Comparative Evaluation of Solubilities of Two Nanohybrid Composite Resins in Saliva Substitute and Distilled Water: An in vitro Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranjal S Walzade ◽  
Sumanthini MV ◽  
Vanitha U Shenoy ◽  
Rohini P Mahajan
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
P Value ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Saliva Substitute ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

ABSTRACT Aim of the study To determine the solubility of nanohybrid (NH) composite resins when immersed in saliva substitute and distilled water. Materials and methods A total of 60 disc-shaped samples (n = 30) were prepared in teflon molds of diameter 10 mm × 2 mm thickness from two NH composite resins. They were light-cured following which the samples were removed and weighed three times using a digital balance. Samples were then immersed in test solutions, i.e., 100 mL of distilled water and saliva substitute each stored for 24 hours and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days in an incubator at 37°C at 100% humidity. At the time intervals mentioned, the samples were removed from the incubator, washed with distilled water, blotted dry, and weighed. Samples were again immersed in fresh test solutions. Difference in preweight and postweight of samples was calculated and data were analyzed using appropriate test by testing normality. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results The results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). As observed from the baseline weight to the 28th day weight, there was a loss of weight of the samples in all the groups except NH composite resin (Flash) in distilled water. Conclusion From the results of the study, it was observed that there was no statistically significant difference in weight, with respect to the solubility of the two NH composite resins and the two solutions tested. Clinical significance of the study is that the NH composite resin that shows lesser solubility can be the choice for an esthetic restorative material in patients for long-term results. How to cite this article Mahajan RP, Shenoy VU, Sumanthini MV, Walzade PS. Comparative Evaluation of Solubilities of Two Nanohybrid Composite Resins in Saliva Substitute and Distilled Water: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent 2017;7(2):82-85.

scholarly journals Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e213981
Author(s):  
Fariba Motevasselian ◽  
Hamid Kermanshah ◽  
Ebrahim Rasoulkhani ◽  
Mutlu Özcan
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group A ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Aim: To compare the microleakage of Cention N, a subgroup of composite resins with a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a composite resin. Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 46 extracted human molars. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups. Group A: Tetric N-Bond etch-and-rinse adhesive and Tetric N-Ceram nanohybrid composite resin, group B: Cention N without adhesive, group C: Cention N with adhesive, and group D: Fuji II LC RMGI. The teeth were thermocycled between 5°-55°C (×10,000). The teeth were coated with two layers of nail vanish except for 1 mm around the restoration margins, and immersed in 2% methylene blue (37°C, 24 h) before buccolingual sectioning to evaluate dye penetration under a stereomicroscope (×20). The data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (α=0.05). Results: Type of material and restoration margin had significant effects on the microleakage (p<0.05). Dentin margins showed a higher leakage score in all groups. Cention N and RMGI groups showed significant differences at the enamel margin (p=0.025, p=0.011), and for the latter group the scores were higher. No significant difference was found at the dentin margins between the materials except between Cention N with adhesive and RMGI (p=0.031). Conclusion: Microleakage was evident in all three restorative materials. Cention N groups showed similar microleakage scores to the composite resin and displayed lower microleakage scores compared with RMGI.

scholarly journals Influence of Toothbrush Abrasion and Surface Treatments on Roughness and Gloss of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramics

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 3694
Author(s):  
Nawaf Labban ◽  
Mohammad D. Al Al Amri ◽  
Sarah M Alnafaiy ◽  
Saleh M. Alhijji ◽  
Mohammad A. Alenizy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Storage Medium ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Toothbrush Abrasion ◽  
Surface Gloss

