scholarly journals Co-emission of volcanic sulfur and halogens amplifies volcanic effective radiative forcing

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 9009-9029
Author(s):  
John Staunton-Sykes ◽  
Thomas J. Aubry ◽  
Youngsub M. Shin ◽  
James Weber ◽  
Lauren R. Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Effective Radius ◽  
Emission Scenarios ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Explosive Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Stratospheric Cooling ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
Co Emission

Abstract. The evolution of volcanic sulfur and the resulting radiative forcing following explosive volcanic eruptions is well understood. Petrological evidence suggests that significant amounts of halogens may be co-emitted alongside sulfur in some explosive volcanic eruptions, and satellite evidence indicates that detectable amounts of these halogens may reach the stratosphere. In this study, we utilise an aerosol–chemistry–climate model to simulate stratospheric volcanic eruption emission scenarios of two sizes, both with and without co-emission of volcanic halogens, in order to understand how co-emitted halogens may alter the life cycle of volcanic sulfur, stratospheric chemistry, and the resulting radiative forcing. We simulate a large (10 Tg of SO2) and very large (56 Tg of SO2) sulfur-only eruption scenario and a corresponding large (10 Tg SO2, 1.5 Tg HCl, 0.0086 Tg HBr) and very large (56 Tg SO2, 15 Tg HCl, 0.086 Tg HBr) co-emission eruption scenario. The eruption scenarios simulated in this work are hypothetical, but they are comparable to Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 6 (e.g. 1991 Mt Pinatubo) and VEI 7 (e.g. 1257 Mt Samalas) eruptions, representing 1-in-50–100-year and 1-in-500–1000-year events, respectively, with plausible amounts of co-emitted halogens based on satellite observations and volcanic plume modelling. We show that co-emission of volcanic halogens and sulfur into the stratosphere increases the volcanic effective radiative forcing (ERF) by 24 % and 30 % in large and very large co-emission scenarios compared to sulfur-only emission. This is caused by an increase in both the forcing from volcanic aerosol–radiation interactions (ERFari) and composition of the stratosphere (ERFclear,clean). Volcanic halogens catalyse the destruction of stratospheric ozone, which results in significant stratospheric cooling, offsetting the aerosol heating simulated in sulfur-only scenarios and resulting in net stratospheric cooling. The ozone-induced stratospheric cooling prevents aerosol self-lofting and keeps the volcanic aerosol lower in the stratosphere with a shorter lifetime. This results in reduced growth by condensation and coagulation and a smaller peak global-mean effective radius compared to sulfur-only simulations. The smaller effective radius found in both co-emission scenarios is closer to the peak scattering efficiency radius of sulfate aerosol, and thus co-emission of halogens results in larger peak global-mean ERFari (6 % and 8 %). Co-emission of volcanic halogens results in significant stratospheric ozone, methane, and water vapour reductions, resulting in significant increases in peak global-mean ERFclear,clean (> 100 %), predominantly due to ozone loss. The dramatic global-mean ozone depletion simulated in large (22 %) and very large (57 %) co-emission scenarios would result in very high levels of UV exposure on the Earth's surface, with important implications for society and the biosphere. This work shows for the first time that co-emission of plausible amounts of volcanic halogens can amplify the volcanic ERF in simulations of explosive eruptions. It highlights the need to include volcanic halogen emissions when simulating the climate impacts of past or future eruptions, as well as the necessity to maintain space-borne observations of stratospheric compounds to better constrain the stratospheric injection estimates of volcanic eruptions.

scholarly journals Co-emission of volcanic sulfur and halogens amplifies volcanic effective radiative forcing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Staunton-Sykes ◽  
Thomas J. Aubry ◽  
Youngsub M. Shin ◽  
James Weber ◽  
Lauren R. Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Effective Radius ◽  
Volcanic Aerosol ◽  
Emission Scenarios ◽  
Explosive Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Stratospheric Cooling ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
Co Emission

