scholarly journals THE LEGAL POSITION OF CANING PUNISHMENT IN ACEH

Author(s):  
Zulfan Zulfan ◽  
Muhammad Hatta

Amongst the punishments that have been implemented in the Islamic criminal law is caning punishment. The caning punishment in Aceh is carried out directly and opens to the public. However, some Islamic countries carry out caning in private such as in prisons. In Aceh, the implementation of caning that has been carried out openly is based on Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law and Qanun No. 7 of 2013 concerning Jinayat Procedural Law. However, in 2015, the implementation of the caning was carried out behind closed doors like in prisons. This is in accordance with the Governor Regulation Number 5 of 2018 about the Implementation of 'Uqubat Whip’ in the Correctional Institutions. Changes in the implementation of the caning punishment led to the pros and cons among the society. Many believe that the implementation of caning in a closed manner will affect the effectiveness of the punishment in reducing the number of shari'ah violations. Although there are many factors that influence the number of crime in society, the punishment and the implementation of the punishment itself are considered as the most important factors

Author(s):  
Ramizah Wan Muhammad ◽  
Khairunnasriah Abdul Salam ◽  
Afridah Abbas ◽  
Nasimah Hussin

Aceh is a special province in Indonesia and different from other Indonesian provinces especially in the context of Shari'ah related laws. Aceh was granted special autonomy and legal right by the Indonesian central government in 2001 to fully apply Islamic law in the province. Generally, Islamic law which is applicable to Muslims in Indonesia is limited to personal laws just as in Malaysia. However, with the passage of time, Islamic law has expanded to include Islamic banking and finance. Besides that, Islamic law in Aceh is also extended to govern criminal matters which are in line with the motto of Aceh Islamic government to apply Islamic law in total or kaffah. Since 1999, the legal administration of Aceh has begun to gradually put in place the institutional framework to ensure that Islamic law is properly administered and implemented. Equally important, such framework is also aimed to ensure that punishments are fairly executed. This paper attempts to analyse the extent of the applicability of Islamic criminal law in Aceh. It is divided into three major parts. The first part discusses the phases in making Aceh an Islamic province and the roles played by Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh as the policy maker in implementing Islamic law as well as educating and training the public about the religion of Islam. The second part gives an overview on the Islamic criminal law and punishment provided in Qanun Aceh No.6/2014 on Hukum Jinayat (hereinafter Qanun Hukum Jinayat or “QHJ”) as well as the criminal procedural law concerning the methods of proof codified in Qanun Aceh No.7/2013 on Hukum Acara Jinayat (hereinafter “QAJ”). The third part of this paper highlights the challenges in the application and implementation of Islamic criminal law in Aceh, and accordingly provides recommendations for the improvement of the provisions in the QHJ and QAJ. Inputs from the interviews with the drafters of QHJ, namely Prof. Dr. Hamid Sarong and Prof. Dr Al Yasa are utilized in preparing this paper. In addition, inputs gathered from nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), namely Indonesian Syarie Lawyers Association (APSI) and Jaringan Masyarakat Sipil Peduli Syariah (JMSPS) are employed. The findings of this research are important in providing an in-depth understanding on the framework of Islamic criminal law in Aceh as well as in recognizing the flaws in its application or practical aspects of the law in Aceh. Keywords: Islamic law, Aceh, Administration, Punishment. Abstrak Aceh merupakan sebuah Wilayah Istimewa di Indonesia dibandingkan dengan wilayah-wilayah lain dari segi pelaksanaan undang-undang Islam. Aceh diberi status Wilayah Istimewa yang berautonomi oleh Pemerintah Pusat Indonesia pada tahun 2001 untuk melaksanakan undang-undang Islam secara menyeluruh. Pemakaian dan pelaksanaan undang-undang Islam di Aceh tidak terhad pada Undang-undang jenayah tetapi telah meliputi bidang perbankan dan kewangan Islam. Sejak tahun 1999, Pentadbiran Undang-undang Aceh telah merangka undang-undang bagi memastikan undang-undang Islam dapat ditadbir dan dilaksanakan dengan baik. Selain itu juga, undang-undang yang dirangka juga turut bertujuan untuk memastikan hukuman yang berasaskan undang-undang Islam dapat dilaksanakan secara adil. Oleh itu, kajian dalam kertas kerja ini dibuat uuntuk menganalisa sejauh mana undang-undang jenayah Islam dilaksanakan di Aceh. Kertas ini terbahagi kepada tiga bahagan utama, yang mana bahagian pertama membincangkan latas belakang awal kewujudan wilayah Islam Aceh dan peranan yang dimainkan oleh Dinas Syariat Islam Aceh sebagai mpembuat dasar dalam pelaksanaan undang-undang Islam, mendidik serta menyediakan latihan kepada masyarakat umum di Aceh mengenai Islam. Bahagian kedua menyediakan gambaran umum tentang undang-undang jenayah dan hukuman dalam Islam sebagaimana termaktub dalam Qanun Aceh No.6/2014 berkenaan Hukum Jinayat (“Qanun Hukum Jinayat” atau “QHJ”) serta undang-undang prosedur jenayah berkenaan cara pembuktiaan jenayah sebagaimana yag termaktub dalam Qanun Aceh No.7/2013 berkenaan Hukum Acara Jinayat (“QAJ”). Bahagian ketiga kertas ini menekankan masalah atau cabaran yang dihadapi daam pelaksanaan undang-undang jenayah Islam di Aceh, serta menyediakan cadangan-cadangan bagi penambahbaikan peruntukan-peruntukan yang ada dalam QHJ dan QAJ. Maklumat hasil dari temuramah dengan Prof. Dr. Hamid Sarong dan Prof. Dr Al Yasa telah digunakan bagi menyiapkan makalah ini. Selain itu, maklumat yang diperolehi daripada organisasi bukan kerajaan iaitu Indonesian Syarie Lawyers Association (APSI) dan Jaringan Masyarakat Sipil Peduli Syariah (JMSPS) turut dimanfaatkan. Dapatan dari kajian ini penting bagi menyediakan kefahaman terhadap kerangka undang-undang jenayah Islam di Aceh serta mengenal pasti masalah dalam aspek peruntukan undang-undang tersebut atau pelaksanaannya di Aceh. Kata Kunci: Undang-undang Islam, Aceh, Pentadbiran, Hukuman.