The aim of this study was to compare the surface roughness and gloss of polymer-infiltrated ceramics after simulated in vitro toothbrushing in different storage mediums. Four polymer- infiltrated ceramics were evaluated, Lava ultimate (LU), Vita enamic (EN), Shofu (SH), and Crystal ultra (CU). The control group was a feldspathic ceramic, Vita Mark II (VM). One hundred and twenty specimens (12 × 14 × 2.5 mm) were prepared using a precision saw. For each material (n = 24), the specimens were allocated into two groups, polished and stained. The specimens of each group were stored (for 7 days) in either citric acid (0.2N) or distilled water. Data for surface gloss (ΔE*SCE-SCI) and roughness (Ra) were evaluated before (baseline) and after simulated toothbrushing. For toothbrushing simulation, a toothpaste slurry containing a toothpaste of 100 relative dentin abrasion (RDA) and 0.3 mL distilled water was used for 3650 cycles (7300 strokes) for each specimen. Data were analyzed using t-test and ANOVA. A p-value of ≤ to 0.05 was considered significant. The highest mean value of surface gloss was identified in CU (stained—water) (4.3 (0.47)) (ΔE*) and EN (stained—acid) (4.3 (1.00)) (ΔE*) specimens, whereas the lowest mean value was shown by SH (stained—acid) (2.04 (0.42)) (ΔE*) samples. The highest mean value of surface roughness was observed in SH (0.40 (0.99)) Ra (stained—acid) whereas the lowest in VM (0.13 (0.039)) Ra (polished—water). A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed in surface roughness and gloss between the materials with simulated toothbrushing, except in VM and LU, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that simulated toothbrushing impacts on surface roughness and gloss, irrespective of the storage medium.

scholarly journals A Preliminary Research Study on the Cytotoxicity of Expired and Non-expired Composite Resins: In Vitro Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 227-238
Author(s):  
Magrur Kazak DDS, PhD ◽  
Nazmiye Donmez DDS, PhD ◽  
Fatemeh Bahadori PhD ◽  
Vildan Betul Yenigun PhD ◽  
Abdurrahim Kocyigit MD, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Cell Viability ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Negative Control Group ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Preliminary Research

Objective: Studies have focused on use of non-expired composites. Unfortunately some clinicians still use expired composite resins without considering their effects. The objective of this in vitro preliminary research was to investigate cytotoxicity of expired(6-months) and non-expired composite resins. Materials and methods: Expired (E) and non-expired (NE) samples of one bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill [TNB], Ivoclar Vivadent), two nano-hybrid (Tetric N-Ceram [TN], Ivoclar Vivadent; Clearfil Majesty ES-2 [CM], Kuraray) composite resins were tested on L929 fibroblast cells. Medium covering cells was removed then plastic rings (2-mm height) were filled with non-polymerized composite resins, placed in direct contact with cells and polymerized with LED light curing unit (LCU). Three samples were prepared for each group. After polymerization, removed medium was added to the cells. Cells that were left without medium (WOM) and cells that were exposed to LCU were used as positive control groups. Cells without any treatment were used as negative control group (C). Cells were incubated with tested materials for 7-days to evaluate cytotoxicity. Cell viability was calculated by sulforhodamine B test as a percentage (%). One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses (p<0.05). Results: Comparison between E and NE groups of same composite resins did not result in statistically significant differences (p>0.05), except between TN NE and TN E (p<0.05). TN E group was significantly more cytotoxic than TN NE group. When NE composite resin groups were compared to each other, statistically significant difference was only obtained between TNB NE and TN NE (p<0.05). Among all tested groups, TN NE group showed the least cytotoxic profile. No statistically significant differences were determined when E composite resin groups were compared to each other (p>0.05). All experimental groups compared with C group showed statistically significant cytotoxicity (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference existed between LCU and C groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: In clinical practice, expired composite resins should never be used. Although a correlation was found between expiration dates of nano-hybrid composite resins and cell viability, opposite data were obtained for bulk-fill composite resin. Researches are still required to evaluate biocompatibility of bulk-fill composite resins at various thicknesses with current LCUs.

scholarly journals Effect of Energy Drinks on the Inorganic Composition of a Composite Resin Material