Abstract. The evolution of volcanic sulfur and the resulting radiative forcing following explosive volcanic eruptions is well understood. Petrological evidence suggests that significant amounts of halogens may be co-emitted alongside sulfur in some explosive volcanic eruptions, and satellite evidence indicates that detectable amounts of these halogens may reach the stratosphere. In this study, we confront an aerosol-chemistry-climate model with four stratospheric volcanic eruption emission scenarios (56 Tg SO2 ± 15 Tg HCl & 0.086 Tg HBr and 10 Tg SO2 ± 1.5 Tg HCl & 0.0086 Tg HBr) in order to understand how co-emitted halogens may alter the life cycle of volcanic sulfur, stratospheric chemistry and the resulting radiative forcing. The eruption sizes simulated in this work are hypothetical Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 7 (e.g. 1257 Mt. Samalas) and VEI 6 (e.g. 1991 Mt. Pinatubo) eruptions, representing 1 in 500–1000 year and 1 in 50–100 year events respectively, with plausible amounts of co-emitted halogens based on satellite observations and volcanic plume modelling. We show that co-emission of volcanic halogens and sulfur into the stratosphere increases the volcanic ERF by 24–30 % compared to sulfur-only emission. This is caused by an increase in both the forcing from volcanic aerosol-radiation interactions (ERFari) and composition of the stratosphere (ERFclear,clean). Volcanic halogens catalyse the destruction of stratospheric ozone which results in significant stratospheric cooling (1.5–3 K); counteracting the typical stratospheric radiative heating from volcanic sulfate aerosol. The ozone induced stratospheric cooling prevents aerosol self-lofting and keeps the volcanic aerosol lower in the stratosphere with a shorter lifetime, resulting in reduced growth due to condensation and coagulation and smaller peak global-mean effective radius compared to sulfur-only simulations. The smaller effective radius found in both co-emission scenarios is closer to the peak scattering efficiency radius of sulfate aerosol, thus, co-emission of halogens results in larger peak global-mean ERFari (6–8 %). Co-emission of volcanic halogens results in significant stratospheric ozone, methane and water vapour reductions, resulting in significant increases in peak global-mean ERFclear,clean (> 100 %), predominantly due to ozone loss. The dramatic global-mean ozone depletion simulated in both co-emission simulations (22 %, 57 %) would result in very high levels of UV exposure on the Earth's surface, with important implications for society and the biosphere. This work shows for the first time that co-emission of plausible amounts of volcanic halogens can amplify the volcanic ERF in simulations of explosive eruptions; highlighting the need to include volcanic halogens fluxes when simulating the climate impacts of past or future eruptions and providing motivation to better quantify the degassing budgets and stratospheric injection estimates for volcanic eruptions.

scholarly journals Effective radiative forcing in the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin S. Grandey ◽  
Daniel Rothenberg ◽  
Alexander Avramov ◽  
Qinjian Jin ◽  
Hsiang-He Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Distribution ◽  
Radiative Effect ◽  
Mixing State ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Aerosol Module ◽  
Aerosol Emissions ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. We quantify the effective radiative forcing (ERF) of anthropogenic aerosols modelled by the aerosol–climate model CAM5.3-MARC-ARG. CAM5.3-MARC-ARG is a new configuration of the Community Atmosphere Model version 5.3 (CAM5.3) in which the default aerosol module has been replaced by the two-Moment, Multi-Modal, Mixing-state-resolving Aerosol model for Research of Climate (MARC). CAM5.3-MARC-ARG uses the default ARG aerosol activation scheme, consistent with the default configuration of CAM5.3. We compute differences between simulations using year-1850 aerosol emissions and simulations using year-2000 aerosol emissions in order to assess the radiative effects of anthropogenic aerosols. We compare the aerosol column burdens, cloud properties, and radiative effects produced by CAM5.3-MARC-ARG with those produced by the default configuration of CAM5.3, which uses the modal aerosol module with three log-normal modes (MAM3). Compared with MAM3, we find that MARC produces stronger cooling via the direct radiative effect, stronger cooling via the surface albedo radiative effect, and stronger warming via the cloud longwave radiative effect. The global mean cloud shortwave radiative effect is similar between MARC and MAM3, although the regional distributions differ. Overall, MARC produces a global mean net ERF of −1.75 ± 0.04 W m−2, which is stronger than the global mean net ERF of −1.57 ± 0.04 W m−2 produced by MAM3. The regional distribution of ERF also differs between MARC and MAM3, largely due to differences in the regional distribution of the cloud shortwave radiative effect. We conclude that the specific representation of aerosols in global climate models, including aerosol mixing state, has important implications for climate modelling.

