scholarly journals Evaluating nighttime CALIOP 0.532 μm aerosol optical depth and extinction coefficient retrievals

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 2143-2160 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Campbell ◽  
J. L. Tackett ◽  
J. S. Reid ◽  
J. Zhang ◽  
C. A. Curtis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Extinction Coefficient ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Diurnal Variability ◽  
Data Points ◽  
Ground Based Lidar

Abstract. NASA Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) Version 3.01 5-km nighttime 0.532 μm aerosol optical depth (AOD) datasets from 2007 are screened, averaged and evaluated at 1° × 1° resolution versus corresponding/co-incident 0.550 μm AOD derived using the US Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS), featuring two-dimensional variational assimilation of quality-assured NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) AOD. In the absence of sunlight, since passive radiometric AOD retrievals rely overwhelmingly on scattered radiances, the model represents one of the few practical global estimates available from which to attempt such a validation. Daytime comparisons, though, provide useful context. Regional-mean CALIOP vertical profiles of night/day 0.532 μm extinction coefficient are compared with 0.523/0.532 μm ground-based lidar measurements to investigate representativeness and diurnal variability. In this analysis, mean nighttime CALIOP AOD are mostly lower than daytime (0.121 vs. 0.126 for all aggregated data points, and 0.099 vs. 0.102 when averaged globally per normalised 1° × 1° bin), though the relationship is reversed over land and coastal regions when the data are averaged per normalised bin (0.134/0.108 vs. 0140/0.112, respectively). Offsets assessed within single bins alone approach ±20%. CALIOP AOD, both day and night, are higher than NAAPS over land (0.137 vs. 0.124) and equal over water (0.082 vs. 0.083) when averaged globally per normalised bin. However, for all data points inclusive, NAAPS exceeds CALIOP over land, coast and ocean, both day and night. Again, differences assessed within single bins approach 50% in extreme cases. Correlation between CALIOP and NAAPS AOD is comparable during both day and night. Higher correlation is found nearest the equator, both as a function of sample size and relative signal magnitudes inherent at these latitudes. Root mean square deviation between CALIOP and NAAPS varies between 0.1 and 0.3 globally during both day/night. Averaging of CALIOP along-track AOD data points within a single NAAPS grid bin improves correlation and RMSD, though day/night and land/ocean biases persist and are believed systematic. Vertical profiles of extinction coefficient derived in the Caribbean compare well with ground-based lidar observations, though potentially anomalous selection of a priori lidar ratios for CALIOP retrievals is likely inducing some discrepancies. Mean effective aerosol layer top heights are stable between day and night, indicating consistent layer-identification diurnally, which is noteworthy considering the potential limiting effects of ambient solar noise during day.

scholarly journals Evaluating nighttime CALIOP 0.532 μm aerosol optical depth and extinction coefficient retrievals

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 2747-2794 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Campbell ◽  
J. L. Tackett ◽  
J. S. Reid ◽  
J. Zhang ◽  
C. A. Curtis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Extinction Coefficient ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Diurnal Variability ◽  
Data Points ◽  
Ground Based Lidar