eL-Mashlahah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-63
Author(s):  
Dahyul Daipon M.Ag

AbstractThis research aims to examine the differences of investigation process between the book of Procedural Criminal Law Constitution (KUHAP) or the Constitution number 8 of 1981 about Positive Procedural Criminal Law and Qanun Aceh number 7 of 2013 about Jinayat Procedural Law. The method used is the yuridis normative law research method. The Identification of problem is How is the investigation process based on the book of Procedural Criminal Law Constitution (KUHAP)? How is the investigation process based on Qonun Aceh number 7 of 2013 about Jinayat Procedural Law? What is the differences of investigation process based on Positive Procedural Criminal Law and Qanun Aceh number 7 of 2013 about Jinayat Procedural Law? The Result of analysis is Investigation process in KUHAP starts of the Investigation.Enforcement, Examination, Settlement, and Submition the case file to the public presecutor, it is process of investigation that written in the Constutition number 7 of 2013 about Jinayat Procedural Law. It mentions in verse 110 until 132. The differences of investigation process based on Positive Procedural Criminal Law and Qanun Aceh number 7 of 2013 about Jinayat Procedural Law are (1)related to paradigms of investigation description that different managed, (2) related to the investigator authority, and (3) related to the direct investigation of crime/jarimah. AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk mengkaji perbedaan proses penyidikan antara Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) atau Undang-Undang nomor 8 tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Positif dengan Qonun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat. Adapun metode yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif yuridis (yuridis normative). Rumusan masalahnya ialah Bagaimana Proses Penyidikan menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)? Bagaimana Proses Penyidikan menurut Qonun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat? Apa Perbedaan Proses Penyidikan menurut Hukum Acara Pidana Positif dan Qonun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat? Adapun hasil dan pembahasannya ialah Proses Penyidikan menurut KUHAP ialah mulai dari Penyelidikan. Penindakan, Pemeriksaan, Penyelesaian dan serta penyerahan berkas perkara kepada Jaksa Penuntut Umum, Bahwa proses Penyidikan yang tercatum di dalam Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat ialah tercantum di dalam Pasal 110 sampai dengan Pasal 132. Adapun terkait Perbedaan Proses Penyidikan menurut Hukum Acara Pidana Positif dan Qanun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 Tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat ialah (1) terkait tentang paradigma penjelasan penyidikan yang diatur berbeda, (2) terkait tentang wewenang penyidik dan (3) terkait dengan penyidikan langsung tindak pidana/jarimah.Kata Kunci: Proses, Penyidikan, Qonun, Aceh,


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Cornel ◽  
Thomas Trenczek

From both a dogmatic legal standpoint and a sociological perspective, this textbook provides an in-depth and well-founded overview of the fundamentals of material criminal law and criminal procedural law, including juvenile criminal law and the alternatives of restorative justice. It will appeal to both students of social work and practitioners in this field, among others social workers, social education workers, mediators, forensic psychiatrists and those working in correctional institutions. The book describes material criminal and procedural law in detail so that the processes and structures of criminal law can be understood and then applied in practice. Moreover, it provides law students and those working in the field of criminal law with an introduction to criminal law thinking and, at the same time, sociological and criminological insights into the application and practice of criminal law. The book ends with a comprehensive glossary of terms.