Climate forcing and committed global warming: GHGs, aerosols and ozone 1970-2010

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alcide Zhao ◽  
David Stevenson ◽  
Massimi Bollasina
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Frequency Distributions ◽  
Climate Risks ◽  
Global Mean

<p>It is crucial to reduce uncertainties in our understanding of the climate impacts of short‐lived climate forcers, in the context that their emissions/concentrations are anticipated to decrease significantly in the coming decades worldwide. Using the Community Earth System Model (CESM1), we performed time‐slice experiments to investigate the effective radiative forcing (ERF) and climate respons to 1970–2010 changes in well‐mixed greenhouse gases (GHGs), anthropogenic aerosols, and tropospheric and stratospheric ozone. Once the present‐day climate has fully responded to 1970–2010 changes in all forcings, both the global mean temperature and precipitation responses are twice as large as the transient ones, with wet regions getting wetter and dry regions drier. The temperature response per unit ERF for short‐lived species varies considerably across many factors including forcing agents and the magnitudes and locations of emission changes. This suggests that the ERF should be used carefully to interpret the climate impacts of short‐lived climate forcers. Changes in both the mean and the probability distribution of global mean daily precipitation are driven mainly by GHG increases. However, changes in the frequency distributions of regional mean daily precipitation are more strongly influenced by changes in aerosols, rather than GHGs. This is particularly true over Asia and Europe where aerosol changes have significant impacts on the frequency of heavy‐to‐extreme precipitation. Our results may help guide more reliable near‐future climate projections and allow us to manage climate risks more effectively.</p>

scholarly journals Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gauss ◽  
G. Myhre ◽  
I. S. A. Isaksen ◽  
V. Grewe ◽  
G. Pitari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Tropospheric Ozone ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Stratospheric Chemistry ◽  
Ozone Column ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. Changes in atmospheric ozone have occurred since the preindustrial era as a result of increasing anthropogenic emissions. Within ACCENT, a European Network of Excellence, ozone changes between 1850 and 2000 are assessed for the troposphere and the lower stratosphere (up to 30 km) by a variety of seven chemistry-climate models and three chemical transport models. The modeled ozone changes are taken as input for detailed calculations of radiative forcing. When only changes in chemistry are considered (constant climate) the modeled global-mean tropospheric ozone column increase since preindustrial times ranges from 7.9 DU to 13.8 DU among the ten participating models, while the stratospheric column reduction lies between 14.1 DU and 28.6 DU in the models considering stratospheric chemistry. The resulting radiative forcing is strongly dependent on the location and altitude of the modeled ozone change and varies between 0.25 Wm−2 and 0.45 Wm−2 due to ozone change in the troposphere and −0.123 Wm−2 and +0.066 Wm−2 due to the stratospheric ozone change. Changes in ozone and other greenhouse gases since preindustrial times have altered climate. Six out of the ten participating models have performed an additional calculation taking into account both chemical and climate change. In most models the isolated effect of climate change is an enhancement of the tropospheric ozone column increase, while the stratospheric reduction becomes slightly less severe. In the three climate-chemistry models with detailed tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry the inclusion of climate change increases the resulting radiative forcing due to tropospheric ozone change by up to 0.10 Wm−2, while the radiative forcing due to stratospheric ozone change is reduced by up to 0.034 Wm−2. Considering tropospheric and stratospheric change combined, the total ozone column change is negative while the resulting net radiative forcing is positive.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and climate to explosive volcanic eruptions

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2957-3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Frölicher ◽  
F. Joos ◽  
C. C. Raible
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Carbon Cycle ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 ◽  
Dynamical Response ◽  
Steric Sea Level ◽  
Explosive Volcanic Eruptions

