Interior of Jupiter in the context of Juno and Galileo: signature of a decoupling between the atmosphere and the interior

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Debras ◽  
Gilles Chabrier
Keyword(s):  
Convective Zone ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Observational Constraints ◽  
Minimum Mass ◽  
Compositional Change ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Formation And Evolution ◽  
To Come ◽  
Gas Accretion

<p>Juno's observations of Jupiter's gravity field have revealed extremely low values for the gravitational moments that are difficult to reconcile with the high abundance of metals observed in the atmosphere by both Galileo and Juno. Recent studies chose to arbitrarily get rid of one of these two constraints in order to build models of Jupiter.</p><p>In this presentation, I will detail our new Jupiter structure models reconciling Juno and Galileo observational constraints. These models confirm the need to separate Jupiter into at least 4 layers: an outer convective shell, a non-convective zone of compositional change, an inner convective shell and a diluted core representing about 60 percent of the planet in radius. Compared to other studies, these models propose a new idea with important consequences: a decrease in the quantity of metals between the outer and inner convective shells. This would imply that the atmospheric composition is not representative of the internal composition of the planet, contrary to what is regularly admitted, and would strongly impact the Jupiter formation scenarios (localization, migration, accretion).</p><p>In particular, the presence of an internal non-convective zone prevents mixing between the two convective envelopes. I will detail the physical processes of this semi-convective zone (layered convection or H-He immiscibility) and explain how they may persist during the evolution of the planet.</p><p>These models also impose a limit mass on the compact core, which cannot be heavier than 5 Earth masses. Such a mass, lower than the runaway gas accretion minimum mass, needs to be explained in the light of our understanding of the formation and evolution of giant planets.</p><p>I will finally detail the application of our work to Saturn, and what we can expect to learn about the interior of the giant planets in the years to come. </p>

New models of Jupiter in the context of Juno and Galileo: signature of a decoupling between the atmosphere and the interior

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Debras ◽  
Gilles Chabrier
Keyword(s):  
Extrasolar Planets ◽  
Convective Zone ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Observational Constraints ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Hot Jupiters ◽  
Formation And Evolution ◽  
Gas Accretion

<p><span lang="en-US">Juno's observations of Jupiter's gravity field have revealed extremely low values for the gravitational moments that are difficult to reconcile with the high abundance of metals observed in the atmosphere by Galileo. Recent studies chose to arbitrarily get rid of one of these two constraints in order to build models of Jupiter.</span></p> <p><span lang="en-US">In this presentation, I will detail our new Jupiter structure models reconciling Juno and Galileo observational constraints. These models confirm the need to separate Jupiter into at least 4 layers: an outer convective shell, a non-convective zone of compositional change, an inner convective shell and a diluted core representing about 60 percent of the planet in radius. Compared to other studies, these models propose a new idea with important consequences: a decrease in the quantity of metals between the outer and inner convective shells. This would imply that the atmospheric composition is not representative of the internal composition of the planet, contrary to what is regularly admitted, and would strongly impact the Jupiter formation scenarios (localization, migration, accretion).</span></p> <p><span lang="en-US">In particular, the presence of an internal non-convective zone prevents mixing between the two convective envelopes. I will detail the physical processes of this semi-convective zone (layered convection or H-He immiscibility) and explain how they may persist during the evolution of the planet.</span></p> <p><span lang="en-US">These models also impose a limit mass on the compact core, which cannot be heavier than 5 Earth masses. Such a mass, lower than the runaway gas accretion minimum mass, needs to be explained in the light of our understanding of the formation and evolution of giant planets.</span></p> <p><span lang="en-US">Using these models of Jupiter, I will finally detail the application of our new understanding of the interior of this planet to giant exoplanets. At a time of direct imaging of extrasolar planets and atmospheric characterization of hot Jupiters, a good understanding of the internal processes of planets in the solar system is paramount to make the best use of all the observations.</span></p>

scholarly journals Close-in giant-planet formation via in-situ gas accretion and their natal disk properties