Abstract. NASA Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) Version 3.01 5-km nighttime 0.532 μm aerosol optical depth (AOD) datasets from 2007 are screened, averaged and evaluated at 1° × 1° resolution versus corresponding/co-incident 0.550 μm AOD derived using the US Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS), featuring two-dimensional variational assimilation of quality-assured NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) AOD. Daytime datasets are investigated similarly for context. Regional-mean CALIOP vertical profiles of night/day 0.532 μm extinction coefficient are compared with 0.523/0.532 μm ground-based lidar measurements to investigate representativeness and diurnal variability. In this analysis, mean nighttime CALIOP AOD are mostly lower than daytime (0.121 vs. 0.126 for all aggregated data points, and 0.099 vs. 0.102 when averaged globally per normalized 1° × 1° bin), though the relationship is reversed over land and coastal regions when the data are averaged per normalized bin (0.134/0.108 vs. 0140/0.112, respectively). Offsets assessed within single bins alone approach ±20%. CALIOP AOD, both day and night, are higher than NAAPS over land (0.137 vs. 0.124) and equal over water (0.082 vs. 0.083) when averaged globally per normalized bin. However, for all data points inclusive, NAAPS exceeds CALIOP over land, coast and ocean, both day and night. Again, differences assessed within single bins approach 50% in extreme cases. Correlation between CALIOP and NAAPS AOD is comparable during both day and night. Higher correlation is found nearest the equator, both as a function of sample size and relative signal magnitudes inherent at these latitudes. Root mean square deviation between CALIOP and NAAPS varies between 0.1 and 0.3 globally during both day/night. Averaging of CALIOP along-track AOD data points within a single NAAPS grid bin improves correlation and RMSD, though day/night and land/ocean biases persist and are believed systematic. Vertical profiles of extinction coefficient derived in the Caribbean compare well with ground-based lidar observations, though potentially anomalous selection of a-priori lidar ratios for CALIOP retrievals is likely inducing some discrepancies. Mean effective aerosol layer top heights are stable between day and night, indicating consistent layer-identification diurnally, which is noteworthy considering the potential limiting effects of ambient solar noise during day.

Lidar Measurements for Comparison of Atmospheric Aerosol Extinction and Scattering Properties over Lanzhou, China

2011 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Jie Cao ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Xiao Jing Quan ◽  
Bi Zhou ◽  
Jing Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Extinction Coefficient ◽  
Atmospheric Aerosol ◽  
Aerosol Extinction ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Aerosol Extinction Coefficient ◽  
Semi Arid

The aerosol comparison experiment was conducted in the Semi-Arid Climate and Environment Observatory of Lanzhou University since March to April 2007 with the measurements of two micro-pulse lidars MPL-4B and CE370-2. In the paper, the differences of aerosol extinction coefficient and optical depth retrieved from the observations of MPL-4B and CE370-2 are analyzed, and the results show: the aerosol extinction coefficient retrieved from the observation of MPL-4B is in general smaller than that from CE370-2, and the difference mainly exists in the low layer, while their trends of vertical profiles agree well; the aerosol optical depths from the observations of MPL-4B and CE370-2 correlate linearly rather well with the coefficient of 0.71, and the aerosol optical depth retrieved from the measurement of MPL-4B is less than that from CE370-2 in whole.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of column aerosol optical depths from CALIPSO and MODIS-Aqua

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kittaka ◽  
D. M. Winker ◽  
M. A. Vaughan ◽  
A. Omar ◽  
L. A. Remer
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Aerosol Retrieval ◽  
Modis Aod ◽  
Seasonal Basis ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) is carried on the CALIPSO satellite and has acquired global aerosol profiles since June 2006. CALIPSO is flown in formation with the Aqua satellite as part of the A-train satellite constellation, so that a large number of coincident aerosol observations are available from CALIOP and the MODIS-Aqua instrument. This study compares column aerosol optical depth at 0.532 μm derived from CALIOP aerosol profiles with MODIS-Aqua 0.55 μm aerosol optical depth over the period June 2006 through August 2008. The study is based on the CALIOP Version 2 Aerosol Layer Product and MODIS Collection 5. While CALIOP is first and foremost a profiling instrument, this comparison of column aerosol optical depth provides insight into quality of CALIOP aerosol data. It is found that daytime aerosol optical depth from the CALIOP Version 2 product has only a small global mean bias relative to MODIS Collection 5. Regional biases, of both signs, are larger and biases are seen to vary somewhat with season. Good agreement between the two sensors in ocean regions with low cloudiness suggests that the selection of lidar ratios used in the CALIOP aerosol retrieval is sufficient to provide a regional mean AOD consistent with that retrieved from MODIS. Although differences over land are observed to be larger than over ocean, the bias between CALIOP and MODIS AOD on a regional-seasonal basis is found to be roughly within the envelope of the MODIS expected uncertainty over land and ocean. This work forms a basis for further comparisons using the recently released CALIOP Version 3 data.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of CALIOP and MODIS aerosol optical depth retrievals

