scholarly journals The Reconstruction of Public Information Dispute Resolution as the Effort in Realizing Substantive Justice in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-116
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sense Of Justice

The right to information is a human right as derogable right. Fulfilment of the right to information often leads to information disputes with Information and Documentation Management Officer (IDMO) as administrative officials who are given the task of managing information and documentation. Information dispute resolution becomes important to be resolved immediately because it is related to fulfilling a sense of justice and fulfilling the right to information for the community. The Establishment of the Government Administration Act (GA Act) causes the dualism of information dispute resolution. Article 53 of the GA Act will be the basis for resolving information disputes in the administrative court domain, while the Public Information Officer/PIO Act is the basis for resolving information disputes within the Information Commission domain. This dualism needs to be resolved to ensure legal certainty for the government and society as Justicia Belen. The development of dispute resolution reconstruction of information is conducted by strengthening information dispute resolution in non-litigation. Ideal information dispute resolution should be resolved first through administrative remedies (objections and administrative appeals) and through the Information Commission. The court becomes the ultimum remedium in resolving a dispute. Therefore, strengthening the Information Commission in terms of development, finance and authority is one way to strengthen the resolution of information disputes outside the court.

scholarly journals Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Data Pertanahan

Widya Bhumi ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Nur Rahmanto
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Right To Know ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Right To Know ◽  
The Right

In essence, every citizen has the right to know about all activities or policies carried out by public officials, this is in addition to the right to obtain information, it is a human right as well as a means of public control over government administration, but the right to obtain this information is often There are obstacles both in terms of regulations and unsupportive behavior of public officials. Law Number 14 of 2008 (UU KIP) which regulates the issue of public information disclosure in its implementation conflicts with Permenagraria / Ka BPN Number 3 of 1997, in which the regulation of the Minister of State for Agrarian Affairs regulates restrictions on restrictions in providing information on land data which are often inconsistent with with the regulation of public information disclosure regulated in the KIP Law, so that the public does not immediately get information on land data which in turn will lead to a lawsuit from the public to the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / BPN at the Information Commission and State Administrative Court. By using the desk study method, this paper will examine the information disclosure arrangements stipulated in the two regulations referred to as well as the conflicts that occur both in the articles of the contents of the regulations and in their implementation practices so that solutions or recommendations will be obtained so that public information disclosure can run properly in Indonesia country.Keywords: public information disclosure, data sharing, land data . Intisari: Setiap warga masyarakat pada hahekatnya adalah berhak untuk tahu mengenai semua kegiatan atau kebijakan yang dilakukan oleh pejabat publik, hal ini selain hak untuk memperoleh informasi itu adalah hak asasi setiap manusia juga sebagai sarana kontrol publik terhadap penyelenggaraan pemerintahan, akan tetapi hak untuk memperoleh informasi ini sering ada kendala baik dari sisi regulasi maupun perilaku petugas publik yang tidak mendukung. Undang Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 (UU KIP) yang mengatur masalah keterbukaan informasi publik dalam pelaksanannya berbenturan dengan Permenagraria/Ka BPN Nomor 3 Tahun 1997, dimana di dalam peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria dimaksud diatur mengenai pembatasan pembatasan dalam memberikan informasi data pertanahan yang seringkali tidak sejalan dengan pengaturan keterbukaan informasi publik yang diatur di dalam UU KIP, sehingga masyarakat tidak serta merta bisa mendapatkan informasi data pertanahan yang pada akhirnya akan memunculkan gugatan dari masyarakat kepada Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/BPN di Komisi Informasi  dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Dengan menggunakan methode desk study tulisan ini akan mengkaji pengaturan keterbukaan informasi yang diatur di dalam kedua peraturan dimaksud serta pertentangan yang terjadi baik di dalam pasal pasal isi peraturan maupun di dalam praktek pelaksanaannya untuk selanjutnya akan diperoleh solusi atau rekomendasi sehingga keterbukaan informasi publik dapat berjalan dengan baik di Negara Indonesia.Kata Kunci: keterbukaan informasi publik, berbagi data, data pertanahan.

scholarly journals Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik (Urgency of Disclosure of Informationin The Implementation of Public Service)

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Eko Noer Kristiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Public Agency ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Democratic Country