2019 ◽  
Vol 629 ◽  
pp. L1
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Hasegawa ◽  
Tze Yeung Mathew Yu ◽  
Bradley M. S. Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Solar Nebula ◽  
Giant Planet ◽  
Central Star ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Minimum Mass ◽  
Gas Accretion ◽  
Increasing Function

Aims. The origin of close-in Jovian planets is still elusive. We examine the in-situ gas accretion scenario as a formation mechanism of these planets. Methods. We reconstruct natal disk properties from the occurrence rate distribution of close-in giant planets, under the assumption that the occurrence rate may reflect the gas accretion efficiency onto cores of these planets. Results. We find that the resulting gas surface density profile becomes an increasing function of the distance from the central star with some structure at r ≃ 0.1 au. This profile is quite different from the standard minimum-mass solar nebula model, while our profile leads to better reproduction of the population of observed close-in super-Earths based on previous studies. We compute the resulting magnetic field profiles and find that our profiles can be fitted by stellar dipole fields (∝r−3) in the vicinity of the central star and large-scale fields (∝r−2) at the inner disk regions, either if the isothermal assumption breaks down or if nonideal magnetohydrodynamic effects become important. For both cases, the transition between these two profiles occurs at r ≃ 0.1 au, which corresponds to the period valley of giant exoplanets. Conclusions. Our work provides an opportunity to test the in-situ gas accretion scenario against disk quantities, which may constrain the gas distribution of the minimum-mass extrasolar nebula.

scholarly journals In Situ exploration of the giant planets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Mousis ◽  
D. H. Atkinson ◽  
R. Ambrosi ◽  
S. Atreya ◽  
D. Banfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Formation History ◽  
History Of ◽  
Composition Structure ◽  
Galileo Probe ◽  
Probe Measurements

AbstractRemote sensing observations suffer significant limitations when used to study the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our Solar System. This impacts our knowledge of the formation of these planets and the physics of their atmospheres. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements was illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as the determination of the noble gases’ abundances and the precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio were only made available through in situ measurements by the Galileo probe. Here we describe the main scientific goals to be addressed by the future in situ exploration of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, placing the Galileo probe exploration of Jupiter in a broader context. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level would yield insight into two broad themes: i) the formation history of the giant planets and that of the Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics, with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay station. An atmospheric probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to a future NASA New Frontiers or flagship mission to be launched toward Saturn, Uranus, and/or Neptune.

scholarly journals The Grand Tack model: a critical review

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (S310) ◽  
pp. 194-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean N. Raymond ◽  
Alessandro Morbidelli
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Protoplanetary Disk ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Asteroid Belt ◽  
Terrestrial Planets ◽  
Saturn’S Satellites ◽  
Internal Inconsistency ◽  
Solar System Bodies ◽  
Gas Accretion

AbstractThe “Grand Tack” model proposes that the inner Solar System was sculpted by the giant planets' orbital migration in the gaseous protoplanetary disk. Jupiter first migrated inward then Jupiter and Saturn migrated back outward together. If Jupiter's turnaround or “tack” point was at ~ 1.5 AU the inner disk of terrestrial building blocks would have been truncated at ~ 1 AU, naturally producing the terrestrial planets' masses and spacing. During the gas giants' migration the asteroid belt is severely depleted but repopulated by distinct planetesimal reservoirs that can be associated with the present-day S and C types. The giant planets' orbits are consistent with the later evolution of the outer Solar System.Here we confront common criticisms of the Grand Tack model. We show that some uncertainties remain regarding the Tack mechanism itself; the most critical unknown is the timing and rate of gas accretion onto Saturn and Jupiter. Current isotopic and compositional measurements of Solar System bodies – including the D/H ratios of Saturn's satellites – do not refute the model. We discuss how alternate models for the formation of the terrestrial planets each suffer from an internal inconsistency and/or place a strong and very specific requirement on the properties of the protoplanetary disk.We conclude that the Grand Tack model remains viable and consistent with our current understanding of planet formation. Nonetheless, we encourage additional tests of the Grand Tack as well as the construction of alternate models.