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 3319-3344 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kittaka ◽  
D. M. Winker ◽  
M. A. Vaughan ◽  
A. Omar ◽  
L. A. Remer
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Calibration Error ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Global Mean ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract. The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) is carried on the CALIPSO satellite and has acquired global aerosol profiles since June 2006. CALIPSO is flown in formation with the Aqua satellite as part of the A-train satellite constellation, so that a large number of coincident aerosol observations are available from CALIOP and the MODIS-Aqua instrument. This study compares column aerosol optical depth at 0.532 μm derived from CALIOP aerosol profiles with MODIS-Aqua 0.55 μm aerosol optical depth over the period June 2006 through August 2008. The study is based on the CALIOP Version 2 Aerosol Layer Product and MODIS Collection 5. While CALIOP is first and foremost a profiling instrument, this comparison of column aerosol optical depth provides insight into quality of CALIOP aerosol data. It is found that daytime aerosol optical depth from the CALIOP Version 2 product has a small global mean bias relative to MODIS Collection 5. Regional biases, of both signs, are larger and biases are seen to vary somewhat with season. In northern mid-latitudes, aerosol optical depth from CALIOP is lower, on average, than from MODIS. This may be partly due to a latitude-dependent calibration error in Version 2 CALIOP Level 1 daytime 0.532 μm profiles. This comparison of CALIOP and MODIS also provides insight into possible biases in the MODIS aerosol optical depth product due to cloud masking and errors in modeling land surface reflectance.

scholarly journals Anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring satellite mission: the need for multi-angle polarimetric observations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie P. Rusli ◽  
Otto Hasekamp ◽  
Joost aan de Brugh ◽  
Guangliang Fu ◽  
Yasjka Meijer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Zenith Angle ◽  
Atmospheric Aerosols ◽  
Solar Zenith Angle ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Satellite Mission ◽  
Measurement Uncertainties ◽  
Data Yield

Abstract. Atmospheric aerosols have been known to be a major source of uncertainties in CO2 concentrations retrieved from space. In this study, we investigate the added value of multi-angle polarimeter (MAP) measurements in the context of the Copernicus candidate mission for anthropogenic CO2 monitoring (CO2M). To this end, we compare aerosol-induced XCO2 errors from standard retrievals using spectrometer only (without MAP) with those from retrievals using both MAP and spectrometer. MAP observations are expected to provide information about aerosols that is useful for improving XCO2 accuracy. For the purpose of this work, we generate synthetic measurements for different atmospheric and geophysical scenes over land, based on which XCO2 retrieval errors are assessed. We show that the standard XCO2 retrieval approach that makes no use of auxiliary aerosol observations returns XCO2 errors with an overall bias of 1.12 ppm, and a spread (defined as half of the 15.9th to the 84.1th percentile range) of 2.07 ppm. The latter is far higher than the required XCO2 accuracy (0.5 ppm) and precision (0.7 ppm) of the CO2M mission. Moreover, these XCO2 errors exhibit a significantly larger bias and scatter at high aerosol optical depth, high aerosol altitude, and low solar zenith angle, which could lead to a worse performance in retrieving XCO2 from polluted areas where CO2 and aerosols are co-emitted. We proceed to determine MAP instrument specifications in terms of wavelength range, number of viewing angles, and measurement uncertainties that are required to achieve XCO2 accuracy and precision targets of the mission. Two different MAP instrument concepts are considered in this analysis. We find that for either concept, MAP measurement uncertainties on radiance and degree of linear polarization should be no more than 3 % and 0.003, respectively. Adopting the derived MAP requirements, a retrieval exercise using both MAP and spectrometer measurements of the synthetic scenes delivers XCO2 errors with an overall bias of −0.004 ppm and a spread of 0.54 ppm, implying compliance with the CO2M mission requirements; the very low bias is especially important for proper emission estimates. For the test ensemble, we find effectively no dependence of the XCO2 errors on aerosol optical depth, altitude of the aerosol layer, and solar zenith angle. These results indicate a major improvement in the retrieved XCO2 accuracy with respect to the standard retrieval approach, which could lead to a higher data yield, better global coverage, and a more comprehensive determination of CO2 sinks and sources. As such, this outcome underlines the contribution of, and therefore the need for, a MAP instrument onboard the CO2M mission.