Since 2008, Indonesia has started a new momentum in the era of openness, related to the passing of Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information (KIP). Disclosure of public information is very important because people can control every step and measures taken by the government, especially the Public Agency. Operation of power in a democratic country should at all times be accountable back to the community. Accountability brings to the good governance that leads to the guarantee of human rights (HAM). Public disclosure is an important part of public service is also a right that is very important and strategic for citizens to get access to other rights, because of how it might be to get the rights and other services properly obtained information regarding such rights it is not obtained appropriately and correctly. The poor performance of public services for, among others, have not been implemented because of transparency and participation in public service delivery. This paper attempts to explain the correlation and importance of the right to information of the public service.Keywords: Public Service, Transparency, Participation, Accountabilitys ABSTRAKSejak Tahun 2008, Indonesia telah memulai sebuah momentum baru dalam era keterbukaan, terkait dengan disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik (KIP). Keterbukaan informasi publik sangat penting oleh karena masyarakat dapat mengontrol setiap langkah dan kebijakan yang diambil oleh Badan Publik terutama pemerintah. Penyelenggaraan kekuasaan dalam negara demokrasi harus setiap saat dapat dipertanggungjawabkan kembali kepada masyarakat. Akuntabilitas membawa ke tata pemerintahan yang baik yang bermuara pada jaminan hak asasi manusia (HAM). Keterbukaan informasi publik merupakan bagian penting dari penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik juga merupakan hak yang sangat penting dan strategis bagi warga negara untuk menuju akses terhadap hak-hak lainnya, karena bagaimana mungkin akan mendapatkan hak dan pelayanan lainnya dengan baik jika informasi yang diperoleh mengenai hak-hak tersebut tidaklah didapatkan secara tepat dan benar.Buruknya kinerja pelayanan publik selama ini antara lain dikarenakan belum dilaksanakannya transparansi dan partisipasi dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik. Tulisan ini mencoba menjelaskan korelasi dan pentingnya hak atas informasi terhadap penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik.Kata Kunci: Pelayanan Publik, Transparansi, Partisipasi, Akuntabilitas

The Right to Information in India Implementation and Impact

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
_______ Naveen ◽  
_____ Priti
Keyword(s):  
Public Life ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Public ◽  
Know How ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

The Right to Information Act 2005 was passed by the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) Government with a sense of pride. It flaunted the Act as a milestone in India’s democratic journey. It is five years since the RTI was passed; the performance on the implementation frontis far from perfect. Consequently, the impact on the attitude, mindset and behaviour patterns of the public authorities and the people is not as it was expected to be. Most of the people are still not aware of their newly acquired power. Among those who are aware, a major chunk either does not know how to wield it or lacks the guts and gumption to invoke the RTI. A little more stimulation by the Government, NGOs and other enlightened and empowered citizens can augment the benefits of this Act manifold. RTI will help not only in mitigating corruption in public life but also in alleviating poverty- the two monstrous maladies of India.

Right to Service Acts in India— Fundamental Governance Reforms or an Exercise in Political Rhetoric?: A Case Study of Delhi Administration

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish Garg
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Indian States ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Veil ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Right ◽  
Governance Reforms

Right-based approach to governance became popular in India in the first decade of present century with the passage of legislations conferring Right to Information, Right to Work in rural areas, and Right to Primary Education upon its citizens. This article examines the next step in that direction—passage of Right to Service (RTS) Acts by a number of Indian States thereby providing its citizens the right to time-bound delivery of notified public services. These Acts not only empower citizens to make claims against the government if the rights are violated but also serve as a tool for the politicians and the senior bureaucrats to control lower bureaucracy. This article traces the genealogy of RTS Acts in Citizen’s Charter movement of the1990s in the UK and evaluates their progress and results with the help of various theories and concepts used for improving the public service delivery. How inept implementation has thwarted the promise of accountability inherent in these Acts will be seen in detail while piercing the veil of statistical data.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusrizal
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Land procurement is the act of the government to realize the availability of land to be used in various interests for development as the public interest. Limitations of land owned by the government takes the land derived from the community to facilitate the course of development for the public interest. The existence of the land needs to be used by the government in carrying out development activities, but in its implementation should not be detrimental to the rights of the landowners. Therefore, for the government which needs the land can not arbitrarily to take the land belonging to the community/the holder of the right to the land which area is affected by development for the public interest. Therefore, the state should provide guarantee and legal protection to the holder of the land in land procurement activity for public interest. So that the implementation of land procurement will be able to provide a sense of justice for the community affected by the development and provide security to the life of the community.

EXPLORING RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND GOOD GOVERNANCE IN PAKISTAN: A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (04) ◽  
pp. 469-484
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kamran ◽  
Irfan Ullah ◽  
Muhammad Kaleem
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Main Theme ◽  
Public Information Officers ◽  
Information Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right

The study attempted to analyze the role of right to information in ensuring good governance in Pakistan. The study objectives were to investigate the experiences of public information officers and civil society actors regarding the right to information contribution to good governance and to analyze the challenges in the implementation of right to information law. For the selection of sampling size, purposive sampling was used and data were collected from 11 ministries public information officers and 3 civil society actors through in depth interviews in Islamabad, Pakistan. Being qualitative study, data were analyzed by using thematic analyses. Jurgen Habermas theory of ‘Public Sphere” was used to throw light on main theme of the study. The findings indicated that right to information is an effective tool in promoting good governance along with all its features like, accountability, transparency, mutual trust between the government and general public, common man facilitation, rule of law and corruption elimination. Study concluded that right to information would be an effective tool in promoting the good governance only when hurdles that prevent it from its true implementation were removed.

