scholarly journals KOMPARASI METODE SAW DAN MOORA DALAM PEMILIHAN JURUSAN PADA SMAN 108 JAKARTA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Alika Putri ◽  
Cahyani Budihartanti
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
High Schools ◽  
Calculation Result ◽  
The South ◽  
Method Calculation ◽  
Academic Abilities ◽  
Moora Method ◽  
Selection Of

SMA Negeri 108 Jakarta merupakan salah satu sekolah menengah atas yang berada didaerah Jakarta selatan, di SMA Negeri 108 Jakarta biasanya dilakukan Pemilihan jurusan pada semester ganjil oleh siswa kelas X. Di sekolah ini terbagi dua jurusan yaitu jurusan IPA dan IPS. Pelaksanaan pemilihan jurusan bagi mereka diperkenalkan sebagai upaya untuk mengarahkan siswa terhadap bakat dan minat serta kemampuan akademik siswa tersebut. Tujuan pemilihan jurusan ini agar siswa lebih mudah dalam menentukan jurusan sesuai keinginannya. Penentuan pemilihan jurusan memang terbukti sangat sulit bagi siswa atau orang tua siswa pada era sekarang. Metode yang digunakan dalam pengambilan keputusan pemilihan jurusan pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode SAW dan MOORA dengan mengomparasi penerapan dan hasil dari perhitungan kedua metode tersebut sehingga menghasilkan keputusan yang konsisten dan terbaik. Hasil dari perhitungan kedua metode menjadikan Anggini Sarah sebagai nilai terbesar dengan nilai perhitungan SAW yaitu 24,600 dan hasil perhitungan metode MOORA yaitu 10,451 menjadi jurusan yang terpilih yaitu IPA.   Kata kunci: Komparasi, SAW, MOORA, Pemilihan Jurusan   Abstract  - SMAN 108 Jakarta is one of the high schools in the south Jakarta area, in the 108 Jakarta High School, the selection of majors is usually done in odd semester by class X students. The school is divided into two majors namely science and social majors. The selection of majors for them was introduced as an effort to direct students towards their students' talents and interests and academic abilities. The purpose of this department selection is for students to more easily determine the department according to their wishes. Determination of the selection of majors indeed proved very difficult for students or parents of students in the current era. The method used in decision making in the selection of majors in this study uses the SAW and MOORA methods by comparing the implementation and results of the calculation of the two methods so as to produce the best and most consistent decisions. The results of the calculation of the two methods make Anggini Sarah the largest value with the SAW calculation value of 24,600 and the MOORA method calculation result of 10.451 being the chosen major, IPA.   Keywords: Comparison, SAW, MOORA, Selection of Departments

Summer institute for mathematically talented high-school youth

1962 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-380
Author(s):  
Robert W. Rempfer
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High Schools ◽  
Summer Institute ◽  
Clark County ◽  
State College ◽  
Mathematically Talented ◽  
School Youth ◽  
Selection Of

Our NSF-supported institute accepted ex-tenth- or eleventh-grade commuters from Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas counties in Oregon and Clark county in Washington. Screened by their high schools before we received their applications, nearly a hundred came to Portland State College from the four counties to take the three-hour test* which was used in the selection of our 26 participants.

scholarly journals Study and Implementation of the Fuzzy Mamdani and Sugeno Methods in Decision Making on Selection of Outstanding Students at the South Aceh Polytechnic

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-164
Author(s):  
Amsar Yunan ◽  
Muhammad Ali
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
Education Student ◽  
The South ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Inference System ◽  
Fuzzy Method ◽  
Determining Factors ◽  
Selection Of

The selection of students who excel academically is a measure of the quality of education in an educational institution. In the implementation of education, student achievement becomes a measure of the success of education at the institution. Achievement is the result of hard work by following the rules given by a certain person or institution with certain criteria and conditions to determine if someone is eligible to be chosen as an award recipient. This research uses the Mamdani Fuzzy method or Fuzzy inference system and Sugeno Fuzzy, to design this decision-making system is to design the decision results from the rules compiled using Matlab software for testing. The South Aceh Polytechnic holds outstanding student elections every year, the selection of students with achievements that are carried out every year only focuses on the GPA value in academic achievement without looking at the determining factors which are more precise. In the research that will be conducted the selection must meet the eligibility criteria as a student who gets an award or as an outstanding student at the South Aceh Polytechnic involving variables in the form of Cumulative Achievement Index, Final Project value, Extracurricular, and Attendance. Research is expected to be a tool in the selection process for candidate participants who compete in the selection of outstanding students at the South Aceh Polytechnic so that relevant departments in universities can determine the eligibility of prospective students as award recipients as students with the best achievement scores by considering the appropriate determining factors. The expected output using the Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy method can become an intellectual property system so that this system can be selected as a guideline by the South Aceh Polytechnic academic for determining outstanding students. The results of the research that have been obtained show that the level of truth is 86.82% for the Mamdani method while the implementation of Sugeno Fuzzy logic is obtained a level of truth of 71.88%

scholarly journals Membandingkan Metode SAW Dan MFEP Dalam Penentuan Jurusan di Tingkat SLTA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Rini Sovia ◽  
Aulia Fitrul Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Natural Sciences ◽  
State School ◽  
National Examination ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Leading Schools ◽  
The City ◽  
Selection Of