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Danielson Guedes Pontes ◽  
Lara Pepita de Souza Oliveira ◽  
Diego Ferreira Regalado ◽  
Danielson Guedes Pontes ◽  
Cláudia Cândida Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immersion Time ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Energy Drinks ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Inorganic Composition ◽  
The Individual

Composite resins are used in Dentistry to perform direct aesthetic restorations, and are a material whose properties can be influenced by the diet of the individual, especially in the face of the action of beverages with acid pH, such as energy drinks. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of two energy beverages on the chemical composition of a nanoparticulate composite resin, at two-time intervals. Filtek Z350XT (3M/ESPE) composite resin was used to produce thirty-six specimens (discs) of 6.0mm x 1.5mm dimensions. The specimens were initially immersed in distilled water for 24h at 37ºC and then randomly divided into two groups (n=18); according to the immersion time: 1 month (T1) and 3 months (T2); and in three subgroups (n=6) referring to immersion solutions: distilled water (control) and two energy beverages (RedBull and Monster). The inorganic composition of the specimens was measured by a spectrometry. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. The main inorganic elements of this restorative material were respectively: zirconium (Zr), silicon (Si) and calcium (Ca), which reduced its percentage after immersion time. RedBull was the most active solution, promoting losses of the mineral Si after 1 month of immersion, of Zr, after 3 months, and of Ca after 1 month and after 3 months. Monster influenced losses only in Si, after 1 month. Distilled water did not induce significant losses. Thus, the two energy beverages reduced the inorganic percentage of the nanoparticulate composite resin evaluated in this research.

scholarly journals Influence of increment thickness on microhardness and bond strength in composite resins

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e32810917974
Author(s):  
Isis Almela Endo Hoshino ◽  
Mariana de Oliveira Bachega ◽  
Paulo Henrique dos Santos ◽  
André Luiz Briso ◽  
Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Knoop Microhardness ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite ◽  
New Generation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop microhardness and the microtensile bond strength of a second-generation of bulk-fill (BF) and a nanohybrid composite resins (NH) in different thicknesses of increments. For this, ninety disks of composite resin were made for Knoop microhardness, being divided into six groups (n = 15). The Knoop microhardness obtained in each millimeter of the internal face. For microtensile bond strength, ninety restored in third molars were used, divided into six groups (n = 15). For Knoop microhardness, the Wilcoxon and Friedman test was used. For the microtensile bond strength were used the Two-way Anova test and Tukey's post-test (p <0.05). The NH resin showed higher Knoop micro hardness than BF and it was observed that hardness value decreases as increases the thickness of the resin. There was no significant difference in microtensile bond strength comparing NH and BF. However, there was a significant difference between G2 and G4 for the NH groups, with the highest and lowest bond strength values, respectively. Thus, the new generation of the bulk-fill composite resin provided lower microhardness values as the thickness of the increments increases in comparison with the nanohybrid composite resin. The microtensile bond strength does not appear to have been influenced by the type of resin, or the thickness of the increment.

scholarly journals Bond Strength Evaluation of Bulk- fill Composites to Dentin Under Different Surface Treatments

2020 ◽  
pp. 194-207
Author(s):  
Kazım Bas ◽  
Ebru Uslu Cender
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Acid Group ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of three high-viscosity bulk-fill composite resins applied as single layers of 4mm thickness and of one microhybrid composite resin applied incrementally with a thickness of 2mm on dentin surfaces prepared with different surface preparation methods. Materials and Methods: A total of 132 caries-free human molars whose dentines had been exposed were used. Three groups, each containing 44 teeth, were formed. The acid group was etched with 32% phosphoric acid; laser group was etched with Er, Cr; YSGG laser and the control group was prepared with silicon carbid paper. Following the application of bonding agent, composite resin materials were applied on teeth using teflon moulds of 4x4mm. The samples were then subjected to shear bond strength tests. Two-way variance analysis and Tukey HSD multiple comparison test were applied on collected data. Results: There was a significant difference between surface treatment methods used regarding shear bond strength (P<0.001). The highest shear bond strength values were detected in the “Acid” group while the lowest shear bond strength values were detected in the “control” group. On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference among composite resins (P>0.05). Conclusions: Laser etching of the dentin tissues is not as effective as acid etching. Bulk-fill composites had similar effects compared with conventional composite resins with regard to bonding strength. More in vitro studies supported with clinical data are required to investigate the performance of bulk-fill composites and laser.