scholarly journals SOCIALIZATION AND TRAINING ACCESS INFORMATION ASEAN COMMUNITY THROUGH NEW MEDIA (INTERNET) BY THE STUDENTS AT SKH. BHAKTI LUHUR CIPUTAT

ICCD ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55
Author(s):  
Denada Faraswacyen L. Gaol ◽  
Samsinar Samsinar
Keyword(s):  
New Media ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Information Dissemination ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Online Media ◽  
The Public ◽  
Asean Member ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
And Training

Indonesia as the largest country in ASEAN with more than 240 million population in 500 cities and 17 thousand islands, needs various efforts in conducting the 2015 ASEAN Community socialization. Effective socialization cannot only rely on conventional methods as previously carried out by agencies related to socialization through seminars to local governments, universities, schools, and other public organizations, as well as the installation of banners and billboards in public places. To support socialization to be more effective and efficient, it can be helped by using mass media, especially online media. Online media is chosen related to the development of ICT and public connectivity, which generally can access news via the internet or gadgets that are owned. The lag behind the public information about the implementation of the 2015 ASEAN Community in December 2015 cannot be separated from geographical, demographic, and information dissemination that is less equitable from the relevant agencies. This phenomenon is an obstacle in the readiness to implement the ASEAN Community. While the readiness of the government and the public is expected to be able to compete with other ASEAN member countries regarding the era of competition that will be implemented. PKM activities with the theme "Socialization and Training of Access to Information on ASEAN Community through New Media by New Students in Bhakti Luhur Ciputat Special School" in June 2016 were intended to increase their knowledge and insight. This is because many of them do not know the information related to the ASEAN program or agenda, especially those related to free competition by ASEAN Community which has begun this year. Students who have limitations (physical or mental) also have the right to get information related to ASEAN Community so that they are more motivated to equip themselves with knowledge and skills to be independent and compete in the upcoming ASEAN Community era.

scholarly journals Strategi Komunikasi Politik dan Budaya Transparansi Partai Politik

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Atie Rachmiatie ◽  
O Hasbiansyah ◽  
Ema Khotimah ◽  
Dadi Ahmadi
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
The Political ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right

Freedom of information has become a momentum for the effort to realize good governance and promote democratic governance system in Indonesia. With the enactment of Freedom of Information Law No. 14 of 2008, the public was given access to the right of public information as human right such as  guaranteed by law. Public freedom of  information should encourage public participation. Political parties as public institutions also have to give  information  in the service of the public who wish to access any kind of information which is regulated by law. However, based on reports ICW, how difficult political parties provide the information requested by the ICW. This Article examines the political culture, political communication strategies and public freedom of information within the political parties.

The Information Commissions in India: A Jurisprudential Explication of Their Powers and Functions

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-716
Author(s):  
Rajvir S. Dhaka
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Disciplinary Action ◽  
The Public ◽  
High Courts ◽  
Public Information Officers ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right

The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, provides for the Constitution of the State Information Commissions (SICs) and the Central Information Commission (CICs) for acting as the final appellate authorities. These Information Commissions have been entrusted with statutory powers while hearing complaints and appeals. These Commissions also enjoy the power to impose penalty and to recommend disciplinary action against the public information officers. Besides, there prevails large-scale confusion in them regarding the contents of Sections 18–20. This has culminated in adverse comments on their decisions by the Supreme Court (SC) and the High Courts (HC). An attempt is being made in this article to evaluate the functioning of these commissions and also about the interpretations given by various High Courts (HCs) and the Supreme Court (SC) about the Constitution, transaction of business and powers of the Information Commissions.

COMMENTARY ON THE JUDGEMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURTOF 28 SEPT. 2018, REF. NO. I OSK2016/16 (PARTLY APPROVING)

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-344
Author(s):  
KRZYSZTOF NOWAK
Keyword(s):  
Justice System ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Infor Mation

The subject matter of the commentary focuses on the issue of the functional and grammatical interpretation of the notion of ‘a person perform-ing a public function’, which, in the author’s opinion, does not directly refer to the public offi cer referred to in Article 115(13) of the Act of 6 June 1997 Penal Code. The author highlights the unjustifi ed perception of a person performing a public function by the Polish justice system as being viewed as a public offi cer as defi ned in Article 115(13) of the Penal Code. The main arguments focus on the risks arising from an overly broad in-terpretation of the concept of a person performing a public function. In fact, the lack of a defi ned set of persons performing public functions may give rise to a malfunction on the part of the entity obliged to make public informa-tion available, and thus to the constitutional principle of limiting the right to public information on the grounds of privacy.The fi nal part of the commentary is a refl ection on making public infor-mation available under the provisions of the Act of 15 July 2011 on Control in Government Administration, and a starting point for a broader discussion on the need to amend the current legal system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document