SMAN 10 Padang is one of the leading schools in the city of Padang State School which has two majors, namely Science (Science Knowledge) and Social Sciences (Social Sciences). A distinctive feature of this school is one of the international standard pilot schools (RSBI) by implementing bilingual and accelerating classes. On average students lack understanding in the selection of majors according to their abilities. Many people fail in the way they have found. To facilitate the determination of majors, a Decision Making System (SPK) is needed to find criteria. In SPK there are several methods in searching criteria, which are usually used by SAW with MFED. Based on the research carried out, by comparing the two methods, the data are grouped into three criteria, namely the value of the Natural Sciences National Examination, Psychology tests, and Interests. The results of this study show about MFEP method take a high accuration between SAW. An accuration of SAW have 38.3 % and MFEP have 70.5%.

scholarly journals EFEKTYVIŲ PROJEKTŲ KŪRIMO DEMONSTRACINĖ SISTEMA/DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM FOR DEVELOPMENT OF EFFICIENT PROJECTS

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 84-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gintautas Ambrasas ◽  
Artūras Kaklauskas ◽  
Edmundas K. Zavadskas
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Knowledge Base ◽  
Rational Design ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Time Process ◽  
Construction Site ◽  
Multicriteria Assessment ◽  
Selection Of

The paper describes the Demonstration System suggested by the authors. This Demonstration System enables efficient performance of alternative life-time process planning, multicriteria assessment, utility degree determination and selection of the most efficient versions of various projects and their constituent parts: Determination of rational design solutions for walls, windows, roof structures, basement floor, heating system. Selection of rational constituent parts of a project (selection of construction site and location, multipurpose complex assessment of buildings, determination of rational types of contracts). Selection of efficient interested parties (contractors, suppliers, neighbours). Alternative designing of life-time process of a project (one-family dwelling houses; agricultural, cast-in-place, prefabricated panel, and thermal renovation of buildings), its multicriteria assessment, determination of utility degree and selection of the most efficient version: Determination of efficient investment projects. Preparation of recommendations on efficiency increase of projects. Alternative roof-to-basement designing of a building (one-family dwelling houses; agricultural, cast-in-place, prefabricated panel, and thermal renovation of buildings) and its multicriteria analysis. This Demonstration System enables to perform alternative designing of projects and their constituent parts, multicriteria analysis, determination of utility degree and priority and preparation of recommendations on further improvement of projects. The Demonstration System is composed of two main parts: knowledge and decisionmaking subsystem. The knowledge base contains information (system and subsystems of criteria, values and significance of criteria, etc.) fully characterizing life-time processes of various projects (investments, buildings and so forth) and their constituent parts. For instance, knowledge base of life-time process of constituent parts of a building consists of information on alternative construction sites, buildings, designers, contractors, suppliers and so on. A construction site can be described by the following system of criteria: cost, assessment of existing services (water supply, sewerage, gas, electric power supply), air contamination level, living expenses, shopping possibilities, assessment of possibilities for recreation, sports and medical care, possibility to find a job, development outlooks of the district, transport conveniences, etc. The composed knowledge base is processed in various sections by decision-making subsystem. The multicriteria analysis of received results is performed by decision-making subsystem two. The Demonstration System is used by Bachelors, Engineers and Masters while working on their term and final projects. The paper gives a more detailed analysis of the proposed System. There is presented one of works performed by means of the Demonstration System.

scholarly journals Financial model of investments to fixed assets

2019 ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
Erika Beniušytė ◽  
Aurelija Zonienė
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Identification ◽  
Financial Model ◽  
Common System ◽  
Financial Benefits ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Investment In Fixed Assets ◽  
Selection Of

The analysis of the investments to fixed assets revealed that there is no common system in evaluation of investments to fixed assets. The financial model of investments to fixed assets is recommended. The model consists of these stages: 1) the need determination of investments in fixed assets; 2) financing sources selection of the investments in fixed assets; 3) the calculation of financial benefits of the investments in fixed assets; 4) risk identification of the investment in fixed assets; 5) decision making.

