scholarly journals Incorporation of Evidence Based Guidelines on Bleeding Risk Assessment Prior to Surgery into Practice: Real Time Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Al-Marhoobi ◽  
Manar Maktoom ◽  
Mohamed Elshinawy ◽  
Hanan Nazir ◽  
Khalid Al Hashmi ◽  
...  

Background: Despite guidelines recommending no-need for coagulation testing prior to surgeries when challenging history of bleeding is negative, yet surgeons still overuse it in this part of the world. We aim to measure unbiased estimate of hemostatic outcomes in ENT surgeries and assess the surgeons’ behavior of pre-operative coagulation testing. Methods: All patients who underwent ENT surgeries during the period from July 2017 to January 2018 were enrolled. The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding. Surgeons were asked about their decision on history alone or doing coagulation testing and their reason. 2 Results: 730 patients were recruited; 372 were interviewed for a challenging bleeding history alone; group1 and 358 had pre-operative coagulation testing; group2. Coagulation testing was repeated twice or more in 55% of patients and more than half of them had coagulation factor and VWF assays. Most surgeons were doing the coagulation testing because of habitual practice. Conclusion: Almost half of local surgeons consider coagulation testing as standard practice to evaluate bleeding risk prior to surgical procedures. This has resulted in unnecessary delays in surgeries, parents/patients anxiety and additional total cost. We recommend awareness campaigns for surgeons and involvement of surgical societies to adhere to guidelines of detailed hemostatic history.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4714-4714
Author(s):  
Nada Al-Marhoobi ◽  
Manar Maktoom ◽  
Fatma Bulushi ◽  
Mohamed Ebrahim Mohamed Ebrahim Elshinawy ◽  
Hanan Nazir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In spite of guidelines recommending the no need for coagulation profile prior to ENT surgeries when challenging history of bleeding is negative, yet surgeons still practice it. Cost and delaying surgeries are major issues faced when insignificant abnormalities are found in the coagulation profile results. In 2008, British Committee for Standards of Hematology has published guidelines (1) on assessing the bleeding risk prior to surgeries or invasive procedures, which stated that the indication for sending a coagulation profile is best based on the bleeding history of the patient. Aim: This study aimed to measure unbiased estimate of hemostatic outcomes in ENT surgeries in relation to coagulation testing. Methods: All patients who underwent ENT surgeries from three tertiary hospitals during the period from 1st July 2016 to 1st January 2017 were enrolled in the study. The retrieved data included gender, age, type of surgery, results of coagulation blood test (if done), other laboratory test results (complete blood count, biochemical profile, etc.), postoperative bleeds, how it was managed, need for blood transfusion and whether the patient required another surgery to stop the bleeding or not. Patients with known bleeding history or previous coagulation derangement were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding. Results: The study included data from 730 patients who underwent ENT surgical procedures. They were 432 males and 298 females. Their mean age was 19.6 + 16.92 year. Out the 730 patients, 372 patients were interviewed for a challenging bleeding history alone (group 1) and 358 were interviewed plus a pre-operative coagulation profile check (Group 2). Total of fourteen patients (1.9 %) developed postoperative bleeding. None of them was due to abnormal bleeding tendency and they didn't require any hemostatic support. Six of them bled early (primary hemorrhage) while at the hospital due to surgical reasons (surgical site bleed that required suturing). Eight patients had delayed postoperative bleeds, after being discharged (due to eating hard food/Trauma). Only total of four patients had major bleeds, requiring surgical intervention. Conclusion: Despite guidelines recommending not doing coagulation testing prior to surgeries, many local surgeons still consider preoperative coagulation testing as a standard practice to evaluate the patients bleeding risk prior to any surgical procedure. This has resulted in unnecessary delays in surgeries (reaching up to a year in many patients) besides the parents/patients anxiety and additional total cost. We recommend awareness campaigns for surgeons and adhering to guidelines of taking detailed hemostatic history. Reference: Chee YL1, Crawford JC, Watson HG, Greaves M. Guidelines on the assessment of bleeding risk prior to surgery or invasive procedures. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol. 2008 Mar;140(5):496-504. Keywords: Coagulation testing, Bleeding History, Surgery Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Abdullah Jibawi ◽  
Mohamed Baguneid ◽  
Arnab Bhowmick

Unselected coagulation testing is less evidenced based in assessing bleeding risk, prior to surgery. This not only delays surgery inappropriately but also causes unnecessary concern in patients who are found to have ‘abnormal’ tests. In addition, it is associated with a significant cost. Patients with a negative bleeding history do not require routine coagulation screening prior to surgery. Patients undergoing surgery should have a screening bleeding history taken. This should include structured detailed history, personal and family history, previous surgery and trauma, and detail of anti-thrombotic medication. Based on a detailed history, a few selected tests should be undertaken. In addition, liaise with the haematologist in the presence of positive bleeding history, significant comorbidities, and when high risk surgery is planned.


