scholarly journals Strategi Komunikasi Politik dan Budaya Transparansi Partai Politik

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Atie Rachmiatie ◽  
O Hasbiansyah ◽  
Ema Khotimah ◽  
Dadi Ahmadi
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
The Political ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right

Freedom of information has become a momentum for the effort to realize good governance and promote democratic governance system in Indonesia. With the enactment of Freedom of Information Law No. 14 of 2008, the public was given access to the right of public information as human right such as  guaranteed by law. Public freedom of  information should encourage public participation. Political parties as public institutions also have to give  information  in the service of the public who wish to access any kind of information which is regulated by law. However, based on reports ICW, how difficult political parties provide the information requested by the ICW. This Article examines the political culture, political communication strategies and public freedom of information within the political parties.

scholarly journals The Reconstruction of Public Information Dispute Resolution as the Effort in Realizing Substantive Justice in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-116
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Substantive Justice ◽  
The Government ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sense Of Justice

The right to information is a human right as derogable right. Fulfilment of the right to information often leads to information disputes with Information and Documentation Management Officer (IDMO) as administrative officials who are given the task of managing information and documentation. Information dispute resolution becomes important to be resolved immediately because it is related to fulfilling a sense of justice and fulfilling the right to information for the community. The Establishment of the Government Administration Act (GA Act) causes the dualism of information dispute resolution. Article 53 of the GA Act will be the basis for resolving information disputes in the administrative court domain, while the Public Information Officer/PIO Act is the basis for resolving information disputes within the Information Commission domain. This dualism needs to be resolved to ensure legal certainty for the government and society as Justicia Belen. The development of dispute resolution reconstruction of information is conducted by strengthening information dispute resolution in non-litigation. Ideal information dispute resolution should be resolved first through administrative remedies (objections and administrative appeals) and through the Information Commission. The court becomes the ultimum remedium in resolving a dispute. Therefore, strengthening the Information Commission in terms of development, finance and authority is one way to strengthen the resolution of information disputes outside the court.

scholarly journals Politics and Political Participation of “Grass-Roots” in General Election 2019, Bandar Selamat Regency, Medan, Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehia K. Isabella Barus ◽  
Armansyah Matondang ◽  
Nina Angelia ◽  
Beby Masitho Batubara
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Participation ◽  
General Election ◽  
The Political ◽  
The Public ◽  
Grass Roots ◽  
The People ◽  
The Right ◽  
Two Stages

Ahead of the 2019 general election which is divided into two stages, namely the Legislative election and the Presidential election. This event is the right moment to find out the political participation of the people at the grass-roots level while at the same time seeing the interaction between the people in the grass-roots and political parties. The interaction that wants to be seen is what forms of political behavior and community participation at the grassroots, as well as how political parties behave in interacting with this community. Then the important point that is also seen is how political parties behave in involving and seeking to raise support from the community. In the end, through this research, it will be known the quality of political participation from the public and electoral political parties in 2019.

scholarly journals Fenomena Politik ‘Pamer-Ganti Bojo’ Konstelasi Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati 2020 di Rembang

POLITEA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Moh Sugihariyadi
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Phenomenological Approach ◽  
The Political ◽  
Leadership Succession ◽  
Electoral Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right ◽  
Electoral Law

<p class="06IsiAbstrak"><span lang="EN-GB">'Show-Changing Bojo' Politics in the Constellation of Election of Regent and Deputy Regent of Rembang. The election of the Regent and Deputy Regent of Rembang is based on the electeroral law. Electoral law is followed by an electoral process, one of which is by receiving input from the public. Because people have the right, opportunity and receive equal services based on statutory regulations. Submission of candidate pairs for Regent and Deputy Regent candidates by the DPC Political Party needs to consider the electoral law and electoral process, including ethical issues in politics. This study aims to analyze the political style of the candidates for regent and deputy regent of Rembang in leadership succession through the 'bojo showing off' model. The method used is qualitative with a phenomenological approach, which proves that community participation in the selection process of prospective regents and deputy regents at the level of political parties is never a concern. Therefore, 'showing off' bojo is one way to attract the attention of the public to pay attention to the succession of the leadership.</span></p>

scholarly journals KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK DALAM PEMERINTAHAN TERBUKA MENUJU TATA PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Nunuk Febriananingsih
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
Governmental Agencies ◽  
Access Information ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