Author(s):  
I Putu Gede Sumariartha Suara

Regarding the regulation and application of the crown witness by the public prosecutor in handling corruption case as stated in the Criminal Law of Formil applicable in Indonesia in this case KUHAP (Indonesian Criminal Procedural Law Code) especially Article 142 Indonesian Criminal Procedural Law Code still cause the existence of obscurity of norm so that in practice of judiciary there is no definite measure about application criteria a crown witness by a public prosecutor in the proof of a criminal case, especially a criminal act of corruption. As for the matters discussed in this regard that is about 1) Arrangement of the Public Prosecutor's Authority on the application of the crown witness in the proving of corruption crime according to the perspective of Indonesian Positive Law (Ius Constitutum) covers the setting up of the crown witnesses in positive law in Indonesia as well as comparative regulation of crown witnesses in the United States and the Netherlands and 2) Formulation of Authority for the Public Prosecutor on the application of the crown witness in the proving of corruption in accordance with the perspective of the coming Law (ius Constituendum) includes the appropriate term used to mention the crown witness, the limits of the application of the crown witness, the plea bargain adaptation system in the Positive Law in Indonesia, the requirements of being a crown witness, the proper punishment of the crown witness and the formulation of Article 142 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedural Law Code so as to grant the limitative authority to the Public Prosecutor against the application of the crown witness Mengenai pengaturan dan penerapan saksi mahkota oleh penuntut umum dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana korupsi sebagaimana tercantum dalam Hukum Pidana Formil yang berlaku di Indonesia dalam hal ini yaitu KUHAP khususnya Pasal 142 KUHAP masih menimbulkan adanya kekaburan norma sehingga dalam praktek peradilan belum terdapat ukuran yang pasti mengenai kriteria penerapan saksi mahkota oleh penuntut umum dalam pembuktian suatu perkara pidana khususnya tindak pidana korupsi. Adapun yang dibahas dalam hal ini yaitu mengenai 1) Pengaturan Kewenangan Penuntut Umum terhadap penerapan saksi mahkota dalam pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi menurut perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia (Ius Constitutum) meliputi pengaturan saksi mahkota dalam hukum positif di Indonesia serta perbandingan pengaturan saksi mahkota di Negara Amerika Serikat dan Belanda dan 2) Formulasi Kewenangan Bagi Penuntut Umum terhadap penerapan saksi mahkota dalam pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi menurut perspektif Hukum yang akan datang (Ius Constituendum) meliputi istilah yang tepat dipakai untuk menyebutkan saksi mahkota, batas-batas penerapan saksi mahkota, adaptasi plea bargain system dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia, syarat-syarat menjadi saksi mahkota, pemidanaan yang tepat diterapkan terhadap saksi mahkota serta formulasi Pasal 142 KUHAP sehingga memberikan kewenangan secara limitatif kepada Penuntut Umum terhadap penerapan saksi mahkota.


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-44
Author(s):  
Ivan Đokić ◽  
◽  
Dragana Čvorović ◽  

The subject of the paper is the analysis of solutions that exist in Serbian and German criminal procedural law and refer to cases in which the public prosecutor in the field of petty crime is authorized to act towards adult perpetrators in accordance with the principle of opportunity of criminal prosecution. In relation to one variant of this principle, which implies conditional and temporary restraint of criminal prosecution, there is a distinct similarity in both mentioned legislations. However, with regard to the classic form of this procedural principle, which enables the public prosecutor to refrain prosecution for reasons of expediency, where he primarily values the public interest in prosecuting, there is a striking difference, because our criminal procedural law does not allow such a variant of the principle of opportunity of criminal prosecution. This difference is a consequence of a different criminal policy approach, because while in German criminal law the problem of petty crime is solved exclusively by procedural mechanisms, in Serbian criminal law, in addition to procedural law, there are also appropriate instruments in the substantive criminal law.