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin M. Gibson ◽  
Carmen B. Smith ◽  
Sondra Davis ◽  
Michael J. Scalese

Background: Apixaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Other DOACs require renal dose adjustments based solely on creatinine clearance. Apixaban differs in that its dose adjustments are more complex, potentially leading to prescribing errors. Objective: To determine if adherence to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dosing for apixaban is maintained in hospitalized patients with NVAF. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with NVAF who received apixaban during admission to 1 of 3 hospitals were evaluated. The primary outcome was to determine if providers order apixaban in accordance with FDA-approved dosages. Secondary outcomes included determining if pharmacist review increased the number of orders in accordance with FDA-approved dosing, which of the 3 criteria (age ≥80 years, body weight ≤60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL) were met in patients receiving off-label dosing, and the rationale for off-label prescribing. Results: A total of 556 patients met inclusion criteria. Apixaban was dosed according to FDA labeling by providers in 83.4% (n = 464) of orders. After pharmacist review, 87.0% (n = 484) of orders were at the approved dose, 12.2% (n = 68) were underdosed, and 0.7% (n = 4) were overdosed. Most patients who were underdosed met only 1 dose reduction criterion—most commonly age ≥80 years (56.0%). Reasons for off-label dosing included home dose continuation (39.0%), history of or perceived bleeding risk (30.5%), or unspecified/other (30.5%). Conclusions: The majority of apixaban orders for NVAF were based on FDA-approved dosages after provider entry and pharmacist review.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydiya Thomas ◽  
EeLaine Woon ◽  
Elizabeth Fong ◽  
Craig Parnaby ◽  
Henry G Watson

Background and aims Indiscriminate coagulation testing in emergency general surgical patients can lead to inappropriate delay in surgery, cause unnecessary concern and is associated with significant cost. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology recommends against coagulation testing to predict peri-operative bleeding risk in unselected patients. Our aim was to assess the appropriateness of coagulation tests performed in emergency general surgical patients and evaluate the effect of a series of educational interventions on clinical practice. Methods and results Appropriate indications for performing coagulation testing included a positive bleeding history, the presence of liver disease/cholestasis, sepsis or use of anticoagulants. Initial data on 142 patients were collected over 2 weeks of receiving. Following analysis, indications for appropriate coagulation testing were highlighted and data were collected on a further 190 patients. Comparing the audit cycles, we observed a decrease in the proportion of patients who underwent routine testing (49.3% vs 32.6%; p = 0.002) and inappropriate testing (67% of tests vs 34% of tests; p < 0.001). Despite being highlighted, there was no evidence of improved documentation of bleeding histories on admission. Conclusions This observational study suggests that simple educational messages can reduce the inappropriate use of coagulation screening tests in general surgical emergencies. This seems to result from clarification of the appropriate surgical indications for coagulation testing in this group.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 495-495
Author(s):  
Shivani Handa ◽  
Michelle Sterpi ◽  
David Frankel ◽  
Katherine A. Hawkins ◽  
Etta B. Frankel