scholarly journals SEM evaluation of gap at the resin dentin interface in Class II composite resin restoration: an in vitro study

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-104
Author(s):  
P Mazumdar ◽  
U Kumar Das ◽  
R Kundu
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Etching Technique ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2

Introduction: Composite resins have become one of the most commonly used direct restorative materials for anterior and posterior teeth.Objectives: To observe and analyze the gap at the resin dentin interface in class II cavities restored with light cure composite resin in four experimental groups employing 37% phosphoric acid or self etching monomers and restored with /without light cure flowable composite resin.Methods: 40 sound maxillary first premolars, extracted due to orthodontic reasons was taken, distoproximal cavities were prepared and divided into 4 groups. Teeth of Group 1 was etched by 37% Phosphoric acid and light cure flowable composite resin was used, in group 2 ,two coats of self etching acidic monomer were applied and light cure flowable composite resin was used. Teeth of group 3 was etched with 37% phosphoric acid and restored without light cure flowable composite resin and in group 4, two coats of self etching acidic monomer were applied and restored without using light cure flowable composite resin material. Thermocycling was done after finishing and polishing and viewed under scanning electron microscope to observe and analyze the gap between tooth and the restoration.Result: Gap was observed at dentin-composite resin interface in all 4 groups. Results were evaluated by F-test and Manwhitney U test. No statistically significant difference was found.Conclusion: Use of flowable composite resin liner and the etching technique do not have any influence on the gap.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6571 Health Renaissance 2012; Vol 10 (No.2); 98-104

scholarly journals An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Different Bleaching Agents on Marginal Integrity of Two Different Restorative Resin Materials: An Analysis by Confocal Laser Microscopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 114-122
Author(s):  
Nitesh Goyal ◽  
Yogesh Kumar ◽  
Neetu Jindal ◽  
Renu Aggarwal
Keyword(s):  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Tooth Bleaching ◽  
Confocal Laser ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class V ◽  
Nanohybrid Composite

Abstract Introduction In our society, with the advances in cosmetic consciousness, well-aligned, properly contoured, white and clean teeth are a symbol of health and standard of beauty. Thus, tooth bleaching has become popular cosmetic therapy among patients and dentists. Microleakage is a major challenge to the success rate for all type of restorations. Materials and Methods Eighty maxillary human molars were collected and evaluated and Class V cavities 5×3×2 mm size were prepared with straight carbide bur (SS White) on the buccal and palatal surfaces at the cementoenamel junction of all the samples, so that the upper margin would be in enamel and lower margins on root surface. In total, 160 class V cavities were prepared on maxillary molars. Then samples were randomly divided into 3 groups (microfilled and nanohybrid composite resins and control group) and 3 subgroups (Pola Office, Whiteness HP Blue, Whiteness Perfect) according to the type of composite resins and bleaching agents used. After application of bleaching agents, all samples were immersed in a contrast solution of rhodamine B fluorescent dye for 24 hours. Then using a diamond disc samples were sectioned buccolingually through the center of the restorations and sectioned teeth were evaluated for marginal microleakage under confocal laser scanning microscope to check the extent of dye penetration. Results When all composite resin groups were compared with all the bleaching agents, at occlusal and gingival levels, lowest marginal leakage scores were obtained with the microfilled composite resin bleached with Whiteness HP blue, and in nanohybrid composite lowest microleakage score were obtained with Pola office bleach at both levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document