scholarly journals Full exploration of the giant planet population around β Pictoris

2018 ◽  
Vol 612 ◽  
pp. A108 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.-M. Lagrange ◽  
M. Keppler ◽  
N. Meunier ◽  
J. Lannier ◽  
H. Beust ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extrasolar Planets ◽  
Giant Planet ◽  
Young Stars ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Close Orbit ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Solar Type ◽  
Formation And Evolution ◽  
The One

Context. The search for extrasolar planets has been limited so far to close orbit (typ. ≤5 au) planets around mature solar-type stars on the one hand, and to planets on wide orbits (≥10 au) around young stars on the other hand. To get a better view of the full giant planet population, we have started a survey to search for giant planets around a sample of carefully selected young stars. Aims. This paper aims at exploring the giant planet population around one of our targets, β Pictoris, over a wide range of separations. With a disk and a planet already known, the β Pictoris system is indeed a very precious system for studies of planetary formation and evolution, as well as of planet–disk interactions. Methods. We analyse more than 2000 HARPS high-resolution spectra taken over 13 years as well as NaCo images recorded between 2003 and 2016. We combine these data to compute the detection probabilities of planets throughout the disk, from a fraction of au to a few dozen au. Results. We exclude the presence of planets more massive than 3 MJup closer than 1 au and further than 10 au, with a 90% probability. 15+ MJup companions are excluded throughout the disk except between 3 and 5 au with a 90% probability. In this region, we exclude companions with masses larger than 18 (resp. 30) MJup with probabilities of 60 (resp. 90) %.

scholarly journals Rapid Formation of Gas-giant Planets via Collisional Coagulation from Dust Grains to Planetary Cores

2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Kobayashi ◽  
Hidekazu Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Protoplanetary Disks ◽  
Central Star ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Solar Systems ◽  
Evolution Path ◽  
Planetary Cores ◽  
Rapid Formation ◽  
Gas Giant ◽  
Planetary Migration ◽  
Gas Accretion

Abstract Gas-giant planets, such as Jupiter, Saturn, and massive exoplanets, were formed via the gas accretion onto the solid cores, each with a mass of roughly 10 Earth masses. However, rapid radial migration due to disk–planet interaction prevents the formation of such massive cores via planetesimal accretion. Comparably rapid core growth via pebble accretion requires very massive protoplanetary disks because most pebbles fall into the central star. Although planetesimal formation, planetary migration, and gas-giant core formation have been studied with a lot of effort, the full evolution path from dust to planets is still uncertain. Here we report the result of full simulations for collisional evolution from dust to planets in a whole disk. Dust growth with realistic porosity allows the formation of icy planetesimals in the inner disk (≲10 au), while pebbles formed in the outer disk drift to the inner disk and there grow to planetesimals. The growth of those pebbles to planetesimals suppresses their radial drift and supplies small planetesimals sustainably in the vicinity of cores. This enables rapid formation of sufficiently massive planetary cores within 0.2–0.4 million years, prior to the planetary migration. Our models shows the first gas giants form at 2–7 au in rather common protoplanetary disks, in agreement with the exoplanet and solar systems.

scholarly journals The confrontation of the shock-powered synchrotron maser model with the Galactic FRB 200428

2020 ◽  
Vol 500 (2) ◽  
pp. 2704-2710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-Wei Yu ◽  
Yuan-Chuan Zou ◽  
Zi-Gao Dai ◽  
Wen-Fei Yu
Keyword(s):  
Line Of Sight ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Observational Constraints ◽  
Synchrotron Emission ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Emission Efficiency ◽  
Free Parameters ◽  
Fast Radio Burst ◽  
Parameter Constraints