Abstract Introduction Factor XI deficiency (FXI) is an autosomally inherited injury-related bleeding disorder. Although relatively rare worldwide, it is common amongst Ashkenazi and Iraqi Jewish ancestry with a heterozygosity rate as high as 8 to 9%. FXI deficiency does not provoke spontaneous bleeding; however, it predisposes to a potential risk of life-threatening bleeding at childbirth or surgery. Unfortunately, data regarding obstetrical and perioperative management of this condition is scarce, with less than 500 cases reviewed in the last 20 years. Therefore, this study aimed to expand this database and identify factors associated with increased bleeding risk. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients (pts) with FXI deficiency who underwent childbirth or other surgical procedures between August 2011 to April 2021 within the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City. Data on age, sex, ethnicity, genotype, family or personal history of bleeding, type of anesthesia, estimated blood loss, peri-procedural bleeding complication, and type and timing of blood product or hemostatic agent administered in the peri-operative period were collected. Prior history of bleeding was defined as 1 or more of the following: easy bruisability, epistaxis, heavy menstrual bleeding, bleeding related to dental, surgical or obstetrical procedure. The paired t-test was used to compare the initial and subsequent FXI levels measured during pregnancy. We performed logistic regression to test the association between historical, laboratory, and procedural variables with the bleeding endpoint (defined as acute postpartum or postoperative hemorrhage or any bleeding warranting non-prophylactic administration of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma [FFP], or tranexamic acid). Receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for FXI levels to identify the cutoff for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Analyses were performed using SPSS software. Results We identified 198 pts who underwent 252 procedures in total- including 143 vaginal deliveries, 64 C-sections and 45 other surgical procedures. Mean age was 36 years with 94% females, and ~70% were Ashkenazi Jews. c.403G&gt;T p.E135X (42%) and c.901T&gt;C p.F301L (44.8%) were the most common genotypes identified. 38 out of 252 procedures resulted in bleeding complications. In multivariable logistic regression, both prior history of bleeding (odds ratio (OR) 8.97, p=0.02) and lower FXI levels ( OR 1.03 per U/dL increase, p=0.05) were independently associated with the bleeding endpoint. Family history of bleeding, ethnicity, genotype, pre-procedural PTT and platelet levels were not associated with bleeding risk. There were no cases of epidural or spinal hematomas associated with neuraxial anesthesia in our cohort. Mean FXI level for pts receiving neuraxial anesthesia was 50 U/dl (3-118 U/dl). Five pts who had a negative bleeding history despite surgical challenges received neuraxial anesthesia at FXI level &lt;10 U/dl without any complications (only 1/5 received prophylactic FFP). Mean FXI level for pts receiving prophylactic FFP was 25.6 U/dl (range 1-71 U/dl). 8 out of 21 (38%) pts suffered a bleeding complication despite prophylactic FFP use. ROC analyzing FXI levels as a risk factor for the bleeding endpoint resulted in an AUC of 0.605 with specificity of 96%, 94%, 91%, 83%, 49% and sensitivity of 11%, 12%, 19%, 35%, 65% respectively for cut-off values of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 U/dl. Of note, there was no significant variation in FXI levels during pregnancy [mean first measurement was 49.7 U/dl vs final measurement of 48.3 U/dl, p=0.3]. Conclusions Personal history of bleeding is the strongest predictor of perioperative or obstetrical bleeding in pts with FXI deficiency. Higher FXI levels correlate with a slightly lower but statistically significant odds of surgical bleeding. Although a FXI level cut-off of 40 U/dl may predict bleeding risk with reasonable specificity (83%), it lacks sensitivity and must be interpreted in the context of personal bleeding history. FXI levels remain stable during pregnancy and repeat measurements may not be necessary. Neuraxial anesthesia appears to be safe to use in this cohort. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e001664
Author(s):  
Maria Gonzalez-Cao ◽  
Teresa Puertolas ◽  
Mar Riveiro ◽  
Eva Muñoz-Couselo ◽  
Carolina Ortiz ◽  
...  

Cancer immunotherapy based on the use of antibodies targeting the so-called checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death-1 receptor, its ligand, or CTLA-4, has shown durable clinical benefit and survival improvement in melanoma and other tumors. However, there are some special situations that could be a challenge for clinical management. Persons with chronic infections, such as HIV-1 or viral hepatitis, latent tuberculosis, or a history of solid organ transplantation, could be candidates for cancer immunotherapy, but their management requires a multidisciplinary approach. The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) panel in collaboration with experts in virology and immunology from different centers in Spain reviewed the literature and developed evidence-based guidelines for cancer immunotherapy management in patients with chronic infections and immunosuppression. These are the first clinical guidelines for cancer immunotherapy treatment in special challenging populations. Cancer immunotherapy in chronically infected or immunosuppressed patients is feasible but needs a multidisciplinary approach in order to decrease the risk of complications related to the coexistent comorbidities.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-017193
Author(s):  
Ching-Jen Chen ◽  
Reda Chalhoub ◽  
Dale Ding ◽  
Jeyan S Kumar ◽  
Natasha Ironside ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe benefit of complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3) over near-complete reperfusion (≥90%, mTICI 2c) remains unclear. The goal of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-treated stroke patients with mTICI 2c versus 3.MethodsThis is a retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) comprising 33 centers. Adults with anterior circulation arterial vessel occlusion who underwent MT yielding mTICI 2c or mTICI 3 reperfusion were included. Patients were categorized based on reperfusion grade achieved. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were mRS scores at discharge and 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge, procedure-related complications, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.ResultsThe unmatched mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 cohorts comprised 519 and 1923 patients, respectively. There was no difference in primary (42.4% vs 45.1%; p=0.264) or secondary outcomes between the unmatched cohorts. Reperfusion status (mTICI 2c vs 3) was also not predictive of the primary outcome in non-imputed and imputed multivariable models. The matched cohorts each comprised 191 patients. Primary (39.8% vs 47.6%; p=0.122) and secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts, except the 90-day mRS which was lower in the matched mTICI 3 cohort (p=0.049). There were increased odds of the primary outcome with mTICI 3 in patients with baseline mRS ≥2 (36% vs 7.7%; p=0.011; pinteraction=0.014) and a history of stroke (42.3% vs 15.4%; p=0.027; pinteraction=0.041).ConclusionsComplete and near-complete reperfusion after MT appear to confer comparable outcomes in patients with acute stroke.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaping Wang ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Xiuqiong Fu ◽  
Tiejun Tong ◽  
Zhiling Yu