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN MITRA KERJASAMA PADA HOTEL GRAND SIRAO DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PSI (Preference Selection Index)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendri Cahaya Putra
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Index Selection ◽  
Short Supply ◽  
Cooperation Partners ◽  
The Right ◽  
Selection Of

Grand Sirao Hotel is a hotel that stands in the middle of Medan City, located on Jl. Semarang. Grand Sirao Hotel is an attractive hotel in the sector of cooperation in certain fields, but in this hotel it often happens in cooperation with outside companies. One of the problems that often occurs at the Grand Sirao Hotel is the constrained stock of goods needed for guests staying at the hotel, items that are often constrained which are usually in the form of sandals and toiletries that are in short supply. This problem often arises because of the many other factors between companies related to hotel owners themselves, debates that often arise from hotel owner claims include quality of goods that are sometimes incompatible with reservations and need to be taken into account, inventory can be exhausted, prices always go up because of skyrocketing market prices and other problems. This collaboration problem arises due to lack of success in determining partnerships with related companies that are not appropriate and in company selection is also still manual and there are appropriate systems and criteria. Therefore a decision support system is needed in the selection of partners upon the proposed approval. One solution to this problem that is right is to make a decision system in the decision of the company's business partners so that the determination of cooperation in accordance with the right requirements. By using a Decision Support System (SPK) is expected to help the company in making decisions made by the right company partners in increasing the efficiency of the decision. PSI (Index Selection Preference Method) is a method for solving multi-decision making (MCDM) decisions. In the proposed method it is not necessary to submit among the attributes. There are no attributes required in computing that are involved in decision making. It is hoped that by using the PSI (Index Selection Preference) Method, it is necessary to establish a decision support system which can assist in the selection of corporate cooperation partners at the Grand Sirao Hotel.Keywords: Determination of Cooperation Partners, Decision Support System, PSI (Index Selection Preference)

THE DETERMINATION OF MARINE TRAINING WITH FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH

JOURNAL ASRO ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Wisono Setiawan ◽  
Okol S Suharyo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Weapon System ◽  
Fuzzy Mcdm ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Decision Making Criteria

ABSTRACT Navy as a marine security defense force has an Integrated Armored Weapon System (SSAT), one of them is the power of Submarine and the amount of it will continue to evolve. The current condition demands to perform development and review of strategic and optimal submarine training areas to support the exercise and preparedness of the submarine's strength to prepare the readiness of combat conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the best criteria for the location of the submarine training by analyzing and reviewing some of the existing locations of Navy Submarine Exercise practice and doing further development. In the selection of submarine training criteria, the method used was the Fuzzy Multiple Decision-Making Criteria (FMCDM).  Keywords: Determination Criteria, Training Location, Fuzzy MCDM

scholarly journals Penerapan Metode SAW dan Fuzzy Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Risa Helilintar ◽  
Wing Wahyu Winarno ◽  
Hanif Al Fatta
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
The Other ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Fuzzy Database ◽  
The University ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Selection Of

Database Model Fuzzy Tahani dan SAW merupakan saatu metode yang dapat digunakan pada proses pengambilan keputusan. Sesuai dengan peraturan pihak Intansi yang memberikan beasiswa unuk memperoleh beasiswa, maka diperlukan kriteria-kriteria untuk menentukan siapa yang akan terpilih untuk menerima beasiswa. Pembagian beasiswa dilakukan untuk membantu penentuan dalam merekomendasikan seseorang yang layak menerima beasiswa maka dibutuhkan sistem pendukung keputusan. Penelitian ini membahas tentang seleksi penerimaan beasiswa dengan metode Fuzzy Database Tahani dan SAW. Penelitian ini dapat membantu KaProdi Teknik Informatika maupun Prodi-Prodi lain di UNP kediri untuk menentukkan penerima beasiswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memadukan metode Fuzzy dan SAW dengan ketentuan dan kriteria yang sudah ditentukan oleh pihak Universitas. Sistem yang akan dibuat harus mampu menentukan perangkingan untuk rekomendasi penerima beasiswa. Penelitian menggunakan metode fuzzy yaitu untuk menentukan nilai input ke SAW sebagai dasar nilai input. Hasil yang didapat pada penelitian ini yaitu berupa rangking dan selanjutnya akan dibuat rekomendasi untuk penerima beasiswa.Database fuzzy Tahani and SAW is the other, a method that can be used in the decision making process. In accordance with the regulation which provides scholarships instance transform and obtaining scholarships, the necessary criteria to determine who will be selected to receive a scholarship. The scholarship division. To assist in the determination of a person recommend the eligible then takes a decision support system. This study discusses the selection of scholarship acceptance by Fuzzy Database Tahani and SAW. This research can help leadership courses Informatics and other study program-UNP Kediri to determine recipients. This research aims to integrate Fuzzy and SAW with the rules and criteria set by the university. The system being designed to be able to determine rankings to recommendation recipients. Research using fuzzy method is to determine the value of the input to the SAW as the basis of input values. The results obtained in this study in the form of ranking and then make a recommendation to the receiving scholarships

scholarly journals Determination Of Lecturer Reception Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Hafizah Hanim ◽  
Jefril Rahmadoni
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchical Structure ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Structure Calculation ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Extra Time ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

During this time, the selection of non permanent lecturers, parts staffing difficulties in selecting lecturers. The obstacle faced is the large number of applicants who register to become prospective lecturers. So that the staffing or the campus must give extra time to choose prospective lecturers so that lecturers can be obtained that fit the desired criteria. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method is a method in the decision-making process, this method performs a hierarchical structure calculation where the top level in the hierarchy is the goal to be achieved then the hierarchy below in the form of criteria in achieving goals and the lowest level is the alternatives in achieving goals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document