ABSTRACT The association of FRB 200428 with an X-ray burst (XRB) from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 offers important implications for the physical processes responsible for the fast radio burst (FRB) phenomena. By assuming that the XRB emission is produced in the magnetosphere, we investigate the possibility that the FRB emission is produced by shock-powered synchrotron maser (SM), which is phenomenologically described with a number of free parameters. The observational constraints on the model parameters indicate that the model can in principle be consistent with the FRB 200428 observations, if the ejecta lunched by magnetar activities can have appropriate ingredients and structures and the shock processes occur on the line of sight. To be specific, a complete burst ejecta should consist of an ultra-relativistic and extremely highly collimated e± component and a sub-relativistic and wide-spreading baryonic component. The internal shocks producing the FRB emission arise from a collision between the e± ejecta and the remnant of a previous baryonic ejecta at the same direction. The parameter constraints depend on the uncertain spectrum and efficiency of the SM emission. While the spectrum is tentatively described by a spectral index of −2, we estimate the emission efficiency to be around 10−4 by requiring that the synchrotron emission of the shocked material cannot be much brighter than the magnetosphere XRB emission.

scholarly journals New Results on the Composition of the Outer Planets and Titan

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 891-893
Author(s):  
Thierry Fouchet
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Atmospheric Chemistry ◽  
Recent Progress ◽  
Giant Planets ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Solar System Formation ◽  
Outer Planets ◽  
System Formation ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIn this brief summary, I present recent progress on our knowledge of the Giant Planets and Titan atmospheric composition, as well as the impact of this progress on our understanding of Solar System formation, and atmospheric chemistry.

scholarly journals Aerosols for Concentrating Solar Electricity Production Forecasts: Requirement Quantification and ECMWF/MACC Aerosol Forecast Assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 903-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Schroedter-Homscheidt ◽  
Armel Oumbe ◽  
Angela Benedetti ◽  
Jean-Jacques Morcrette
Keyword(s):  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Aerosol Extinction ◽  
Grid Integration ◽  
Weather Forecasts ◽  
Preparatory Activity ◽  
To Come ◽  
Solar Electricity

The potential for transferring a larger share of our energy supply toward renewable energy is a widely discussed goal in society, economics, environment, and climate-related programs. For a larger share of electricity to come from fluctuating solar and wind energy-based electricity, production forecasts are required to ensure successful grid integration. Concentrating solar power holds the potential to make the fluctuating solar electricity a dispatchable resource by using both heat storage systems and solar production forecasts based on a reliable weather prediction. These solar technologies exploit the direct irradiance at the surface, which is a quantity very dependent on the aerosol extinction with values up to 100%. Results from present-day numerical weather forecasts are inadequate, as they generally use climatologies for dealing with aerosol extinction. Therefore, meteorological forecasts have to be extended by chemical weather forecasts. The paper aims at quantifying on a global scale the question of whether and where daily mean or hourly forecasts are required, or if persistence is sufficient in some regions. It assesses the performance of recently introduced NWP aerosol schemes by using the ECMWF/Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) forecast, which is a preparatory activity for the upcoming European Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) Atmosphere Service.

Analysis of ozone budget in CMIP6 experiments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Griffiths ◽  
Zeng Guang ◽  
Sungbo Shim ◽  
Jane Mulcahy ◽  
Lee Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Aerosol Particles ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Anthropogenic Emissions ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Chemical Production ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Intercomparison Project

<p>A grand challenge in the field of chemistry-climate modelling is to understand the connection between anthropogenic emissions, atmospheric composition and the radiative forcing of trace gases and aerosols.   The AerChemMIP model intercomparison project, part of CMIP6, focuses on calculating the radiative forcing of gases and aerosol particles over the period 1850 to 2100.  We present an analysis of the trends in tropospheric ozone budget in the UKESM1 and other models from CMIP6 experiments. We discuss these trends in terms of chemical production and loss of ozone as well as physical processes such as transport and deposition.  Where possible, AerChemMIP attribution experiments such as histSST-piCH4, will be used to quantify the effect of individual emissions and forcing changes on the historical ozone burden and budget.  For future experiments, we focus on analogous experiments from the SSP3-70 scenario, a ‘regional rivalry’ shared socioeconomic pathway involving significant emissions changes.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document