<p>Kebebasan informasi merupakan hak asasi yang fundamental. Pengalaman selama ini menunjukkan bahwa informasi lembaga pemerintah dan non pemerintah dianggap sulit dijangkau masyarakat. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana kesiapan lembaga-lembaga pemerintah dalam mengimplementasikan UU KIP dalam upaya mewujudkan tata pemerintahan yang baik. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif diketahui bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik memberi jaminan kepada masyarakat untuk mengakses informasi dari badan publik, meskipun lembaga pemerintah belum siap mengimplementasikan UU KIP. Hal ini terlihat dari belum tersedianya informasi terkait dengan urusan tata kepemerintahan seperti kebijakan publik dan pelayanan publik. Untuk itu Pemerintah perlu segera mengimplementasikan UU KIP sesuai dengan yang diamanatkan oleh PP Nomor 61 Tahun 2010 tentang pelaksanaan UU KIP.</p><p>Freedom of information is a fundamental human right. Past experience shows that information and non-governmental agencies are considered hard to reach communities. Issues raised in this paper is how the readiness of government agencies in implementing the law is in an effort to realize good governance. By using the method of normative legal research note that the Act No. 14 of 2008 concerning Freedom of Information gives assurance to the public to access information from public bodies, although the government agency implementing the law is not yet ready. This is evident from the unavailability of information relating to the affairs of governance such as public policy and public service. For the Government should immediately implement in accordance with the law is mandated by the Government Regulation Number 61 Year 2010 concerning the implementation of the law is.</p>

scholarly journals Una visión de la libertad de comunicación desde la perspectiva de las diferencias entre la libertad de expresión, en sentido estricto, y la libertad de información

2007 ◽  
pp. 359
Author(s):  
José Luis García Guerrero
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
The Political ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
Commercial Speech ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right ◽  
Constitutional Jurisprudence

The present Project contains a complete synthesis of the constitutional Spanish jurisprudence. The author considers that the right to freedom and the political rights are grouped around three or four genres. It identifies, between those, the freedom of communication that the constitutional assembly and the constitutional jurisprudence have extended to all sorts of activities. After this assumption, the project is focused on giving a view of the freedom of communication from the point of view of the differences between the freedom of information and the freedom of speech in a strict way. After defending a legal nature which protects all kinds of communications and which can be exercised by all sorts of chaps; it is rejected that the institutional offshoot explains the really different limitations that several messages introduce, wide restrictions regarding commercial speech or pornography and dropped ones regarding politics. The argument which is proposed for its justification is based on the different systematic connections that are originated between the constitutional rules by the different matter and the purpose pursued by the messages, and, when this yardstick is insufficient, it is complemented with the concept of relevance or public interest, the one which is pretended to be refined. The exercise of that freedom by journalists and maximizing the professional diligence reinforce the freedom of communication when it has to be pondered with other rights or constitutional goods. In Spain, the affair Terminello versus Chicago is considered as a worth yardstick to solve conflicts with the public order.

scholarly journals The Interplay of Rhetoric and Voting Behavior in Pakistan: The Perspective of Youth

2020 ◽  
Vol V (II) ◽  
pp. 215-227
Author(s):  
Shabnam Gul ◽  
Zainab Asif Dar ◽  
Kishwar Munir
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Voting Behavior ◽  
Political System ◽  
Political Rhetoric ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Awareness ◽  
Party Leaders ◽  
The Public ◽  
Electoral Campaigns

Political communication is one of the major aspects of any political system. The speeches of politicians, especially the political party leaders, are an important source of political awareness regarding pertinent issues facing any country. However, politicians often rely on political rhetoric to appeal to the emotions of prospective voters. This paper explored the use of political rhetoric in political discourse in Pakistan. Political rhetoric pertains to exaggeration of reality and distortion of facts to change the views and perception of the public. Politicians actively use this as a tool to gain the support of their potential voters in their electoral campaigns. The researchers analyzed the statements of leaders of three major political parties in Pakistan. It has been concluded from this research that politicians focus on populist political rhetoric when they address their voters to garner support rather than educating them about real political, social, and economic challenges. Thus political rhetoric is a significant factor in voting behavior.

scholarly journals UU KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK ANTARA HARAPAN DAN KENYATAAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Suko Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Property ◽  
Information Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Disclosure of public information is one manifestation of the implementation of good governance where the public information disclosure is the duty of government and public institutions. It refers to the fact that the public information is public property and is not owned by the government and public institutions. Therefore, to be able to meet these conditions, the Freedom of Information Law was established, despite the fact that the law is not so popular in the community, so it is still necessary

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI INFORMASI POLITIK (STUDI KASUS PADA MASYARAKAT KOTA CIMAHI PASCA PENETAPAN CALON WALIKOTA DAN WAKIL WALIKOTA DALAM PILKADA SERENTAK )

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Political Information ◽  
Policy Choice ◽  
The Political ◽  
Local Democracy ◽  
Electoral Institutions ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
The Common