Abstract. Impacts of low-latitude, explosive volcanic eruptions on climate and the carbon cycle are quantified by forcing a comprehensive, fully coupled carbon cycle-climate model with pulse-like stratospheric sulfur release. The model represents the radiative and dynamical response of the climate system to volcanic eruptions and simulates a decrease of global and regional atmospheric surface temperature, regionally distinct changes in precipitation, a positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation, and a decrease in atmospheric CO2 after volcanic eruptions. The volcanic-induced cooling reduces overturning rates in tropical soils, which dominates over reduced litter input due to soil moisture decrease, resulting in higher land carbon inventories for several decades. The perturbation in the ocean carbon inventory changes sign from an initially weak carbon sink to a carbon source. Positive carbon and negative temperature anomalies in subsurface waters last up to several decades. The multi-decadal decrease in atmospheric CO2 yields an additional radiative forcing that amplifies the cooling and perturbs the Earth System on much longer time scales than the atmospheric residence time of volcanic aerosols. In addition, century-scale global warming simulations with and without volcanic eruptions over the historical period show that the ocean integrates volcanic radiative cooling and responds for different physical and biogeochemical parameters such as steric sea level or dissolved oxygen. Results from a suite of sensitivity simulations with different amounts of sulfur released and from global warming simulations show that the carbon cycle-climate sensitivity γ, expressed as change in atmospheric CO2 per unit change in global mean surface temperature, depends on the perturbation. On decadal time scales, modeled γ is several times larger for a Pinatubo-like eruption than for the industrial period and for a high emission, 21st century scenario.

scholarly journals Radiative and climate impacts of a large volcanic eruption during stratospheric sulfur geoengineering

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Laakso ◽  
H. Kokkola ◽  
A.-I. Partanen ◽  
U. Niemeier ◽  
C. Timmreck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Volcanic Eruption ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Changes ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
Solar Radiation Management ◽  
Atmospheric Conditions ◽  
Maximum Increase ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. Both explosive volcanic eruptions, which emit sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, and stratospheric geoengineering via sulfur injections can potentially cool the climate by increasing the amount of scattering particles in the atmosphere. Here we employ a global aerosol-climate model and an Earth system model to study the radiative and climate changes occurring after an erupting volcano during solar radiation management (SRM). According to our simulations the radiative impacts of the eruption and SRM are not additive and the radiative effects and climate changes occurring after the eruption depend strongly on whether SRM is continued or suspended after the eruption. In the former case, the peak burden of the additional stratospheric sulfate as well as changes in global mean precipitation are fairly similar regardless of whether the eruption takes place in a SRM or non-SRM world. However, the maximum increase in the global mean radiative forcing caused by the eruption is approximately 21 % lower compared to a case when the eruption occurs in an unperturbed atmosphere. In addition, the recovery of the stratospheric sulfur burden and radiative forcing is significantly faster after the eruption, because the eruption during the SRM leads to a smaller number and larger sulfate particles compared to the eruption in a non-SRM world. On the other hand, if SRM is suspended immediately after the eruption, the peak increase in global forcing caused by the eruption is about 32 % lower compared to a corresponding eruption into a clean background atmosphere. In this simulation, only about one-third of the global ensemble-mean cooling occurs after the eruption, compared to that occurring after an eruption under unperturbed atmospheric conditions. Furthermore, the global cooling signal is seen only for the 12 months after the eruption in the former scenario compared to over 40 months in the latter. In terms of global precipitation rate, we obtain a 36 % smaller decrease in the first year after the eruption and again a clearly faster recovery in the concurrent eruption and SRM scenario, which is suspended after the eruption. We also found that an explosive eruption could lead to significantly different regional climate responses depending on whether it takes place during geoengineering or into an unperturbed background atmosphere. Our results imply that observations from previous large eruptions, such as Mount Pinatubo in 1991, are not directly applicable when estimating the potential consequences of a volcanic eruption during stratospheric geoengineering.

scholarly journals The Greenhouse Effect Calculations by an Iteration Method and the Issue of Stratospheric Cooling

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Antero Ollila
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Effect ◽  
Iteration Method ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Transient Climate Response ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Stratospheric Cooling ◽  
Temperature Impacts ◽  
Increased Co2 Concentration

The anthropogenic global warming theory is based on the greenhouse effect (GH), which is due to the longwave (LW) absorption by GH gases and clouds according to the IPCC. This LW radiation downward is the imminent cause for the GH effect increasing the surface temperature by 33°C. It has been shown that latent and sensible heating are essential parts of downward LW radiation and the total GH effect. In this study, an iteration method utilizing this basic GH effect mechanism has been applied to simulate the warming impacts of enhanced GH effect changes. The results are compatible with the Transient Climate Response (TCR) of 0.6°C. The issue of stratospheric cooling due to increased CO2 concentration has been calculated and analyzed. The stratospheric cooling effect is real but its impact on the Effective Radiative Forcing (ERF) has been shown to be negative and not positive as generally implied. The reason is that the decreased absorption of LW radiation in the atmosphere always decreases the GH effect. This result challenges the new concept of the ERF that is the sum of Instantaneous RF (IRF) and rapid adjustments as applied in General Climate Models (GCMs). If the stratospheric adjustment has the opposite effect, then the IRF values would be also wrongly calculated in these models. Two independent validation methods were applied to test the temperature impacts of CO2 concentration increases.