scholarly journals Using the OMI Aerosol Index and Absorption Aerosol Optical Depth to evaluate the NASA MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (23) ◽  
pp. 32177-32231 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Buchard ◽  
A. M. da Silva ◽  
P. R. Colarco ◽  
A. Darmenov ◽  
C. A. Randles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Properties ◽  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Biomass Burning ◽  
Saharan Dust ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Aerosol Absorption ◽  
Modis Aod ◽  
Aerosol Index

Abstract. A radiative transfer interface has been developed to simulate the UV Aerosol Index (AI) from the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System version 5 (GEOS-5) aerosol assimilated fields. The purpose of this work is to use the AI and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth (AAOD) derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurements as independent validation for the Modern Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications Aerosol Reanalysis (MERRAero). MERRAero is based on a version of the GEOS-5 model that is radiatively coupled to the Goddard Chemistry, Aerosol, Radiation, and Transport (GOCART) aerosol module and includes assimilation of Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor. Since AI is dependent on aerosol concentration, optical properties and altitude of the aerosol layer, we make use of complementary observations to fully diagnose the model, including AOD from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR), aerosol retrievals from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) and attenuated backscatter coefficients from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) mission to ascertain potential misplacement of plume height by the model. By sampling dust, biomass burning and pollution events in 2007 we have compared model produced AI and AAOD with the corresponding OMI products, identifying regions where the model representation of absorbing aerosols was deficient. As a result of this study over the Saharan dust region, we have obtained a new set of dust aerosol optical properties that retains consistency with the MODIS AOD data that were assimilated, while resulting in better agreement with aerosol absorption measurements from OMI. The analysis conducted over the South African and South American biomass burning regions indicates that revising the spectrally-dependent aerosol absorption properties in the near-UV region improves the modeled-observed AI comparisons. Finally, during a period where the Asian region was mainly dominated by anthropogenic aerosols, we have performed a qualitative analysis in which the specification of anthropogenic emissions in GEOS-5 is adjusted to provide insight into discrepancies observed in AI comparisons.

Dust Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval over a Desert Surface Using the SEVIRI Window Channels

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 704-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart De Paepe ◽  
Steven Dewitte
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Surface Radiation ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Surface Emissivity ◽  
Ir Radiation ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
A Minor

Abstract The authors present a new algorithm to retrieve aerosol optical depth (AOD) over a desert using the window channels centered at 8.7, 10.8, and 12.0 μm of the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) instrument on board the Meteosat Second Generation satellite. The presence of dust aerosols impacts the longwave outgoing radiation, allowing the aerosols over the desert surfaces to be detected in the thermal infrared (IR) wavelengths. To retrieve the aerosol properties over land, the surface contribution to the satellite radiance measured at the top of the atmosphere has to be taken into account. The surface radiation depends on the surface temperature, which is characterized by a strong diurnal variation over the desert, and the surface emissivity, which is assumed to be constant over a time span of 24 h. The surface emissivity is based on clear-sky observations that are corrected for atmospheric absorption and emission. The clear-sky image is a composite of pixels that is characterized by the highest brightness temperature (BT) of the SEVIRI channel at 10.8 μm, and by a negative BT difference between the channels at 8.7 and 10.8 μm. Because of the lower temperatures of clouds and aerosols compared to clear-sky conditions, the authors assume that the selected pixel values are obtained for a clear-sky day. A forward model is used to simulate the thermal IR radiation transfer in the dust layer. The apparent surface radiation for the three window channels in the presence of aerosols is calculated as a function of the surface emissivity and the surface temperature, the aerosol layer temperature, and the AOD for different aerosol loadings. From these simulations two emissivity ratios, which are stored in lookup tables (LUT), are calculated. The retrieval algorithm consists of processing the clear-sky image and computing the surface emissivity, processing the instantaneous image, and computing the apparent surface radiation for the three window channels. The two emissivity ratios are computed using the radiances at 8.7 and 10.8 μm and at 8.7 and 12.0 μm, respectively. The SEVIRI AOD is obtained by the inversion of these emissivity ratios using the corresponding LUT. The algorithm is applied to a minor dust event over the Sahara between 19 and 22 June 2007. For the validation the SEVIRI AOD is compared with the AOD from the Cloud Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) along the satellite track.