Author(s):  
Detlef Liebs

Abstract Four kinds of Romans in the Frankish kingdoms in the 6th to 8th centuries. Roman law texts from Merowingian Gaul make a difference between cives Romani, Latini and dediticii, all considered as Romans. This difference mattered only to slaves who had been freed. The status of Latin and dediticius was hereditary, whereas the descendants of one who had been freed as civis Romanus were free born Romans, who should be classified as a proper, a fourth kind of beeing Roman; it was the standard kind. The difference was important in civil law, procedural law and criminal law, especially in wergeld, the sum to be payed for expiation when somebody had been killed: Who had killed a Roman, had to pay different sums according to the status of the killed.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-5

It is hardly surprising that philosophers have long regarded the criminal law as fertile ground. As the most visible application of state power, the criminal law raises issues of the first importance to political philosophy: issues of liberty, justice, and the common good. In announcing and enforcing rules of behaviour the criminal law connects with the concerns of moral philosophers, who have paid particular attention to the justification of punishment and the moral basis of criminal responsibility. Lastly, since the criminal law is typically concerned with the actions of human beings, it raises issues in the philosophy of action. Philosophers have devoted much attention to such central criminal law concepts as voluntariness, intention, and causation.The essays collected here explore topics which fall into three broad groups: the interests protected by the criminal law, the relation of agents to outcomes, and defenses to otherwise criminal conduct. Criminal law protects certain types of interests against certain kinds of invasions. Not everything that sets back a person’s interests is subject to legal sanction. Among those interests that the law deems worthy of protection, only certain kinds of invasions merit criminalization. The papers by Marshall and Duff, Hampton, Lacey, and Brett all touch on issues of the moral basis of criminalization. Marshall and Duff focus on the general issue of criminalization, arguing that crimes merit a certain kind of public response because they are attacks on the public. Drawing out the implications of the familiar fact that the state is a party to a criminal proceeding, they argue that the criminal law appropriately addresses wrongs that are shared by the wider community. For Marshall and Duff, criminalization is about deciding that a wrong against one person is serious in a way that makes it a wrong against everyone in the community, and demands a collective response.


Author(s):  
Julián López Muñoz

Existe la necesidad de crear un concepto o definir, en términos jurídicos, el significado de crimen organizado, en sentido global. A pesar de que Naciones Unidas lo ha intentado, no todos sus países miembros han seguido el mandato. España ha incluido en su Derecho Penal un nuevo tipo delictivo: la organización y el grupo criminal. El orden público, como bien jurídico superior, se verá con esta medida protegido y también el Estado se verá defendido de la acción desestabilizadora procedente de la «gran criminalidad».There is a need to create a concept or define globally, in legal terms, the meaning of the organized crime. Despite the United Nations have attempted it, not all the Member Countries have followed their mandate. Spain has included in its Criminal Law a new category of offence: the criminal organization and group. The public order, as a superior legal right, will be protected by this measure and also, the State will be defended against the destabilizing action from the «great criminality».


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Kútna ◽  
Imrich Antalík ◽  
Norbert Gyurián ◽  
Zoltán Šeben

In 2013, the Slovak Parliament adopted the Law on Amendments to the Law on Income Tax. One of the most significant changes was the introduction of the Tax License of a Legal Entity. On January 1st, 2018, a minimum corporate tax (the so-called tax license), which was introduced in 2014, was abolished. The main aim of this paper is the evaluation and quantification of the impact which the minimum corporate tax has on the amount of tax liability of a selected group of legal entities in the agricultural sector. The research had tried to find an answer if the tax license abolishment was more in the political interests or if it had some economic background. The main research questions are how has the corporate tax duty increased in the agricultural sector in the Slovak Republic after introducing the minimum corporate tax and how has the tax burden for agricultural holdings increased after introducing the tax license. The analysis presented in this paper confirms that the instrument of introducing the minimum tax is for loss-making sectors, such as the agricultural sector, undoubtedly unfair. On the other hand, the study has confirmed that the public which regularly pays the taxes, agrees with its introduction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Feona Sayles

<p>The District Council (Prohibition of Gang Insignia) Act 2009 (‘Gang Insignia Act 2009’) came into force in 2009 and prohibited the ‘display’ of ‘gang insignia’ within ‘specified areas’ of the Whanganui District. The purported aim of the legislation was to reduce intimidation of the public and confrontations between gangs. There was no requirement for intent on the part of the wearer of the insignia. This made the Whanganui gang insignia ban unique in terms of criminal law as it maintained that harm was inflicted due to group identity rather than specific conduct. This raises the question of how an identity can be constructed so that it is considered capable of causing criminal harm. To address this question, this research looked at the ways in which the media contributed to the construction of gang identity during the period of 2004 to 2013. This was achieved through (1) a content analysis of reports from three print newspapers and two online newspapers, (2) a content analysis of reader interactions with the reports, and (3) a textual analysis of two print newspapers. The research was guided by moral panic theory so looked for ways in which the events related to stages or elements of moral panic. The focus of the moral panic was also expanded so as to explore the overall context operating at the particular time. It was found that the events did correspond to a moral panic model and that whilst the panic was triggered by key occurrences of gang violence, the underlying motive for the panic could be attributed to racial tensions, penal populism, and the use of a terrorist frame. Whilst this research focuses on the construction of gang identity, the techniques used by the media can be applicable to other group identities.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document