The consolidation of local democracy will be realized well if the political information provided by the electoral institutions and political institution through political communication can encourage people to get a 'nutrition' receive political information, so they can learn about politics. Political information in simultaneosly election is part of candidate “candidates pair” a Mayor Cimahi City can do political communication for competing to provide on political information about prospective policy choice that will be submitter later. When the political information of the citizen is fulfilled, the citizen can choose with a large responsibility and rationally to choose leader in their area, based on considerations that the common benefit of the people themselves. In 2017 is a political year for 101 regions that held the head simultaneous elections (Pilkada) throughout in Indonesia. There are 7 Provinces, 76 District and 18 Cities that participate in the simultaneous elections. One of the 18 cities that held the elections was Cimahi City. Cimahi City has a permanent voter list of 375,722 people who use its sovereignty to elect a Mayor candidate who will lead the region for the next 5 years. In the party of democracy, it is fundamental that political information becomes a reinforcement in political cognition that will be implemented in the space of political participation itself. Political education is an obligation for political organizers, especially for the General Election Commision (KPU) Cimahi City and Political Parties to provide political information to the public.

scholarly journals Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Data Pertanahan

Widya Bhumi ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Nur Rahmanto
Keyword(s):  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Right To Know ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Right To Know ◽  
The Right

In essence, every citizen has the right to know about all activities or policies carried out by public officials, this is in addition to the right to obtain information, it is a human right as well as a means of public control over government administration, but the right to obtain this information is often There are obstacles both in terms of regulations and unsupportive behavior of public officials. Law Number 14 of 2008 (UU KIP) which regulates the issue of public information disclosure in its implementation conflicts with Permenagraria / Ka BPN Number 3 of 1997, in which the regulation of the Minister of State for Agrarian Affairs regulates restrictions on restrictions in providing information on land data which are often inconsistent with with the regulation of public information disclosure regulated in the KIP Law, so that the public does not immediately get information on land data which in turn will lead to a lawsuit from the public to the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / BPN at the Information Commission and State Administrative Court. By using the desk study method, this paper will examine the information disclosure arrangements stipulated in the two regulations referred to as well as the conflicts that occur both in the articles of the contents of the regulations and in their implementation practices so that solutions or recommendations will be obtained so that public information disclosure can run properly in Indonesia country.Keywords: public information disclosure, data sharing, land data . Intisari: Setiap warga masyarakat pada hahekatnya adalah berhak untuk tahu mengenai semua kegiatan atau kebijakan yang dilakukan oleh pejabat publik, hal ini selain hak untuk memperoleh informasi itu adalah hak asasi setiap manusia juga sebagai sarana kontrol publik terhadap penyelenggaraan pemerintahan, akan tetapi hak untuk memperoleh informasi ini sering ada kendala baik dari sisi regulasi maupun perilaku petugas publik yang tidak mendukung. Undang Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 (UU KIP) yang mengatur masalah keterbukaan informasi publik dalam pelaksanannya berbenturan dengan Permenagraria/Ka BPN Nomor 3 Tahun 1997, dimana di dalam peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria dimaksud diatur mengenai pembatasan pembatasan dalam memberikan informasi data pertanahan yang seringkali tidak sejalan dengan pengaturan keterbukaan informasi publik yang diatur di dalam UU KIP, sehingga masyarakat tidak serta merta bisa mendapatkan informasi data pertanahan yang pada akhirnya akan memunculkan gugatan dari masyarakat kepada Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/BPN di Komisi Informasi  dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Dengan menggunakan methode desk study tulisan ini akan mengkaji pengaturan keterbukaan informasi yang diatur di dalam kedua peraturan dimaksud serta pertentangan yang terjadi baik di dalam pasal pasal isi peraturan maupun di dalam praktek pelaksanaannya untuk selanjutnya akan diperoleh solusi atau rekomendasi sehingga keterbukaan informasi publik dapat berjalan dengan baik di Negara Indonesia.Kata Kunci: keterbukaan informasi publik, berbagi data, data pertanahan.

scholarly journals Freedom of Information and Citizens’ Perception in Albania

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-219
Author(s):  
Ardita Shehaj
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Citizen Education ◽  
Information Law ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
The Right

Abstract Transparency and the right to information are among the most important components of good governance, strong and stable democracy, citizen’s participation and the fight against corruption. The right to information is a constitutional right that is guaranteed not only by freedom of information law but also from the Albanian constitution. This legal framework is ranked 6th in the world and guarantees not only citizens right to access public information but also obliges institutions to proactively disclose information. Beside the fact that the Albanian legal framework is a very good one, it is very important to know citizens perception regarding the necessity of this right. For this reason, a survey was conducted and the data show that citizen education and their contact with the law are not enough for the proper implementation of this law. Public awareness is needed not only to explain how to exercise the right to access information but especially to explain the importance of this law in the fight against corruption.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document