Abstract Background The traditional Chinese medicine formula Si-Jun-Zi-Tang (SJZT) has a long history of application in the treatment of functional dyspepsia (non-ulcer dyspepsia, FD)-like symptoms. SJZT-based therapies have been claimed to be beneficial in managing FD. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SJZT-based therapies in treating FD by meta-analysis. Methods Systematic searches for RCTs were conducted in seven databases (up to February 2019) without language restrictions. Data were analyzed using Cochrane RevMan software version 5.3.0 and Stata software version 13.1, and reported as relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was response rate and the secondary outcomes were gastric emptying, quality of life, adverse effects and relapse rate. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to criteria from the Cochrane risk of bias. Results A total of 341 potentially relevant publications were identified, and 12 RCTs were eligible for inclusion. For the response rate, there was a statically significant benefit in favor of SJZT-based therapies (RR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.30). However, the benefit was limited to modified SJZT (MSJZT). The relapse rate of FD patients received SJZT-based therapies was lower than that of patients who received conventional medicines (OR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.51). No SJZT-based therapies-related adverse effect was reported. Conclusion SJZT-based prescriptions may be effective in treating FD and no serious side-effects were identified, but the effect on response rate appeared to be limited to MSJZT. The results should be interpreted with caution as all the included studies were considered at a high risk of bias. Standardized, large-scale and strictly designed RCTs are needed to further validate the benefits of SJZT-based therapies for FD management. Trial registration Systematic review registration: [PROSPERO registration: CRD42019139136].


Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001380
Author(s):  
Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch ◽  
Mia Marie Pries-Heje ◽  
Sarah Louise Kjølhede Holle ◽  
Thomas Engstrøm ◽  
Merete Heitmann ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo prospectively validate the CT-Valve score, a new risk score designed to identify patients with valvular heart disease at a low risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) who could benefit from multislice CT (MSCT) first instead of coronary angiography (CAG).MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of patients referred for valve surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark and Odense University Hospital from the 1 February 2015 to the 1 February 2017. MSCT was implemented for patients with a CT-Valve score ≤7 at the referring physician’s discretion. Patients with a history of CAD or chronic kidney disease were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients needing reevaluation with CAG after MSCT and risk of CAD among the patients determined to be low to intermediate risk.ResultsIn total, 1149 patients were included. The median score was 9 (IQR 3) and 339 (30%) had a score ≤7. MSCT was used for 117 patients. Of these 29 (25%) were reevaluated and 9 (7.7%) had CAD. Of the 222 patients with a score ≤7 that did not receive an MSCT, 14 (6%) had significant CAD. The estimated total cost of evaluation among patients with a score ≤7 before implementation was €132 093 compared with €79 073 after, a 40% reduction. Similarly, estimated total radiation before and after was 608 mSv and 362 mSv, a 41% reduction. Follow-up at a median of 32 months (18–48) showed no ischaemic events for patients receiving only MSCT.ConclusionThe CT-Valve score is a valid method for determining risk of CAD among patients with valvular heart disease. Using a score ≤7 as a cut-off for the use of MSCT is safe and cost-effective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-101
Author(s):  
Thi Minh Khue Nguyen ◽  
Quang Tung Nguyen

Objectives: Describe bleeding characteristics and evaluate the correlation between surgical-related bleeding and bleeding risk according by ISTH – BATs. Methods: Research was conducted on 340 surgical patients at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Results: The percentage of patients with bleeding during and after surgery is 13.5%. The proportion of patients at risk of bleeding according to BATs is 1.8%. There was a correlation between bleeding risk according to ISTH - BAT with bleeding status during and after surgery with p = 0.004. The positive predictive value of ISTH - BATs is 66.7%, negative predictive value is 87.4%, the sensitivity is 8.7%, the specificity is 99.3%. Conclusions: Surgery has a high risk of abnormal bleeding. Bleeding history has important implications in assessing bleeding risk during and after surgery. The ISTH - BATs is a bleeding history assessment tool that can be used to assess the risk of bleeding before surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document