scholarly journals A Multi Linear Regression Model to Derive Dust PM10 in the Sahel Using AERONET Aerosol Optical Depth and CALIOP Aerosol Layer Products

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 3099
Author(s):  
Jean-François Léon ◽  
Nadège Martiny ◽  
Sébastien Merlet
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Linear Regression Model ◽  
Population Exposure ◽  
Aerosol Layer ◽  
Multi Linear Regression ◽  
Sun Photometer ◽  
The Impact

Due to a limited number of monitoring stations in Western Africa, the impact of mineral dust on PM10 surface concentrations is still poorly known. We propose a new method to retrieve PM10 dust surface concentrations from sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) and CALIPSO/CALIOP Level 2 aerosol layer products. The method is based on a multi linear regression model that is trained using co-located PM10, AERONET and CALIOP observations at 3 different locations in the Sahel. In addition to the sun photometer AOD, the regression model uses the CALIOP-derived base and top altitude of the lowermost dust layer, its AOD, the columnar total and columnar dust AOD. Due to the low revisit period of the CALIPSO satellite, the monthly mean annual cycles of the parameters are used as predictor variables rather than instantaneous observations. The regression model improves the correlation coefficient between monthly mean PM10 and AOD from 0.15 (AERONET AOD only) to 0.75 (AERONET AOD and CALIOP parameters). The respective high and low PM10 concentration during the winter dry season and summer season are well produced. Days with surface PM10 above 100 μg/m3 are better identified when using the CALIOP parameters in the multi linear regression model. The number of true positives (actual and predicted concentrations above the threshold) is increased and leads to an improvement in the classification sensitivity (recall) by a factor 1.8. Our methodology can be extrapolated to the whole Sahel area provided that satellite derived AOD maps are used in order to create a new dataset on population exposure to dust events in this area.

scholarly journals Retrieval of desert dust aerosol vertical profiles from IASI measurements in the TIR atmospheric window

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 2577-2591 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vandenbussche ◽  
S. Kochenova ◽  
A. C. Vandaele ◽  
N. Kumps ◽  
M. De Mazière
Keyword(s):  
Optical Depth ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Dust Aerosol ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Desert Dust ◽  
Dust Aerosols ◽  
Infrared Measurements

Abstract. Desert dust aerosols are the most prominent tropospheric aerosols, playing an important role in the earth's climate. However, their radiative forcing is currently not known with sufficient precision to even determine its sign. The sources of uncertainty are multiple, one of them being a poor characterisation of the dust aerosol's vertical profile on a global scale. In this work, we tackle this scientific issue by designing a method for retrieving dust aerosol vertical profiles from Thermal Infrared measurements by Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) instruments onboard the Metop satellite series. IASI offers almost global coverage twice a day, and long (past and future) time series of radiances, therefore being extremely well suited for climate studies. Our retrieval follows Rodger's formalism and is based on a two-step approach, treating separately the issues of low altitude sensitivity and difficult a priori definition. We compare our results for a selected test case above the Atlantic Ocean and North Africa in June 2009, with optical depth data from MODIS, aerosol absorbing index from GOME-2 and OMI, and vertical profiles of extinction coefficients from CALIOP. We also use literature information on desert dust sources to interpret our results above land. Our retrievals provide perfectly reasonable results in terms of optical depth. The retrieved vertical profiles (with on average 1.5 degrees of freedom) show most of the time sensitivity down to the lowest layer, and agree well with CALIOP extinction profiles for medium to high dust optical depth. We conclude that this new method is extremely promising for improving the scientific knowledge about the 3-D distribution of desert dust aerosols in the atmosphere.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document