scholarly journals A Temporal Kernel Method to Compute Effective Radiative Forcing in CMIP5 Transient Simulations*

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1497-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik J. L. Larson ◽  
Robert W. Portmann
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Kernel Method ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Atmospheric Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Effective radiative forcing (ERF) is calculated as the flux change at the top of the atmosphere after allowing rapid adjustments resulting from a forcing agent, such as greenhouse gases. Rapid adjustments include changes to atmospheric temperature, water vapor, and clouds. Accurate estimates of ERF are necessary in order to understand the drivers of climate change. This work presents a new method of calculating ERF using a kernel derived from the time series of a model variable (e.g., global mean surface temperature) in a model-step change experiment. The top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative imbalance has the best noise tolerance for retrieving the ERF of the model variables tested. This temporal kernel method is compared with an energy balance method, which equates ERF to the TOA radiative imbalance plus the scaled surface temperature change. Sensitivities and biases of these methods are quantified using output from phase 5 of the the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The temporal kernel method is likely more accurate for models in which a linear fit is a poor approximation for the relationship between temperature change and TOA imbalance. The difference between these methods is most apparent in forcing estimates for the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenario. The CMIP5 multimodel mean ERF calculated for large volcanic eruptions is 80% of the adjusted forcing reported by the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). This suggests that about 5% more energy has come into the earth system since 1870 than suggested by the IPCC AR5.

Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Gregory ◽  
Mark Webb
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Feedback Parameter ◽  
Tropospheric Adjustment ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract The radiative forcing of CO2 and the climate feedback parameter are evaluated in several climate models with slab oceans by regressing the annual-mean global-mean top-of-atmosphere radiative flux against the annual-mean global-mean surface air temperature change ΔT following a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration. The method indicates that in many models there is a significant rapid tropospheric adjustment to CO2 leading to changes in cloud, and reducing the effective radiative forcing, in a way analogous to the indirect and semidirect effects of aerosol. By contrast, in most models the cloud feedback is small, defined as the part of the change that evolves with ΔT. Comparison with forcing evaluated by fixing sea surface conditions gives qualitatively similar results for the cloud components of forcing, both globally and locally. Tropospheric adjustment to CO2 may be responsible for some of the model spread in equilibrium climate sensitivity and could affect time-dependent climate projections.

scholarly journals Observational constraints reduce estimates of the global mean climate relevance of black carbon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Myhre ◽  
Bjørn Samset ◽  
Camilla Weum Stjern ◽  
Øivind Hodnebrog ◽  
Ryan Kramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Black Carbon ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Absorption Efficiency ◽  
Surface Temperature Change ◽  
A Value ◽  
Rapid Adjustment ◽  
Effective Radiative Forcing ◽  
Mean Climate ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract How emissions of black carbon (BC) aerosols affect the climate is still uncertain, due to incomplete knowledge of its sources, optical properties and atmospheric processes such as transport, removal and impact on clouds. Here we constrain simulations from four climate models with observations of atmospheric BC concentrations and absorption efficiency, and the most recent emission inventories, to show that the current global mean surface temperature change from anthropogenic BC emissions is likely to be weak at +0.03 ±0.02K. Atmospheric rapid adjustment processes are found to reduce the top of atmosphere radiative imbalance relative to instantaneous radiative forcing (direct aerosol effect) by almost 50% as a multi-model mean. Furthermore, constraining the models to reproduce observational estimates of the atmospheric vertical profile reduces BC effective radiative forcing to 0.08 W m-2, a value more than 50% lower than in unconstrained simulations. Our results imply a need to revisit commonly used climate metrics such as the global warming potential of BC. This value (for a 100-year time horizon) reduces from 680 when neglecting rapid adjustments and using an unconstrained BC profile to our best estimate of 160 ±120.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document