty of trial fees and payment for his unlawful actions harmed Ronald Sanjaya as the legal owner of the land and buildingsKeywords: Agreement, Sale, and Purchase of Land and Buildings, Against the Law

scholarly journals PENGGANTIAN BIAYA KEPADA SAKSI ATAU AHLI DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Studi Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Takengon)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Lisa Purba Hajini Purba ◽  
Sumiadi S ◽  
Yusrizal Y
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Compensation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Cost

Summons of witnesses at each level of criminal case examination has consequences for the cost of attending the summons. So far, the provisions regarding the cost of summoning witnaesses and experts have been regulated in Article 229 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims and Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning Procedures for Protection of Witnesses and Victims in Human rights violations, however, in reality the fees that have been regulated in the law are not fully provided to all witnesses and even if there are costs they are not up to standard and not optimal. These costs include accommodation costs, consumption costs, transportation costs and costs of reimbursing lost income due to having to attend calls. The purpose of this research is to find out and explain the compensation mechanism to witnesses or experts in order to differentiate information in the criminal justice system in the jurisdiction of the Takengon District Court and what are the obstacles in reimbursing costs to witnesses or experts in order to provide information in the criminal justice system in the region. the law of the Takengon District Court. This type of research is juridical empirical, that is, approaching the problem through legal research by looking at the prevailing legal norms and relating them to the facts that exist in society in connection with the problems encountered in the research.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PASAL 7 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 56 PRP TAHUN 1960 DALAM PELAKSANAAN GADAI TANAH PERTANIAN DI KECAMATAN TANAH JAMBO AYE KABUPATEN ACEH UTARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusra Y ◽  
Yulia Y ◽  
Herinawati H
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Made In

This study aims to identify and analyze and explain the application of Article 7 of Law No. 56 Prp of 1960 in the implementation of agricultural land mortgages, analyze the obstacles to the application of Article 7 of Law No. 56 Prp of 1960, and analyze the efforts made in overcoming obstacles to the application of Article 7 Law 56 Prp of 1960. The implementation of pawning agricultural land is not in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of Law Number 56 Prp of 1960, the community keeps pawning by not returning agricultural land to its owner even though it has passed the limit on the use of agricultural land. The method used in this study is an empirical juridical approach, with a qualitative legal research type, the legal source used is through field research. The results of this study indicate that the application of Article 7 of Law Number 56 Prp of 1960 in the implementation of land pawning is not appropriate. Barriers to the implementation of Article 7 of Law No. 56 Prp of 1960 are the public's ignorance of Article 7 of Law No. 56 Prp of 1960, the factor that there is no special implementing qanun that regulates the pawning of agricultural land in Aceh and the factor of low public awareness of the law. Efforts that can be made to overcome these obstacles are adding new regulations regarding the application of Article 7 of Law Number 56 Prp of 1960 in each region the existing implementing qanun, conducting negotiations and mediation. Keywords: Implemention of Pawn, Land.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Fahmi ◽  
Rai Iqsandri ◽  
Rizana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

The problems examined in this study are how to apply the sanctions against the perpetrators of hate speech in the Pekanbaru District Court and what are the obstacles faced in applying the sanctions against the perpetrators of hate speech in the Pekanbaru District Court. This research method is carried out directly in the field according to the type of sociological legal research. The results of the study show that the application of sanctions against hate speech offenders in the Pekanbaru District Court is not optimal. Factors that hinder the application of sanctions against hate speech offenders do not realize that what they are doing is a criminal act that has a fairly severe sanction in accordance with the law.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM SAKSI DAN KORBAN SEBAGAI WHISTLEBLOWER DAN JUSTICE COLLABORATORS PADA PENGUNGKAPAN KASUS KORUPSI BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Suratno Suratno
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Interesting Issue ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Force

The question of Whistle blower or Justice Collaborator is a complex and interesting issue tobe discussed in a conception or legislation. The role of Whistle Blower and Justice Collaboratorin exposing such extraordinary crimes as corruption is a dilemma, because there is no adequatelegal tool to facilitate the legal guarantee to be obtained. The research approach used in thisresearch is sociological or socio-jurisdiction approach method -legal research. The results of theresearch indicate that: 1. The protection of the witness and victim’s witness law as Whistleblowerand Justice Collaborators on the disclosure of corruption has not been based on the valueof justice, it can be seen that the legal status of a whistle blower does not stop only whistleblowers, Be someone to be held accountable. 2. Legal protection barriers to the existence ofWhistleblower and Justice Collaborators on the disclosure of corruption based on the value ofjustice, known from the side of the substance of the law is the weakness of the arrangement ofJustice collaborator explicitly regulated only in Supreme Court Circular Number 4 of 2011 onthe treatment of rapporteur of acts A Whistleblower and a Justice Collaborator in a particularcriminal case, so that the SEMA does not have a binding legal force as does the Law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document